Pivot-shift Test Research Articles

The "Bankart knee": high-grade impression fractures of the posterolateral tibial plateau lead to increased translational and anterolateral rotational instability of the ACL-deficient knee.

The aim of this biomechanical cadaver study was to evaluate the effects of high-grade posterolateral tibia plateau fractures on the kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient joints; it was hypothesized that, owing to the loss of the integrity of the osseous support of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (PHLM), these fractures would influence the biomechanical function of the lateral meniscus (LM) and consequently lead to an increase in anterior translational and anterolateral rotational (ALR) instability. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic setup (KR 125, KUKA Robotics, Germany) with an attached optical tracking system (Optotrack Certus Motion Capture, Northern Digital, Canada). After the passive path from 0 to 90° was established, a simulated Lachman test and pivot-shift test as well as external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) were applied at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion under constant 200 N axial loading. All of the parameters were initially tested in the intact and ACL-deficient states, followed by two different types of posterolateral impression fractures. The dislocation height was 10mm, and the width was 15mm in both groups. The intraarticular depth of the fracture corresponded to half of the width of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus in the first group (Bankart 1) and 100% of the meniscus width in the second group (Bankart 2). There was a significant decrease in knee stability after both types of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures in the ACL-deficient specimens, with increased anterior translation in the simulated Lachman test at 0° and 30° of knee flexion (p = 0.012). The same effect was seen with regard to the simulated pivot-shift test and IR of the tibia (p = 0.0002). In the ER and posterior drawer tests, ACL deficiency and concomitant fractures did not influence knee kinematics (n.s.). This study demonstrates that high-grade impression fractures of the posterolateral aspect of the tibial plateau increase the instability of ACL-deficient knees and result in an increase in translational and anterolateral rotational instability.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Decreases Passive Anterior Tibial Subluxation Compared With Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Despite Similar Rotational Stability and Clinical Outcomes

To analyze the effect of augmenting a hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) on a primary outcome of passive anterior tibial subluxation (PATS) and a secondary outcome of the clinical outcomes. ACL-injured patients who underwent primary ACLR between March 2014 and February 2020 at our center were enrolled. Patients who underwent combined procedures (ACLR+ ALLR) were matched in a 1:1 propensity ratio to patients who underwent ACLR only. We evaluated PATS, knee stability (side-to-side laxity difference, pivot-shift test), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after the procedure and documented complications. From an initial cohort of 252 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years (48.4 ± 16.6 months), 35 matched pairs were included, and 17 patients (48.6%) in each group underwent second-look arthroscopy. The combined ACLR+ ALLR group showed significantly better improvement of PATS in the lateral compartments than the isolated ACLR group (P= .034). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding knee stability (side-to-side laxity difference, pivot-shift test), PROMs, complications, and second-look arthroscopic findings (all P > .05). Moreover, the proportions of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs were not different between groups. The combined ACLR+ ALLR procedure was associated with a mean improvement in anterior tibial subluxation for the lateral compartment that was 1.2 mm better than an isolated ACLR procedure, despite its lack of clinical significance. III, cohort study.

Posterolateral stabilization of the elbow by autologous ligament reconstruction to limit long-term development of osteoarthritis.

Posterolateral instability is the most frequent form of both acute and chronic elbow instability. Joint incongruity due to posterolateral unlocking leads to shear and compression stress of the internal aspect of the humeroulnar joint. We carried out long-term analysis of patients with posterolateral elbow instability in order to determine whether, in addition to improving their symptoms, reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex may play a protective role against the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll stabilizes the elbow and also limits the development of osteoarthritis in the long term. Patients with symptomatic posterolateral instability of the elbow and who underwent ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll from January 1995 to December 2010 were identified and retrospectively included for 2 follow-up evaluations at a mean of 5 and 14years. Fourteen elbows in 14 patients were included. All had a negative lateral pivot shift test and none reported a new episode of instability. Two patients (14%) had osteoarthritis. The 2 radiographic evaluations showed no progression of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis developed in 33% of patients with intra-articular fracture. In simple dislocations, pre-existing osteoarthritic lesions were stabilized and there were no new cases of osteoarthritis. Elbow ligament reconstruction according to the technique of O'Driscoll gives effective posterolateral stabilization and appears to protect against progression to osteoarthritic degeneration in the long term. In the absence of associated lesions, it prevents the development of osteoarthritis or the worsening of pre-existing osteoarthritis.

