Relative Risk Of In-hospital Mortality Research Articles

Comparison of Body Mass Index (Four Categories) to In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Although obesity is often associated with adverse outcomes in cardiovascular diseases, studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect on patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), coining the term "obesity paradox." We sought to determine if the obesity paradox is valid when patients are studied in body mass index (BMI) groups versus simplified classification of obese and nonobese. We examined the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019 for all patients who underwent TAVI >18 years of age using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition procedure codes. Patients were grouped by BMI categories of underweight, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese. They were compared with normal-weight patients to assess the relative risk of in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, bleeding complications requiring transfusions, and complete heart blocks requiring permanent pacemaker. A logistic regression model was constructed to account for potential confounders. Of the 221,000 patients who underwent TAVI, 42,315 patients with appropriate BMI designation were stratified into BMI groups. Compared to the normal-weight group, overweight, obese, and morbid-obese TAVI patients were associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.48, confidence interval [CI] 0.29 to 0.77, p <0.001), (RR 0.42, CI 0.28 to 0.63, p <0.001), (RR 0.49, CI 0.33 to 0.71, p <0.001 respectively), cardiogenic shock (RR 0.27, CI 0.20 to 0.38, p <0.001), (RR 0.21, CI 0.16 to 0.27, p <0.001), (RR 0.21, CI 0.16 to 0.26, p <0.001), and blood transfusions (RR 0.63, CI 0.50 to 0.79, p <0.001), (RR 0.47, CI 0.39 to 0.58, p <0.001), (RR 0.61, CI 0.51 to 0.74, p <0.001). This study indicated that obese patients were at a significantly lower risk of in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, and bleeding complications requiring transfusions. In conclusion, our study supported the existence of the obesity paradox in TAVI patients.

Mortality among acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays in Taiwan

Weekend effect has been considered to be associated with poorer quality of care and patient’s survival. For acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, the question of whether patients admitted during off-hours have worse outcomes as compared with patients admitted during on-hours is still inconclusive. We conducted this study to explore the weekend effect in AMI patients, using a nationwide insurance database in Taiwan. Using Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database, we designed a retrospective cohort study, and extracted 184,769 incident cases of AMI through the NHI claims database between January 2006 and December 2014. We divided the patients into weekend admission group and weekday admission group. Patients were stratified as ST elevation/non-ST elevation AMI and receiving/not receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We used a logistic regression model to examine the relative risk of in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality which were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry between study groups. We found no difference between weekend group and weekday group for risk of in-hospital mortality (15.8% vs 16.2%, standardized difference 0.0118) and risk of 1-year mortality (30.2% vs 30.9%, standardized difference 0.0164). There was no statistically significant difference among all the comparisons through the multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for all the covariates and stratifying by the subtypes of AMI and whether or not executing PCI during hospitalization. As for AMI patients in Taiwan, admission on weekends or weekdays did not have a significant impact on either in-hospital mortality or 1-year cumulative mortality.

