Perioperative Complication Rate Research Articles

Thermal ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies

The outcomes of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after thermal ablation (TA) versus liver resection (LR) are debated. We aimed to compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and operative outcomes after TA and LR for HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Until November 15, 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases by using Medical Subject Heading terms and other terms, and used the Newcastle-Ottawa literature evaluation scale to assess the quality of selected studies. OS, DFS, and operative outcomes were extracted and analyzed. The meta-analysis showed that 5 propensity-score matched (PSM) studies including 933 patients (463 TA vs. 470 LR) were included. After analysis, TA and LR had similar results at 1-year OS (odds ratio [OR] 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–2.78; P = 0.05) and 3-year OS (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.56–1.04; P = 0.08), whereas LR increased 5-years OS (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.18–0.74; P = 0.005). In addition to the DFS, the 1-year DFS was significantly higher in patients with LR. However, there were no obvious differences in 3-year and 5-year DFS when comparing TA and LR. The length of operative time and hospital stay were longer in the LR group. Besides, the LR group had significantly higher rate of perioperative blood transfusions and major complications. Our research proved that LR took advantage of OS and DFS for HCC patients with cirrhosis. Additional well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed.

Advancing geriatric surgical outcomes in elective ventral and incisional hernia repair surgeries: An American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program study

IntroductionIncreasing age is known to be associated with increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality, however, the goal of this study was to determine if an increase in age correlates to differences in surgical outcomes for elective ventral hernia repair. MethodsRetrospective cohort study using American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2016 to 2020. Included diagnosis codes were laparoscopic or open incisional or ventral hernia repairs, categorized into three age groups: 18-64y, 65-74y, and ≥75y. Thirty-day perioperative outcomes analyzed using bivariate χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression. ResultsWe identified 116,643 people who had elective ventral or incisional hernia repair. Compared to 18-64y and 65-74y age groups, patients ≥75y were significantly more likely to develop any post-operative complication, be re-admitted post-operatively for any reason, have an extended hospital stay, and require a reoperation. ConclusionsPatients ≥75y have significantly higher rates of perioperative complications after elective hernia repair compared to younger patients.

The morphology of occlusion stump for endovascular recanalization in non-acute vertebral ostial occlusion

PurposeNon-acute vertebral ostial occlusion (VOO) is a debilitating condition with significant mortality and morbidity rates. However, currently, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for VOO. This study aims to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of endovascular recanalization in patients with VOO. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of data from 21 consecutive patients with VOO who underwent endovascular recanalization between May 2018 and August 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on a new angiographic classification proposed by Gao et al. Type I (tapered stump group) included patients with non-acute extracranial vertebral artery ostial occlusion presenting a tapered occlusion stump. Type II (nontapered stump group) consisted of patients with a nontapered occlusion stump. We collected data on recanalization rates, perioperative complications, and follow-up outcomes. ResultsOur analysis included data from a total of 21 patients (22 lesions) with a mean age of 64.6 ± 10.6 years. The technical success rate was 66.7 % (14/21), and the rate of periprocedural complications was 14.3 % (3/21). The success rate of transitioning from the tapered stump group to the nontapered stump group was 90.9 % (10/11) and 40 % (4/10), respectively (P = 0.024). The perioperative complication rate for type I and type II patients was 18.2 % (2/11) and 10 % (1/10), respectively. Among these patients, 18 underwent endovascular recanalization using transfemoral access, while 3 underwent transradial access after failed transfemoral access, with successful outcomes for two patients. ConclusionsThis study suggests that endovascular recanalization may offer a safe, effective, and feasible treatment option for VOO patients. Additionally, the proposed angiographic classification may serve as a useful guide in selecting suitable candidates for surgery.

