Numerous sociologists (Gibbs, 1960; Block Geis, 1964; Gibbons, 1965; Ferdinand, 1966; Clinard and Quinney, 1967; and Driver, 1968) have long recognized the heterogeneous nature of the subject matter defined as crime and delinquency. They have argued that it is not plausible to expect the same or similar social conditions to emerge as causal for all forms of crime and delinquency; therefore, it is necessary to subclassify the subject matter of crime and delinquency into homogeneous types to be studied somewhat independently. However, while this state of affairs may be the case, it should not be confused with social reality, and interpreted to mean that the ostensively heterogeneous nature of the subject matter entitled crime and delinquency dictates the employment of typologies. The subject matter of every research area is phenomenologically heterogeneous. It is the role of social scientists to formulate theories which describe the underlying order or regularity. Up to now theories of crime and delinquency have been limited in their scope of application, that is, no principle of regularity has been discovered which is applicable to all or even most acts of crime and delinquency. Rather limited principles of regularity have been found workable in limited sub-areas of the field. Hence, the subject matter designated as the field of crime and delinquency appears to require a typology. Furthermore, since even these empirically limited theories are relatively ambiguous and underdeveloped, what constitutes the appropriate types also remains unclear.1 Lacking clear theoretical guidelines, some sociologists (e.g., Gibbs, 1960; Scott, 1959; and Dentler and Monroe, 1961) have attempted to construct typologies on the basis of empirical interrelationships between different criminal and delinquent patterns, that is, combining as one criminal-delinquent type those criminal and delinquent patterns which show a high empirical interrelationship. Still others (e.g., Gibbons, 1965; Ferdinand, 1966; and Clinard, 1967) have attempted to construct typologies in terms of concepts frequently employed to explain crime and delinquency, that is, combining as one criminal-delinquent type those criminal and delinquent patterns which show a strong relationship to the same causal variables. In this paper we will discuss these two
Read full abstract