Norms Of Administrative Law Research Articles

The norms of administrative law as a form of implementation of public administration

Being a systematically implemented activity of state authorities and local self-government, public administration is aimed at regulating social relations, ensuring a stable state and development of social processes in the interests of optimal functioning and development of society and the state. The norms of administrative law play an important role in this context. Through public administration, there are qualitative transformations of the methods and functions of state administration, which from abstract prescriptions of administrative law norms become means of performing the tasks of state administration in specific legal situations. On the one hand, public administration is implemented through the norms of administrative law, since it is the norms of administrative law that regulate the activities of subjects of public administration, form the basis of administration in all spheres of the life of society and the state. On the other hand, the main form of public administration is the adoption and implementation of administrative acts, which are understood as decisions or legally significant actionsofanindividualnature, adopted(committed) by an administrative body to resolve a specific case and aimed (directed) at the acquisition, change, termination or realization of rights and/ or duties of an individual (persons). An administrative act can be issued both by a representative of public authority performing public tasks/functions and by a subject of delegated powers - a subject of public administration. At the same time, the following acts: contain legal norms that specify the norms contained in legislative acts of higher legal force, and also provide a mechanism for their implementation; define typical rules of conduct in the field of public administration; establish the organizational and legal status of public administration bodies; establish the necessary prohibitions and restrictions; grant special rights and assign special duties in the field of public administration; the conditions of interaction and coordination of activities of public administration bodies are formed; implement socio-economic programs; do not resolve cases that arose in the body, the subject of which is the regulation of the internal activity of the public administration.

On the question of administrative-delicit law of Ukraine

The article notes that the active development of social relations affected the renewal of the doctrinal foundations of Ukrainian administrative law, as a result of which there are constant discussions in the modern science of administrative law of Ukraine, including those directly related to administrative-legal relations. And therefore, the prospects of administrative and legal science, as well as the fields of administrative law, are connected with modern tasks that science sets before itself in accordance with social requirements, which must be solved, including through the application of measures. It is emphasized that administrative law regulates a significant number of different social relations, among which a special place is occupied by administrative-delict relations, which cover a variety of relations that are subject to the norms of administrative law, which is currently in the stage of systemic reform and is mostly connected with relations to ensure implementation of human and citizen rights and freedoms, consideration of administrative disputes, application of measures of administrative responsibility, bringing to disciplinary responsibility persons of public law. Attention is drawn to the attempts to reform the administrative-tort legislation, since the codified act of the administrative-tort legislation adopted in Soviet times does not meet the realities and requirements of today. Therefore, the issue of updating the administrative-delict legislation occupies a prominent place in the scientific developments of domestic legal scientists. Existing scientific discussions on the separation of administrative-tort law into an independent branch of law exist to this day, but we must state that administrative-tort law, despite its own specificity, a significant number of various functions (regulatory, binding, permitting, protective, educational etc.), is a sub-branch of administrative law, which has a special subject of legal regulation, which is a set of legal norms that regulate relations arising from the doctrine of administrative tort. It is emphasized that the formation of modern administrative-delict law involves interaction with the institutions of administrative responsibility provided for by the sectoral norms of laws, which may include the procedure of bringing a person to administrative responsibility, completely different from that regulated by the Code of Administrative Offenses, which requires new theoretical views on the establishment of a system of administrative penalties.

Defining the functions of administrative law norms in the modern theory of administrative law

Defining the functions of administrative law norms in the modern theory of administrative law

Pojęcie nadzoru materialnego nad dobrostanem zwierząt

In the context of growing global awareness regarding animal protection and requirements for their treatment, administrative oversight of animal welfare is gaining importance as a key element in ensuring the proper functioning of the state and its institutions in enforcing administrative law norms. The article focuses on defining and discussing the objectives of administrative oversight in the context of animal welfare, highlighting its multidimensional nature, which serves not only to protect animal rights but also to maintain overall welfare standards. Through a review of existing positions in doctrine and jurisprudence, the author aims to define administrative oversight of animal welfare in the material aspect, considering preventive and reactive actions and the main goal, which is to improve living conditions for animals. In light of this perspective, he argues that effectively conducted administrative oversight can contribute to faster and more efficient improvement of living conditions for animals than traditional criminal proceedings. The considerations have both dogmatic and practical significance, emphasizing the role that administrative oversight can play in improving animal welfare. Highlighting the effectiveness of administrative tools in protecting animal rights contributes to the discussion on the superiority of these tools over penal legal measures, offering new perspectives on achieving better living standards for animals.

