HomeCirculationVol. 104, No. 18Peripheral and Myocardial Microcirculation Free AccessLetterPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessLetterPDF/EPUBPeripheral and Myocardial Microcirculation Johann Auer, MD, Berent Robert, MD and Bernd Eber, MD Johann AuerJohann Auer Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, General Hospital Wels, Wels, Austria Search for more papers by this author , Berent RobertBerent Robert Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, General Hospital Wels, Wels, Austria Search for more papers by this author and Bernd EberBernd Eber Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, General Hospital Wels, Wels, Austria Search for more papers by this author Originally published30 Oct 2001https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.104.18.e100Circulation. 2001;104:e100To The Editor:We do not agree with Bøttcher and colleagues1 when they conclude that the results of their study indicate “…different mechanisms of microvascular activation or regulation…” in coronary and brachial circulation.The assessment of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasomotor responses in systemic and coronary arteries has confirmed the association between vascular risk factors and endothelial dysfunction.2,3In their study, Bøttcher and colleagues1 used two completely different stimuli to induce hyperemia in coronary and brachial circulation. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was measured by the response to the vasoactive substance dipyridamole using positron emission tomography, and brachial artery vasoreactivity was assessed ultrasonographically by postocclusion hyperemia. The effects of these two stimuli on microvascular function are completely different.In the myocardium, the hyperemic response is mediated by the accumulation of adenosine and the stimulation of adenosine A2 receptors.4 Ischemia-induced accumulation of vasodilating metabolites is assumed to be responsible for the postocclusion hyperemia of the brachial artery.5No evidence is provided to conclude that the results of the study indicate different mechanisms controlling microvascular activation or regulation in peripheral and coronary circulation. In contrast, it would be appropriate to state that there is no correlation of vasomotor responses in the two vascular beds if assessed by these two methods. References 1 Bøttcher M, Madsen MM, Refsgaard J, et al. Peripheral flow response to transient arterial forearm occlusion does not reflect myocardial perfusion reserve. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1109–1114.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Pitkanen OP, Raitakari OT, Ronnemaa T, et al. Influence of cardiovascular risk status on coronary flow reserve in healthy young men. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79: 1690–1692.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Pedrinelli R, Dell’Omo G, Gimelli A, et al. Myocardial and forearm blood flow reserve in mild-moderate essential hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 1997; 15: 667–673.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Rump LC, Jabbari-T J, von Kugelgen I, et al. Adenosine mediates nitric-oxide-independent renal vasodilation by activation of A2A receptors. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 1987–1993.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Leeson P, Thorne S, Donald A, et al. Non-invasive measurement of endothelial function: effect on brachial artery dilatation of graded endothelial dependent and independent stimuli. Heart. 1997; 78: 22–27.CrossrefMedlineGoogle ScholarcirculationahaCirculationCirculationCirculation0009-73221524-4539Lippincott Williams & WilkinsResponseBottcher Morten, , MD, PhD, Nielsen Torsten Toftegård, , MD, Madsen Mette M., , MD, Dørup Inge, , MD, Sørensen Keld, , MD, Refsgaard Jens, , MD, PhD, and Buus Niels Henrik, , MD, PhD30102001We thank Drs Auer, Robert, and Eber for their interest in our article. They raise important issues regarding the interpretation of our findings and particularly regarding our statement about different mechanisms controlling vasodilatation in the peripheral vessels and in the coronary circulation.We fully agree that our conclusions regarding the lack of correlation between the regulation of the coronary and peripheral circulation confine themselves to the two methods used. This was specifically the purpose of the study and is stated several times throughout the article. It is also stressed in the article that different mechanisms are in play during the two different stimulations, and the mechanisms are as correctly reiterated in the letter. We also agree with their comments regarding endothelial function, which seems to be related in the brachial and coronary circulation. This, however, was not the objective of our study.We certainly found that both the ultrasound-based evaluation of brachial artery flow and positron-emission tomography-based perfusion measurements in the myocardium are valuable tools in the investigation of cardiovascular disease. However, the ability to extrapolate between the two techniques needs to be kept in mind. Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Huang H, Chu C, Tsai C, Wu C, Lai L, Yeh H and Bueno V (2014) Perfusion Index Derived from a Pulse Oximeter Can Detect Changes in Peripheral Microcirculation during Uretero-Renal-Scopy Stone Manipulation (URS-SM), PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0115743, 9:12, (e115743) October 30, 2001Vol 104, Issue 18 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.104.18.e100PMID: 11684647 Originally publishedOctober 30, 2001 PDF download Advertisement
Read full abstract