No: 1626 Presentation at ESCV 2015: Oral 16 Routine sequencing of enteroviruses in clinical materials identifies the presence of new Group-C enterovirus types in the Netherlands C.C. Van Leer-Buter1,∗, R. Poelman1, R. Borger1, J. Weel2, C.H. Benne3, H.G.M. Niesters1 1 Division of Clinical Virology, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands 2 Izore, Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands 3 CERTE Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, Groningen, The Netherlands Background: Enteroviruses (EV) that infect humans belong to four EV groups (A–D) while the rhinoviruses can be divided into three genogroups (A–C). While rhinoviruses are seen primarily as respiratory pathogens, EV can cause a wide variety of diseases in affecting different organ systems, The fact that respiratory infections may be caused by EV infections has been clear since the identification of EV-D68 in 1962. During the summer and fall of 2014, the largest EV-D68 outbreak took place in the USA and it was shown that the strains of the EV-D68 outbreak in North America also circulated in Europe. EV types are defined by sequence divergence in the VP-1 capsid coding region. Ongoing mutations and recombination of the viruses is causing the appearance of new EV types. The newest additions to the expanding cloud of EV typeswere identified either as new variants found in the poliovirus surveillance programs or in respiratory secretions that were sampled as part of studies investigating respiratory viruses. Methods: During a four-year period, all samples from patients with clinical presentations compatible with EV infections were screened using a laboratory-developed test All EV isolates were subsequently genotyped by sequencing the VP1 region. To complete the data with samples from secondary hospital care and general practice, EV isolates from two regional laboratories were included in the routine genotyping program. Results: Enteroviruses were detected in 657 clinical samples, and genotypes could be obtained from 607. EV was detected in 88 CSF samples, 7 vesicular fluids, 13 plasma and serum samples, 85 respiratory samples, and in 338 fecal samples. 76were unidentified materials from general practice. Genotypes from all four EV groups were found with EV-D68 being the only representative of group D. Group C enteroviruses were found either in respiratory samples and/or fecal samples. In respiratory materials, we found the following group C enteroviruses: CV-A21 (n=4), EV-C104 (n=1), EV-C105 (n=1), EV-C109 (n=5), and EV-C117 (n=1). Phylogenetic analysis shows that the four CV-A21 isolates are similar to the isolates found in North America in 2006. The EV-C109 isolates show 8–10% divergence from the other stains identified to date. Conclusion: Enteroviruses are increasingly identified as causes or respiratory disease. Routine screening followed by sequencing provides essential information about which enteroviruses are circulating and how new genotypes evolve. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2015.07.026 Abstract No: 1519 Presentation at ESCV 2015: Oral 17 Respiratory viruses in children attending Kindergarten N. Moe1,∗, L.H. Skanke1, S.A. Nordbo2, S. Krokstad2, A. Smyrnaios1, H. Dollner1 1 Department of Pediatrics, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway 2 Department of Medical Microbiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway Background: Many studies have investigated the prevalence of respiratory viruses in hospitalized children, but little is known about this prevalence outside hospitals. Methods: We examined 1–6 years old children attending 2 kindergartens four times from 2012 to 2014 and included a total of 379 cases. Near 80% of all children participated in the study. The children were clinically examined by a pediatrician for signs of respiratory tract infection (RTI). A nasopharyngeal swap was used to collect a nasopharyngeal secrete (NPS) at each examination and was analyzed by in-house real-time PCRs for a panel of 16 respiratory viruses. Results: NPS was positive for at least one virus in 42.5% of the cases, of which 30.6% had one virus and 11.9% had two or more viruses. Rhinovirus was detected in 24.2% of the samples, enterovirus in 11.7% and parechovirus in 8.7%. Adenovirus, human bocavirus, coronavirus-OC43/NL63/229E, influenza A and B virus, human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus type 1–4 and RSV were each detected in 0.3–2.6% of the samples. In two-thirds of the examinations, the children had clinically signs of a RTI. Children with clear signs of a RTI had frequently 1 or more viruses (70%), compared to childrenwith amilder RTI (40%) and childrenwithout signs of RTI (28%) (p<0.001). Conclusions:This is thefirstNorwegian study screeningkindergarten children with an extensive panel of respiratory viruses along with clinical examination. Surprisingly two-thirds of children attending Norwegian kindergartens had mild or clear signs of an upper respiratory tract infection. Our results furthermore showed a high prevalence of picornaviruses (rhino-, enteroand parechovirus) in childrenwith RTI, but even childrenwithout signs of RTI had often a positive PCR-test for picornaviruses. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2015.07.027
Read full abstract