Некоторые проблемы административного регулирования в сфере миграционной политики

This article analyzes some aspects of administrative regulations, establishes their significance, identifies some imperfections in their implementation, including non-compliance with the norms of administrative law, since most of them are not relevant, they do not have a single general procedure, sequence, specificity in the execution of administrative procedures, and some procedures are duplicated and arise significant problems in the implementation of migration legislation. The article considers the need for a comprehensive scientific study of the legal nature of administrative regulations, the need to study and define the general concept, the essence of administrative regulations and the importance of analyzing the classification of regulations.

Norms of administrative and procedural law (to the discussion of their structure and constituent elements)

The article analyzes scientific approaches to determining the structure of administrative- procedural norms and formulates the author’s approach to solving the specified scientific task. The specificity of the structure of the norms of procedural law in comparison with substantive norms is noted. It is emphasized that the hypothesis is an element of the structure of the administrative- procedural norm, which contains an indication of legal facts, the occurrence of which is associated with the «start» of the action of the disposition. It is also emphasized that the absence of a hypothesis as a structural element of the administrative- procedural legal norm makes its effectiveness impossible, or even its implementation at all. It is argued that the disposition of the administrative-procedural norm is a set of rights and legal obligations, a rule of conduct, according to which the participants of administrative- procedural relations act in the presence of the hypothesized circumstances. The disposition may contain options for choosing behavior for the participant in the proceedings, providing him with an alternative in his legal behavior during the consideration of the case and decision-making. In other words, the disposition fully reveals the potential of the dispositive method of legal regulation of the relevant legal relations. It is noted that among the elements, along with hypothesis and disposition, it is expedient to outline incentive as an element of the norms of administrative and procedural law, which establishes positive (incentives, guarantees) or negative (procedural coercion, restrictions, including warnings; removal from the courtroom; temporary removal evidence for examination by the court; pretext; fine; refusal of a procedural act, which was adopted by this procedural norm; recognition of evidence as improper, which was obtained in violation of the law; leaving the statement of claim without consideration or movement, etc.) legal consequences of implementation/non-implementation of its prescriptions.

Legal regulations and sanctions related to the illegal dumping of waste in Polish environmental law

This paper concerns legal regulations and sanctions regarding the illegal dumping of waste in environmental law in Poland. First, introductory remarks are presented, including an outline of the status of Poland’s implementation of EU instruments through national law. This section of the paper concludes with an overview of the basic legal acts that are applicable in Poland, to illustrate the legal spectrum of this topic (related administrative law norms and certain criminal and civil law rules). Second, considerations regarding permits for the transportation and processing of waste are discussed; this section includes relevant administrative provisions applicable in Poland. Third, legal regulations concerning administrative control are presented; in particular, this section pays special attention to control in the context of issuing permits as well as field inspections independent of this process. Fourth, civil liability is addressed. Fifth, provisions of criminal law are discussed, including penal code provisions, extra code provisions, and provisions related to administrative fines. Finally, the paper concludes with a concise summary.