Defining Posttraumatic Sepsis for Population-Level Research

Multiple classification methods are used to identify sepsis from existing data. In the trauma population, it is unknown how administrative methods compare with clinical criteria for sepsis classification. To characterize the agreement between 3 approaches to sepsis classification among critically ill patients with trauma and compare the sepsis-associated risk of adverse outcomes when each method was used to define sepsis. This retrospective cohort study used data collected between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, from patients aged 16 years or older with traumatic injury, admitted to the intensive care unit of a single-institution level 1 trauma center and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 3 days. Statistical analysis was conducted from August 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. Hospital-acquired sepsis, as classified by 3 methods: a novel automated clinical method based on data from the electronic health record, the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), and explicit and implicit medical billing codes. The primary outcomes were chronic critical illness and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included number of days in an intensive care unit, number of days receiving mechanical ventilation, discharge to a skilled nursing or long-term care facility, and discharge to home without assistance. Of 3194 patients meeting inclusion criteria, the median age was 49 years (IQR, 31-64 years), 2380 (74%) were male, and 2826 (88%) sustained severe blunt injury (median Injury Severity Score, 29 [IQR, 21-38]). Sepsis was identified in 747 patients (23%) meeting automated clinical criteria, 118 (4%) meeting NTDB criteria, and 529 (17%) using medical billing codes. The Light κ value for 3-way agreement was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.14-0.19). The adjusted relative risk of chronic critical illness was 9.9 (95% CI, 8.0-12.3) for sepsis identified by automated clinical criteria, 5.0 (95% CI, 3.4-7.3) for sepsis identified by the NTDB, and 4.5 (95% CI, 3.6-5.6) for sepsis identified using medical billing codes. The adjusted relative risk for in-hospital mortality was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6) for sepsis identified by automated clinical criteria, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.7-4.3) for sepsis identified by the NTDB, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.2) for sepsis identified using medical billing codes. In this cohort study of critically ill patients with trauma, administrative methods misclassified sepsis and underestimated the incidence and severity of sepsis compared with an automated clinical method using data from the electronic health record. This study suggests that an automated approach to sepsis classification consistent with Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) clinical criteria is feasible and may improve existing approaches to health services and population-based research in this population.

Elevated Driving Pressure and Elastance Does Not Increase In-Hospital Mortality Among Obese and Severely Obese Patients With Ventilator Dependent Respiratory Failure.

To determine if driving pressure (DP) and total respiratory system elastance (Ers) differ among normal/overweight (body mass index [BMI] < 30 kg/m2), obese, and severely obese ventilator-dependent respiratory failure (VDRF) patients and if there any associations with clinical outcomes. Retrospective observational cohort study during 2016-2018 at two tertiary care academic medical centers using electronic health record data from the first 2 full days of mechanical ventilation. The cohort was stratified by BMI classes to measure median DP, time-weighted mean tidal volume, plateau pressure, and Ers for each BMI class. Mechanically ventilated patients in medical and surgical ICUs. Primary outcome and effect measures included relative risk of in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay with multivariable adjustment. The cohort included 3,204 patients with 976 (30.4%) and 382 (11.9%) obese and severely obese patients, respectively. Severe obesity was associated with a DP greater than or equal to 15 cm H2O (relative risk [RR], 1.51 [95% CI, 1.26-1.82]) and Ers greater than or equal to 2 cm H2O/(mL/kg) (RR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14-1.49]). Despite elevated DP and Ers, there were no differences in in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days, or ICU length of stay among all three groups. Despite higher DP and ERS among obese and severely obese VDRF patients, there were no differences in in-hospital mortality or duration of mechanical ventilation, suggesting that DP has less prognostic value in obese and severely obese VDRF patients.

Ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: 20-year trends in the FAST-MI study.

Sudden cardiac arrest remains a major complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is frequently related to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Incidence and impact of VF among patients hospitalized for AMI were evaluated. Data from the FAST-MI programme consisting of 5 French nationwide prospective cohort studies between 1995 and 2015 were analysed, totally including 14 423 patients with AMI (66 ± 14 years, 72% males, 59% ST-elevation myocardial infarction). Overall, proportion of patients presenting in-hospital VF decreased from 3.9% in 1995 to 1.8% in 2015 (P < 0.001). One-year mortality decreased from 60.7% to 24.6% (P < 0.001). However, compared with patients who did not develop VF, the over-risk of 1-year mortality associated with VF was stable over time [hazard ratio (HR) 6.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.03-9.14 in 1995 and HR 6.64, 95% CI 4.20-10.49 in 2015, P = 0.52]. This increased mortality in the VF group was mainly related to fatal events occurring prior to hospital discharge, representing 86.2% of 1-year mortality, despite the very low rate of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the VF group (2.6%). This study demonstrates that in-hospital VF incidence and mortality in the setting of AMI have significantly decreased over the past 20 years. Nevertheless, VF remained steadily associated with approximately a 10-fold increased relative risk of in-hospital mortality, without an impact on post-discharge mortality. Beyond long-term cardiac defibrillation strategy, these results emphasize the need to identify in-hospital interventions to further reduce mortality in VF patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00673036, NCT01237418, NCT02566200.