Safety and Efficacy of Stent-Graft in the Treatment of Aortoiliac Artery Occlusive Disease: A Multicenter Study of Short-Term and Medium-Term Outcomes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the short and mid-term safety and efficacy of stent-graft compared with bare stents for treatment of aortoiliac artery occlusive disease (AIOD). Methods183 patients diagnosed with AIOD who received stent implantation at three vascular centers in north China between January 2019 and December 2021 were enrolled. Patients were divided into those undergoing stent-graft (Group A; n=67) or bare stent (Group B; n=116) implantation for retrospective cohort analysis. Efficacy was assessed as surgical success rate and rate of freedom from clinically driven target lesion reintervention (ffCDTLR) at each follow-up time point. Safety was assessed by the rate of perioperative complication, major limb amputation and aortoiliac artery-related mortality. ResultsThere were no preoperative baseline differences between the two groups (p>0.05). The surgical success was 91.04% for Group A, significantly higher than that for Group B (79.31%; p<0.05). Incidence of perioperative complications was 2.98% for Group A, significantly lower than that for Group B (9.48%, p<0.05), as was the rate of major limb amputation (A:1.49% vs B: 5.17%) and aortoiliac artery-related mortality (A: 1.49% vs B: 4.31%), although these two indicators were not significantly different (p>0.05). Follow-up rates were 91.8% for the total follow-up time of 3 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis gave significantly higher 1- and 2-year ffCDTLR for Group A (98.51% and 95.52%) than for Group B (95.69% and 89.66%, p<0.05). ConclusionStent-graft is more effective and safer than bare stent in the treatment of AIOD

Does the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Need Modification for Orthopaedic Surgery Practices? A Cross-Sectional Survey Among Indian Orthopaedic Surgeons.

It is well known that the implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist (SSC) leads to improved operating room team coordination and reduced perioperative complication and mortality rates. Although it is proven to be beneficial worldwide, its awareness and usage need to be evaluated in a diverse country like India. As orthopaedic surgeries involve implants and tourniquet usage, it is important to evaluate the applicability of WHO SSC specifically to orthopaedic surgeries, and whether any modifications are needed. A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among Indian Orthopaedic Surgeons with a pre-defined questionnaire regarding awareness, usage and suggestions to modify the existing WHO SSC (2009) for orthopaedic surgeries. 513 responses were included for final analysis. 90.3% of surgeons were aware of the surgical safety checklist; however, only 55.8% used it routinely in their practice. The awareness of SSC availability was 1.85 times more among younger surgeons (< 20years of experience) than among those with > 20years of experience. 17% of surgeons thought the usage of SSC was time-consuming and 52.4% of participants felt a need to modify the existing WHO SSC (2009) for orthopaedic surgeries. 34.5% recommended the inclusion of the patient blood group in the "Sign-in" section, 62.77% proposed the inclusion of details about the tourniquet, whereas only 6.63% suggested adding about surgical implant readiness in the "Time-out" section and 72.7% suggested including a check to make sure the tourniquet was deflated, removed and also recording of the total usage time during the "Sign-out" section. Despite high (90%) awareness among Indian Orthopaedic surgeons, they have limited usage of the WHO SSC in their practice. Identifying barriers and considering modifications for orthopaedic surgeries, like details about tourniquet usage during the "Time-out" section and a check to ensure it was removed during the "Sign-out" section, will improve patient safety and outcomes. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01096-5.

Examining the Applicability of Surgical Coaching Rules for Resident Autonomy in Non-teaching Hospitals.

This retrospective study aims to analyze the impact of standardized rules for teaching in university hospitals on surgical resident autonomy and patient safety, as measured by patient outcomes, and also examines the learning curves for residents and their impact on patient outcomes in a non-teaching hospital. The data for the study was collected retrospectively from medical records of 2000 adult patients who went through surgical procedures fromJanuary 2020 to December 2022. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the supervision level provided by attending surgeons and residents. Appropriate statistical methods were used to analyze the data. It was observed that operative times of cases handled by both attending and resident surgeons were less than those handled by residents alone. On the other hand, the former group had a significantly higher burden of comorbidities and higher rate of perioperative complications than the latter. These results have important implications for the training of medical residents and the overall delivery of healthcare services in university hospitals. The findings will also help towards better understanding of the effectiveness of these rules and their potential for improving the quality of care provided by residents in these settings.