GENERAL PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE CATEGORY “OBJECTIVE” AS ELEMENT OF OBJECTIVES IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

The article revealed general philosophical and legal aspects of the category “goal” as an element of goal-setting norms of administrative law. Emphasis is placed on the fact that: 1) in the theory of law, the concept of “law in the objective sense” is defined as the result of rule-making activity and characterized as a system of legal norms; 2) the real realization of the goals of the right in an objective sense is acquired through law-making activity and through other forms of realization of the right; 3) “legal norm” as a static phenomenon has its own goals, because they are formed by the subject of norm-making and are the result of his goal-setting; 4) “law” as a general concept that characterizes all mandatory rules of conduct contained in the sources of national legislation also has its own goals, the main ones of which were formed in ancient times, but this does not exclude the possibility of correlation of such goals in the future. It has been established that the study of the goal as a key category of goal-setting norms of administrative law presupposes its study, on the one hand, as a general philosophical or general sociological concept, which is inherent in all types of purposeful activity (general philosophi­cal aspect), and, on the other hand, as a multifaceted concept that can acquire its substantive features depending on the level of legal regulation, the subject of goal-setting or the sphere of social relations where the relevant norms of law are implemented (legal aspect). It is proved that in the philosophy of law, the following basic approach to the interpretation of the concept of “goal” was formed - the goal is always a subjective reflection of objective reality in ideal images, although the definitions can be as follows - “it is an idealized need of a person who has found his object”, “this is such a subjective image of the object of activity, in the ideal form of which the result of human activity is assumed”, “imaginary, ideal image of the result of action”, etc. It was concluded that the legal aspect of the “goal” category consists in the analysis of the factors determining the goal of the subject of rule-making activity, the place, role and types of goals in legal regulation, methods of identifying and formalizing the goals of the subject of rule-making activity, etc. These aspects of the category “goal” reveal its meaning in different legal dimensions, which can be closely interconnected (for example, the goals of administrative law, the goals of administrative-legal regulation, the goals of administrative law norms), and can exist in parallel without interfering with each other one (for example, the goals of administrative proceedings and the goals of the development of the information society in Ukraine. It was found that none of the existing goals of law or norms of law are individually (independently) capable of giving a comprehensive idea of the phenomenon of “goals” in law. This can only be done on the basis of comprehensive, integrative and systematic analysis of the goal as a multifaceted phenomenon in legal reality.

Judicial enforcement as a specific type of law enforcement: administrative and legal aspect

In the article, the author reflects on the possibility of recognizing judicial enforcement as a specific type of law enforcement. Proceeding from the already finally formed position of recognition of application as a separate independent form of implementation of the norms of administrative law, along with its other forms - implementation, compliance, use, the author directs his scientific search to the study of the specifics of law enforcement by its special subject - the court . Having analyzed the arguments available in scientific sources about the specifics of judicial enforcement, the author rejects most of the features that are proposed in scientific sources as being inherent only in judicial enforcement (simultaneous and related application of not only the norms of substantive law, but also the norms of procedural law; legal interpretation activity court; the need to coordinate judicial enforcement with judicial practice) as those that characterize the enforcement activity not only of courts, but also of other subjects. Such a deficiency of normative regulation is indicated, such as the lack of normative definitions of the concepts of "norms of material norm” ("material norms”, "substantive law”, other similar), "norms of procedural law” ("procedural norms”, "procedural law”, other similar ), as well as "application of legal norms”, "application of material law norms”, "application of procedural law norms”, etc. As criteria for distinguishing judicial application as a separate type of law enforcement, the author considers: the specificity of the subject of application itself; different from other cases of (non-judicial) application of normative regulation of relevant procedural issues, and the content of the concepts "type” and "typing” is taken into account. It is indicated that, in the absence of a unified approach to determining the content of all forms of implementation of legal norms (execution, use, compliance, application), it is problematic (and will remain until the normative resolution of this issue) to attribute certain actions of the court in the implementation of procedural norms to certain specific forms The author considers the possibility of interpreting the actions of the court to implement procedural norms in some cases as "use” and in others as "application” as a promising direction for further discussions.