The predictive probability of mortality in the presence of full-thickness burns

IntroductionPrognostication of burn injury mortality is challenging. Recent mortality prognostication tools have incorporated the percent of full-thickness surface area (FTSA). We hypothesize that the presence of full-thickness burn injury independently increases in-hospital mortality. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2007 to 2019 of adults (≥16 years old) with burn injuries. Variables evaluated included basic demographics, presence of inhalation injury, percent TBSA, and percent FTSA burned. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We performed modified Poisson regression modeling adjusting for significant variables to estimate the relative mortality risk. Results75,816 patients met inclusion criteria. When controlling for TBSA, the presence of a full-thickness burn had a relative risk of in-hospital mortality of 1.42 (95% CI 1.09–1.85, p = 0.008). The predicted probability of mortality was 100% at 50% FTSA. ConclusionThe presence of full-thickness burns and the proportion of full-thickness burns independently and significantly increased in-hospital mortality. Therefore, clinicians should utilize prognostication models incorporating percent full-thickness burn area to predict mortality more accurately.

COVID-19 pandemic affects STEMI numbers and in-hospital mortality: results of a nationwide analysis in Germany

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to extensive restrictions in Germany in 2020, including the postponement of elective interventions. We examined the impact on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as an acute and non-postponable disease.MethodsUsing German national records, all STEMI between 2017 and 2020 were identified. Using the number of STEMI cases between 2017 and 2019, we created a forecast for 2020 and compared it with the observed number of STEMI in 2020.ResultsFrom 2017 to 2020, 248,062 patients were treated for STEMI in Germany. Mean age was 65.21 years and 28.36% were female. When comparing forecasted and observed STEMI in 2020, a correlation can be seen: noticeable fewer STEMI were treated in those weeks respectively months with an increasing COVID-19 hospitalization rate (monthly percentage decrease in STEMI: March − 14.85%, April − 13.39%, November − 11.92%, December − 22.95%). At the same time, the crude in-hospital mortality after STEMI increased significantly at the peaks of the first and second waves (relative risk/RR of monthly in-hospital mortality: April RR = 1.11 [95% CI 1.02; 1.21], November RR = 1.13 [1.04; 1.24], December RR = 1.16 [1.06; 1.27]).ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic led to a noticeable decrease in the number of STEMI interventions in Germany at the peaks of the first and second waves in 2020, corresponding to an increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations. At the same time, in-hospital mortality after STEMI increased significantly in these phases.Graphical abstractImpact of the COVID-19 pandemic on STEMI numbers and in-hospital mortality in Germany. Relative difference between forecasted and observed STEMI numbers (above figure), the relative risk of in-hospital mortality (middle figure) as well as number of new hospital admissions for COVID-19 per million inhabitants according to Roser et al.27 (bottom figure).

Outcome and Clinical Characteristics of Nosocomial Infection in Adult Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectiveThis study conducts a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of nosocomial infection in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and systematically evaluates clinical epidemiological characteristics.MethodsDocument retrieval strategies were determined, and all adult patients treated by ECMO were included. The prevalence, incidence, mortality, ECMO use time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay time, hospital stay time, and risk factors of nosocomial infection were systematically evaluated. Subsequently, a meta-analysis of the impact of nosocomial infection on risk of in-hospital mortality was conducted.ResultsA total of 25 retrospective studies were included, and 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of nosocomial infection was 8.8–64.0%, incidence was 1.7–85.4‰ (per 1,000 ECMO days), and in-hospital mortality was 31.5–75.4%. The duration of ECMO usage and length of ICU stay were longer for infected patients. Compared with non-infected patients, the meta-analysis revealed that nosocomial infection increased the relative risk of death of adult patients receiving ECMO by 32%. The risk factors included the duration of ECMO usage and disease severity score.ConclusionsAdult patients treated by ECMO have high prevalence of nosocomial infection. In addition, their ECMO use time and ICU stays are longer. Nosocomial infection significantly increases the relative risk of in-hospital mortality.

