Although contemporary architectural design education adopts the parametric design approach, which involves complex iterations between the arrangement of form components and building performance, this method limits students' exploration of the optimal matches between generated form and the behaviours of prospective users. Therefore, as a solution, this study hypothesises the effects of human behaviour simulation on students' exploration of user-centric values in the parametric design process. This paper compares the self-evaluation scores of 90 undergraduate students before and after simulation. Data were collected during an authentic digital design course that examined shopfront façade prototypes. Statistical analysis and interpretation indicate that simulation better facilitates students' search for matches between initially value-isolated forms, created using a parametric design tool, and useful user-centric values. However, simulation is not relevant for discovering unexpected forms. This study addresses the unknown affordances in simulation when assigning user-related value to form generation that lacks value.