Rate Of Intracranial Hemorrhage Research Articles

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Reduced Doses of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

This Nordic observational cohort study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared to standard warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The study, utilizing nationwide administrative databases from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, spanned from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2018 (2017 for Sweden). The cohort included 26,883 patients initiating reduced-dose DOACs and 108,014 comparable warfarin patients. Effectiveness was measured by the composite endpoint of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, while safety was assessed through intracranial hemorrhage. The meta-analysis across countries revealed similar or lower incidences of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients on reduced-dose DOACs compared to standard warfarin (rivaroxaban: HR 0.93, dabigatran: HR 0.88, apixaban: HR 0.79). Incidences within warfarin groups ranged from 2.16 to 3.71 per 100 person-years, comparable to DOAC recipients. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were generally low, ranging from 0.16 to 1.85 per 100 person-years. In comparison with warfarin patients, meta-analyses yielded HRs for rivaroxaban (1.41), dabigatran (0.35), and apixaban (0.72). In this study, atrial fibrillation patients initiating reduced-dose rivaroxaban and dabigatran exhibited incidences of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism similar to warfarin, and for apixaban, even lower. Rates of intracranial hemorrhage were comparable to or lower for patients on DOACs compared to warfarin.

Poor Prestroke Glycemic Control Increases the Rate of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage after Mechanical Thrombectomy.

(1) Background: Diabetes is a well-established risk factor for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study evaluated the impact of prestroke glycemic control in diabetic patients on their 3-month clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). (2) Methods: AIS patients with a premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 who were admitted within 6 h after stroke onset and treated with MT between January 2020 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated the effect of prestroke glycemic control on the stroke severity, reperfusion rate, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale score 0-2) at 3 months after endovascular treatment. (3) Results: A total of 364 patients were analyzed, with 275 cases of non-diabetes (ND), 66 of well-controlled diabetes (WCD) and 23 of poorly controlled diabetes (PCD). There was no significant difference in the baseline neurological deficit expressed according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale among the three groups. The time from stroke onset to groin puncture was similar in the ND, WCD and PCD groups (median 215 min, 194.5 min and 222.5 min, respectively). There was no significant difference in the favorable 3-month clinical outcomes among these three groups (35.2% of ND patients, 42.4% of WCD patients and 39.1% of PCD patients) or full recovery (12.4% of ND patients, 11.0% of WCD patients and 17.4% of PCD patients). The rate of sICH was significantly higher in the PCD group as compared to the ND and WDP groups (21.7% of PCD patients versus 7.6% of ND patients, p = 0.038, and 6.0% of WCD patients, p = 0.046), but the 3-month mortality did not differ between the three groups (21.8% of ND group, 19.7% of WCD group and 26.1% of PCD group). (4) Conclusions: This study shows that poor prestroke glycemic control in AIS diabetic patients does not change the chance of a good clinical functional outcome after endovascular treatment. However, the increased risk of hemorrhagic complications in this group of patients should be considered.

Methylprednisolone as Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke

It is uncertain whether intravenous methylprednisolone improves outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. To assess the efficacy and adverse events of adjunctive intravenous low-dose methylprednisolone to endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to LVO. This investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was implemented at 82 hospitals in China, enrolling 1680 patients with stroke and proximal intracranial LVO presenting within 24 hours of time last known to be well. Recruitment took place between February 9, 2022, and June 30, 2023, with a final follow-up on September 30, 2023. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to intravenous methylprednisolone (n = 839) at 2 mg/kg/d or placebo (n = 841) for 3 days adjunctive to endovascular thrombectomy. The primary efficacy outcome was disability level at 90 days as measured by the overall distribution of the modified Rankin Scale scores (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The primary safety outcomes included mortality at 90 days and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours. Among 1680 patients randomized (median age, 69 years; 727 female [43.3%]), 1673 (99.6%) completed the trial. The median 90-day modified Rankin Scale score was 3 (IQR, 1-5) in the methylprednisolone group vs 3 (IQR, 1-6) in the placebo group (adjusted generalized odds ratio for a lower level of disability, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.96-1.25]; P = .17). In the methylprednisolone group, there was a lower mortality rate (23.2% vs 28.5%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.71-0.98]; P = .03) and a lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (8.6% vs 11.7%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]; P = .04) compared with placebo. Among patients with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, adjunctive methylprednisolone added to endovascular thrombectomy did not significantly improve the degree of overall disability. ChiCTR.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2100051729.

