The evaluation and treatment of acute anterior circulation occlusion stroke with high clot burden: Progressive stratified aspiration thrombectomy vs. stent retriever thrombectomy

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the progressive stratified aspiration thrombectomy (PSAT) in treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). Methods117 AIS-LVO patients with high clot burden who underwent emergency endovascular treatment were included. All patients were divided into two groups according to surgical technique: PSAT group, stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) group. The primary outcome was the 90-day mRS, the secondary outcomes included recanalization rate, the 24-h and 7-day NIHSS, the 7-day symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) rate and 90-days mortality. Results65 patients underwent PSAT, and 52 patients underwent SRT. The PSAT group performed better than SRT group regarding the successful recanalization rate (86.3 % vs. 71.2 %, P < 0.05) and time from puncture to recanalization (70 min [IQR, 58–87 min] vs. 87 min [IQR, 68–103 min], P < 0.05). The 7-day NIHSS score of the PSAT group was lower than that of the SRT group (12 [10–18] vs. 12 [8–25], P < 0.05). It was worth noting that at the 90-day follow-up, the favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2) rate of PSAT group was higher (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of the 24-h NIHSS score after surgery (15 [10–18] vs. 15 [10–22], P > 0.05), SICH (23.1 % vs. 26.9 %, P > 0.05) and mortality rate between the two groups (13.4 % vs. 19.2 %, P > 0.05). ConclusionsIt is safe and effective to treat high clot burden AIS-LVO patients with PSAT, which has a better reperfusion rate and prognostic outcome than SRT.