Salivary glands are common organs at risk in both head and neck external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT), but incidences of xerostomia in RPT are inconsistent with the EBRT Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) limits. In EBRT, salivary glands are usually assumed to be parallel organs, with QUANTEC guidelines based on Dmean, but this is known to be a gross over-simplification of the full complexity of the underlying functional organization. The goal of this work is to combine machine learning of EBRT dose–outcome data with stylized small-scale RPT dosimetry to discover more reliable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models of xerostomia across both modalities. A retrospective cohort of 211 EBRT patients was analyzed using a custom-designed in-house machine learning workflow. From this, a hierarchy of three models of increasing complexity was trained, evaluated for performance and generalization, and coupled with stylized small-scale salivary gland dosimetry to assess the influence of model complexity on the predicted NTCP for plausible patterns of RPT dose nonuniformity. The three models in the hierarchy (A, B, C), in increasing order of complexity, associate xerostomia with the following: the mean dose to the whole contralateral parotid (model A), the mean dose to a ductally localized region (model B) and a serial interaction dose term between two ductal sub-compartments (model C). While the difference between the three models for EBRT p-values and AUCs is rather marginal, for physiologically driven ductal dose distributions in RPT, the predicted reduction in TD50 can be as large as a factor of 10. These results provide hints towards a plausible reconciliation of the observed inconsistency of xerostomia in RPT with EBRT dose limits.
Read full abstract