Endovascular thrombectomy for DAWN- and DEFUSE-3 ineligible acute ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been proven beneficial for treating acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Recent trials of DAWN and DEFUSE-3 have extended the treatment window to 6-24 h, sparking investigations into EVT outcomes for patients not eligible for DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria. To assess the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for late-window anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke patients, comparing DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND) groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined EVT outcomes for patients with late-window anterior circulation LVO beyond 6 h. We categorized patients as DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND). Our search covered PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. A total of 464 records were initially identified. After duplicate removal, 298 studies were screened. Nine studies were included and analyzed. Our analysis focused on study characteristics, baseline comparisons, risk of bias, and outcomes. Baseline characteristics showed comparable age, gender, most comorbidities, NIHSS score, and ASPECTS between DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND) patients. NDND patients' history showed a higher rate of atrial fibrillation and larger infarct volumes on baseline imaging. Successful reperfusion rates (TICI 2b-3) were similar between DD and NDND with 354 out of 469 in the DD group and 364 out of 459 in the NDND group (OR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.40, 1.84; p = 0.689), though with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 73%; P = 0.002). The proportion of patients with distal occlusions was significantly higher in the NDND group as compared to the DD group (137 (39.4%) of 347 patients versus 47 (11%) of 428 patients, respectively), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 85%, p = 0.023). Functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2) showed no significant difference between groups with 259 out of 802 in the DD group and 197 out of 668 in the NDND group (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.77, 1.63; p = 0.552) but also exhibited notable heterogeneity (I2 = 46%, p = 0.063). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates were lower in DD with 14 out of 309 in the DD group and 47 out of 400 in NDND group (OR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.25, 0.93; p = 0.029) as compared to the NDND patients, showing no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.552). 90-day mortality was lower in DD with 43 out of 304 in the DD group and 107 out of 399 in the NDND group (OR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.37, 0.82; p = 0.004) as compared to NDND patients, with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.536). This meta-analysis demonstrates equivalent rates of functional independence between DD and NDND patients. However, the high proportion of distal occlusions and higher rates of sICH and mortality in NDND patients suggest caution in offering mechanical thrombectomy to DAWN/DEFUSE-3 ineligible patients. A more flexible approach to EVT eligibility criteria could benefit select patients in real-world practice. Nonetheless, further research is needed to identify which patients would benefit from expanded EVT eligibility criteria.

Abstract 152: Endovascular Therapy versus Medical Management for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Infarct: A Time-Benefit Relationship Analysis

Objective: Recent randomized trials demonstrated the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. We aimed to characterize the effect of time to treatment on the benefit of endovascular therapy compared to medical management among patients with acute large ischemic stroke. Methods: Analysis the Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core trial (ANGEL-ASPECT), which was a multicenter, randomized trial at 46 comprehensive stroke centers in China from August 2020 to October 2022. Onset to arterial puncture time (OPT) associated with outcomes of endovascular therapy were analyzed as a category and continuous variable. The primary outcome was favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-3) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included degree of disability (modified Rankin scale range), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, any intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Results: Among 455 eligible patients, the median age was 68 years, and median Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score was 3 (interquartile range 3-4). Compared with medical management alone, endovascular therapy plus medical management was associated with higher rates of favorable outcome with OPT within 6 hours (44.4% vs 29.9%, adjusted odds ratio[aOR] 2.78 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-6.32]), 6-12 hours (45.7% vs 29.6%, aOR 2.39 [95% CI 1.21-4.71]), but not in OPT beyond 12 hours (51.6% vs 41.4%, aOR 2.05 [95% CI, 0.88-4.77]). The benefit in favorable outcome became nonsignificant after OPT of 13 hours and 22 minutes. In three OPT intervals, the odds of better disability outcome with endovascular therapy plus medical management than medical management alone were observed; the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality were similar, though the rates of any intracranial hemorrhage increased. Conclusion: In patients with large cerebral infarction, endovascular therapy plus medical management was efficacious in improving functional outcomes with acceptable safety in a broad time window of 0 to 24 hours, but greater benefit was observed with earlier treatment. A pooled analysis with larger sample size is needed.

