Rate Of Intracranial Hemorrhage Research Articles

Low-dose intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke without large vessel occlusion screened by 3T MRI.

Globally, there are more than six million deaths due to cerebrovascular disease, which is the second leading cause of death. Although the imaging findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are more accurate than computed tomography for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), it is uncommon in recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) treatment. Alteplase is not only strongly recommended treatment for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours, but also decreases the disability and mortality rate. Besides, low-dose rTPA was associated with significant reductions in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), compared with standard one. However, the benefits of low-dose rTPA for the treatment of AIS without large vessel occlusion (LVO) have not been fully demonstrated. We evaluated whether the low-dose rTPA in AIS without LVO could improve prognosis in patients three months post-treatment. This was a cross-sectional study on patients with AIS treated within 4.5 hours of symptom onset admitted to Can Tho S.I.S General Hospital between February 2019 and July 2021. The eligibility criteria were patients aged > 18 years treated with low-dose rTPA (0.6 mg/kg) and screened by 3T MRI. Patients with a pre-hospital modified Rankin score (mRS) ≥ 2 points, intracranial hemorrhage, LVO, or ≥ 3 microbleeds on brain MRI were excluded. The primary outcomes were the favorable outcome rate at three months and safety, which were evaluated by the rates of intracranial hemorrhage and mortality at three months. This study enrolled 92 eligible patients between February 2019 and July 2021. Their National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were 7.5 ± 3.7 at admission, 3.3 ± 3.5 at discharge or seven days after discharge, and 2.2 ± 2.8 at three months. Their mRS were 2.9 ± 0.8 at admission, 1.4 ± 1.3 at discharge or seven days after discharge, and 1.1 ± 1.1 at three months. Elevated cardiac enzymes, age ≥ 75 years, and body mass index ≥ 25 were associated with increased poor outcomes at three months. While AIS was more common in men than women, a similar number of men (33.3%) and women had poor mRS. Three patients had complications associated with low-dose rTPA treatment: one (1.1%) had intracranial hemorrhage, one (1.1%) had new infarcts, and one (1.1%) had gastrointestinal bleeding. No deaths occurred within three months. Our study indicates the efficacy and safety of low-dose rTPA treatment for AIS without LVO within 4.5 hours. Patient selection for rTPA by 3T MRI decreased complications and mortality.

Novel technique of stent placement via gateway balloon in intracranial atherosclerosis-associated large vessel occlusion.

Neuroform Atlas stent can be deployed directly via gateway balloon for angioplasty and stent placement without the need for exchange maneuver required for Wingspan stent use. We present our initial experience of this strategy in intracranial atherosclerosis-associated large vessel occlusions. Patients were identified through mechanical thrombectomy (MT) database from January 2020 to June 2022 at our institutions. Due to reocclusion or impending occlusion, rescue angioplasty with stent placement was performed after initial standard MT. Primary outcomes were good angiographic recanalization with modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b-3, rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and favorable functional outcome at 3months, that is, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3. We identified 22 patients treated using this technique. Among those, 11 were females with their average age at 66years (range: 52-85). Initial median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was 11 (range: 5-30) and all patients received loading doses of aspirin and P2Y₁₂ inhibitor. After performing submaximal angioplasty and Neuroform Atlas stent deployment through the gateway balloon, we achieved final mTICI of 2b-3 in 20 (90%) patients. One patient had ICH post-op that was asymptomatic. Eight (36%) patients had mRS of 0-3 at 90days. Our preliminary experience suggests possible safety and feasibility of deploying Neuroform Atlas stent through a compatible Gateway balloon microcatheter without the need for ICH-associated microcatheter exchange. Further studies with long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up are warranted to corroborate our initial findings.

