Pivot-shift Test Research Articles

Clinical outcomes of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using six-strand hamstring autograft

Objectives: Quadrupled and five-strand hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but there is significant variability in graft diameter. The six-strand HT autograft has been introduced to increase graft diameter in patients with undersized HT grafts and may achieve better clinical outcomes. None of the studies has reported clinical outcomes following this technique in Indian patients. We investigated clinical outcomes in patients who underwent primary ACLR using a six-strand HT autograft technique with a minimum six-month follow-up. Materials and Methods: Fifty-five patients who underwent primary ACLR using six-strand HT autografts with interference screw fixation were included in the study. These patients were followed up at three and six months for the evaluation of clinical outcomes. Subjective evaluations included the TegnerLysholm score, anterior cruciate ligament-quality-of-life (ACL-QOL) score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. Laxity assessments of the knees were performed using the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test. Functional evaluation of the patients was performed with an overall IKDC objective score. Results: The mean IKDC subjective score was significantly improved at three-month (63.42 ± 5.38) and six-month (82.82 ± 7.49) follow-up after surgery (P < 0.05) when compared with pre-operative scores (50.55 ± 1.84). A similar finding was also noted with the Tegner-Lysholm score and ACL-QOL score in our study. All patients have achieved normal to near-normal functional outcomes at six months in our study without any major complications. The most commonly found complication was paresthesia (21.80%) in the present study. Conclusion: In the primary ACLR, six-strand hamstring autograft achieves similar clinical outcomes and complications as reported with four-strand or five-strand HT autografts. However, the percentages of patients who achieved normal to near-normal outcomes were higher in the present study (100%) as compared to earlier reported data using four-strand or five-strand HT autografts (~85%). The six-strand graft technique is a useful means of increasing graft diameter when faced with an undersized hamstring graft.

Diagnostic accuracy of lever sign test in acute and chronic ACL injuries

IntroductionThe anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a commonly affected knee ligament prone to frequent injuries. Henceforth, we aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of lever sign test in Acute and chronic ACL injuries. MethodAt the institution's initial outpatient visit, 150 consecutive patients (92 males and 58 females) were evaluated. Total 108 patients had injury in their right leg, whereas 42 had injury in their left leg. Based on time since injury, the patients were divided into Acute and chronic groups. Clinical examinations (lachman's test and lelli's test) of all patients were confirmed with arthroscopic findings and compared between the two groups. ResultsIn the acute ACL injury, the lever test had a kappa value 0.704. The accuracy and sensitivity of the Lachman, anterior drawer, pivot shift, and lever tests were calculated. We found that the lever test had the highest accuracy and sensitivity (85.48 %, 91.18 %) than the rest. In the chronic ACL injury, the kappa value for the results of the Lachman test evaluation was 0.723. The chronic ACL injuries accuracy and sensitivity values for the Lachman (86.36 %, 91.67 %), anterior drawer (76.14 %, 81.25 %), pivot shift (55.68 %, 58.49 %), and lever tests were determined. ConclusionThe lever sign test is more accurate and reliable in the acute ACL injuries, while the Lachman test is more accurate and reliable in the chronic ACL injuries.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Combined with Complete Radial Tear of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus: Suture or Resection?

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture often presents with a tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. There is no clear preference between ACL reconstruction with suture and resection of the meniscus. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of ACL reconstruction with suture versus resection in patients presenting with arthroscopic ACL rupture and radial complete tear of the posterior corner of the lateral meniscus. We retrospectively analyzed 157 patients with ACL rupture and complete radial tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Between May 2010 and April 2015, 86 of 157 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus suture (study group, 54.78%) and 71 of 157 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus resection (control group, 45.22%) in our department. All patients were monitored over the 12 to 72-month follow-up period. The primary evaluation indices were the Lysholm scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, pivot shift test, the Barret criteria, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of meniscal healing. The majority of 157 patients were relatively young men (29.64 ± 7.79 years) with low body mass index (BMI) (23.79 ± 2.74). The postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores of the two groups were significantly improved over the corresponding preoperative scores (p < 0.05). The clinical results and excellent and good rates were significantly better for the study group than for the control group (both, p < 0.05). MRI showed that the meniscal healed rate of the study group was 96.51%. There was no significant difference in BMI between subgroups for any functional outcome. For patients with ACL rupture and complete radial tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, ACL reconstruction and both simultaneous suture and resection of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus were found to be safe and effective. There was no association between outcomes and BMI. However, the former was associated with a superior long-term clinical effect and may restore the integrity of the meniscus and is particularly recommended for young patients.

New Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Used in a Complex Revision ACL Reconstruction

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs) are performed to restore knee biomechanics, increase knee stability, and slow the progression of osteoarthritis. After ACLRs, many patients still have residual anterolateral instability which is a risk factor for ACL graft failure. An anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) attempts to restore the native function of the anterolateral complex to augment the ACL. Performing an ALLR with an ACLR has been reported to reduce symptoms of instability and improve clinical outcomes. Indications: While no definitive indication for an ALLR has been set, current considerations include high posterior tibial slope &gt;12°, revision ACLR, high-grade pivot shift, skeletally immature patients, hyperlaxity, and patients in high-level sports. Technique Description: The preoperative assessment includes a thorough physical examination with special attention paid to rotational laxity assessed via the pivot-shift examination. Imaging should include standard radiographic series (anteroposterior, posteroanterior flexion, lateral, and sunrise views), long-leg mechanical axis views to assess coronal plane alignment and standing lateral ACL stress radiographs to assess sagittal alignment and objective instability. The iliotibial band ALLR graft is harvested first. An 8-cm long by 1-cm wide strip of the inferior iliotibial band is harvested in a standard fashion, leaving the distal aspect attached to Gerdy’s tubercle. An anchor is placed centered upon the native ALL distal tibial insertion. The native ALL femoral origin is identified at 4.7 mm posterior and proximal to the fibular collateral ligament, and a second suture anchor is placed at this point. Final fixation is performed after the final fixation of the ACLR graft. Results: A study by Pioger et al reported that patients with ACLR and ALLR had significantly less reoperation rate than patients with isolated ACLR, 8.9% versus 20.5% respectively. Lee et al found that a revision ACLR in combination with an ALLR was effective in reducing rotational laxity, which was assessed by the pivot-shift test. Discussion: We describe a technique for a new anatomic ALLR using the iliotibial band that attempts to restore the native ALL anatomy. This surgical technique effectively restores rotational laxity and improves knee stability. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Evaluation of anterolateral ligament healing in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its relationship with clinical examination tests.

This study radiologically investigated the potential of preoperative recovery of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in patients who did not undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery in the early stages despite surgical indication. The secondary aim was to investigate the relationship between ALL injuries in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the results of Lachman and pivot shift tests performed preoperatively and postoperatively under anaesthesia amongpatients who underwent ACLR in acute and chronic stages. The study examined 100 patients aged 19-51 years who underwent anatomic single bundle ACLR using hamstring autografts for the ACL. Based on the time between the injury and ACLR, they were divided into acute (≤6 months) and chronic (>6 months) groups. The chronic group had three subgroups of ACLR times: 7-12, 13-24and >24 months. Complete recovery was defined as a change from grade B or C upon injury to grade A before surgery according to the Muramatsu MRI classification. The relationship between preoperative and postoperative Lachman grades and pivot shifting test results and the degree of ALL injury was evaluated. In the chronic group, 19/61 patients (31.1%) had preoperative grade A, and 4/61 patients (6.5%) had grade A at the time of injury. In the acute group, 22/29 patients with grades B and C (76%) had grade 3 preoperative pivot shifting. In the acute group, grades 1 and 2 were more common in patients with grades B and C (10/29, 35%) than grade A (0/10, 0.0%). The improvement rate was 24.6% amongpatients who did not receive ACLR in the acute phase and underwent ACLR in the chronic phase. In the acute group, the degree of ALL damage was related to the pivot shift results. However, the results in the chronic phase were not associated with the degree of injury. Level IV.