COVID-19 and acute kidney injury in German hospitals 2020.

IntroductionThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a major challenge for patients, healthcare professionals, and populations worldwide. While initial reporting focused mainly on lung involvement, the ongoing pandemic showed that multiple organs can be involved, and prognosis is largely influenced by multi-organ involvement. Our aim was to obtain nationwide retrospective population-based data on hospitalizations with COVID-19 and AKI in Germany.Materials & methodsWe performed a query of G-DRG data for the year 2020 via the Institute for the hospital remuneration system (Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus GmbH, InEK) data portal and therefore included hospitalizations with a secondary diagnosis of RT-PCR proven COVID-19 infection, aged over 15 years. We included hospitalizations with acute kidney injury (AKI) stages 1 to 3. Age-specific and age-standardized hospitalization and in-hospital mortality rates (ASR) per 100.000 person years were calculated, with the German population of 2011 as the standard.ResultsIn 2020, there were 16.776.845 hospitalizations in German hospitals. We detected 154.170 hospitalizations with RT-PCR proven COVID-19 diagnosis. The age-standardized hospitalization rate for COVID-19 in Germany was 232,8 per 100.000 person years (95% CI 231,6–233,9). The highest proportion of hospitalizations associated with COVID-19 were in the age group over 80 years. AKI was diagnosed in 16.773 (10.9%) of the hospitalizations with COVID-19. The relative risk of AKI for males was 1,49 (95%CI 1,44–1,53) compared to females. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was performed in 3.443 hospitalizations, 20.5% of the hospitalizations with AKI. For all hospitalizations with COVID-19, the in-hospital mortality amounted to 19.7% (n = 30.300). The relative risk for in-hospital mortality was 3,87 (95%CI 3,80–3,94) when AKI occurred. The age-standardized hospitalization rates for COVID-19 took a bimodal course during the observation period. The first peak occurred in April (ASR 23,95 per 100.000 person years (95%CI 23,58–24,33)), hospitalizations peaked again in November 2020 (72,82 per 100.000 person years (95%CI 72,17–73,48)). The standardized rate ratios (SRR) for AKI and AKI-related mortality with the overall ASR for COVID-19 hospitalizations in the denominator, decreased throughout the observation period and remained lower in autumn than they were in spring. In contrast to all COVID-19 hospitalizations, the SRR for overall mortality in COVID-19 hospitalizations diverged from hospitalizations with AKI in autumn 2020.DiscussionOur study for the first time provides nationwide data on COVID-19 related hospitalizations and acute kidney injury in Germany in 2020. AKI was a relevant complication and associated with high mortality. We observed a less pronounced increase in the ASR for AKI-related mortality during autumn 2020. The proportion of AKI-related mortality in comparison to the overall mortality decreased throughout the course of the pandemic.

Characteristics and outcomes of sepsis patients with and without COVID-19

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to describe and compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in critically ill septic patients with and without COVID-19. MethodsFrom February 2020 to March 2021, patients from surgical and medical ICUs at the University Hospital Dresden were screened for sepsis. Patient characteristics and outcomes were assessed descriptively. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Associations between in-hospital mortality and risk factors were modeled using robust Poisson regression, which facilitates derivation of adjusted relative risks. ResultsIn 177 ICU patients treated for sepsis, COVID-19 was diagnosed and compared to 191 septic ICU patients without COVID-19. Age and sex did not differ significantly between sepsis patients with and without COVID-19, but SOFA score at ICU admission was significantly higher in septic COVID-19 patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients with 59% compared to 29% in Non-COVID patients. Statistical analysis resulted in an adjusted relative risk for in-hospital mortality of 1.74 (95%-CI=1.35–2–24) in the presence of COVID-19 compared to other septic patients. Age, procalcitonin maximum value over 2 ng/ml, need for renal replacement therapy, need for invasive ventilation and septic shock were identified as additional risk factors for in-hospital mortality. ConclusionCOVID-19 was identified as independent risk factor for higher in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients. The need for invasive ventilation and renal replacement therapy as well as the presence of septic shock and higher PCT should be considered to identify high-risk patients.