Abstract WP184: Intravenous Thrombolysis Improves Outcomes in Stroke Patients With Unsuccessful Mechanical Thrombectomy

Introduction: The benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are not well established. Methods: This study included patients from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 occlusions with unsuccessful MT (mTICI score ≤ 2a). Patients who received IVT prior to MT were compared to those who received MT alone. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed using age, sex, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS), admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), occluded vessel, ASPECTS score, mTICI score, and symptom onset to groin puncture time. The primary outcome was favorable 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2). Results: Of 610 patients with unsuccessful MT, 219 were matched in each group. Median ages were 70 [IQR: 61 - 80] and 73 [IQR: 62 - 81] in the IVT + MT and MT alone groups, respectively. In the IVT + MT group. Final TICI scores of 0, 1, and 2a were achieved in 92 (42.0%), 33 (15.1%), and 94 (42.9%) patients, respectively, compared to 76 (34.7%), 29 (13.2%), and 114 (52.1%) in the MT alone group. The IVT + MT group showed a significantly. higher 90-day mRS of 0-2 (aOR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.53-4.32) and mRS of 0-3 (aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.12). There were no significant differences between the groups in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, or 90-day mortality rates. Conclusions: IVT is associated with improved functional outcomes in patients with unsuccessful MT. Ensuring that IVT is provided to all eligible stroke patients should remain a priority.

Abstract WMP90: Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment versus Best Medical Treatment for Acute Basilar-Artery Occlusion: Impacts of Etiology in the ATTENTION Randomized Trial

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment versus best medical treatment strategies in acute basilar artery occlusion with different stroke etiologies. Methods: The study was a post-hoc analysis of the Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Basilar-artery Occlusion (ATTENTION), which was a multicenter, randomized trial at 36 centers in China from February 2021 to September 2022. Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion were classified into three groups according to stroke etiology: large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardioembolism (CE), and undetermined/other determined cause (UC/ODC). The primary outcome was favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-3) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Results: A total of 340 patients were included. Compared with best medical treatment, endovascular treatment was associated with higher rates of favorable outcome at 90 days in the LAA group (49.1% vs 23.8%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-6.71), CE group (52.2% vs 30.8%; aOR 3.68; 95%CI 1.04-12.97), and UC/ODC group (37.5% vs 17.4%; aOR 5.73, 95%CI 1.99-16.48). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving endovascular treatment with LAA, CE and UC/ODC was 8.3%, 2.2%, and 3.2%, respectively, and none of the best medical treatment patients. Endovascular treatment led to lower 90-day mortality than best medical treatment in LAA patients (33.3% vs 57.1%; aOR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19-0.91). Among patients receiving endovascular treatment, a better functional outcomes of CE etiology was found than the UC/ODC etiology (52.2% vs 37.5%; aOR 2.68; 95% CI 1.07-6.70); there was no differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality among the three etiology subtypes. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment was associated with better outcomes than the best medical treatment in acute basilar artery occlusion patients regardless of stroke etiologies, but the benefits-risk ratios were different among etiologies. The stroke etiology might be an important factor in predicting the prognosis of thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion.