High-definition Cathodal Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS) provides neuroprotection in preclinical models of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by inhibiting peri-infarct excitotoxic effects and enhancing collateral perfusion due to its vasodilatory properties. To report the first-in-human pilot study using individualized high-definition (HD) C-tDCS as a treatment of AIS. This randomized clinical trial was sham controlled with 3 + 3 dose escalation design, and was conducted at a single center from October 2018 to July 2021. Eligible participants were treated for AIS within 24 hours from onset, had imaging evidence of cortical ischemia with salvageable penumbra, and were ineligible for reperfusion therapies. HD C-tDCS electrode montage was selected for each patient to deliver the electric current to the ischemic region only. Patients were followed for 90 days. Primary outcomes were feasibility, assessed as time from randomization to study stimulation initiation; tolerability, assessed by rate of patients completing the full study stimulation period; and safety, assessed by rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours. The efficacy imaging biomarkers of neuroprotection and collateral enhancement were explored. A total of 10 patients with AIS were enrolled, 7 were randomized to active treatment and 3 to sham. Patient age was mean (SD) 75 (10) years old, 6 (60%) were female, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was mean (SD) 8 (7). Two doses of HD C-tDCS (1 milliamp [mA] for 20 minutes and 2 mA for 20 minutes) were studied. The speed of HD C-tDCS implementation was a median (IQR) 12.5 minutes (9-15 minutes) in the last 4 patients. Patients tolerated the HD C-tDCS with no permanent stimulation cessation. The hypoperfused region was reduced by a median (IQR) 100% (46% to 100%) in the active group vs increased by 325% (112% to 412%) in sham. Change in quantitative relative cerebral blood volume early poststimulation was a median (IQR) 64% (40% to 110%) in active vs -4% (-7% to 1%) sham patients and followed a dose-response pattern. Penumbral salvage in the active C-tDCS group was median (IQR) 66% (29% to 80.5%) vs 0% (IQR 0% to 0%) in sham. In this randomized, first-in-human clinical trial, HD C-tDCS was started efficiently and well tolerated in emergency settings, with signals of beneficial effect upon penumbral salvage. These results support advancing HD C-tDCS to larger trials. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03574038.

Tenecteplase: A Review of Its Pharmacology and Uses.

Tenecteplase: A Review of Its Pharmacology and Uses.

Balloon‐Expandable Stenting as a Bridging Therapy in Patients With Acute Stroke and Tandem Occlusions

Background Stenting extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) lesions in acute ischemic stroke with tandem lesions is technically challenging. Its safety is highly debated because of the requirement of dual‐antiplatelet therapy. The optimal stenting device, timing, and periprocedural antiplatelet therapy for extracranial ICA stenting in the setting of acute tandem occlusion are still unclear. Methods We performed a retrospective study of patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to tandem lesions who underwent endovascular treatment during a 5‐year period receiving either conventional self‐expanding carotid stents (SX) or balloon‐expandable carotid stent (BX). BX stents were restented with an SX in the subacute phase. Primary outcomes of interest were extracranial ICA patency at follow‐up and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Results A total of 112 patients admitted from April 2016 to April 2021 were included. Dual‐antiplatelet therapy immediately following endovascular treatment was more frequently administered in the SX group (35/39 [89.7%]) compared with the BX group (20/73 [27.4%]) ( P <0.001). Patients in the BX stent group (3/73 [4.1%]) developed a lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared with patients in the SX stent group (7/39 [17.9%]) ( P =0.031). No differences in extracranial ICA high‐grade restenosis or reocclusion were found between groups at 24 hours after procedure (BX: 20/73 [27.4%]; SX: 9/39 [23.1%]; P =0.673). Conclusions In patients with acute ischemic stroke and tandem occlusions, a bridging therapy including BX stents with less‐aggressive antiplatelet therapy and subsequent definitive SX stenting to treat extracranial ICA lesions resulted in a lower rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation and no differences in stent patency.

Outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus systemic thrombolysis in the treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) versus systemic thrombolysis (ST) in the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE). The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched to collect the literature on the comparison of the results of CDT and ST in the treatment of PE from the beginning of their records to May 2020, and meta-analysis was performed by STATA software (version 15.1). Using standardized data-collection forms, the authors screened the studies and independently extracted data, and assessed the quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Cohort studies that examined the following results were included in the current study: in-hospital mortality, all-cause bleeding rate, gastrointestinal bleeding rate, intracranial hemorrhage rate, the incidence of shock, and hospital length of stay. A total of eight articles, with 13,242 participants, involving 3962 participants in the CDT group and 9280 participants in the ST group were included. CDT compared with ST in the treatment of PE can significantly affect in-hospital mortality rate [odds ratio (OR) = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.30-0.56, P < 0.05], all-cause bleeding rate (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39, P = 0.012), gastrointestinal bleeding rate (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.13-1.81, P = 0.003), the incidence of shock (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.57, P < 0.05), and hospital length of stay [standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07-0.25, P < 0.05]. However, there was no significant effect on intracranial hemorrhage rate in patients with PE (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.47-1.03, P = 0.070). CDT is a viable alternative to ST in the treatment of PE, as it can significantly reduce in-hospital mortality rate, all-cause bleeding rate, gastrointestinal bleeding rate, and incidence of shock. However, CDT may prolong hospital length of stay to a certain extent. Further research is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CDT and ST in the treatment of acute PE and other clinical outcomes.

A Study on the Efficacy of Thrombectomy in Patients with Atherosclerotic and Cardioembolic Basilar Artery Occlusion.

Background Studies on basilar artery occlusion are relatively few compared with those of anterior circulation stroke. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion classified as large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardioembolism (CE), and to analyze the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of EVT. Methods A total of 123 people were assigned to the LAA and CE groups (97 to the LAA and 26 to the CE). The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 2 or lower at 90 days. The primary safety outcome was mortality at 90 days. Secondary safety endpoints included the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and reinfarction. Multiple logistic regression was used to screen out independent risk factors for EVT prognosis of the LAA and CE groups. Results In the analysis, the patients with LAA stroke had better collateral circulation (American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology [SIR] score of 2-4; 61.9 vs. 19.2%, p = 0.000), and higher angioplasty rate (32.0 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.002). The proportions of patients with a 90-day mRS score of 0 to 2 and 90-day mortality were not found to be statistically significant between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age, SIR, white blood cell, blood glucose, and modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction were independent risk factors for the poor prognosis of EVT in the LAA group. Conclusion Although there were differences in clinical characteristics and imaging features between LAA and CE, there was no evidence of a significant difference in prognosis after EVT. In addition, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was not among the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of the LAA group.

Sex disparity in stroke outcomes in a multicenter prospective stroke registry in Viet Nam.

Although men have a higher rate of stroke than women, it is not clear whether women have a worse outcome after adjusting for confounders such as vascular risk factors, age, stroke severity, and reperfusion therapy. We evaluated sex differences on 90-day functional outcomes after stroke in a multicenter study in Vietnam. We recruited patients presenting with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at 10 stroke centers in Vietnam for a period of 1 month from August 1, 2022, to August 31, 2022. We reviewed the patient's clinical demographics, time from symptom onset to hospital admission, stroke classification, stroke subtype, stroke severity, characteristics of reperfusion therapy, and 90-day clinical outcome. We compared functional outcomes and predisposing factors at day 90 between men and women after an ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Poor outcome was defined as mRS 3-6. There were 2,300 stroke patients included. Men accounted for 61.3% (1,410) of participants. Compared with men, women were older (67.7±13.9 vs. 63.7±13.3, P<0.001), had a higher rate of diabetes mellitus (21.1% vs.15.3%, P<0.001), a lower rate of smoking (1.0 % vs. 23.6%, P<0.001), and a lower BMI (21.4 ± 2.70 vs. 22.0 ± 2.72, P<0.001). There was a higher rate of ICH in men (21.3% vs.15.6%, P=0.001), whereas the rate of subarachnoid hemorrhage was higher in women (6.2% vs.3.0%, P<0.001). For ischemic stroke, door-to-needle time (36.9±17.6 vs. 47.8±35.2 minutes, P=0.04) and door-to-recanalization time (113.6±51.1 vs.134.2±48.2, p=0.03) were shorter in women.There was no difference in 90-day functional outcomes between sexes. Factors associated with poor outcomes included age ≥ 50 years (adjusted OR, aOR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.66), history of stroke (aOR 1.50; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.96), large artery atherosclerosis (aOR 5.19; 95% CI, 3.90 to 6.90), and cardioembolism (aOR 3.21; 95% CI, 1.68 to 6.16). Factors associated with mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke included a history of coronary artery disease (aOR 3.04; 95% CI, 1.03 to 8.92), large artery atherosclerosis (aOR 3.37; 95% CI, 2.11 to 5.37), and cardioembolism (aOR 3.15; 95%CI, 1.20 to 8.27). There were no sex differences in the clinical outcome of stroke and ischemic stroke in this prospective cohort of hospitalized Vietnamese patients.

Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the abrupt reduction of blood flow to a certain area of the brain which causes neurologic dysfunction. Different types of percutaneous arterial endovascular interventions have been developed, but as yet there is no consensus on the optimal therapy for people with AIS. To compare the safety and efficacy of different types of percutaneous arterial endovascular interventions for treating people with AIS. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Issue 4 of 12, 2022), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 13 May 2022), Embase (1947 to 15 May 2022), Science Citation Index Web of Science (1900 to 15 May 2022), Scopus (1960 to 15 May 2022), and China Biological Medicine Database (CBM; 1978 to 16 May 2022). We also searched the ClinicalTrials.gov trials register and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to 16 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing one percutaneous arterial endovascular intervention with another in treating adult patients who have a clinical diagnosis of AIS due to large vessel occlusion and confirmed by imaging evidence, including thrombo-aspiration, stent-retrieval thrombectomy, aspiration-retriever combined technique, and thrombus mechanical fragmentation. Two review authors independently performed the literature searches, identified eligible trials, and extracted data. A third review author participated in discussions to reach consensus decisions when any disputes occurred. We assessed risk of bias and applied the GRADE approach to evaluate the quality of the evidence. The primary outcome was rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0 to 2 at three months. Secondary outcomes included the rate of modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) of 2b to 3 postprocedure, all-cause mortality within three months, rate of intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours, rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours, and rate of procedure-related adverse events within three months. Four RCTs were eligible. The current meta-analysis included two trials with 651 participants comparing thrombo-aspiration with stent-retrieval thrombectomy. We judged the quality of evidence to be high in both trials according to Cochrane's risk of bias tool RoB 2. There were no significant differences between thrombo-aspiration and stent-retrieval thrombectomy in rate of mRS of 0 to 2 at three months (risk ratio [RR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.13; P = 0.68; 633 participants; 2 RCTs); rate of mTICI of 2b to 3 postprocedure (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.07; P = 0.77; 650 participants; 2 RCTs); all-cause mortality within three months (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.37; P = 0.95; 633 participants; 2 RCTs); rate of intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.24; P = 0.73; 645 participants; 2 RCTs); rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.68; P = 0.75; 645 participants; 2 RCTs); and rate of procedure-related adverse events within three months (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.41; P = 0.90; 651 participants; 2 RCTs). Another two included studies reported no differences for the comparisons of combined therapy versus stent-retrieval thrombectomy or thrombo-aspiration. One RCT is ongoing. This review did not establish any difference in safety and effectiveness between the thrombo-aspiration approach and stent-retrieval thrombectomy for treating people with AIS. Furthermore, the combined group did not show any obvious advantage over either intervention applied alone.

Endovascular Versus Medical Management of Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The PLATO Study.

The optimal management of patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion is uncertain. We compared clinical outcomes for endovascular therapy (EVT) versus medical management (MM) in patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion. This multinational case-control study conducted at 27 sites in Europe and North America included consecutive patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last well from January 2015 to August 2022. Patients treated with EVT or MM were compared with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting. The coprimary outcomes were the 90-day modified Rankin Scale ordinal shift and ≥2-point decrease in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Of 1023 patients, 589 (57.6%) were male with median (interquartile range) age of 74 (64-82) years. The median (interquartile range) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 6 (3-10). The occlusion segments were P1 (41.2%), P2 (49.2%), and P3 (7.1%). Overall, intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 43% and EVT in 37%. There was no difference between the EVT and MM groups in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale shift (aOR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.85-1.50]; P=0.41). There were higher odds of a decrease in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale by ≥2 points with EVT (aOR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.35-2.52]; P=0.0001). Compared with MM, EVT was associated with a higher likelihood of excellent outcome (aOR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.07-2.09]; P=0.018), complete vision recovery, and similar rates of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2), despite a higher rate of SICH and mortality (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 6.2% versus 1.7%; P=0.0001; mortality, 10.1% versus 5.0%; P=0.002). In patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion, EVT was associated with similar odds of disability by ordinal modified Rankin Scale, higher odds of early National Institutes of Health stroke scale improvement, and complete vision recovery compared with MM. There was a higher likelihood of excellent outcome in the EVT group despite a higher rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. Continued enrollment into ongoing distal vessel occlusion randomized trials is warranted.

