This brief review highlights problems in the interpretation of results about perceived postural roll-tilt of human subjects undergoing roll-tilt around their naso-occipital axis, when visual stimuli are used as a means of indicating perception. The otolithic stimulus, which causes the changes in perceived posture, also causes the eyes to roll (or tort). In turn, the altered torsional position of the eye causes the perceived orientation of visual stimuli to change. Consequently, indicators of postural perception, which rely on visual stimuli, are a confounded combination of two factors; the person's perceived postural roll-tilt, and the effect of the otolithic stimulus on ocular torsional position. Consequently, setting of a visual stimulus do not permit direct unambiguous interpretation of a subject's perceived postural roll-tilt.