Abstract WP20: Hemorrhagic Conversion Patterns After Stroke Thrombolysis With Alteplase versus Tenecteplase Real-World Experience

Importance: Tenecteplase use is more prevalent as the thrombolytic drug of choice for acute ischemic stroke, with results demonstrating its non-inferiority compared to alteplase. However, there is conflicting data regarding intracranial hemorrhage risk. Objective: To determine the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in ischemic stroke patients after thrombolysis with either tenecteplase or alteplase. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: 15 Texas stroke centers. Participants: 431 patients that were eligible for thrombolytic therapy, and received either tenecteplase or alteplase. Exposure: Data was collected 90 days before and after the stroke center changed from alteplase to tenecteplase. Main Outcomes: Primary endpoint was to compare the incidence of sICH according to SITS-MOST/ECASS-3 criteria in the alteplase and tenecteplase groups. Secondary endpoint included the radiographic pattern of hemorrhagic conversion according to the Heidelberg bleeding classification (HBC). Results: Median age was 62.94 for alteplase and 64.45 for tenecteplase, females represented half of each cohort:110 for alteplase and 117 for tenecteplase. Half of patients received alteplase (n=216), 174 (81%) received alteplase within 3 hours versus 176 (82%) for tenecteplase. Endovascular thrombectomy was attempted in 34 patients (15%) receiving alteplase versus 26 patients (12%) receiving tenecteplase. 7 patients in the alteplase group (3.2%) and 14 (6.5%) in the tenecteplase group had sICH, with an odds ratio of 1.44 (95% CI 0.60-3.43; P=0.41). A higher NIHSS score on arrival (1.06; 95% CI 1.0004-1.131; P=0.04) was a statistically significant predictor of sICH. A two-sample proportion test on tenecteplase produced a statistically significant increase in HBC class 3 (P=0.040) over alteplase. Conclusions and Relevance: An increased rate of sICH was observed with a statistically significant increase in HBC class 3 with tenecteplase administration compared to alteplase. Suggested mechanisms of bleeding are hemorrhagic conversion in clinically silent infarcts and contusions underlying the lesions. This suggests a potential need to reevaluate the criteria for tenecteplase administration. Larger studies are required to confirm this data.

Abstract WP24: Safety of Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Telestroke: A Large Multistate Experience (STAT)

Background: Prompt treatment with IV thrombolytics (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is critical for improved recovery and survival. Recently, hospital systems are switching to the IVT tenecteplase (TNK) instead of the FDA approved alteplase (tPA) for treatment. Multiple studies and meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of TNK demonstrate similar or superior outcomes when compared to tPA. TNK is not FDA approved for treatment leading to hesitation and attention on the complications profile including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rates. Methods: AIS consults seen in the ED by TeleSpecialists, LLC at 220 facilities (26 states) from January 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023 were extracted from the TeleCare by TeleSpecialists TM database. The encounters were reviewed for IVT candidate, door to needle (DTN) time, IVT used, advanced imaging, LVO, complication occurrence, complication type, symptomatic ICH, and ECASS II ICH score. Comparison of complications was performed between the two groups by IVT: TNK or tPA. Comparison of continuous variables was performed by student’s t-test for normally distributed data, and the Mann-Whitney test for nonnormally distributed data. Pearson's Chi-square test was employed for comparisons of categorical variables. Results: A total of 2305 TNK patients and 3337 tPA patients were extracted. DTN times were faster (37 min vs 42 min, p < 0.0001) and more total complications were seen in the TNK group (87 vs 80, p =0.0035). In nonLVO IVT patients, TNK group had more complications (57 vs 47, p 0.0078), specifically ICH (48 vs 35, p= 0.0036). In LVO IVT patients, TNK group did not have a statistically significant difference in ICH (21 vs 18, p =0.07). In IVT patients not accepted for NIR, TNK group had more complications (77 vs 69, p=0.005), specifically ICH (63 vs 51, p=0.0026). In IVT patients accepted for NIR, no significant differences were observed. There were no statistically significant differences in symptomatic ICH between groups. Conclusions: TNK group was found to have significantly more complications including ICH compared to tPA group driven by non-LVO patients. Closer analysis of potential for increased risk to non-LOV patients is warranted based on this data from the largest simultaneously collected data.