Ovarian cancer surgery in Germany: An analysis of the nationwide hospital file 2005-2015.

Objectives:Nationwide hospitalization data on the surgical management of ovarian cancer are scant. We assessed type of surgery, surgical approach, length of stay, surgery-related complications and in-hospital mortality among women with ovarian cancer in Germany. We analyzed nationwide hospitalization file of 2005 through 2015 including 77,589 ovarian cancer-related hospitalizations associated with ovarian surgery.Methods:We calculated the relative frequency of the surgical approaches by type of surgery and calendar time. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate relative risk of in-hospital mortality (including 95% confidence intervals) according to complications. About 63% of the hospitalizations included an additional hysterectomy besides ovariectomy.Results:About 85% of the surgeries were performed by laparotomy. However, from 2005–2006 through 2013–2015, the proportion of laparoscopic ovariectomies (±salpingectomy) increased from 14% to 35%. The in-hospital mortality risks for laparotomic and laparoscopic surgery were 2.9% and 0.4%, respectively. Adjusted mortality risk ratios varied from 1.35 (95% confidence interval = 0.94–1.94) for bleedings requiring blood transfusion to 3.65 (95% confidence interval = 3.31–4.03) for postoperative infections.Conclusion:We observed a tendency away from laparotomy toward laparoscopy for ovariectomies (±salpingectomy) over time. Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy was associated with lower risk of complications and death. All complications studied were associated with higher in-hospital mortality risk.

In-hospital survival after pancreatoduodenectomy is greater in high-volume hospitals versus lower-volume hospitals: a meta-analysis.

Variation in cut-off values for what is considered a high volume (HV) hospital has made assessments of volume-outcome relationships for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) challenging. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing in-hospital mortality after PD in hospitals above and below HV thresholds of various cut-off values. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to 4 January 2021 for studies comparing in-hospital mortality after PD in hospitals above and below defined HV thresholds. After data extraction, risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, including meta-regressions. Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021224432. From 1855 records, 17 observational studies of moderate quality were included. Median HV cut-off was 25 PDs/year (IQR: 20-32). Overall relative risk of in-hospital mortality was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.45), that is, 63% less in HV hospitals. All subgroup analyses found an in-hospital survival benefit in performing PDs at HV hospitals. Meta-regressions from included studies found no statistically significant associations between relative risk of in-hospital mortality and region (USA vs. non-USA; p=0.396); or 25th percentile (p=0.231), median (p=0.822) or 75th percentile (p=0.469) HV cut-off values. Significant inverse relationships were found between PD hospital volume and other outcomes. In-hospital survival was significantly greater for patients undergoing PDs at HV hospitals, regardless of HV cut-off value or region. Future research is required to investigate regions where low-volume centres have specialized PD infrastructure and the potential impact on mortality.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: evolving outcomes from the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

BackgroundOver the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, the care of patients with COVID-19 has changed and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased. We aimed to examine patient selection, treatments, outcomes, and ECMO centre characteristics over the course of the pandemic to date.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry and COVID-19 Addendum to compare three groups of ECMO-supported patients with COVID-19 (aged ≥16 years). At early-adopting centres—ie, those using ECMO support for COVID-19 throughout 2020—we compared patients who started ECMO on or before May 1, 2020 (group A1), and between May 2 and Dec 31, 2020 (group A2). Late-adopting centres were those that provided ECMO for COVID-19 only after May 1, 2020 (group B). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality in a time-to-event analysis assessed 90 days after ECMO initiation. A Cox proportional hazards model was fit to compare the patient and centre-level adjusted relative risk of mortality among the groups.FindingsIn 2020, 4812 patients with COVID-19 received ECMO across 349 centres within 41 countries. For early-adopting centres, the cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after ECMO initiation was 36·9% (95% CI 34·1–39·7) in patients who started ECMO on or before May 1 (group A1) versus 51·9% (50·0–53·8) after May 1 (group A2); at late-adopting centres (group B), it was 58·9% (55·4–62·3). Relative to patients in group A2, group A1 patients had a lower adjusted relative risk of in-hospital mortality 90 days after ECMO (hazard ratio 0·82 [0·70−0·96]), whereas group B patients had a higher adjusted relative risk (1·42 [1·17−1·73]).InterpretationMortality after ECMO for patients with COVID-19 worsened during 2020. These findings inform the role of ECMO in COVID-19 for patients, clinicians, and policy makers.FundingNone.

