BackgroundExercise promotes immunometabolic health and is increasingly recognized as an effective depression treatment. Exercise may be beneficial for patients with immunometabolic depression (IMD), who experience inflammatory and metabolic dysregulations and may respond less to antidepressants. This secondary analysis of the MOTAR study compared the effects of running therapy and antidepressants on IMD features among patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder. We additionally assessed whether baseline IMD moderated intervention effects on depression. MethodsParticipants received 16 weeks of group-based running therapy (N = 96) or escitalopram/sertraline (N = 45) in a partially randomized patient preference design. IMD features included atypical, energy-related symptom (AES) severity, inflammation index (CRP, IFN-γ, IL-6, TNF-α), metabolic syndrome index, three metabolite principle components (PC) (derived from 73 metabolites) and a composite IMD index. ResultsInterventions differed in changes in the metabolic syndrome index (d = 0.59, p = 0.026) and IMD index (d = 0.85, p < 0.001). While running therapy decreased both outcomes, the antidepressant group showed an increased IMD index. Although groups did not differ statistically significant in changes in AES severity, inflammation index, and metabolite PC1, results indicated a consistent trend towards greater improvement with running therapy across these outcomes as well (d = 0.38 to 0.52). Baseline IMD did not moderate intervention effects on depression outcomes. ConclusionsThis study suggests that exercise more effectively targets the IMD dimension than antidepressants. Patients with IMD did not benefit more from running therapy than antidepressants in terms of reductions in depression. Exercise should be considered an alternative or complementary treatment to particularly reduce IMD features in depressed patients. Trial registrationTrialregister.nl Number of identification: NTR3460.
Read full abstract