Over the past 25 years, following the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 〈 http://www.itrs.net/Links/2006Update/FinalToPost/08_Lithography2006Update.pdf〉, 2006 [1], the main feature size of integrated circuits has decreased from approximately 3 μm to 70 nm. With feature sizes well below the exposure wavelength of the stepper, resolution enhancement features such as serifs, scatter-bars, and hammer heads are added to the mask design. Given a 4:1 reduction from mask to wafer, the resolution enhancement features, such as scatter bars, are roughly the same size as main features on the wafer. Recently, with the reduction of mask feature size, mask-manufacturing technology faces several problems in satisfying customer needs for resolution, CD uniformity, and CD linearity. The problems result, in part, as the legacy of material and process choices made in the early days of mask making. For example, the use of chrome as an absorber was suitable material choice for wet etch binary mask processes, but this material is now seen as problematic current dry etch process. Another general source of problems for the mask industry is its small size relative to wafer manufacturing. As a result, vendors focus material and equipment development efforts on wafer, and then make adaptations to fit mask-making requirements. Nowadays the patterns of high-end lithographic masks are written by variable shaped beam 50 kV e-beam writers with minimum beam size of as little as few nm. However, the latent pattern after writing differs significantly from the final pattern on the mask due to interactions during post exposure bake, resist development, and etch processes so the final pattern is a convolution of these effects. The parameters of interest are resolution, critical dimension uniformity (CDU), pattern fidelity, CD linearity, iso-dense as well as clear-dark bias, transmission of the transparent substrate and absorber, and birefringence. Besides these requirements, there are implicit, not specified, expectations that the mask has to fulfill. To this group of parameters belongs, for example, reflectivity of the surface, chemical and environmental stability of the mask, and mechanical properties. This paper will present some issues which must be solved in order to satisfy future needs for lithographic masks. The focus of the presentation is to examine shortcomings of materials used in today's technology and provides a description of the properties needed for future materials.
Read full abstract