Bone-patellar tendon-bone versus two- and four-strand hamstring tendon autografts for ACL reconstruction in young adults: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), two- and four-strand hamstring tendon (4SHT and 2SHT, respectively) are the most common autografts used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The present study compared BPTB, 2SHT, and 4SHT for ACL reconstruction in terms of joint laxity, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), rate of failure and anterior knee pain (AKP). The time to return to sport and the peak torque between the autografts were also compared. Finally, prognostic factors leading to worse outcomes were also investigated. It was hypothesized that all grafts yield similar proprieties in terms of joint laxity, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and rate of failure, but that the BPTB autograft causes a greater rate of anterior knee pain (AKP). The literature search was conducted. All clinical trials comparing BTPB and/or 2SHT, and/or 4SHT were accessed. Grafts other than BTPB and/or 4SHT and/or 2SHT were not considered. Articles reporting outcomes of allografts or synthetic grafts were not eligible, nor were those concerning revision settings. Articles reporting ACL reconstruction in patients with multi-ligament damage were also not eligible. Data from 95,575 procedures were retrieved. The median length of follow-up was 36 months. The median age of the patients was 27.5 years. With regard to joint laxity, similarity was found in terms of Lachman and Pivot shift tests between all three autografts. The BPTB demonstrated the greatest stability in terms of instrumental laxity. BPTB demonstrated the greatest PROMs. BPTB demonstrated the greatest rate of AKP, while AKP in 2SHT and 4SHT was similar. Concerning failure, statistically significant inconsistency was found (P = 0.008). The 4SHT demonstrated the quickest return to sport, followed by BPTB, and 2SHT. There was evidence of a negative association between the time span between injury to surgery, Lysholm score (P = 0.04), and Tegner scale (P = 0.04). Furthermore, there was evidence of a weak positive association between the time span between injury to surgery and return to sport (P = 0.01). BPTB may result in lower joint laxity, greater PROMs, and greater peak flexion torque compared to 2SHT and 4SHT autografts. On the other hand, BPTB reported the lowest peak extension torque and the greatest rate of AKP. Finally, a longer time span between injury and surgery negatively influences outcome.

Association Between Anterior Tibial Subluxation of Lateral Compartment and High-Grade Knee Laxity in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Background: High-grade knee laxity and excessive anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) are correlated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and share similar risk factors; however, the association between excessive ATS and high-grade knee laxity remains unclear. Purpose: To identify the association between excessive ATS and high-grade knee laxity in patients with ACL deficiency and determine the possibility that ATS can predict high-grade knee laxity. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 226 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between May 2018 and March 2022 were analyzed in the present study; the high-grade group consisted of 113 patients who had a grade 3 result on the preoperative anterior drawer test, Lachman test, or pivot-shift test while under anesthesia, and the low-grade group consisted of 113 matched patients. The ATS values for medial and lateral compartments (ATSMC and ATSLC) were measured on magnetic resonance imaging while patients relaxed the quadriceps in the supine position under no anesthesia. The optimal cutoff values of ATSMC and ATSLC for high-grade knee laxity were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with stratification were performed to identify the association between excessive ATS and high-grade knee laxity. Results: Compared with the low-grade group, the high-grade group had a longer time from injury to surgery; higher rates of medial meniscus posterior horn tear (MMPHT), lateral meniscus posterior horn tear (LMPHT), and anterolateral ligament (ALL) abnormality; and larger lateral tibial slope, ATSMC, and ATSLC. The optimal cutoff value was 2.6 mm (sensitivity, 52.2%; specificity, 76.1%) for ATSMC and 4.5 mm (sensitivity, 67.3%; specificity, 64.6%) for ATSLC in predicting high-grade knee laxity. After adjustment for covariates, ATSLC ≥4.5 mm (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% CI, 1.56-5.55; P = .001), MMPHT (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.35-5.08; P = .004), LMPHT (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.20-4.78; P = .014), and ALL abnormality (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13-3.89; P = .019) were associated with high-grade knee laxity. The association between excessive ATSLC and high-grade knee laxity was validated in patients with acute ACL injury as well as those with chronic ACL injury. Conclusion: Excessive ATSLC was associated with high-grade knee laxity in patients who had ACL deficiency, with a predictive cutoff value of 4.5 mm. This study may help surgeons estimate the degree of knee instability more accurately before anesthesia and may facilitate preliminary surgical decision-making, such as appropriate graft choices and consideration of extra-articular augmentation.