Association of health vulnerability with adverse outcomes in older people with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES:Health vulnerability is associated with a higher risk of mortality and functional decline in older people in the community. However, few studies have evaluated the role of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) in predicting clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients. In the present study, we tested the ability of the VES-13 to predict mortality and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in older people hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).METHODS:This prospective cohort included 91 participants aged ≥60 years who were confirmed to have COVID-19. VES-13 was applied, and the demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were collected within 72h of hospitalization. A Poisson generalized linear regression model with robust variance was used to estimate the relative risk of death and invasive mechanical ventilation.RESULTS:Of the total number of patients, 19 (21%) died and 15 (16%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Regarding health vulnerability, 54 (59.4%) participants were classified as non-vulnerable, 30 (33%) as vulnerable, and 7 (7.6%) as extremely vulnerable. Patients classified as extremely vulnerable and male sex were strongly and independently associated with a higher relative risk of in-hospital mortality (p<0.05) and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (p<0.05).CONCLUSION:Elderly patients classified as extremely vulnerable had more unfavorable outcomes after hospitalization for COVID-19. These data highlight the importance of identifying health vulnerabilities in this population.

The Effect of Organ System Surgery on Intensive Care Unit Mortality in a Cohort of Critically Ill Surgical Patients.

The critical illness burden in the United States is growing with an aging population obtaining surgical intervention despite age-related comorbidities. The effect of organ system surgical intervention on intensive care units (ICUs) mortality is unknown. We performed an 8-year retrospective analysis of surgical ICU patients. Poisson regression analysis was performed assessing the relative risk of in-hospital mortality based on surgical intervention. Of 468000 ICU patients included, 97968 (20.9%) were surgical admissions and 97859 (99.9%) had complete outcomes data. Nonsurvivors were older (68.8 ± 15.4 vs. 62.7 ± 15.8years, P < .001) with higher Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III Scores (81.4 ± 33.6 vs. 46.7 ± 20.1, P < .001. Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) (n = 1,558, 7.8%), musculoskeletal (n = 277, 5.5%), and neurological (n = 884, 4.6%) system operations had the highest mortality. Upon Poisson regression model, patients undergoing emergent operative interventions on the neurologic system (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.67-2.07, P < .001) had increased relative risk of mortality when compared to emergent operative interventions on the cardiovascular system after controlling for pertinent covariates. Elective operative interventions on the respiratory (RR 2.39, 95% CI 2.03-2.80, P < .001), GI (RR 2.34, 95% CI 2.10-2.61, P < .001), and skin and soft tissue (RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.77-2.89, P < .001) systems had increased risk of mortality when compared to elective cardiovascular system surgery after controlling for pertinent covariates. We found significant differences in the risk of mortality based on organ system of operative intervention. The prognostication of critically ill patients undergoing surgical intervention is currently not accounted for in prognostic scoring systems.

Intracranial pressure management in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated cryptococcal meningitis in a resource-constrained setting.