Abstract WP193: Endovascular Thrombectomy for DAWN- and DEFUSE 3 Ineligible Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The current evidence supports the benefits of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials expanded the EVT window up to 24 hours. A few real-world studies explored EVT outcomes in DAWN/DEFUSE-3 ineligible (NDND) patients. Methods: This meta-analysis investigated EVT outcomes in patients with late-window anterior circulation LVO, including both DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and NDND patients. Nine studies were included, focusing on study characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes. Results: Baseline characteristics showed comparable age, gender, comorbidities, NIHSS score, and ASPECTS between DD and NDND patients. NDND patients exhibited larger infarct volumes and higher atrial fibrillation rate. Successful reperfusion rates (TICI 2b-3) were comparable between the two groups (OR= 0.86; 95% CI= 0.40, 1.84; p = 0.689), with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 73%; P = 0.002). Functional independence (90-day mRS score 0-2) was not significantly different between the two groups (OR= 1.12; 95% CI= 0.77, 1.63; p = 0.552) with notable heterogeneity (I 2 = 46%, p = 0.063). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rate was lower in the DD group as compared to NDND patients (OR= 0.49; 95% CI= 0.25, 0.93; p = 0.029) with no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.552). 90-day mortality was lower in the DD group than in the NDND group (OR= 0.55; 95%-CI= 0.37, 0.82; p = 0.004) with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.536). Conclusion: While this meta-analysis showed comparable rates of functional independence between DD and NDND patients, the potential bias introduced by the higher rates of sICH and mortality in the latter group should prompt great care when offering EVT to NDND patients. Less restricted EVT eligibility criteria might yield positive outcomes in real-world practice in specific patients. However, increased risks of sICH and mortality in NDND patients warrant further investigation to optimize the risk-benefit balance in expanding EVT eligibility criteria.

Abstract WP31: Real World Comparison of Outcomes of IV Tenecteplase versus IV Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background: Tenecteplase (TNK) has been reported to be non-inferior to alteplase from a clinical outcome and safety standpoint according to recent studies. In our study, we compare the outcomes of IV TNK & IV alteplase for acute ischemic stroke patients. Materials and Methods: We evaluated acute AIS patients treated with IVT between10/2020-03/2023 at theDepartment of Neurology, Hackensack MeridianHealth, JFKMedical Center. All analyses was done using SPSS version 29 software. Results: Among the total 270 patients, 150(55.6%) received IV alteplase and 120(44.4%) received IV TNK. Major neurological improvement (defined as improvement in NIHSS score by 8 or more points at 24hours) was observed with TNK. Any intracranial hemorrhage was higher among patients treated with IV TNK compared to alteplase (25% versus 14.7%, p=0.024). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage(sICH) was higher inTNK group (8.3% versus3.3%, p=0.075). The proportion of routine discharge was higher among alteplase patients, while non-routine discharge was higher among TNK patients (51.7% vs. 28%, p<0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, patients treated with IV TNK were at a significantly higher risk of any intracranial hemorrhage(odds ratio[OR], 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.051-3.57, p=0.034). After adjusting for age, gender, NIHSS, thrombectomy, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, CHF, previous TIA and previous stroke, there was anon-significant higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage. A nonsignificant decrease in the odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was seen with TNK. There were significantly higher rates of non-routine discharge (OR, 3.078, 95% CI 1.8-5.19, p<0.001) and death (OR, 4.84, 95% CI1.20-19.66, p=0.002) inpatients treated with IV TNK. After adjusting for the above-mentioned factors, there was a significantly higher rate of non-routine discharge in the TNK group and a higher trend of death in the TNK group. Conclusions: We found that IV TNK was associated with higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage compared to IV alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Abstract WP231: The Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients Anticoagulated With Factor Xa Inhibitors (FXai): A Multi-Country Observational Study (AXIOM ICH)