The evaluation and treatment of acute anterior circulation occlusion stroke with high clot burden: Progressive stratified aspiration thrombectomy vs. stent retriever thrombectomy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the progressive stratified aspiration thrombectomy (PSAT) in treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). Methods117 AIS-LVO patients with high clot burden who underwent emergency endovascular treatment were included. All patients were divided into two groups according to surgical technique: PSAT group, stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) group. The primary outcome was the 90-day mRS, the secondary outcomes included recanalization rate, the 24-h and 7-day NIHSS, the 7-day symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) rate and 90-days mortality. Results65 patients underwent PSAT, and 52 patients underwent SRT. The PSAT group performed better than SRT group regarding the successful recanalization rate (86.3 % vs. 71.2 %, P < 0.05) and time from puncture to recanalization (70 min [IQR, 58–87 min] vs. 87 min [IQR, 68–103 min], P < 0.05). The 7-day NIHSS score of the PSAT group was lower than that of the SRT group (12 [10–18] vs. 12 [8–25], P < 0.05). It was worth noting that at the 90-day follow-up, the favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2) rate of PSAT group was higher (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of the 24-h NIHSS score after surgery (15 [10–18] vs. 15 [10–22], P > 0.05), SICH (23.1 % vs. 26.9 %, P > 0.05) and mortality rate between the two groups (13.4 % vs. 19.2 %, P > 0.05). ConclusionsIt is safe and effective to treat high clot burden AIS-LVO patients with PSAT, which has a better reperfusion rate and prognostic outcome than SRT.

Rescue Stenting for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Background When mechanical thrombectomy (MT) fails to achieve successful reperfusion, rescue stenting (RS) has proven to be a feasible rescue therapy. However, the available evidence remains underpowered to assess clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of RS versus routine medical management in patients with failed MT using an aggregated meta‐analysis. Methods A systematic review was performed from inception to July 2022 of all studies using RS after failed MT. Outcomes of interest included a modified Rankin scale score of 0–2 at 90 days, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b–3) after RS and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A random‐effects meta‐analysis between the RS and medical treatment arms was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for each outcome. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed with I2 statistics. Results A total of 12 studies included 1855 participants, 729 in the RS arm and 1126 in the medical treatment arm. The pooled results indicated that RS was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0–2 at 90 days (RS: 41% versus 21%; OR,3.27; [95% CI 2.08–5.16]; I2=64%; moderate‐certainty evidence) and a decreased risk of mortality at 90 days (RS: 22.5% versus 33.8%; OR, 0.47; [95% CI 0.32–0.69]; I2=45%; low‐certainty evidence), compared with medical treatment after failed MT. The pooled rate of successful reperfusion after RS was 87% (95% CI 82–91; I2=57%; low‐certainty evidence). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between groups (RS: 8.5% versus 11.7%; OR, 0.85; [95% CI 0.59–1.20]; I2=7%; low‐certainty evidence). Conclusion RS is a promising strategy for maximizing recovery in acute stroke patients after first line MT fails to achieve meaningful reperfusion. However, randomized trials using a standardized approach/technique and MT failure definition are warranted to confirm these results.

Early venous filling after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation

BackgroundThe significance of early venous filling (EVF) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is not fully understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of...