BackgroundCryptococcal meningitis (CCM) is the leading cause of meningitis in people living with HIV (PLWH) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The mortality and morbidity associated with CCM remain high. Combination of antifungal therapy, diligent management of intracranial pressure (IP) and the correct timing of the introduction of antiretroviral therapy (ART) minimise the risk of mortality and morbidity. The absence of spinal manometers in many healthcare centres in SSA challenges the accurate measurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and its control.ObjectivesWe hypothesised that four lumbar punctures (LPs) in the first week of the diagnosis and treatment of CCM would reduce IP such that in-hospital mortality and morbidity of HIV-associated CCM (HIV/CCM) would be significantly reduced.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study to assess whether receipt of four or more LPs in the first week of the diagnosis and treatment with combination antifungal therapy of HIV/CCM would be associated with the reduction of in-hospital mortality in adult PLWH.ResultsFrom 01 January 2016 to 31 December 2016, 116 adult patients were admitted to the Dora Nginza District Hospital in Zwide, Port Elizabeth, South Africa. After exclusion of 11 (two were younger than 18 years, two had missing hospital records and seven demised or left the hospital before 7 days of hospitalisation), 105 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 39.4 (standard deviation [s.d.] ± 9.7) years, 64.8% were male. All were PLWH. A total of 52.4% had defaulted ART and 25.7% were ART naïve. Forty-three patients received four or more LPs (mean = 4.58 [± 0.96]) in the first week of hospitalisation with an associated in-hospital mortality of 11.6% (n = 5/43) compared with 62 patients who received less than four LPs (mean = 2.18 [± 0.80]) with an in-hospital mortality of 29% (n = 18/62) and a relative risk of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66–0.97), p = 0.034.ConclusionIn the current study of adult PLWH presenting to hospital with HIV/CCM, four or more LPs in the first 7 days following admission and the initiation of treatment were associated with a 17.4% reduction in absolute risk of in-hospital mortality and a 20% reduction in relative risk of in-hospital mortality. This mortality difference was noted in patients who survived and were in hospital at the time of the 7-day study census and persisted until the time of hospital discharge.

Impact of congestive heart failure and role of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been reported to cause worse outcomes in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease, especially in patients with acute cardiac injury, which is determined by elevated levels of high-sensitivity troponin. There is a paucity of data on the impact of congestive heart failure (CHF) on outcomes in COVID-19 patients. MethodsWe conducted a literature search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases from 11/1/2019 till 06/07/2020, and identified all relevant studies reporting cardiovascular comorbidities, cardiac biomarkers, disease severity, and survival. Pooled data from the selected studies was used for metanalysis to identify the impact of risk factors and cardiac biomarker elevation on disease severity and/or mortality. ResultsWe collected pooled data on 5967 COVID-19 patients from 20 individual studies. We found that both non-survivors and those with severe disease had an increased risk of acute cardiac injury and cardiac arrhythmias, our pooled relative risk (RR) was — 8.52 (95% CI 3.63–19.98) (p < 0.001); and 3.61 (95% CI 2.03–6.43) (p = 0.001), respectively. Mean difference in the levels of Troponin-I, CK-MB, and NT-proBNP was higher in deceased and severely infected patients. The RR of in-hospital mortality was 2.35 (95% CI 1.18–4.70) (p = 0.022) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.12–2.05) (p = 0.008) among patients who had pre-existing CHF and hypertension, respectively. ConclusionCardiac involvement in COVID-19 infection appears to significantly adversely impact patient prognosis and survival. Pre-existence of CHF, and high cardiac biomarkers like NT-pro BNP and CK-MB levels in COVID-19 patients correlates with worse outcomes.

10year trends in hospitalization rates due to heart failure and related in-hospital mortality in Poland (2010-2019).