Reforming the justice process as a basis for combating corruption

Despite the ongoing measures to combat corruption in the judicial system of the Russian Federation, there remain cases when the presiding judge in a case is guided not by the norms of laws, but by personal and other material interests, which necessitates a change in the approach to identify, eliminate the causes, prevent, disclose, investigate corruption offenses, minimize and eliminate such offenses. The subject of the study is the norms of constitutional, civil and administrative law, other normative legal and judicial acts defining the procedural provisions of ongoing trials in the Russian Federation. The purpose of the research is to study the existing measures to combat corruption in the judicial system, as well as to develop proposals aimed at identifying and suppressing them. In the course of the research, the following methods were used: dialectical, logical, systemic, functional, formal-legal, comparative-legal research methods. The study analyzes the main legislative provisions related to combating corruption, as well as procedural norms of the law of judicial processes. The novelty of the research is the consideration of judicial instances as a single entity, where judges are divided not by specific courts where they carry out their official activities, but by internal conviction, and judges are united depending on the judicial instance. At the same time, the concealment of information about the judges themselves and the introduction of certain prohibitions on establishing their identity by the participants in the process will not only reduce the dependence of judges on the participants in the process, but also increase their personal security and reduce corruption. The analysis of the conducted research allowed us to establish that currently in the Russian Federation there are cases of corruption in the judicial system, where one of the main directions is the imposition of an illegal and unjustified court order, and in some cases the acquittal of a person who committed a crime. In this regard, it is proposed to reform the process of justice, which is based on the concealment of information about the identity of the presiding judges.

Implementation of child protection’ constitutional guarantees in the branch legislation

Constitutional guarantees are considered, their impact on the norms of industry legislation in terms of defining and consolidating guarantees in the sphere of labor for children, as well as in connection with motherhood, the presence of children, guarantees enshrined in the norms of family law, as well as some norms of administrative and criminal law. The guarantee nature of constitutional principles in relation to labor relations involving minor workers is substantiated. A classification of guarantee standards in the labor sphere is given. A classification of constitutional guarantees for the protection of children is proposed.

Gender rights of citizens in Russian legislation and law enforcement practice

Human rights and freedoms are the highest value in the Russian Federation, and their observance and protection is the responsibility of the State. Despite the constitutional consolidation of this provision, the equality of rights of men and women, as well as the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex, Russian legislation distinguishes the constitutional rights of women and men in certain aspects, taking into account the physiological characteristics of the former exclusively. Thus, legislators grant more rights and freedoms to some categories of people, and in some cases this preference imposes certain restrictions. In particular, the restriction of women's rights to work. The subject of the study is the norms of constitutional, civil and administrative law, other normative legal and judicial acts defining gender equality and inequality of citizens in the Russian Federation. The purpose of the study is to compare legislation and law enforcement practice in relation to men and women. In the course of the work, the following methods were used: dialectical, logical, systemic, functional, formal-legal, comparative-legal research methods. The study analyzes the basic constitutional rights of men and women, as well as the application of a gender approach in law enforcement. The novelty of the conducted research is the differentiation of gender constitutional rights of citizens, a comparison of the application of legislation to men and women depending on physiological characteristics, as well as a comparison of law enforcement practices applied to them in homogeneous processes. The analysis of the conducted research allowed us to establish that some of the legislative acts have gender discriminatory provisions. This is directly related to the fact that legislators take into account only the physiological characteristics of the female body, while the characteristics of the male body are ignored. Law enforcement practice in the gender aspect implies that men's rights are derived from the rights of women (whose rights are prerogative). In this regard, there is a need both for the development of law enforcement approaches and for the adoption (amendment) of legislative acts themselves, which should be based on the principle of equality of citizens' rights.