OBJECTIVELY MEASURED KNEE INSTABILITY DURING PIVOT-SHIFT TEST: AN EXPERIMENTAL DYNAMIC RSA STUDY

The Pivot-shift test is a clinical test for knee instability for patinets with Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), however the test has low inter-observer reliability. Dynamic radiostereometry (dRSA) imaging is a highly precise method for objective evaluation of joint kinematics. The purpose of the study was to quantify precise knee kinematics during Pivot-shift test by use of the non-invasive dynamic RSA imaging.Eight human donor legs with hemipelvis were evaluated. Ligament lesion intervention of the ACL was performed during arthroscopy and anterolateral ligament (ALL) section was performed as a capsular incision. Pivot-shift test examination was recorded with dRSA on ligament intact knees, ACL-deficient knees and ACL+ALL-deficient knees.A Pivot-shift pattern was identifyable after ligament lesion as a change in tibial posterior drawer velocity from 7.8 mm/s in ligament intact knees, to 30.4 mm/s after ACL lesion, to 35.1 mm/s after combined ACL-ALL lesion. The anterior-posterior drawer excursion increased from 2.8 mm in ligament intact knees, to 7.2 mm after ACL lesion, to 7.6 mm after combined lesion. Furthermore a change in tibial rotation was found, with increasing external rotation at the end of the pivot-shift motion going from intact to ACL+ALL-deficient kneesThis experimental study demonstrates the feasibility of RSA to objectively quantify the kinematic instability patterns of the knee during the Pivot-shift test. The dynamic parameters found through RSA displayed the kinematic changes from ACL to combined ACL-ALL ligament lesion.

Comparison of Functional Outcomes of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using a Peroneus Longus Graft as an Alternative to the Hamstring Tendon Graft.

Background Ever since the arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has begun, the use of the peroneus longus (PL) graft for primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has never been thought of. There is very little literature on it. Hence, our study aims to compare the functional outcomes, knee stability, donor site morbidity, and assessment of thigh muscle wasting in patients with ACL injury managed by arthroscopic single bundle reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon (PLT) and hamstring tendons (HT), respectively. Methods All adults aged 16-50 years of either gender presenting with symptoms of symptomatic ACL deficiency were admitted for arthroscopic single-bundle ACLR and allocated into two groups (peroneus longus and hamstring tendon). Functional scores (International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm score), clinical knee evaluation (anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift test), donor site morbidity (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score (AOFAS)), and thigh circumference were recorded preoperatively and at six months and one year postoperatively. The same post-op rehabilitation protocol was followed in both groups. Results One hundred and ninety-four patients (hamstring n = 96, peroneus n = 98) met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences between the preoperative, six-month postoperative, and one-year postoperative scores between the hamstring and peroneus longus groups in the IKDC (p=0.356) and Lysholm knee score (p=0.289). The mean for the AOFAS was 99.05 ± 3.56 and 99.80 ± 0.70 in the PLT and HT groups, respectively, showing no statistical difference, with a significant improvement in thigh muscle wasting among the PLT group at final follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusion We observed similar knee stability and functional outcomes and no obvious donor site morbidity among both groups. These patients also had better responses to physiotherapy in recovering from their thigh muscle wasting. So, we can recommend that a PL graft can be a safe, viable, and effective option for usual arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

No difference in patient reported outcomes, laxity, and failure rate after revision ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendon graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to synthesize and quantitatively assess the outcomes of ACL Revision using a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft and to compare them with those of ACL Revisions performed with hamstring tendons (HT) graft.MethodsA comprehensive search based on the PRISMA protocol was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception until February 2022. Clinical studies reporting the outcomes of ACL Revision with QT autograft were included. Subjective and Objective IKDC, Tegner activity level, Lysholm knee score, KOOS score, VAS for pain, knee laxity (KT-1000/2000 arthrometer, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test), and graft failure were assessed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed and a quality assessment of the included studies was carried out with the MINORS score.ResultsSeven studies met the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review for the qualitative synthesis of data. A pooled mean of all the variables was provided for the 7 studies, while 3 studies included a control group of ACL Revision with HT and were included in a meta-analysis. A total of 420 participants with a mean age of 28.9 ± 10.5 years and a mean postoperative follow-up of 39.3 ± 16.4 months were assessed. Of these, 277 patients underwent ACL Revision with QT and 143 patients underwent ACL Revision with HT. In the QT group, average graft failure was 9.8% compared to 17.4% in the HT group. KOOS Sport and pivot-shift test showed better postoperative outcomes in QT than HT, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.052).ConclusionThe QT autograft was associated with an improved trend of rotatory laxity, PROMs and failure rate compared to HT autograft after revision ACL reconstruction. The QT autograft for revision ACL reconstruction is supported by the current literature. It is a viable graft that should be considered for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Efficacy comparison between a new generation of artificial ligaments and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament revision

