It seems well accepted now that Pb0 centers are the main defects at the Si(100)/SiO2 interface in conventional MOS transistors, even after forming annealing.Besides, the charge pumping (CP) technique in which a MOSFET is repeatedly switched between inversion and accumulation has been widely used for studying single capture/emission events in deep submicron transistors [1]. In CP, the minority carriers stored into the interface traps in inversion recombine in accumulation with majority carriers from the substrate (n-channel case), providing a CP current which can be studied.When it was accepted that in submicron MOSFETs the CP current, Icp, was given by Icp = f.q.N, f being the gate signal frequency, q, the electron charge, and N, the number of traps entering Icp, recently, Tsuchiya and co-workers [2,3] studying devices having SiO2 obtained by Rapid Thermal Oxidation, pointed out step heights equal to 2.q among a number of steps from 0 to 2.q. Pb0 centers with their donor-like and acceptor-like states in the lower and upper halves of the silicon bandgap, respectively, were thus measured for the first time in such devices.As the energy at the interface that can be probed by CP is close to that between these two states, » 0.6 eV, the authors discussed the capability of CP to account for the two components with regard to the gate pulse characteristics.In the present paper, the traps remaining electrically active at the Si(100)-SiO2 interface in large area conventional MOSFETs after the full technological process including forming gas annealing are studied. This is achieved using techniques developed in recent years that use the variation of the gate signal frequency for different gate voltage swings [4]. Trap time constant distributions are pointed out and studied as function of gate voltage and gate signal frequency. The results are discussed with regard to those reported in [2,3], to the CP models previously proposed and to CP curves simulation [5].[1] G. Groeseneken et al. , IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 43, 940 (1996).[2] T. Tsuchiya and Y. Ono, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 04DC01 (2015).[3] T. Tsuchiya and P.M. Lenahan, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 56, 031301 (2017).[4] Y. Manéglia, F. Rahmoune, and D. Bauza, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 014502 (2004).[5] D. Bauza, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 3239 2003).
Read full abstract