RETROSPECTIVE PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF ACL TEAR WITH QUADRUPLED HAMSTRING GRAFT VERSUS QUADRUPLED HAMSTRING GRAFT INTERNALLY BRACED WITH FIBERTAPE

Background: Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament is a widely done surgery. The surgical outcome is dependent upon the strength of the graft used. Quadrupled hamstring graft is a commonly used graft as it provides good strength and functional outcomes. However graft re-rupture and laxity of the graftare amongst the known complications which lead to repeat surgeries and unsatisfactory outcomes. Various techniques have been described to strenghthen the graft. This study compares the cumulative effect of internally bracing quadrupled hamstring graft using fibertape with quadrupled hamstring graft alone in terms of functional outcome and laxity. Materials and Method:The study was done at the Department of Orthopaedics at King Georges Medical University in Lucknow on 60 patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears from October 2021 to October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 had quadrupled hamstring graft reconstruction done alone, and Group 2 had quadrupled hamstring graft reconstruction done with fibertapebracedinternally.Lysholm knee score was used as a measure of functional outcome along with standardized Pivot shift test, Lachman testand anterior drawer test to measure and compare the pre- and postoperative variation in laxity. Results:On comparing the improvement in grades at subsequent follow-up, group 2 showed significant improvement in functional outcomes in terms of Lysholm knee score . Conclusion:We concluded that reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament using quadrupled hamstring graft internally braced with fiber tape gives a better functional outcome in form of Lysholm knee score although there was no significant improvement in grades of Anterior Drawer and Lachman test. Although follow up period of six months was a limiting factor . Further clinical evaluation over a longer period of follow up to evaluate the effect of fibertape on shielding and creeping of graft is essential and also to study the resultant collagen fibretapes clinical behavior.

Dynamic radiostereometry can objectively quantify the kinematic laxity patterns and rotation instability of the knee during a pivot-shift test.

The pivot-shift test is used to clinically assess knee instability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesions; however, it has low interobserver reliability. Dynamic radiostereometry (dRSA) is a highly precise and noninvasive method for the objective evaluation of joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to quantify precise knee kinematics during a pivot-shift test using dRSA imaging. Eight human donor legs, including hemipelvises, were evaluated. Arthroscopic intervention was performed inducing ligament lesions in the ACL, and anterolateral ligament (ALL) section was performed as a capsular incision. The pivot-shift test was recorded with dRSA on knees with intact ligaments, ACL-deficient and ACL + ALL-deficient knees. A pivot-shift pattern was identifiable after ligament lesion, as a change in tibial posterior drawer velocity from 7.8 mm/s (95% CI: 3.7; 11.9) in ligament intact knees to 30.4 mm/s (95% CI 23.0; 38.8) after ACL lesionto 35.1 mm/s (95% CI 23.4; 46.7) after combined ACL-ALL lesion. The anterior-posterior drawer excursion increased from 2.8 mm (95% CI 2.1; 3.4) in ligament intact kneesto 7.2 mm (95% CI 5.5; 8.9) after ACL lesionto 7.6 mm (95% CI 5.5; 9.8) after combined lesion. A statistically significant increase in tibial external rotation towards the end of the pivot-shift motion was observed when progressing from intact to ACL + ALL-deficient knees (p < 0.023). This experimental study demonstrates the feasibility of dRSA to objectively quantify the kinematic laxity patterns of the knee during the pivot-shift test. The dynamic parameters obtained through dRSA revealed the kinematic changes from ACL to combined ACL-ALL ligament lesion. Not applicable.

Effect of anterior cruciate ligament injury on acceleration response of knee joint.

This study investigated the effect of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury on relative acceleration of the tibia and femur during a number of tests/activities, in order to assess the feasibility of acceleration-based diagnosis of ACL injury using inertial sensors. First, a detailed finite element model of the knee joint was developed to simulate the target tests/activities, and identify those in which a large difference between the maximum acceleration peaks (MAPs) of the healthy and ACL injured knees is likely to be observed. The promising tests/activities were entered in an experimental study, where the relative accelerations of the tibiae and femurs of 20 individuals with unilateral ACL injury, allocated randomly to two groups of conscious and unconscious test conditions, were recorded. Model predictions indicated MAP ratios>1.5 for the ACL-injured to healthy knees, during the anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift tests, as well as the lunge activity. The experimental MAP results indicated acceptable test-retest reliabilities for all tests (coefficient of variation<0.25), and significant MAP differences (p < 0.05) in the anterior drawer and pivot-shift tests, in both coconscious and unconscious conditions. The individualized MAP results indicated side-to-side differences>2 m/s2 for all subjects during unconscious pivot shift tests, and >0.5 m/s2 for eight cases out of ten during conscious anterior drawer tests. It was concluded that the pivot shift test had a great repeatability and discriminative ability for acceleration-based diagnosis of ACL injury in unconscious condition. For the conscious condition, however, the anterior drawer test was appeared to be most promising.