Background: Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is associated with significant long-term morbidity, high healthcare costs and mortality. There is a paucity of accurate national incidence rate data on ICH, fatal ICH and ICH sub-types in patients on FXai anticoagulants (e.g. rivaroxaban and apixaban). Aim: To describe patient characteristics and incidence of ICH following the initial use of FXai in an ongoing multi-country study. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort analysis of electronic health records from new users of FXai in the UK and Canada. Individuals with FXai prescriptions for a therapeutic indication such as venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation (AF), and/or non-mechanical cardiac-valve replacement, were included. Demographic and clinical data were summarised using descriptive statistics, and incidence rates for ICH events were reported per 100 person-years with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroups have been analysed. Results: In the UK and Canada, there were a total of 383,433 new users of FXai; average age 69 years, 54% male, average BMI 29 kg/m 2 and 88% of patients used an oral FXai. The most common indication was AF (73%). 1650 and 438 ICH events were reported in the UK and Canada, with 1-year incidence rates of 0.56 and 0.72 per 100 person-years, 27% and 26% were fatal (Table), respectively. Event rates remain elevated in the years following FXai initiation. Conclusions: Findings indicate incidence rates of ICH in patients treated with FXai were consistent over time, approximately 0.64 per 100 person-years or 1:160 patients per year throughout the course of treatment. Case fatality rates are high, around 27%, remaining elevated in the years following FXai initiation.

Abstract TP197: Impact of First-Pass Effect on Clinical Outcomes in Stroke Patients With Low Aspects

Introduction: The first-pass effect (FPE), defined as a complete or near-complete recanalization after a single pass of a mechanical thrombectomy (MT) device, has been linked to favorable clinical outcomes. However, its effectiveness in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with low ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 2-5) has not been validated. Method: We utilized data from STAR, a multicenter database of 84 centers worldwide, to conduct a retrospective, cohort study on patients who underwent MT for internal carotid artery (ICA) or M1 occlusion presenting with ASPECTS 2-5. We compared the outcomes of patients who achieved FPE (successful recanalization with an mTICI score of 2c or higher in one pass) to those who did not. The primary outcome was a 90-day favorable outcome, defined as mRS 0-3. Secondary outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results: Out of 10,229 patients in the STAR database, 250 patients met our inclusion criteria. Among those, 60 (24%) achieved FPE. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline, imaging, and procedural characteristics. FPE was significantly associated with higher odds of 90-day mRS 0-3 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04 - 4.20; P-value: 0.04) and lower rates of ICH (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.25 - 0.93, P-value: 0.03). However, there was no significant difference in sICH rates (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.31 - 2.04, P-value: 0.70). Conclusion: Achieving FPE in AIS stroke patients with low ASPECTS was associated with significantly higher rates of good functional outcomes and lower rates of ICH.

Thrombolytic Treatment in Wake-Up Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Treatment Effectiveness in the Norwegian Stroke Registry.

Previous clinical trials found improved outcome of thrombolytic treatment in patients with ischemic wake-up stroke (WUS) selected by advanced imaging techniques. The authors assessed the effectiveness of thrombolytic treatment in patients with WUS in a nationwide stroke registry. Using propensity score matching, the authors assessed the effectiveness and safety of thrombolytic treatment versus no thrombolytic treatment in 726 patients (363 matched pairs) with WUS in the Norwegian Stroke Registry in 2014 to 2019. Thrombolytic treatment in WUS versus known-onset stroke was compared in 730 patients (365 matched pairs). Functional outcomes were assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. A significant benefit of thrombolytic treatment in WUS was seen in ordinal analysis (odds ratio [OR], 1.48 [95% CI, 1.15-1.91]; P=0.003) and for mRS 0 to 2 (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.29-2.52]; P=0.001) but not for mRS 0 or 1 (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.00-1.74]; P=0.050). The proportion of patients with mRS 0 or 1 was lower in patients with WUS who underwent thrombolysis versus those with known-onset stroke (50.4% versus 59.5%; OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52-0.93]; P=0.013), while outcomes were similar between groups for mRS 0 to 2 and ordinal analysis. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolytic treatment occurred in 4.4% of patients with WUS and 3.9% of patients with known-onset stroke (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.54-2.41]; P=0.726). Thrombolytic treatment in patients with WUS was associated with improved functional outcome compared with patients with no thrombolytic treatment and was not associated with increased rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared with known-onset stroke. The results indicate that thrombolytic treatment is effective and safe in WUS in a real-life setting.

