The morphology of occlusion stump for endovascular recanalization in non-acute vertebral ostial occlusion

Abstract

PurposeNon-acute vertebral ostial occlusion (VOO) is a debilitating condition with significant mortality and morbidity rates. However, currently, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for VOO. This study aims to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of endovascular recanalization in patients with VOO. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of data from 21 consecutive patients with VOO who underwent endovascular recanalization between May 2018 and August 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on a new angiographic classification proposed by Gao et al. Type I (tapered stump group) included patients with non-acute extracranial vertebral artery ostial occlusion presenting a tapered occlusion stump. Type II (nontapered stump group) consisted of patients with a nontapered occlusion stump. We collected data on recanalization rates, perioperative complications, and follow-up outcomes. ResultsOur analysis included data from a total of 21 patients (22 lesions) with a mean age of 64.6 ± 10.6 years. The technical success rate was 66.7 % (14/21), and the rate of periprocedural complications was 14.3 % (3/21). The success rate of transitioning from the tapered stump group to the nontapered stump group was 90.9 % (10/11) and 40 % (4/10), respectively (P = 0.024). The perioperative complication rate for type I and type II patients was 18.2 % (2/11) and 10 % (1/10), respectively. Among these patients, 18 underwent endovascular recanalization using transfemoral access, while 3 underwent transradial access after failed transfemoral access, with successful outcomes for two patients. ConclusionsThis study suggests that endovascular recanalization may offer a safe, effective, and feasible treatment option for VOO patients. Additionally, the proposed angiographic classification may serve as a useful guide in selecting suitable candidates for surgery.