Comparison of Cross-Pin Versus Cortical Button Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings Autograft: A Long-Term Clinical Study and Review of the Literature.

Background Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common operative procedure and many options regarding the type of the selected graft and fixation technique have been described to date. Although many studies have addressed the issue of the optimal femoral fixation device during ACLR with a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft, no clear evidence to indicate one technique over another has been found. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term postoperative outcomes and complication rates between transfemoral Cross-pin (CP) and Endobutton-Cortical Button (CB) fixation techniques in patients undergoing ACLR with an HT autograft. Methods One hundred and seven consecutive patients underwent ACLR by using a quadruple HT autograft that was stabilized with either a CP (CP Group: 52 patients) or a CB (CB Group: 55 patients) fixation technique. The Lachman test (LT), the Pivot-shift test (PST), the side-to-side difference in anterior translation of the tibia, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Lysholm knee scoring systems were evaluated before surgery and during long-term follow up. Thefemoral and tibial tunnel diameter was measured in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographsafter surgery and at the final follow-up. Areview of the literature was also carried out to identify any differences between both techniques. Results Study groups were comparable in terms of patient demographics. The mean follow-up was 10.4 ± 1.3 and 10.6 ± 1.3 years in the CP and CB Groups, respectively (p = 0.47). In the CP Group, improvements after surgery in LT and PST from grade 2 (n=34) or 3 (n=18) to grade 0 (n = 41) or 1 (n = 11) and from grade 2 (n=36) or 3 (n = 16) to grade 0 (n = 44) or 1 (n = 8), respectively, were observed. In the CB Group, similar improvements in LT and PST scores from grade 2 (n = 40) or 3 (n = 15) to grade 0 (n = 46) or 1 (n = 9) and from grade 2 (n = 41) or 3 (n = 14) to grade 0 (n = 47) or 1 (n = 8), respectively, were observed. However, no differences between the groups (p = 0.53 for LT and p = 0.90 for PST) were noted. The mean Lysholm scores were 89.7 ± 6.8 and 90.2 ± 7.2 in the CP and CB groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Side-to-side difference improved from 9.1 ± 2.8 to 1.7 ± 1.5 mm and from 8.6 ± 2.5 to 1.6 ± 1.4 mm in the CP and CB groups, respectively (p = 0.89 between groups). According to IKDC grades, 92.1% and 91.4% of knees in the CP and CB groups, respectively were reported to be Grade A (Normal) or B (Nearly Normal) with a p = 0.7. Femoral and tibial tunnel widening was found in the last follow-up in both groups. However, there was no difference in the degree of tunnel widening among the two techniques.With respect to LT, PST, anterior drawer test, and IKDC score, none of the 15 published comparative studies demonstrated any significant differences between the two techniques and only one study detected a difference regarding the Lysholm score in favor of CP fixation. Conclusion In the long term, both CB and CP femoral stabilization techniques were shown to be associated with similar functional outcomes and low complication rates. Further large multicenter random clinical trials are still required to identify the most effective method of femoral fixation for HT autograft during ACLR surgery.

Young men undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial drilling outperform at 5- to 10-year follow-up in terms of graft stability and activity levels compared to those undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial drilling