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of a new generation of ligaments (LARS artificial ligament) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft as grafts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision. Methods: A retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of 54 patients who underwent ACL revision from January 2018 to June 2020 in the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. There were 44 males and 10 females with a mean age of (28.5±7.7) years (15-45 years). Among them, 24 cases underwent ACL revision with LARS artificial ligament (LARS group), the other 30 cases underwent ACL revision with BPTB (BPTB group). The subjective and objective knee joint evaluation indexes were compared between the two groups to evaluate the clinical efficacy. The subjective evaluation indexes included Tegner score, Lysholm score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. The objective evaluation indexes included the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, the anterior tibial translation (ATT) measurement at the weight-bearing position and the rate of patients returned to pre-injury sports. Results: The follow-up period was (32.8±5.3) months (24-42 months). At the last follow-up, the IKDC score, Tegner score and Lysholm score in the two groups significantly increased when compared with those before surgery (all P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in those indexes between the two groups (all P>0.05). The ATT measurement in the weight-bearing position was (3.1±0.7) mm in the LARS group and it was (4.1±0.9) mm in the BPTB group, which were significantly improved when compared with those before surgery (both P<0.05), and it was better in the LARS group than in the BPTB group (P<0.05). Postoperative Lachman test and pivot-shift test results in the LARS group were better than those in the BPTB group with statistically significant difference (both P<0.05). The rate of patients returned to pre-injury sports one year after surgery was 79.2%(19/24) in the LARS group and it was 50.0%(15/30) in the BPTB group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.029). Conclusions: Both LARS artificial ligament and BPTB autograft can achieve good short-term clinical efficacy in ACL revision, but LARS artificial ligament group has more advantages than BPTB autograft group in knee stability and early return to sports.

A prospective study of arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon graft: Experience of 439 cases.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequent ligamentous injuries that necessitate reconstruction in many cases. The patellar tendon and the hamstring tendon are the most frequently utilized autografts for reconstruction. However, both have certain disadvantages. We hypothesized that the peroneus longus tendon would be an acceptable graft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study is to determine whether a peroneus Longus tendon transplant is a functionally viable option for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction without compromising donor ankle activity. In this prospective study 439 individuals aged between 18 to 45 years, who underwent ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral Peroneus longus tendon autograft were observed. The injury to the ACL was initially assessed by physical examinations and further confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The outcome was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after the surgery using Modified Cincinnati, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner-Lysholm scores. The donor ankle stability was evaluated using foot and ankle disability index (FADI) and AOFAS scores, as well as hop tests. Significant (P < .001) improvement in the result of the IKDC score, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score was observed at the final follow-up. The Lachman test was mildly (1+) positive only in 7.70% of cases, the anterior drawer became negative in all cases, and the pivot shift test was negative in 97.43% of cases at 24 months after the surgery. FADI and AOFAS scores for donor's ankle functional assessment were impressive, as were single hop test, triple hop test, and cross over hop test results at 2 years. None of the patients had any neurovascular deficit. However, 6 cases of superficial wound infection were observed, 4 at the port site and 2 at the donor site. All resolved after appropriate oral antibiotic therapy. The peroneus longus tendon can be considered a safe, effective, and promising graft of choice for arthroscopic primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction because it has a good functional outcome and impressive donor ankle function after surgery.