Comparison of En Bloc Resection and Intralesional Excision for Re-resection of Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine.

Re-resection of spinal giant cell tumors is an exceedingly difficult procedure. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with en bloc resection or intralesional excision for re-resection has rarely been reported. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of en bloc resection with that of intralesional excision in patients undergoing re-resection for giant cell tumors of the spine. This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent revision surgeries for relapse of giant cell tumors of the spine at our center between January 2005 and January 2021. Local progression-free survival represents the duration between en bloc resection or intralesional excision and tumor recurrence. Neurological recovery, survival rates, local control, and complications were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for survival analysis. A total of 22 patients (nine men and 13 women) with a mean age of 34.1 (range 19-63) years were included. Significant statistical differences were found in the local tumor recurrence rate between patients treated with en bloc resection and those treated with intralesional excision (p < 0.05). The 5- and 10-year local progression-free survival rates were both 90% in the en bloc resection group, while in the intralesional excision group, the 5-year local progression-free survival rate was 80% with a 10-year rate of 45.7%. The en bloc resection group had a lower local tumor recurrence rate than that of the intralesional excision group (p < 0.05), but the former had a higher rate of complications (p = 0.015). This study revealed a low local recurrence rate in patients who underwent en bloc resection for giant cell tumors, while the perioperative complication rate was high.

Editor's Choice – Prevalence of Smoking and Impact on Peri-Operative Outcomes After Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

The contemporary burden of smoking in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in the UK is unknown. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of smoking in patients undergoing AAA repair in the UK and determine the association between smoking and peri-operative outcomes. This was an observational cohort study. The National Vascular Registry was interrogated for adults undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair from 2014 to 2021 for prevalence of current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers over time. The primary outcomes were post-operative complications by smoking status. Secondary outcomes were variation in smoking rates over time and by hospital, in hospital mortality, and length of stay by smoking status. All analyses were adjusted using the validated British Aneurysm Repair score. Overall, 26 916 patients undergoing elective AAA repair were included (21.9% smokers, 62.2% former smokers, 15.9% non-smokers). The prevalence of smoking did not change over time, with a 2.4 fold variation between UK hospitals (range 13.0 - 31.8% excluding outliers). In hospital mortality was not significantly different between smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers (p > .050 for all comparisons). Compared with non-smokers, smoking was associated with increased overall (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24 - 1.57) and respiratory complications (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.63 - 2.39), limb ischaemia (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.19 - 2.23), bowel ischaemia (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.06 - 2.54), return to theatre (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11 - 1.71), and intensive care admission (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.31 - 1.56). Compared with former smokers, smoking was associated with increased overall (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14 - 1.36), respiratory (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27 - 1.63) and limb ischaemia complications (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19 - 1.84), and intensive care admission (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28 - 1.46). On analysis of the endovascular aneurysm repair subgroup, active smoking was associated with significantly higher rates of limb ischaemia compared with former and non-smokers (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.49 - 3.01 and OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.19 - 3.16 respectively). The prevalence of smoking remains high in patients undergoing elective AAA repair with no evidence of a decline in active smokers from 2014 to 2021 compared with the general UK population. Smoking is associated with increased peri-operative complication rates.

Comparisons of survival and surgical outcomes between minimally invasive partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma.

We compared survival and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for older patients (age 70 years or older) with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This retrospective, single-center study included 260 patients who underwent RAPN and 44 patients who underwent LRN. The overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups using an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. Compared with the LRN group, a trend of more complications was observed in the RAPN group, including a higher body mass index (24 vs. 22 kg/m2 ; P = 0.0002) and higher rates of hypertension (77% vs. 55%; P = 0.0029) and chronic kidney disease (62% vs. 36%; P = 0.0027). After adjustment by the IPTW analysis, the RAPN group had a shorter operative time (143 vs. 282 min; P = 0.033), shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (4.1 vs. 7.9 days; P = 0.004), and less change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate during surgery (-8.4% vs. -32%; P < 0.0001) than the LRN group; however, the perioperative complication rates were similar. Patients who underwent RAPN had better 5-year OS than those who underwent LRN (95% vs. 90%; log-rank, P = 0.017). RAPN resulted in better OS and surgical outcomes, with shorter operative time, shorter PLOS, and better renal function preservation, than LRN for older patients with stage 1 RCC. Therefore, RAPN may be the primary option for patients indicated for surgical intervention. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 269-274.