ObjectiveTo compare 5- to 10-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young men performed with bone-patellar tendon bone (BPTB) autograft and anteromedial portal to reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial technique. It was hypothesised that in young adult men, at 5- to 10-year follow-up, superior restoration of knee laxity and activity levels would be demonstrated using BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal technique. MethodsNinety-four men who had ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal were eligible for comparison to 106 men who had reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial technique. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18–35 years, (2) ACL tear caused by sports trauma only, (3) no concomitant ligament reconstruction and (4) 5- to 10-year follow-up. Outcome measures compared between the two groups included Lachman and pivot shift tests, KT side-to-side difference, Tegner and Marx scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)-subjective score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS), Short Form (SF)-36, and single hop test for distance. P value ​< ​0.05 indicated statistical significance. ResultsForty-five patients with BPTB and 55 patients with hamstring ACL reconstruction were available for in-person assessment at 5–10 years after surgery. Outcomes in the BPTB group compared to the hamstring group showed KT difference 1.4 ​± ​1.9 mm vs. 2.8 ​± ​2.3 mm (p ​< ​0.01), pivot shift grade 2–3 in 4% vs. 34% (p ​< ​0.01), return to preinjury Tegner level in 51% vs. 36% (p ​= 0.1) and to preinjury Marx score in 29% vs. 11% (p ​= 0.02), and IKDC-subjective 88 ​± ​10 vs. 82 ​± ​13 vs (p ​< ​0.01), respectively. Statistically significant inter-relationships were found between KT side-to-side difference and the Tegner, Marx and IKDC-subjective scores at follow-up (r ​= ​−0.314, p ​< ​0.01; r ​= ​−0.263, p ​< ​0.01; r ​= ​−0.218, p ​= ​0.03, respectively). ConclusionYoung men undergoing ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial drilling outperform at 5- to 10-year follow-up in terms of graft stability and activity levels compared to young men undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial drilling. Level of EvidenceIII (Retrospective cross-sectional comparative study).

Functional knee and ankle outcomes of a peroneus longus tendon autograft for primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Background Peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft is commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction because it is easily harvested and has the same size and strength as the ACL. There are few studies in the literature that discussed donor site complications after ACL reconstruction by PLT. PLT was used as an autograft for reconstructions of the medial patellofemoral ligament and deltoid ligament. We evaluated clinical and functional outcomes for knee, foot, and ankle joints after the use of PLT as an autograft in primary isolated ACL reconstruction. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were operated for primary ACL reconstruction by PLT autograft from May 2020 to May 2021. Preoperatively and postoperatively, all patients were examined clinically for knee stability by anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests, applying the International Knee Documentation Committee as well as the Lysholm score. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, and ankle range of motion were used for the evaluation of postoperative foot and ankle functions. Return time to the sport was also evaluated. Results Sixty-five patients with ACL-injured knees were included. Their mean age was 29.81 ± 8.33 years and ranged from 20 to 45 years, and males were 54 (83%) and females were 11 (17%). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 32.5 ± 3.1 months. Mean of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score was 99.33 and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure was 99.7 after 12 months. Postoperative Lysholm score mean±SD was 95.30 ± 4.65, and the International Knee Documentation Committee mean±SD was 93.47 ± 9.82 with P value less than 0.001. Return to sport ranged from 4 to 8 months with mean±SD of 5.67 ± 0.75. Conclusion PLT autograft for primary reconstruction of isolated ACL injury did not affect foot and ankle functions with good knee stability and restoration of knee functions postoperatively, which facilitated the return to preoperative sports activity level.

The Influence of Tunnel Parameters and Graft Inclination Angle on Clinical and Radiological Outcome at Long-term Follow-up after Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Objective To study the influence of various tunnel parameters and graft inclination angle (GIA) on the clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at long-term follow-up. Methods In this retrospective study, 80 patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treated by single bundle ACLR using bone patellar tendon bone (BPTB) and hamstring (HT) autografts were evaluated clinically and radiologically at their long-term follow-up. The study population were divided into two groups based on ideal and nonideal tunnel parameters as well as ideal and nonideal GIA. The various tunnel parameters and GIA were interpreted with clinical and radiological outcome at long-term follow-up. Results Eighty patients, 36 (45%) using BPTB and 44 (55%) using HT autografts, were available to complete the study. Patients with ideal coronal tibial tunnel angle (CTTA) and coronal femoral tunnel angle (CFTA) show superior clinical outcome (pivot shift test) than nonideal CTTA and CFTA, which was found to be statistically significant ( p -value < 0.038 and 0.024, respectively). Similarly, patients with ideal coronal tibial tunnel position (CTTP) show superior clinical outcome (International Knee Documentation Committee - IKDC objective) over nonideal CTTP ( p -value < 0.017). All other tunnel parameters and GIA were not found to have influence on clinical outcome. None of the tunnel parameters have influenced osteoarthritis (OA) change. There was no progression of OA change in the study population at long-term follow-up after ACLR. Conclusion Ideal coronal tunnel parameters produced a better clinical outcome at long-term follow-up after ACLR. There was no progression of OA change at long-term follow-up after isolated ACLR.