AimsHeart failure (HF) remains a major public health challenge worldwide. Contemporary epidemiological data on HF hospitalization rates and related in‐hospital mortality are scarce also in Poland. The aim of the study was to determine the trends in hospitalization rates due to HF and related in‐hospital mortality in Poland in the recent decade.Methods and resultsData on HF hospitalizations and in‐hospital mortality in patients aged >17 years in Poland between 2010 and 2019 were obtained from the central database of the Polish National Health Fund. Hospitalizations with either primary or secondary diagnosis of HF were identified using the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems codes (I50, I42, J81 with extensions, and R57.0). There were 4 259 698 HF hospitalizations and 608 577 in‐hospital deaths (14% in‐hospital mortality) reported during 2010–2019 in Poland. During this period, there was a steady increase in the number of HF hospitalizations per 1000 inhabitants in subsequent years, being more pronounced in men than in women (in 2019: 16 and 13 HF hospitalizations per 1000 inhabitants in men and women, respectively). The relative risk of HF hospitalization was higher in men than in women, and this gender‐related difference steadily increased from 9% in 2010 to 25% in 2019. During 2010–2019, there was an increase in the number of HF hospitalizations per 1000 inhabitants in subsequent age groups, with a trend being more pronounced in men than in women (129 and 99 HF hospitalizations per 1000 inhabitants in men and women aged ≥80 years, respectively). During this period, there was a slight increase in in‐hospital mortality during HF hospitalization in subsequent years, being more pronounced in women than in men (in 2019: 16% and 14% of in‐hospital mortality in women and men, respectively). The relative risk of in‐hospital mortality during HF hospitalization was higher in women than in men, and this gender‐related difference steadily increased from 8% in 2010 to 18% in 2019. During this period, in‐hospital mortality during HF hospitalization was ~12% for women and men aged 18–29 years, whereas the highest values of in‐hospital mortality reached ~19% for patients aged ≥80 years.ConclusionsWe have observed steady growing trends in HF hospitalization rates and related in‐hospital mortality in Poland over the last decade. Both age and gender have differentiated the reported epidemiological patterns.

Asociación entre temperatura corporal al ingreso a urgencias y mortalidad intrahospitalaria en pacientes sépticos, estudio de cohortes

ObjectiveTo estimate the relationship between body temperature on admission and hospital mortality. DesignProspective analytical observational cohort study conducted between February and July 2017 on patients diagnosed with sepsis, and who were admitted to fourth level hospital. Digital temperature was taken, and the outcome was in-hospital mortality. FrameworkThe association between body temperature and hospital mortality in sepsis is controversial. Studies show that fever increases oxygen consumption and worsens multi-organ dysfunction, and the counterpart is, that it helps control pathogens. PatientsPatients admitted consecutively over a 6-month period to the Resuscitation room of Méderi Hospital Universitario Mayor with sepsis and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Interventions and measurementsThe axillary digital temperature was taken upon admission, using a standardised digital thermometer, guaranteed and with a calibration guarantee). ResultsThe relative risk for in-hospital mortality in septic patients, according to hypothermia vs no-hypothermia was 1.58, 95%, confidence interval 0.85-2.84, P=.056. The incidence of death in hypothermic patients was 4.2 per 100 hospital admission days, compared to an incidence of death in non-hypothermic patients of 2.6 per 100 patient hospital admission days. This was not statistically significant (P=.056). ConclusionsAlthough there is a non-statistically significant trend between presenting with hypothermia and mortality, there was no direct association in this cohort between body temperature and in-hospital mortality. In this population, the factors most associated with in-hospital mortality were pulmonary foci and septic shock.

How the high acuity unit changes mortality in the intensive care unit: a retrospective before-and-after study.

High acuity units (HAU) are hospital units that provide patients with more acute care and closer monitoring than a general hospital ward but are not as resource intensive as an intensive care unit (ICU). Nevertheless, the impact of opening a HAU on ICU patient outcomes remains poorly defined. We investigated how the creation of a HAU impacted patient outcomes in the ICU. This historical cohort study compared ICU patient in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS before and after the creation of a HAU in a tertiary-care hospital with a medical/surgical ICU between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017. Data from 4,380 patients (984 in the pre-HAU group and 3,396 in the post-HAU group) were analyzed. In this cohort of ICU patients, 360 (37%) died in the pre-HAU group before the creation of a HAU, and 1,074 (32%) died in the post-HAU group after the creation of a HAU. The creation of a HAU was associated with lower relative risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted risk ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.89; P < 0.001). The creation of a HAU was also associated with reduced ICU and hospital LOS with a 12% increase in the rate of ICU discharge (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23; P = 0.02) and a 26% increase in the rate of hospital discharge (adjusted SHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.39; P < 0.001), when accounting for the competing risk of death. These data support the hypothesis that the creation of a HAU may be associated with reduced in-hospital mortality, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS for ICU patients.