Outcomes and predictors of amputation-free survival in patients undergoing below-knee popliteal-distal bypass

ObjectiveThe infrageniculate popliteal artery is a potential source for inflow in lower extremity bypass surgery in patients with isolated tibial artery disease. The objective of our study was to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of popliteal-distal bypasses using data from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). MethodsThe VQI registry was queried between 2003 and 2021 for patients undergoing surgical revascularizations with the below-knee popliteal artery serving as inflow. Demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier models were used to estimate amputation-free survival, survival, and freedom from amputation. Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with major amputation or death. ResultsA total of 1884 procedures were analyzed. The mean age of the included patients was 67.7 years. The most frequently observed preoperative comorbidities included insulin-dependent diabetes (52.3%), coronary disease (32.4%), and end-stage renal disease (14.4%). Of all the patients, 670 (35.6%) had a history of ipsilateral endovascular intervention. The procedures were performed for a variety of indications, including tissue loss (84.3%), rest pain (10.9%), and claudication (4.8%). Intraoperatively, the outflow targets were the dorsalis pedis (31.4%), the posterior tibial (24.4%), and the anterior tibial arteries (15.6%). Vein conduit was used in 92.1% of cases. The rate of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) was 2.4%, and the 30-day mortality was 1.9%. The median length of follow up was 371 days. Amputation-free survival was found to be 85.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.0%-87.2%) at 6 months and 78.6% (95% CI, 76.6%-80.4%) at 12 months. Survival was found to be 93.4% (95% CI, 92.2%-94.5%) at 6 months and 88.6% (95% CI, 87.1%-90.0%) at 12 months. Freedom from amputation was found to be 92.0% (95% CI, 90.7%-93.3%) at 6 months and 89.0% (95% CI, 87.3%-90.4%) at 12 months. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that age greater than 65 years, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, and end-stage renal disease were associated with a higher risk of major amputation or death (P < .05). ConclusionsBelow-knee popliteal-distal bypass is a safe and effective approach to treat severe tibial vessel occlusive disease in this challenging patient cohort. Patients exhibited low perioperative complication rates and good amputation-free survival at 1 year.

Benefits of surgical treatment within 48 h of proximal femoral fracture in centenarians: a retrospective cohort study.

Proximal femoral fractures in aging populations represent a significant concern, with an increasing prevalence among individuals aged ≥100 years. The existing research does not provide robust guidance for clinicians managing older patients aged ≥100 years with proximal femoral fractures. We investigated the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment in patients aged ≥100 years with proximal femoral fractures and evaluated the impact of early surgery on their outcomes. This retrospective cohort study involved 15 patients aged ≥100 years who underwent surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures; the control group included 137 patients in their 90s. Data were collected between January 2010 and December 2017. Evaluation items included patient characteristics, surgical details, perioperative complication rates, length of hospital stay, the proportion of patients discharged to the same facility or home, rate of regaining walking ability, and 1-year survival rate. The patients aged ≥100 years and those in their 90s had comparable outcomes. Thus, age alone does not dictate surgical success. Early surgery (≤48 h) was associated with trends toward improved perioperative complications, ambulatory ability, and return to original living environment. This study underscores the potential benefits of surgical intervention for proximal femoral fractures in patients aged ≥100 years, indicating the relevance of early surgery (≤48 h). Our findings emphasized the importance of timely intervention and evidence-based decision-making for this demographic. Clinicians, policymakers, and patients could benefit from our insights to enhance fracture management strategies, along with future research endeavors to validate and expand our results in larger multicenter cohorts.