Peculiarities of proceedings in administrative cases regarding the placement of a foreigner who is subject to deportation or readmission to a point of temporary stay

The article examines the specifics of proceedings in administrative cases regarding the placement of foreigners who are subject to deportation or readmission to the point of temporary stay of foreigners and stateless persons who are illegally staying in Ukraine. The topicality of the topic is due to the implementation of the Agreement on the Association of Ukraine and the European Union regarding the creation of a single legal space, including the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of foreigners and stateless persons when challenging placement in special institutions. The object of the study is a complex of social relations that are formed in the process of contesting the placement of foreigners who are subject to deportation or readmission to the point of temporary stay of foreigners and stateless persons. The subject of the study is the norms of administrative law, which determine the specifics of the protection of the rights of foreigners, stateless persons who are placed in a temporary detention center, in accordance with the procedure defined by the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine. The methodological basis of the research is a set of general scientific methods and private methods of scientific knowledge. The work uses the following methods: dialectical, formal-logical, statistical, comparative-legal, systemic-structural, analysis and synthesis. The article examines the concepts of «expulsion» and «readmission», examines the peculiarities of proceedings in administrative cases concerning the accommodation of a foreigner or a stateless person who is subject to expulsion or readmission to the point of temporary stay of foreigners and stateless persons who are illegally staying in Ukraine. Judicial practice has been studied and the main reasons for administrative claimants' appeals to the court for the specified category of cases have been identified. It is proposed to establish a maximum period of detention of foreigners and stateless persons in the points of temporary stay of foreigners and stateless persons who are illegally staying in Ukraine.

The problems of defining and applying the concepts of gender equality and gender inequality in Russian law

The article examines the issues of the emergence, development and current state of the scientific problem of defining the concepts of gender equality (inequality), as well as the law enforcement aspect of its solution in the Russian Federation and in foreign countries. The object of the study is public relations between the state and citizens of Russia on issues of equality of rights, freedoms, opportunities for their realization and obligations established by Part 2 of Article 6 and Part 3 of Article 19 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The subject of the study is the norms of constitutional (Part 2 of Article 6, Part 3 of Article 19 and paragraph "zh.1" of Part 1 of Article 72 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation), civil (part 1 of Article 12 of the RF IC) and administrative law (Part 2 of Article 3.9 and Part 2 of Article 4.2 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation), other normative legal acts and judicial acts defining gender equality (inequality) of citizens. In the course of the work, dialectical, logical, systemic, functional, formal-legal, comparative-legal research methods were used. The aim of the study is to develop a uniform approach to establishing the concepts of gender equality (inequality) in order to eliminate the problems of ambiguous interpretation and conflict of legislation in modern science and law enforcement practice. This goal has determined the need to set and solve the following tasks: 1. Research on the concepts of gender equality (inequality) as legal categories in the Russian Federation and foreign countries. 2. Formulation of uniform definitions of gender equality (inequality). 3. Definition of the main difference between the concepts of gender equality (inequality). 4. Consideration of the possibility of applying the author's concepts of gender equality (inequality) in law enforcement practice and in normative acts. The study showed that there is no single approach to understanding gender equality (inequality) in modern science and law enforcement practice. Most modern concepts of gender equality (inequality) are based on the recognition of the equality of rights and freedoms of men and women. The author of the article puts forward the theory that gender equality is a right guaranteed by the state and international legal acts, freedom, duties and opportunities to achieve them in relation to citizens without gender separation, and gender inequality, on the contrary, acts as a discriminatory sign in relation to citizens depending on their gender.

On the question of the significance of the energy security of Ukraine under the conditions of marital state and its legal regulation

The paper is devoted to topical issues of Ukraine's energy security in the context of martial law in general and the negative consequences that the russian federation is having on energy infrastructure facilities in particular. Attention is focused on the fact that the energy security of the state is a component of the national security of a modern civilized state and one of the important areas of ensuring national interests. The formation and implementation of Ukraine's energy policy in the context of national security is an extremely important direction of economic policy in the context of European integration and striving for world standards. It is emphasized that russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 endangered the normal functioning of Ukraine's energy system. A legal analysis of the state's energy security and legal responsibility for offenses in the energy sector under martial law is provided. The paper is based on the legislative base of Ukraine and norms of international law, works of domestic scientists, as well as materials of national and foreign periodicals, statistical compilations, including those of international organizations. It was determined that the protection of citizens of Ukraine and the energy sector also includes norms of civil, administrative, and economic law. However, in the conditions of martial law, the norms of criminal legislation that encroach on the energy security of the state and establish criminal liability for committing criminal offenses in the field of national and public security, in particular, sabotage, explosions, acts of terrorism, intentional destruction or damage to residential objects deserve the greatest attention - communal economy, violation of laws and rules of warfare, etc. It is substantiated that an integral and important feature of the listed criminal offenses is the occurrence of a socially dangerous consequence in the form of creating a danger to human life and health or causing significant property damage or the occurrence of other serious consequences, which consists in such changes when there is a real threat to normal functioning transport, communication, providing consumers with water and electricity.