Positive Pivot Shift Test among Patients with Displaced Anterior Tibial Spine Fractures Undergoing Arthroscopic Fixation in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Understanding of displaced anterior tibial spine fractures has evolved over the years and is now considered to be anterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries rather than intra-articular fractures. However, there are very few studies available evaluating the presence or absence of a pivot shift test, which is specific in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, in patients with anterior tibial spine fractures. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of the positive pivot shift test among patients with displaced anterior tibial spine fractures undergoing arthroscopic fixation in a tertiary care centre. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients presented with displaced anterior tibial spine fractures undergoing arthroscopic fixation. The data were collected between 1 January 2020 and 30 May 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: IRC_2019_11_09_1). All patients who presented with displaced anterior tibial spine fractures undergoing arthroscopic fixation were included in the study and those who did not provide consent were excluded. The pivot test was performed under anaesthesia. Point estimate and 90% Confidence Interval were calculated. Among 48 patients, pivot shift was positive in 36 (75%) (64.75-85.25, 90% Confidence Interval). The mean age of the participants was 28.97±11.16 years, 21 (58.33%) were males and 15 (41.66%) were females. The prevalence of positive pivot shift test under anaesthesia in patients with displaced anterior tibial spine fractures undergoing arthroscopic fixation was higher than other studies done in similar settings. anterior cruciate ligament; arthroscopy; knee fractures; physical examination.

A STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH ANATOMICAL HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFT

Background: The Anterior Cruciate ligament (ACL) is the primary stabilizer of the knee and prevents the knee against anterior translation. It is also important in counteracting rotational and valgus stress. Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an established and widely practiced surgical procedure with proven efcacy and a low morbidity prole. The arthroscopically aided approach has the advantages of smaller skin and capsular incisions, improved viewing of the intercondylar notch for placement of the tunnel and attachment sites, less postoperative pain, fewer adhesions, earlier motion, and easier rehabilitation. The advantages with anatomical hamstring grafts are availability of a greater sectional area and unaffected integrity of the extensor mechanism. Moreover tensile strength of quadrupled anatomical hamstring is found to be even better than a normal ACL. The rate of complications like extension loss, anterior knee pain and surgical site infections was also lower than other procedures. Cortical suspension devices have the necessary biomechanical properties with regard to ultimate failure strength, displacement, and stiffness for initial xation of soft tissue in the femoral tunnel for ACL reconstruction. The aperture xation methods like the interference screws allows for early rm xation and heal with tight bone-tendon interface. To evalua Objectives: te functional outcome of arthroscopy assisted ACL reconstruction with anatomical hamstring tendon graft using Endobutton and Bioabsorbable interference screw and tibial disc. The Methodology: study results included 30 patients admitted with clinical and radiological deciency of ACL during October 2021 to December 2022, in Department of Orthopaedics, SMIMER Hospital, Surat. Study aims to assess the functional outcome of arthroscopy assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomical hamstring tendon graft using Endobutton and Bioabsorbable interference screw and tibial disc in terms of range of motion, postoperative knee stability, graft site morbidity, subjective knee functions and prospective assessment of functional outcome using Tegner Lysholm knee scoring system. All the patients included in the s Results: tudy were 23 male and 2 female patient. The analysis of the studied cases revealed that the most common affected age group was between 18 to 24 years .. Majority of patients were operated more than 6 months after injury. Sports/BPET (Battle Physical Efciency Test) injuries was the most common mode of injury. The mean size of graft used was 8.2±0.39.Post-operatively at 3, 6, 12month follow up,1 case (4%) had a positive Pivot shift test with a "Glide" (Grade-I), whereas remaining 24 cases (96%) had a negative Pivot shift test. None of the patients had grade III laxity. The mean postoperative Lysholm score improved from preoperative score of 66±5.2 to 88.70±5.54. The overall satisfactory result (excellent + good) at follow up was 95%. All the patients had returned to preinjury level of activity. ACL injuries are common in younger age group individuals. S Conclusion: ports related injury and RTA are the most common modes of injury. Arthroscopy assisted ACL reconstruction using Anatomical hamstring tendon autograft provides a stable knee, reduces postoperative morbidity and enables early rehabilitation. Graft xation using endobutton and and Bioabsorbable interference screw will help the graft to facilitate graft tunnel healing and also maintain its strength until there is a good graft to bone healing occurs. It allows the patients to return to preinjury level of activity, allows the patient to squat, sit crossed leg and climb stairs without difculty. Degeneration of the articular surfaces rarely occurs and the re-operation rates are minimal.

A comparison of the outcomes of anterior curciate ligament reconstruction with large-size graft versus reconstruction with average-size graft combined with extraarticular tenodesis.

