The critical pitting temperature (CPT) represents a critical condition for stable pit growth and is used as a principal parameter to evaluate the pitting resistance of stainless steels and nickel-based alloys. In the past several decades, many efforts have been made to clarify the underlying mechanism behind the CPT phenomenon. In this talk, we will summarize our existing understanding on this topic based on a recent framework for pit growth stability [1-8]. However, the previous theory mainly focused on the potentiostatic-CPT, which is associated with a sharp increase in current caused by pitting when the temperature increases above the CPT. Although many new insights were generated, the framework cannot fully rationalize the potentiodynamic-CPT, which is the sharp transition of breakdown potential from the transpassive region to pitting region when the CPT is exceeded. To fill the knowledge gap, we proposed that the CPT transition might be related to repassivation underneath the salt film of metastable pits. Our previous work has already confirmed the phenomenon of repassivation underneath the salt film in deep pits (~400 µm) [9]. We expected that this phenomenon also occurs in metastable pits (i.e. small pits) but it has not yet been reported. To verify this hypothesis, the critical conditions of potential (E) and temperature (T) for repassivation at relatively small depth (20 µm and 30 µm) were investigated using one-dimensional artificial pit electrodes. The repassivation underneath the salt film in small pits was indeed observed. Based on this finding, several possible models were proposed to interpret the potentiodynamic-CPT, and insights for a more comprehensive understanding on pit growth stability were also generated. Acknowledgments: Tianshu Li acknowledges the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52201085). G. S. Frankel acknowledges the support of the US Office of Naval Research (Grant No. N00014-23-1-2202).Reference[1] G.S. Frankel, T. Li, J.R. Scully, Localized Corrosion: Passive Film Breakdown vs Pit Growth Stability, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 164 (2017) C180-C181.[2] T. Li, J.R. Scully, G.S. Frankel, Localized Corrosion: Passive Film Breakdown vs Pit Growth Stability: Part II. A Model for Critical Pitting Temperature, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 165 (2018) C484-C491.[3] T. Li, J.R. Scully, G.S. Frankel, Localized Corrosion: Passive Film Breakdown vs. Pit Growth Stability: Part III. A Unifying Set of Principal Parameters and Criteria for Pit Stabilization and Salt Film Formation, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 165 (2018) C762-C770.[4] T. Li, J.R. Scully, G.S. Frankel, Localized Corrosion: Passive Film Breakdown vs. Pit Growth Stability: Part IV. The Role of Salt Film in Pit Growth: A Mathematical Framework, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 166 (2019) C115-C124.[5] T. Li, J.R. Scully, G.S. Frankel, Localized Corrosion: Passive Film Breakdown vs Pit Growth Stability: Part V. Validation of a New Framework for Pit Growth Stability Using One-Dimensional Artificial Pit Electrodes, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 166 (2019) C3341-C3354.[6] T. Li, J. Wu, G.S. Frankel, Localized corrosion: Passive film breakdown vs. Pit growth stability, Part VI: Pit dissolution kinetics of different alloys and a model for pitting and repassivation potentials, Corrosion Science, 182 (2021) 109277.[7] T. Li, D.E. Perea, D.K. Schreiber, M.G. Wirth, G.J. Orren, G.S. Frankel, Cryo-based structural characterization and growth model of salt film on metal, Corrosion Science, 174 (2020) 108812.[8] T. Li, J. Wu, X. Guo, A.M. Panindre, G.S. Frankel, Activation energy of metal dissolution in local pit environments, Corrosion Science, 193 (2021) 109901.[9] T. Li, G.S. Frankel, Repassivation underneath salt film on stainless steel pits, Corrosion Science, 203 (2022) 110353.
Read full abstract