Effectiveness of the mechanism of goal-setting norms of administrative law: concept, essence and meaning

Based on the analysis of various approaches, theoretical and legal ideas regarding the effectiveness of the goal-setting mechanism of administrative law norms have been determined, and the author’s point of view has been expressed on some fundamental aspects of the problem.
 It is noted that the author is a supporter of the so-called complex approach, according to which the evaluation of any phenomenon from the point of view of its effectiveness has a multifaceted orientation. At the same time, it should be noted that, taking into account the specificity and content of the mechanism of goal-setting norms of administrative law, the basis of such an assessment is the priority approach, according to which the analysis of the achievement of real final results by the mechanism of goal-setting norms of administrative law, embodied in the legal consequences of the implementation of norms, is carried out . At the same time, among the aspects of such an analysis there is a block of social and economic evaluations, where the priority of one or another aspect in one or another case is determined depending on the nature, level, or direction of one or another group of norms of administrative law that is subject to evaluation - that is, it is the direct subject of evaluation on efficiency.
 It is emphasized that the effectiveness of the goal-setting mechanism of administrative law is not limited by social or economic aspects. This mechanism can be evaluated for political purposes (determines the effectiveness of the goal-setting mechanism in terms of the state’s ability to perform internal and external functions, etc.); psychological (evaluates the ability of the goal-setting mechanism to ensure the perception of the norms of administrative law by their addressees); conflict (determines the ability of the goal-setting mechanism to influence the level of conflict in society as a whole, in a certain social group, team, etc.) and other aspects.
 It has been established that the effectiveness of the goal-setting mechanism of administrative law norms is a complex category that includes a set of criteria and indicators that determine the level of achievement by the process of formulating and adjusting the goals of administrative law norms of specific social, economic, political or other results, which is manifested as a result of the implementation of the specified norms.

Modern understanding of subjeсt of science of administrative law

The article is devoted to discussion of the subject of science of Administrative Law. It is concluded about the fallacy of understanding of the subject of science of Administrative Law by B. V. Rossinsky and authors which take a similar position with him (Yu. N. Starilov and others). Based on the concept of the subject of science of Administrative Law proposed by K. S. Belsky the auther highlights and considrs such elements of the subject of science of Administrative Law as administrative-law norms, administrative-law relations, administrative-law categories, law enforcement administrative practice. The role and meaning of doctrine were sown in the definition of the subject of science of Administrative Law.

Mechanism of Administrative and Legal Regulation

In modern conditions, issues of regulating relations related to the implementation of public administration and the protection of subjective rights, freedoms and legitimate interests in this area are of great importance. Their consideration at the scientific, educational and didactic levels can be carried out through such a category as a mechanism of administrative and legal regulation. Its use in scientific circulation makes it possible to establish the relationship that exists between the norms of administrative law, administrative legal relations and legal acts of management, as well as to characterize the interaction between them. This article attempts to systematically study these categories, as well as the features of their implementation in individual institutions of administrative law in Russia and foreign countries. The mechanism of administrative legal regulation is studied in the science of administrative law in the aspect of the action of various regulatory and protective measures, through the prism of the implementation of state regulatory policy, special administrative legal regimes and administrative responsibility, protection of subjective administrative rights, mandatory requirements, and administrative coercion. At the same time, until now in the science of Russian administrative law, despite its widespread use of this category in relation to applied issues of public administration, it has not been the subject of comprehensive scientific knowledge. At the same time, at the theoretical level it is recognized that subjective administrative rights and obligations cannot exist outside the application of the norms of administrative law and the implementation of administrative legal relations. This scientific article defines the importance of the mechanism of administrative and legal regulation, presents the content of this scientific category, and carries out an analysis of scientific positions existing in the relevant field of knowledge.