Safety and Efficacy of Baseline Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke: Antiplatelets Before Mechanical Thrombectomy

PurposeTo investigate the safety and efficacy of baseline antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Materials and MethodsBaseline use of antiplatelet medication before MT for (AIS) may provide benefit on reperfusion and clinical outcome but could also carry an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). All consecutive patients with AIS and treated with MT with and without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between January 2012 and December 2019 in all centers performing MT nationwide were reviewed. Data were prospectively collected in national registries (eg, SITS-TBY and RES-Q). Primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) at 3 months; secondary outcome was ICH. ResultsOf the 4,351 patients who underwent MT, 1,750 (40%) and 666 (15%) were excluded owing to missing data from the functional independence and ICH outcome cohorts, respectively. In the functional independence cohort (n = 2,601), 771 (30%) patients received antiplatelets before MT. Favorable outcome did not differ in any antiplatelet, aspirin, and clopidogrel groups when compared with that in the no-antiplatelet group: odds ratio (OR), 1.00 (95% CI, 0.84–1.20); OR, 1.05 (95% CI, 0.86–1.27); and OR, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.55–1.41), respectively. In the ICH cohort (n = 3,685), 1095 (30%) patients received antiplatelets before MT. The rates of ICH did not increase in any treatment options (any antiplatelet, aspirin, clopidogrel, and dual antiplatelet groups) when compared with those in the no-antiplatelet group: OR, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.87–1.21); OR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.83–1.18); OR, 1.10 (95% CI, 0.82–1.47); and OR, 1.43 (95% CI, 0.87–2.33), respectively. ConclusionsAntiplatelet monotherapy before MT did not improve functional independence or increase the risk of ICH.

Rare Causes of Cerebral Venus Sinus Thrombosis: A Systematic Review.

Background: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare manifestation of thrombosis commonly caused by thrombophilia, hormonal-related factors, non-cerebral malignancy, and hematologic diseases. The aim of this review was to identify and summarize rare CVST cases. Methods: A literature search of the Medline database was performed in November 2022. CVST cases of a common cause were excluded. Demographic and clinical data were extracted. Eligible cases were categorized into inflammatory, primary CNS tumors, post-operative/traumatic, and idiopathic groups to allow statistical group comparisons. Results: 76 cases were analyzed. Idiopathic CVST was most frequently reported followed by inflammatory, post-traumatic/operative and primary CNS tumor causes. The intracranial hemorrhage rate was 23.7% and it was found to increase in the inflammatory group (45.8%). Anticoagulation was used in the majority of cases and it was significantly related to better outcomes. A low rate of anticoagulation use (43.8%) was found among CVST cases in the post-operative/traumatic group. The overall mortality rate was 9.8%. 82.4% of patients showed significant early improvement. Conclusions: Most rare CVST cases were either of idiopathic or inflammatory origin. Interestingly, hemorrhage occurred often he idiopathic CVST cases. A low rate of anticoagulation use in neurosurgical CVST cases after trauma or head surgery was observed.

Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Acute Stroke: Mortality and Bleeding Complications

Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase has been the foundation of initial treatment of acute ischemic stroke for several decades. Tenecteplase is a thrombolytic agent that offers logistical advantages in cost and administration relative to alteplase. There is evidence that tenecteplase has at least similar efficacy and safety outcomes compared with alteplase for stroke. In this study, we compared tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute stroke in a large retrospective US database (TriNetX) regarding the following 3 outcomes: (1) mortality, (2) intracranial hemorrhage, and (3) the need for acute blood transfusions. In this retrospective study using the US cohort of 54 academic medical centers/health care organizations in the TriNetX database, we identified 3,432 patients treated with tenecteplase and 55,894 patients treated with alteplase for stroke after January 1, 2012. Propensity score matching was performed on basic demographic information and 7 previous clinical diagnostic groups, resulting in a total of 6,864 patients with acute stroke evenly matched between groups. Mortality rates, the frequency of intracranial hemorrhage, and blood transfusions (as a marker of significant blood loss) were recorded for each group over the ensuing 7- and 30-day periods. Secondary subgroup analyses were conducted on a cohort treated from 2021 to 2022 in an attempt to determine whether temporal differences in acute ischemic stroke treatment would alter the results. Patients treated with tenecteplase had a significantly lower mortality rate (8.2% versus 9.8%; risk ratio [RR], 0.832) and lower risk of major bleeding as measured by the frequency of blood transfusions (0.3% versus 1.4%; RR, 0.207) than alteplase at 30 days after thrombolysis for stroke. In the larger 10-year data set of patients with stroke treated after January 1, 2012, patients receiving tenecteplase were not found to have a statistically different incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (3.5% versus 3.0%; RR, 1.185) at 30 days after the administration of the thrombolytic agents in patients. However, a subgroup analysis of 2,216 evenly matched patients with stroke treated from 2021 to 2022 demonstrated notably better survival and statistically lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage than the alteplase group. In our large retrospective multicenter study using real-world evidence from large health care organizations, tenecteplase for the treatment of acute stroke demonstrated a lower mortality rate, decreased intracranial hemorrhage, and less significant blood loss. The favorable mortality and safety profiles observed in this large study, taken together with previous randomized controlled trial data and operational advantages in rapid dosing and cost-effectiveness, all support the preferential use of tenecteplase in patients with ischemic stroke.

Trends in outcomes and racial disparities in adult hospitalizations for immune thrombocytopenia over a decade.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a diagnosis of exclusion characterized by a low platelet count in patients for whom other etiologies have been ruled out. It occurs due to autoimmune-mediated platelet destruction and thrombopoietin deficiency. ITP is a rare hematologic disorder in adults, and scarce information exists on the hospitalization outcomes among these patients. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a nationwide population-based study from 2010 to 2019 using the National Inpatient Sample. We found a trend toward an increase in the annual admissions for ITP (from 392.2 to 417.3, p = 0.07). There was a decrease in mortality exclusively for White patients over the period studied (p = 0.03), which was not seen in Black or Hispanic patients. There was an increase in total charges adjusted for inflation for all subgroups (p < 0.01). Length of stay decreased during the decade analyzed (p < 0.01) for the total population and most subgroups. The rates of epistaxis and melena increased (p < 0.01), while rates of intracranial hemorrhage and hematemesis did not change significantly. Advances have been made in the ITP management over the past decade. However, this has not resulted in a decrease in the number of hospitalizations or total healthcare charges during hospitalization. Furthermore, a decrease in mortality was observed in White patients but not in other races. Prospective studies are needed to better characterize the financial burden of the disease, as well as to investigate racial variability in access to care, disease behavior, and response to treatment.

Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Best Medical Management Beyond 24 Hours From Last Known Well in Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion

Background The safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion presenting beyond 24 hours from last known well (LKW) remains undetermined. Methods In this single center study, we identified patients with large vessel occlusion who were eligible for EVT based on noncontrast computed tomography (CT)/CT angiography (without CT perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging) using an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score of ≥5, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of ≥6, and presenting beyond 24 hours from LKW, between January 2018 and March 2022. During the study period, EVT service limitations meant patients eligible for EVT presenting outside service hours, routinely received best medical management (BMM). Functional and safety outcomes were compared between patients receiving EVT or BMM following multivariable adjustment for age, baseline stroke severity, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, time from LKW, IV thrombolysis, and clot location. Results Among 35 patients presenting beyond 24 hours from LKW and eligible for EVT, 19 (54%) were treated with EVT and 16 (46%) with BMM. Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score were similar across both groups (EVT: 7 [6.75–8] versus BMM: 7 [6–8]), but not the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (EVT: 17 [11–19.5] versus BMM: 20 [9.75–26]). No significant difference was observed between the EVT and BMM groups in the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (5.3% versus 0%; P =0.28) or mortality (26.3% versus 37.5%; P =0.42) rates, respectively. The modified Rankin scale at 90 days (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 1.94; [95% CI 0.42–8.87]; P =0.39) and functional independence rate, although numerically higher in the EVT group compared with the BMM group (modified Rankin scale≤2; 36.9% versus 18.8%; adjusted OR, 4.34; [95% CI 0.34–54.83]; P =0.25), were not significantly different. 94.7% of patients treated with EVT achieved successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b–3). Conclusion In routine clinical practice, EVT beyond 24 hours from LKW appears safe and feasible, when performed in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were deemed eligible for EVT by noncontrast CT /CT angiography alone. A large collaborative randomized trial assessing the efficacy of EVT beyond 24 hours is warranted. Our findings provide a basis for the sample size estimate for an adequately powered trial.