Effect of urgent surgery within 8 hours compared to surgery between 8 and 24 hours on perioperative complications and neurological prognosis in patients older than 70 years with cervical spinal cord injury: a propensity score-matched analysis.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of surgery within 8 hours on perioperative complications and neurological prognosis in older patients with cervical spinal cord injury by using a propensity score-matched analysis. The authors included 87 consecutive patients older than 70 years who had cervical spinal cord injury and who had undergone posterior decompression and fusion surgery within 24 hours of injury. The patients were divided into two groups based on the time from injury to surgery: surgery within 8 hours (group 8 hours) and between 8 and 24 hours (group 8-24 hours). Following the preliminary study, the authors established a 1:1 matched model using propensity scores to adjust for baseline characteristics and neurological status on admission. Perioperative complication rates and neurological outcomes at discharge were compared between the two groups. Preliminary analysis of 87 prematched patients (39 in group 8 hours and 48 in group 8-24 hours) revealed that the motor index score (MIS) on admission was lower for lower extremities (12.3 ± 15.5 vs 20.0 ± 18.6, respectively; p = 0.048), and total extremities (26.7 ± 27.1 vs 40.2 ± 30.6, respectively; p = 0.035) in group 8 hours. In terms of perioperative complications, group 8 hours had significantly higher rates of cardiopulmonary dysfunction (46.2% vs 25.0%, respectively; p = 0.039). MIS improvement (the difference in scores between admission and discharge) was greater in group 8 hours for lower extremities (15.8 ± 12.6 vs 9.0 ± 10.5, respectively; p = 0.009) and total extremities (29.4 ± 21.7 vs 18.7 ± 17.7, respectively; p = 0.016). Using a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis, 29 patient pairs from group 8 hours and group 8-24 hours were selected. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, neurological status on admission, and perioperative complications between the two groups, including cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Even after matching, MIS improvement was significantly greater in group 8 hours for upper extremities (13.0 ± 10.9 vs 7.8 ± 8.3, respectively; p = 0.045), lower extremities (14.8 ± 12.7 vs 8.3 ± 11.0, respectively; p = 0.044) and total extremities (27.8 ± 21.0 vs 16.0 ± 17.5, respectively; p = 0.026). Results of the comparison after matching demonstrated that urgent surgery within 8 hours did not increase the perioperative complication rate and significantly improved the MIS, suggesting that surgery within 8 hours may be efficient, even in older patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin for mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer with negative mesorectal fascia: Long-term outcomes of a prospective trial (PKUCH-R03 trial).

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer with negative mesorectal fascia (MRF). This prospective, single-arm phase II trial was designed and conducted at Peking University Cancer Hospital. The patients who provided consent received 3 months of NCT (capecitabine and oxaliplatin, CapOX) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR). From January 2019 through December 2021, a total of 53 patients were enrolled, 7.5% of whom experienced grade 3-4 adverse events during NCT. The pCR rate was 17.0% for the entire cohort, and the overall rate of postoperative complications was 37.7% (1.9% of grade IIIa patients). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 91.4%, and 23.5% (12/51) of the patients suffered from major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Postoperative complications were independently associated with major LARS. For patients with mid-low rectal cancer with negative MRF, 3 months of NCT were found to yield a favorable tumor response with acceptable toxicity. With fair long-term survival, the NCT regimen could be associated with low rates of perioperative complications as well as acceptable anal function.