Injuries to both anterolateral ligament and Kaplan fiber of the iliotibial band do not increase preoperative pivot-shift phenomenon in ACL injury

BackgroundTo assess the incidence of anterolateral ligament (ALL) and Kaplan fiber of the iliotibial band (KF) injuries in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to investigate the association between these injuries and the magnitude of preoperative pivot-shift test. MethodOne-hundred and five patients with primary ACL injury were retrospectively reviewed. ALL injury and KF injury were assessed by preoperative MRI, and subjects were allocated into four groups: Group A, neither injury; Group B, only ALL injury; Group C, only KF injury; Group D, simultaneous ALL and KF injuries. Before ACL reconstruction, tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test was measured by an electromagnetic measurement system, and manual grading was recorded according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) guideline. ResultsIn MRI, the ALL was identified in 104 patients (99.1%) and KF in 99 patients (94.3%). ALL and KF injuries were observed in 43 patients (43.9%) and 23 patients (23.5%), respectively. Patient distribution to each group was as follows; Group A: 43 patients (43.9%), Group B: 32 patients (32.7%), Group C: 12 patients (12.2%), Group D: 11 patients (11.2%). No significant differences were observed in tibial acceleration, and manual grading among the four groups. ConclusionSimultaneous injury to both ALL and KF was uncommon, and preoperative pivot-shift phenomenon did not increase even in those patients. The finding suggests that the role of ALL and KF in controlling anterolateral rotatory knee laxity may be less evident in the clinical setting compared to a biomechanical test setting.

Association Between MRI Signal Intensity of the Repaired Lateral Meniscus and Residual Anterolateral Knee Laxity After ACL Reconstruction.

Anterolateral knee laxity (ALLx) has been linked to tears of the lateral meniscus (LM) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. To investigate the longitudinal relationship between the signal intensity (SI) of the repaired LM on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and residual ALLx after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Included were 87 patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR and lateral meniscal repair (mean age, 23.5 years; body mass index, 23.7 kg/m2; 56 women) at a single institution between 2010 and 2019. Proton density-weighted (PDW) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and the SI ratio (SIR) was calculated as (SI of the repaired LM)/(SI of the posterior cruciate ligament). At the 12-month follow-up, ALLx was evaluated using the pivot-shift test; an International Knee Documentation Committee grade ≥1 indicated residual ALLx. Overall, 12 patients (13.8%) exhibited ALLx at 12 months postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, the SIR on PDW images (SIR-PDW) was significantly higher in patients with ALLx versus those without ALLx (1.98 ± 0.77 vs 1.49 ± 0.52, respectively; P = .007); there was no difference in the SIR on T2W images between the groups. SIR-PDW at 3 months postoperatively was correlated negatively with patient age (r = -0.308, P = .004). When patients were stratified into a younger (≤22 years; n = 53; ALLx = 7 [13.2%]) and an older (>22 years; n = 34; ALLx = 5 [14.7%]) group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for SIR-PDW in the younger group were statistically significant for predicting the prevalence of ALLx at all follow-up times (AUCs, 0.733-0.788) with optimal cutoff values of 2.00 at 3 months, 1.50 at 6 months, and 1.50 at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis revealed that if younger patients consistently had higher SIR-PDW values than the cutoff values, they were more likely to have residual ALLx (odds ratios, 10.24-23.57). For younger patients who underwent both ACLR and lateral meniscal repair, higher MRI SI of the repaired LM was associated with a higher prevalence of residual ALLx.