Changing or Retaining Direct Oral Anticoagulant After Ischemic Stroke Despite Direct Oral Anticoagulant Treatment.

The optimal antithrombotic strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation who experience ischemic stroke (IS) despite direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy remain inconclusive. This study compared outcomes for patients with DOAC treatment failure who changed or retained their prestroke DOAC. This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Research Database from 2012 to 2020. Patients with atrial fibrillation who experienced IS during DOAC therapy were assigned to either (1) the DOAC-change group: changing prestroke DOAC or (2) the DOAC-retain group: retaining prestroke DOAC. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent IS and transient ischemic attack. The secondary outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding, systemic thromboembolism, and all-cause death. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance the baseline characteristics between the DOAC-change and DOAC-retain groups. The Cox proportional hazards model compared the risk of outcomes between the 2 groups. In total, 1979 patients were enrolled (609 DOAC-change patients and 1370 DOAC-retain patients). The incidence rates of recurrent IS or transient ischemic attack were 7.20 and 6.56 per 100 person-years in the DOAC-change and DOAC-retain groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.87-1.30]). A nonsignificantly higher incidence rate of intracranial hemorrhage was observed in the DOAC-change group compared with the DOAC-retain group (0.75 versus 0.53 per 100-person-years; HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.78-2.83]). The systemic thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death rates were comparable between the DOAC-change and DOAC-retain groups. Changing prestroke DOAC does not reduce the risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia in patients with atrial fibrillation who develop IS during DOAC therapy. However, future studies should continue to observe the potential trends of increased intracranial hemorrhage risk.

IV Thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion – Real-world experience from a comprehensive stroke center

ObjectivesCentral retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a stroke of the retina potentially amenable to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We aimed to determine feasibility of an emergency treatment protocol and risk profile of IVT for CRAO in a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). MethodsWe performed a retrospective, observational cohort study including patients with acute CRAO admitted to a CSC over 4 years. Patients are offered IVT if they present with acute vision loss of ≤ 20/200 in the affected eye, have no other cause of vision loss (incorporating a dilated ophthalmologic exam), and meet criteria akin to acute ischemic stroke. We collected socio-demographic data, triage data, time from onset to presentation, IVT candidacy, and rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH)- or extracranial hemorrhage. Results36 patients presented within the study period, mean (standard deviation (SD)) age of 70.7 (10), 52 % female, and median time (Q1, Q3) to ED presentation of 13.5 (4.3, 18.8) h. Patients within 4.5 h from onset presented more commonly directly to our ED (66.6 % vs 37.1 %, p = 0.1). Nine patients (25 %) presented within the 4.5 h window. Of those eligible, 7 (77 %) received IVT. There were no events of intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage. ConclusionsOur study confirmed that IVT for acute CRAO is feasible. We found a high rate of treatment with IVT of those eligible. However, because 75 % of patients presented outside the treatment window, continued educational efforts are needed to improve rapid triage to emergency departments to facilitate evaluation for possible candidacy with IVT.

Endovascular thrombectomy for posterior cerebral artery strokes in the national inpatient sample (EaT PeCANpIeS) study.