Many patients who have had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (R) complain of instability, inability to return to previous levels of sports activity, and possible ACL graft failure. Graft size was discovered to be an important factor in lowering ACL failure rates. Also, extraarticular tenodesis decreases recurrent instability, A comparative study was done to compare the effect of graft size and lateral external tenodesis on the recurrence of instability after ACL-R. A Prospective Blinded Randomized Controlled study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent ACL-R with hamstring tendon grafts in our Hospital. The patients were allocated into two groups (Group A and B) with randomization; group A received ACL-R with a large-size ACL-graft diameter of 6 strands, and group B received ACL-R of 4 strands combined with lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) (Modified Lemaire). Each group had fifty patients. The follow-up time was two years. They were examined for graft failure, anterolateral rotatory instability with the pivot shift test, and clinical outcomes, which were evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC) both subjective and objective. In this study; group A, graft failure occurred in three (6.3%) patients, a positive pivot shift test grade I was detected in eight (17.8%) patients, grade II in three (6.7%) patients, and grade III in one (2.2%) patient. The subjective IKDC score was 87.9 (± 7.19) points. The objective IKDC score was normal or nearly normal in 43 (93.4%) patients. In group B, one (2.1%) patient had graft failure, five (10.9%) had a positive pivot shift test grade I, one (2.1%) had a grade II, and no patient had a grade III. The subjective IKDC score was 91.9 (± 8.9) points. The objective IKDC score was normal or nearly normal in 44 (95.6%) patients. As regard the subjective IKDC score, there was a non-significant difference between both groups (p value=0.465). Both groups showed a low ACL-graft failure rate, low anterolateral rotatory instability, and a good clinical outcome. Although there was no significant difference in subjective IKDC score between both groups, the failure rate and anterolateral rotatory instability were significantly lower in the ACL-R (4 strands) with LET combination group than in the group with the large-diameter (6 strands) graft. Level 1; Randomized Comparative Study.

Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Versus Without Anterolateral Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

It is clear that the anterolateral ligament has an important role in rotational knee stability. However, whether patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) can benefit from anterolateral augmentation (ALA) is still controversial. To compare the effects of isolated ACLR versus ACLR combined with ALA (ACLR+ALA) on clinical outcomes and knee stability. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1. The methodology followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was undertaken to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing isolated ACLR with ACLR+ALA for the treatment of ACL injuries in the last 15 years. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool and the revised Jadad scale were utilized by 2 independent reviewers to determine the quality of RCTs. Relevant data were extracted and compared between procedures, and heterogeneity across the RCTs was assessed using the I 2 statistic. The initial search yielded 849 articles. A total of 14 studies (1850 patients; 941 ACLR and 909 ACLR+ALA) satisfied the eligibility criteria for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between the procedures in terms of patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) or return-to-sport rates. However, patients who underwent ACLR+ALA had better knee stability based on the pivot-shift test (risk ratio [RR], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10]; P = .0008), Lachman test (RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.07]; P = .04), and side-to-side difference in anterior laxity (standardized mean difference, -0.55 [95% CI, -0.98 to -0.12]; P = .01) as well as a lower incidence of graft failure (RR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.45]; P < .01) compared with patients who underwent isolated ACLR. ALA can be considered as a reinforcement of ACLR to improve anteroposterior and anterolateral rotational stability of the knee and reduce the risk of failure. The patient-reported outcomes of isolated ACLR were similar to those of ACLR+ALA, and both procedures provided improved knee function.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with over-the-top route procedure and anatomic single-bundle reconstruction in pediatric patients

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of over-the-top route (OTTR) reconstruction for pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and compare them with results of anatomic single-bundle reconstruction (SBR), which used the bone tunnel technique and was performed early after epiphyseal closure (age ≤15 years). This study included pediatric patients aged 11-15 years who underwent ACL reconstruction. The mean age at surgery was 13.4 years (11-15 years), including 14 men and 29 women. Operative procedures were determined according to growth plate closure. In all cases, the tibial side was reconstructed using a bone tunnel procedure. On the femoral side, we selected the OTTR procedure (group O) with open physis. Where the physis was closed, we selected the anatomical SBR (group B). The clinical results were evaluated with manual examination, the side-to-side difference (SSD) in tibial anterior translation using the Kneelax 3, and knee function score. There were no significant differences in the Lachman and pivot-shift tests, SSD in tibial anterior translation with Kneelax 3, or knee function score between the two groups before or after the surgery. Growth disturbance was not observed on either the femoral or tibial side in group O. The OTTR method provided comparable results with the bone tunnel anatomical method in manual examination, Kneelax 3, and knee clinical function scores, suggesting that the OTTR method is very useful for pediatric ACL reconstructions. Level of evidence: III; retrospective study.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a 4-Strand Semitendinosus Tendon Graft or a Doubled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Graft: A 4.5-Year Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study