Comparison of Graft Type and Fixation Method in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Control Studies.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured ligament in the knee. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) proves the standard for treating this injury. However, graft choice and method of fixation remain a heavily debated topic. This study investigates the following: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) vs. hamstring tendon (HT) autograft, single-bundle vs. double-bundle hamstring graft, and metal vs. bioabsorbable screws in ACLR. A systematic review was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were collected on patient demographics, complications, and functionality scores including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted with Review Manager. Outcome measurements were determined using forest plots with significant differences considered p < 0.05. Twenty-five studies were included, accounting for 2,170 patients. No statistically significant difference was appreciated when comparing BPTB to hamstring autografts. Patients who received a double bundle HT autograft exhibited significantly superior outcomes in terms of revision (p = 0.05), failure (p = 0.002), normal pivot shift tests (p = 0.04), and normal IKDC (p = 0.008). When comparing screw types, bioabsorbable screws had a greater Lysholm score (p = 0.01) and lower failure rates for copolymer screws (p = 0.03). Overall, the data collected suggested that BPTB and HT autografts display similar postoperative results. However, if an HT autograft is used, the data suggest a double-bundle graft improves both functionality and decreases the possible complications. Finally, bioabsorbable screws prove superior to metal screws when looking at both functionality and failure rates. Further research into the superior graft type is still needed. Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Peracetic acid sterilized tendon and ligament allografts for knee reconstruction : For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and complex knee surgery.

The use of allografts and autografts has been met with mixed views on whether allografts are asuitable alternative to autografts. We aimed to investigate if chemically sterilized allografts show similar rerupture rates to those reported in the literature for allografts and autografts in anterior (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligaments (PCL) and complex knee surgery. Retrospective data on knee reconstructions performed between 2011 and 2015 with tendon/ligamnet allografts sterilized with peracetic acid were collected in the form of aquestionnaire. The inclusion criteria of 2years for each patient were met by 38patients, representing 22ACL reconstructions, 5PCL reconstructions, 3OTHER surgeries, including the Larson technique and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and 8COMPLEX surgeries. The main endpoints were rerupture and complication rate. Secondary endpoints included stability of the knee (Lachman test, Pivot shift test) and the range of motion. The rerupture rate was 7.9% (3grafts). Reruptures only occurred in the ACL group. No reruptures were observed in the PCL, OTHER and COMPLEX surgery groups. Stability improved significantly after surgery and the range of motion returned to values similar to that of healthy knees. Tendon allografts sterilized with peracetic acid show promising low rerupture rates and good clinical scores and the results are comparable to the literature on autografts and other allografts.

The PIVOT App: A User Guide

Background: While the pivot shift examination is often regarded as the gold standard test for diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, one of the pitfalls of the pivot shift test is that it lacks standardization among physicians. The PIVOT App is a validated application to quantify the amount of tibial translation during the pivot shift maneuver and improve standardization of clinical measurement. Indications: The PIVOT App can be used in both clinic and operating room settings for patients who sustained injury to the ACL. The PIVOT App may assist in identifying the amount of rotatory knee laxity in patients with ACL deficiency or following ACL reconstruction. Technique Description: The PIVOT App works by quantifying the amount of translation in the lateral tibia relative to a marker on the lateral femoral epicondyle. To use the PIVOT App, 3 yellow circle stickers are placed on the bony prominences of the lateral knee: the lateral epicondyle, Gerdy’s tubercle, and the “pivot point” 3 cm posterior to Gerdy’s tubercle parallel to the joint line. Once placed, the pivot shift flexion maneuver can be recorded in the PIVOT App and analyzed to identify both the distance of spontaneous tibial reduction during the pivot shift maneuver and the time of reduction in seconds. The most common problems encountered while using the application include (1) improper marker placement, (2) interference of marker tracking with yellow color in the background, (3) interference of marker tracking with overhead lighting, and (4) extraneous data collection before and after pivot shift flexion. Results: Previous studies have validated the PIVOT App to accurately distinguish normal, low-grade, and high-grade pivot shifts with resultant increasing tibial translation in the lateral compartment of the knee. The PIVOT App has been used at institutions worldwide to quantify and standardize measurement of the pivot shift. Conclusion: The PIVOT App is a validated application to quantify the amount of lateral tibial translation and reduction during the pivot shift maneuver. Proper use and avoidance of complications while using the application can aid clinicians in accurate diagnosis of rotatory knee laxity in patients following ACL injury. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Suture Versus Headless Screw Fixation for Tibial Eminence Fractures in Children

