ABSTRACT The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy (NAPH) posits a subject advantage in extraction from relative clauses and other constructions – a claim supported by numerous cross-linguistic language acquisition studies. However, Chinese languages differ from the majority of the languages hitherto studied in having SVO (head-initial) word order and prenominal relative clauses, a typologically peculiar combination that provides the opportunity to tease apart predictions of various theories of relative clauses. This study uses Cantonese in an experiment on children’s comprehension of relative clauses to investigate the effects of NP accessibility using pair-wise comparisons across the NP positions of subject, direct object, indirect object, and oblique. The results strongly support a universal subject preference and also support, to some extent, the NPAH’s predictions for the acquisition order of relative clauses. In addition, children’s errors reveal a multifactorial influence, suggesting that their processing of relative clauses is affected by semantic prominence and word order canonicity.
Read full abstract