Efeito da intervenção de enfermagem com objetivos diversificados no período perinatal de pacientes com diabetes mellitus gestacional

Abstract Objective To assess the effect of goal diversified nursing intervention on the perinatal period of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods In this prospective study, 96 patients with GDM treated from February 2020 to February 2023 were selected and randomly divided into observation group (n=48) and control group (n=48). The patients in control group were given routine nursing, based on which those in observation group received goal-oriented diversified nursing intervention. The incidence rates of perioperative complications and adverse neonatal outcomes, and blood glucose indicators, the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale (C-DMSES) score and the Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Scale (DSQL) score before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results The levels of fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin in the observation group during delivery were lower than those in the control group and before intervention (P&lt;0.05). The C-DMSES score in each dimension in the observation group after intervention was higher than that in the control group and before intervention (P&lt;0.05). After intervention, the scores of treatment, physiology, psychology and social relationship in DSQL in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group and before intervention (P&lt;0.05). The incidence rate of perioperative complications in the observation group (10.42%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (31.25%) (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion Goal-oriented diversified nursing intervention can effectively control the blood glucose indicators, improve self-management ability, reduce the incidence of perioperative complications and adverse neonatal outcomes.

Does Spinal Surgery in Elderly Patients (Over 80 Years-Old) Lead to More Early Post-Operative Complications Than Lower Limb Prosthetic Surgery?

Purpose: Patients and surgeons may be reluctant on spinal surgery over 80 years old, fearing medical complications despite the possible improvement on quality of life. However, fewer reservations for lower limb prosthetic surgery (LLPS) seem to be arisen in this population. Is spinal surgery after 80 years-old responsible of more complications than lower limb surgery? Methods: The consecutive files of 164 patients over 80 years that had spinal surgery or LLPS were analyzed. The data collected pre-operatively were demographic, clinical and post-operatively the number and types of medical complications and length of stay. Results: The mean number of medical complications was 1.11 ± 0.6 [0-6] for spinal surgery and 1.09 ± 1.0 [0-3] for LLPS, (p = 0,87). The length of stay in orthopedic unit was comparable between the two groups: 10.7 ± 4.9 days [2-36] for SS and 10.7 ± 3.0 days [5-11] for LLPS (p = 0,96). Conclusion: The global rate of peri-operative complications and the length of hospital stay were similar between spinal surgery and lower limb prosthetic surgery. These results may be explained by the rising cooperation between geriatric specialist and surgeons and the development of mini-invasive surgical technics, diminishing the early post-operative complication rates.

Lymphadenectomy in clinically early epithelial ovarian cancer and survival analysis (LILAC): a Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators Collaboration (GORILLA-3002) retrospective study.

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically early-stage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; non-lymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients. No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107-0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm, lymphadenectomy should be performed according to histologic subtype and subsequent chemotherapy in patients with clinically early-stage EOC. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007309.

Off-clamp vs on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare intra- and postoperative outcomes between off-clamp and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), using data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or covariate-matched studies (propensity score-matched or matched-pair analysis). A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant literature review was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and CENTRAL for relevant studies comparing off-clamp to on-clamp RAPN. Primary outcomes were estimated blood loss, postoperative percentage decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and margin positive rate. Secondary outcomes were operative time, postoperative eGFR, length of stay, all postoperative complications, major complications, and need for transfusion. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to generate mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs). A total of 10 studies (2307 patients) were shortlisted for analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated operative blood loss between off-clamp and on-clamp RAPN (MD 21.9 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.9 to 44.7 mL; P = 0.06, I2 = 58%). Off-clamp RAPN yielded a smaller postoperative eGFR deterioration (MD 3.10%, 95% CI 1.05-5.16%; P = 0.008, I2 = 13%) and lower odds of margin positivity (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.94; P = 0.03, I2 = 0%). No significant differences were found for all secondary outcomes. Off-clamp and on-clamp RAPN are similarly effective approaches for selected renal masses. Within the classic trifecta of PN outcomes, off-clamp RAPN yields similar rates of perioperative complications and may possibly offer better preservation of renal function and reduced margin-positive rates.