Background: Suture and screw fixations are widely used to treat tibial eminence fractures (TEFs). Although a few biomechanical and clinical studies have compared suture fixation (SF) and screw fixation in the treatment of TEFs in children, no comparative clinical studies are available regarding headless screw fixation (HSF). Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of children with TEF who underwent SF and HSF. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included 24 patients treated with either SF (11 patients) or HSF (13 patients) within 1 month of TEF (type 2 or 3) without associated ligamentous and bone injury between 2015 and 2020. All patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up in terms of Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, and isometric strength test. Knee stability was compared based on the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference. Results: No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score at follow-up. All patients were able to resume their daily activities within 6 months after the injury. However, flexion deficits (6°-10°) were found in 2 patients in the SF group and 1 patient in the HSF group, and extension deficits (3°-5°) were found in 3 patients in the SF group and 1 patient in the HSF group, without significant intergroup difference. Stability based on the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference was also similar between the 2 groups at follow-up. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in isometric tests performed. Conclusion: The present study is the first to compare the clinical and functional results of SF and HSF techniques. The HSF technique demonstrated comparable clinical and functional outcomes, suggesting its potential as an alternative to the SF technique.

Electroacupuncture improves cognitive function in a rat model of mild traumatic brain injury by regulating the SIRT-1/PGC-1α/mitochondrial pathway.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common neurological trauma that can lead to cognitive impairment. The sirtuin-1 (SIRT-1)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) pathway has been reported to have neuroprotective effects in rats with craniocerebral injury. We evaluated potential mechanisms underlying electroacupuncture-mediated recovery of cognitive function after mTBI, focusing on the SIRT-1/PGC-1α/mitochondrial pathway. We included forty 6-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats in this study. Rats were randomly divided into four groups: controlled cortical impactor (CCI, n = 10), sham operation (sham, n = 10), electroacupuncture-treated CCI (CCI+EA, n = 10), and electroacupuncture-treated sham (sham+EA, n = 10) group. Randomization was performed by assigning a random number to each rat and using a random number table. The mTBI rat model was established using a controllable cortical impactor. Electroacupuncture therapy was performed on the back of rats, by inserting acupuncture needles to the specific acupoints and setting appropriate parameters for treatment. We evaluated spatial learning and memory functions with the Morris water maze test. We performed quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blotting, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) determination, and mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I (MRCC I) determination on rat hippocampal tissue. We analyzed SIRT-1/PGC-1α expression levels and the results of mitochondrial function assays, and compared differences between groups using bilateral Student's t -tests. Compared with the sham group, SIRT-1/PGC-1α expression was downregulated in the hippocampus of CCI group ( P <0.01). Although this expression was upregulated following electroacupuncture, it did not reach the levels observed in the sham group ( P <0.05). Compared with the sham group, MRCC I and ATP levels in the CCI group were significantly reduced, and increased after electroacupuncture ( P <0.01). In the Morris water maze, electroacupuncture reduced the incubation period of rats and increased average speed and number of crossing platforms ( P <0.05). Electroacupuncture may improve cognitive function in the mTBI rat model by regulating the SIRT-1/PGC-1α/mitochondrial pathway.

Combining an Anterolateral Complex Procedure With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces the Graft Reinjury Rate and Improves Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is a well-established surgical procedure, but it may not always restore complete rotational knee stability. Interest is increasing in anterolateral complex (ALC) procedures, lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), in association with ACLR to overcome this problem. The better ALC procedure, LET or ALLR, remains controversial to date. Purpose: To analyze the patient-reported outcome measures and ACL reinjury rate after ACLR with an ALC procedure compared with after isolated ACLR, as well as to analyze the clinical results and graft failure rate of the LET group versus the ALLR group. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart was used to conduct a comprehensive search of 5 databases: Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Eligible articles were classified according to the levels of evidence of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. A methodological quality assessment of randomized controlled trials was performed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO. Results: A total of 14 clinical trials were included in the final analysis, with 1830 patients. Isolated ACLR or a combined procedure with LET or ALLR was performed, with several characteristics described, including the surgical technique, additional torn knee structures and their management, graft failure, complications, clinical outcomes, clinical and instrumental examinations to assess knee stability, and postoperative protocols. Regarding clinical outcomes, pivot-shift tests and reduced graft failure, a significant difference was found in the superiority of the combined ACLR associated with the ALC procedure compared with an isolated ACLR (P < .05). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 ALC procedures. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis reported on the importance of combined ACLR and ALC procedures in patients with a high-grade rotational laxity, as both procedures, LET or ALLR, without superiority of one over the other, are associated with improved pivot-shift tests, patient-reported outcome measures, and reduced graft failure rates.