Background: Hamstring tendon grafts are the most common choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Previous studies have provided evidence that offers conflicting opinions concerning the most favorable graft choice. Purpose: To identify whether the use of a quadrupled semitendinosus tendon (ST) or doubled semitendinosus tendon and gracilis tendon (ST/G) graft provides comparable anterior tibial translation (ATT) with similar functional results and similar donor site morbidity. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: This was a prospective, patient- and surgeon-blinded, randomized trial set in a busy orthopaedic and traumatology department at a university hospital. Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 162 patients with ACL lesions were randomized to undergo ACLR with either a quadrupled ST or doubled ST/G graft. The primary endpoint was ATT assessed with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective evaluation form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm knee scoring scale. Results: Preoperative demographic data, ATT, and PROM scores showed no significant differences. At 4.5 years, no significant differences were found between the ST and ST/G groups with respect to PROM scores and KT-1000 arthrometer, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test findings. Differences in functional results between groups were significant (muscle strength). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly increased ATT in female patients undergoing ACLR with a quadrupled ST graft during the 4.5-year observation period, as assessed by the KT-1000 arthrometer, as well as inferior KOOS, IKDC, Lysholm, and VAS scores. Conclusion: This study showed a significant increase in ATT as well as inferior results on PROMs during a 4.5-year observation period in female patients undergoing ACLR with a quadrupled ST graft. In male patients, the study provided evidence of the noninferiority of ACLR with an ST graft, with no influence on donor site morbidity. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03626883

OUTCOME OF SIMULTANEOUS ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING AUTOGENOUS GRAFTS WITH ALL-INSIDE TECHNIQUE

Introduction: Bicruciate knee ligament injury is a lesion affecting both the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) simultaneously, which is one of the most severe knee joint injuries. Operative simultaneous reconstruction is the standard of treatment. Objectives: To evaluate clinical results of one-stage ACL and PCL reconstruction using autogenous tendon grafts with an all-inside technique. Material and methods: The medical records of patients operated on by a group of surgeons at the Orthopedic Center, Military Hospital 103 from March 2015 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-four patients (24 males, 10 females) with combined rupture of both ACL and PCL underwent one-stage ACL and PCL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring and peroneus longus tendon grafts with all-inside technique. Results: The mean time of follow-up was 32.09 ± 25.15 months (9 - 68 months). The mean age was 37.7 ± 9.0 years (range 23 - 56 years). At the final follow-ups, all patients were without limit extension, 5/34 patients (14.71%) with limit flexion. The Lachman test was negative in 32 patients (94.12%), the pivot shift testing in 32 patients (94.12%) was negative, 26 patients (76.47%) had a positive posterior drawer test. The Lysholm knee score preoperative and final follow-up were 46.76 ± 17.08 (range 12 - 82) and 89.29 ± 8.57 (range 50 - 99) (p &lt; 0.01), respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of both ACL and PCL using autogenous hamstring and peroneus longus tendon for restoring knee stability with an all-inside technique.

Anatomical and Biomechanical Characteristics of the Anterolateral Ligament: A Descriptive Korean Cadaveric Study Using a Triaxial Accelerometer.