On the Question of the Concept, Essence and Types of Administrative Procedures of the State Registration of Civil Status Acts

The article is devoted to the consideration of issues related to the definition of the concept of administrative procedures of state registration of civil status acts and the main criteria for its division. The relevance of the topic is determined by the fact that the leading place in the system of providing administrative procedures belongs to the institute of state registration of acts of civil status, which is carried out by various subjects of public administration on the basis of the norms of administrative law. Increasing attention to the problem of defining, streamlining and proper legal regulation of various procedures is due to the complexity and diversity of management, regulatory and control activities of public authorities. The purpose of the article is to define the concept of administrative procedures for state registration of acts of civil status and to highlight the main criteria of their types. Achieving the outlined goal became possible thanks to the use of a complex of methods of scientific knowledge, namely: the dialectical method, the logical-semantic, structural-functional method and the method of interpreting legal norms. Scientific positions on the interpretation of the essence of the concept of "administrative procedure" have been analyzed. On the basis of the conducted theoretical analysis, it was concluded that scientists are united by the thesis that the administrative procedure is directly related to the activity of public administration and is an established algorithm for the functioning of subjects of power (state authorities, local self-government bodies, their officials and officials, etc.). It is substantiated that the most convincing is the recognition of the administrative procedure as a complex normative regulator of the system of administrative-procedural norms, which determine the procedure for the implementation of certain types of actions by administrative bodies regarding the application of standardized administrative-legal measures as normatively fixed methods and techniques for the performance of state functions entrusted to these bodies . Attention is paid to the study of issues of classification of administrative procedures of state registration of acts of civil status according to separate criteria, distinguished by their own characteristics. On the basis of the conducted research, conclusions were formulated and recommendations were made for establishing at the legislative level the types of administrative procedures for state registration of civil status acts, grouped according to the relevant criteria.

Conditions for the effectiveness of the mechanism of goal-setting norms of administrative law: concepts and varieties

Based on the analysis of various approaches, the conditions of effectiveness of the mechanism of goal-setting norms of administrative law are outlined: concepts and varieties, and the author's point of view is expressed on some fundamental aspects of the problem.
 It is noted that the conditions for the effectiveness of the goal-setting mechanism of administrative law norms in comparison with the effectiveness of the legal regulation mechanism, the effectiveness of administrative law norms or their implementation have their own specifics, but in general, the same theoretical models are the basis of their delineation. As the author notes, the conditions for the effectiveness of the goal-setting mechanism of administrative law are circumstances and/or features of reality of a general and special nature that ensure the effectiveness of the goal­setting process of administrative law. Secondly, it is advisable to divide the specified conditions into general and special ones.
 Among the general conditions for the effectiveness of the mechanism of goal-setting norms of administrative law, in particular, the following are outlined: compliance of the specified mechanism with general laws and principles of self-organization of society and other systemic phenomena; correlation of the goal-setting mechanism of administrative law norms with the needs of social development; compliance of the goal-setting mechanism with the specific historical conditions of the functioning of administrative law; compliance of the goal-setting mechanism with the real needs and interests of those subjects, the relations between which are regulated by the norms of administrative law, etc.
 Among the special factors of effectiveness of the mechanism of goal-setting of norms of administrative law, the following can be mentioned: the objective determination of the activity of the law-making subject during the determination of the goal and the assignment of norms of administrative law or their groups; features of administrative law­making as a result of the creative process; the level of legal awareness of subjects of relevant administrative legal relations; conformity of the goal-setting mechanism of administrative law norms to the theoretical and practical results of scientific research (social, precise, natural, technical, etc.), the objects of which are simultaneously objects of administrative legal relations, etc.