Posterior cerebral arteries with acute ischemic strokes (PCA-AISs) comprise around 2% of all acute ischemic strokes and may result in significant long-term deficits. Current guidance regarding endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for PCA-AIS is insufficient as no published randomized trials exist. An analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database compared medical management versus EVT for PCA-AIS. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for nonrandomization. The study included 19,655 patients. Before matching, the EVT cohort had significantly higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (10.21 vs. 4.67, p < 0.001), had lower rates of favorable functional outcomes, functional independence, and higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and inpatient mortality. After matching, no differences in functional outcomes were identified, but revealed a higher proportion of ICH in the EVT group (17.45% vs. 8.98%, p < 0.001). However, NIHSS subgroup analysis identified improved functional outcomes associated with the EVT group who presented with an NIHSS between 10 and 19 both in terms of rates of favorable functional outcomes (35.56% vs. 12.09%, p < 0.001) and rates of functional independence (26.67% vs. 9.34%, p < 0.01). On further investigation, the clinical benefit, in the NIHSS 10-19 subgroup, was driven by patients receiving EVT in combination with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). This analysis shows that current national practices utilize EVT for more severe PCA strokes. Clinical benefit was only detected in patients with moderate stroke severity (NIHSS 10-19) who were treated with combined EVT and IVT. Further work is needed to investigate the features of PCA-AIS that might benefit from EVT the most.

Repeat thrombectomy after large vessel re-occlusion: a propensity score matched analysis of technical and clinical outcomes

BackgroundEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains the standard of care for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. However, the safety and efficacy of repeat thrombectomy (rEVT) in recurrent LVO remains unclear. This...

Associations between NIHSS sub-item scores and prognosis and intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke.

The relationship between sub-item scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and prognosis and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) has been insufficiently studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between NIHSS sub-item scores, prognosis, and intracranial hemorrhage. This study included patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke undergoing EVT between February 2019 and April 2022. The outcomes included functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2 at 3 months after EVT, intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h after EVT, and mortality within 3 months. A multivariate regression analysis was performed, including NIHSS sub-item scores and other adjusted variables. A total of 568 patients were enrolled. Of the 568 patients, 239 (45%) achieved functional independence at 3 months after EVT. The median age in this group was 63 years (IQR 52-69) and 176 (73.6%) were male patients. Intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h after EVT occurred in 170 (30%) patients. The median age in this group was 65 years (IQR 56-71) and 105 (61.8%) were male patients. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, gender, and factors with a value of p of <0.05, the NIHSS limb movement sub-item score was strongly associated with prognosis at 3 months (OR 0.833, 95% CI 0.758-0.915) and intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h after EVT (OR 1.161, 95% CI 1.037-1.300). Higher limb movement sub-item scores on the NIHSS were independently associated with a poorer prognosis at 3 months and a higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h after EVT among patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke.

The prevalence and risk factors of intracranial non-traumatic hemorrhage in newborns

To assess the prevalence rate of intracranial hemorrhage in newborns and to detect the size of the relative risk for different characteristics of the background of intrauterine development according to the materials of the Republican Prenatal Center. The study was conducted on the basis of the Republican Prenatal Center of the Azerbaijan Republic. All newborns (996 children) (birth weight - 500 grams or more, gestational age - over 22 completed weeks) have been examined by a neuropathologist. If there were signs of any neurological abnormalities, an ultrasound examination of the brain was performed. The prevalence rate of intracranial non-traumatic hemorrhage (INTH) among newborns was 15.66% (4.8% among full-term, 48.8% among premature). Depending on mother's age the prevalence rate of INTH changed from 12.7% (mother's age 20-24 years) to 23.0% (mother's age 35 years or more). The risk of INTH statistically significantly increased with maternal age 35 years or more, with 4 or more births, with the birth of a fetus weighing up to 2500 and more than 4000 grams, with a gestational age of less than 37 weeks, with multiple pregnancies and with vaginal delivery.