Background and Objectives: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) could be the potential anatomical structure responsible for rotational instability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the ALL in Korean cadaveric knee joints. Materials and Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected and tested. Femoral and tibial footprints of the ALL were recorded. Pivot shift and Lachman tests were measured with KiRA. Results: The prevalence of ALL was 100%. The average distance of the tibial footprint to the tip of the fibular head was 19.85 ± 3.41 mm; from the tibial footprint to Gerdy's tubercle (GT) was 18.3 ± 4.19 mm; from the femoral footprint to the lateral femoral epicondyle was 10.25 ± 2.97 mm. ALL's footprint distance was the longest at 30° of flexion (47.83 ± 8.05 mm, p < 0.01) in a knee with intact ALL-ACL and neutral rotation. During internal rotation, the footprint distance was the longest at 30° of flexion (50.05 ± 8.88 mm, p < 0.01). Internal rotation produced a significant increase at all three angles after ACL-ALL were transected (p = 0.022), where the footprint distance was the longest at 30° of flexion (52.05 ± 7.60 mm). No significant difference was observed in KiRA measurements between intact ALL-ACL and ALL-transected knees for pivot shift and Lachman tests. However, ACL-ALL-transected knees showed significant differences compared to the intact ALL-ACL and ALL-transected knees (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The ALL was identified as a distinct ligament structure with a 100% prevalence in this cadaveric study. The ALL plays a protective role in internal rotational stability. An isolated ALL transection did not significantly affect the ALL footprint distances or functional stability tests. Therefore, the ALL is thought to act as a secondary supportive stabilizer for rotational stability of the knee joint in conjunction with the ACL.

Lateral meniscal status, chronicity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency, and initial graft tension were associated with abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction

PurposeGraft failure or recurrence of instability without obvious trauma remains one of the problems following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction. MethodsA total of 291 patients who underwent primary anatomical ACL reconstruction were included in this study. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), time to surgery, medial meniscal status, lateral meniscal status, graft materials, initial graft tension protocol, preoperative and postoperative pivot shift test and side-to-side differences in anterior tibial translation using the arthrometer were reviewed. Abnormal knee laxity was defined as constituting one or both of the following criteria: (i) a side-to-side difference of ≥3 mm by arthrometer; and (ii) a positive pivot shift test, being “glide,” “clunk”, or “gross”. ResultsAbnormal knee laxity occurred in 30 patients (10.3%) at a median follow-up of 25 months. Results of univariate analysis indicated that a higher likelihood of abnormal knee laxity was associated with female sex, greater BMI, longer time to surgery, higher initial graft tension protocol, and lateral meniscus resection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal knee laxity was significantly associated with time to surgery [1-month increase; odds ratio (OR), 1.01], higher initial graft tension protocol (vs. lower tension; OR, 3.5), and lateral meniscus resection (vs. intact and repaired lateral meniscus; OR, 12.8). ConclusionHigher initial graft tension protocol, chronicity of ACL deficiency, and lateral meniscus resection were risk factors for abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction. Level of evidenceLevel III retrospective prognostic study.

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Revision and Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis With 3-5 Years of Follow-up

Background: There are limited studies designed by matching related factors to compare clinical outcomes and return to sport (RTS) between patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) and primary ACLR (P-ACLR). Purpose: (1) To compare the outcomes between R-ACLR and P-ACLR in a matched-pair analysis with 3- to 5-year follow-up and (2) to evaluate patient-reported factors for not returning to preinjury-level sport. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent R-ACLR between September 2016 and November 2018 were propensity matched by age, sex, body mass index, passive anterior tibial subluxation, and generalized hypermobility in a 1:1 ratio to patients who underwent P-ACLR during the same period. By combining in person follow-up at 2 years postoperatively and telemedicine interview at the final follow-up (January 2022), knee stability and clinical scores were compared, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner. Status of RTS was requested, specifically whether the patient returned to preinjury level of sport. Patient-reported reasons for not returning were analyzed. Results: There were 63 matched pairs in the present study. Knee stability was similar in terms of KT-2000 arthrometer, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test results between the groups at 2 years of follow-up. At the final follow-up, no significant difference was found between groups for postoperative clinical scores (IKDC, Tegner, and Lysholm) (P > .05). There was a significant difference in total RTS: 53 (84.1%) in the P-ACLR cohort and 41 (65.1%) in the R-ACLR cohort (P = .014). No significant difference was shown in terms of RTS at the same level: 35 (55.6%) in P-ACLR and 31 (49.2%) in R-ACLR (P = .476). Significantly more patients showed fear of reinjury: 26 of 32 (81.3%) in the R-ACLR group as compared with 15 of 28 (53.5%) in the P-ACLR group (P < .021). Conclusion: R-ACLR resulted in similar clinical scores (IKDC, Tegner, and Lysholm) but significantly lower RTS versus P-ACLR at 3 to 5 years of follow-up. Fear of reinjury was the most common factor that caused sport changes in patients with R-ACLR.