Randomized clinical trial on the use of IMAGE1 S LIGHT (SPIES) vs. white light in the prevention of recurrence during transurethral resection of bladder tumors: Analysis after 12-month follow-up

IntroductionThe improved image resolution of IMAGE1 S technology will increase tumor detection, achieve a greater number of complete resections, and would probably have an impact on the reduction of recurrences. AimThe primary objective was to compare the recurrence rates of IMAGE1 S vs. white light during transurethral resection of the bladder (TUR); the secondary objective was to compare the complication rates according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) at 12 months of follow-up. MethodsProspective, randomized 1:1, blinded clinical trial. Recurrence and complication rates according to CD were analyzed using chi-square/U Mann-Whitney tests and recurrence-free survival (RFS) using Kaplan-Meier curves. The European Association of Urology (EAU) 2021 scoring model was used. ResultsThe analysis included 103 participants; 49 were assigned to the IMAGE1 S group and 54 to the white light group. Recurrence rates were 12.2% and 25.9%, respectively (P = .080). The low and intermediate risk group had a lower recurrence rate with IMAGE1 S (7.7% vs. 30.8%, P = .003) and a higher RFS with IMAGE1 S (85.2% vs. 62.8% Log Rank: 0.021), with a Hazard Ratio of 0.215 (95% CI: 0.046−0.925). No differences were observed in the high and very high-risk groups. Complications were mostly grade I and rates were similar between both groups (IMAGE1 S 20.4% vs. white light 7.4% P = .083). ConclusionsThere were no differences in the recurrence rates between groups. However, the low and intermediate risk group had a lower recurrence rate with IMAGE1 S. In addition, perioperative complication rates were not higher.

Clinical outcomes for 20 cats with congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts treated with ameroid constrictor ring attenuation (2002-2020).

To report the clinical perioperative, short-term, and long-term outcomes for cats undergoing ameroid ring constrictor (ARC) attenuation of a congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (EHPSS). Retrospective case series from a single veterinary teaching hospital (2002-2020). Twenty client-owned cats with EHPSS. Data collected from medical records included signalment, history, physical examination, clinicopathologic testing, medications, diagnostic imaging, intraoperative findings, perioperative complications, and postoperative clinical outcomes. Long-term clinical outcome was obtained from a standardized owner interview or medical records. Perioperative complications were reported in five cats out of 20, including blindness (two cats), ascites (one cat), head pressing (one cat), and seizures and death (one cat). Short-term clinical outcome was excellent in 14/18 cats, good in 2/18 cats, and poor in 2/18 cats that were available for follow up, and long term clinical outcome was excellent in 15/18, good in 1/18 cats, and poor in 2/18 cats that were available for follow up. Long-term clinical outcome was good or excellent in 16/18 of cats available for follow up. Perioperative complications were reported in five cats. Surgical attenuation of EHPSS with an ARC can result in resolution of clinical signs and biochemical abnormalities in the majority of cats. The perioperative complication rate for feline patients with EHPSS attenuated with an ARC was lower than reported historically. Seizures may persist in the long term despite normal bile acid stimulation test results, complete blood count, and biochemistry analysis.

Determining the need for a thoracoscopic approach to treat a giant hiatal hernia when abdominal access is poor.

Giant hernias present a significant challenge for digestive surgeons. The approach taken (laparoscopic vs thoracoscopic) depends largely on the preferences and skills of each surgeon, although in most cases today the laparoscopic approach is preferred. To determine whether patients presenting inadequate laparoscopic access to the intrathoracic hernial sac obtain poorer postoperative results than those with no such problem, in order to assess the need for a thoracoscopic approach. For the retrospective series of patients treated in our hospital for hiatal hernia (n = 112), we calculated the laparoscopic field of view and the working area accessible to surgical instruments, by means of preoperative imaging tests, to assess the likely outcome for cases inaccessible to laparoscopy. Patients with giant hiatal hernias for whom a preoperative calculation suggested that the laparoscopic route would not access all areas of the intrathoracic sac presented higher rates of perioperative complications and recurrence during follow-up than those for whom laparoscopy was unimpeded. The difference was statistically significant. Moreover, the insertion of mesh did not improve results for the non-accessible group. For patients with giant hiatal hernias, it is essential to conduct a preoperative evaluation of the angle of vision and the working area for surgery. When parts of the intrathoracic sac are inaccessible laparoscopically, the thoracoscopic approach should be considered.