Outcomes in patients with acute stroke treated at a comprehensive stroke center using telemedicine versus in-person assessments.

Telemedicine has been shown to be a safe and effective modality to assess and treat patients with acute stroke who present to a community hospital. There are no previous reports on using telemedicine to treat patients with acute stroke who present to a comprehensive stroke center. We report here the outcomes of patients with acute stroke treated in 2021 at our comprehensive stroke center using telemedicine versus an in-person assessment. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated after either a telemedicine or in-person assessment at our hospital in 2021 were identified by a retrospective chart review. The primary outcomes collected were door-to-needle (DTN) time for alteplase (tPA) administration, door-to-puncture (DTP) time for endovascular thrombectomy, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates and 3-month mortality. There were 302 patients with acute stroke treated at our hospital in 2021. Of these, 18.2% (n = 55/302) were treated using telemedicine. There were no differences in any of the outcomes between patients treated using telemedicine versus an in-person assessment: DTN (35.5 min (n = 42) vs 33 min (n = 182), p < 0.76), DTP (86.5 min (n = 30) vs 85 min (n = 134), p < 0.97), sICH (0% (n = 0/55) vs 1.6% (n = 4/245, p < 0.59) or 3-month mortality (20.6% (n = 7/34) vs 22.1% (n = 40/181), p < 0.29). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report on outcomes for acute stroke patients treated using telemedicine at a comprehensive stroke center. In this study, there were no differences in outcomes between patients treated using telemedicine versus an in-person assessment.

An Experience of a Single Comprehensive Stroke Center after Implementation of Routine Tenecteplase Administration for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment. (P7-5.023)

<h3>Objective:</h3> The objectives of this study were to determine if there is a significant difference between Alteplase and Tenecteplase in improvement of NIHSS, door to needle time (DTNT), disability at discharge determined by modified Rankin scale (mRS), and rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). <h3>Background:</h3> There is growing interest in using Tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment. Currently there is no clear consensus on its indication and dosage. We transitioned to Tenecteplase administration for AIS treatment in March 2021, at a dosage of 0.25 mg/kg. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> A retrospective comparison analysis on the outcomes of AIS patients who were treated with Alteplase between April 2020 – March 2021 or Tenecteplase between April 2021 – March 2022. <h3>Results:</h3> Of 216 patients, 45.8% (n = 99) were given Alteplase and 54.1% (n = 117) were given Tenecteplase. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics except hyperlipidemia, substance use, and history of smoking. No mean difference in mRS was measured at admission or discharge between Alteplase (1.42+/− 1.77) and Tenecteplase (1.32 +/− 1.56, p-value 0.703) and delta NIHSS between Alteplase and Tenecteplase (p-value 0.926). There was no difference in DTNT between both groups (p-value 0.172). Successful recanalization ratio was not significantly different. Symptomatic ICH was of no significant difference between the two groups: occurring in 5.05% patients receiving Alteplase and 5.13% patients receiving Tenecteplase (p-value 0.682). Rate of mortality was 13.13% (n = 13) in Alteplase and 11.11% (n = 13) in Tenecteplase, also of no significant difference (p-value 0.683). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> The results suggest that Tenecteplase has a similar efficacy and safety profile to Alteplase in real world practice. These findings are similar to results of previous randomized trials. At the dose of 0.25 mg/kg, Tenecteplase appears to be a reasonable alternative to Alteplase for use with acute ischemic strokes within 4.5 hours of onset. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. Cawley has nothing to disclose. Dr. Simon has nothing to disclose. Dr. Radomski has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kuns has nothing to disclose. Dr. Bejleri has nothing to disclose. Dr. Seol has nothing to disclose. Dr. Razak has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Janssen Pharmaceuticals.