Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates whether industrial companies with more toxic emissions outperform those with less toxic emissions. First, firms that pollute the most do not consistently outperform those that pollute the least in an almost stochastic dominance sense. Moreover, firms with average amounts of emissions occasionally outperform firms that pollute the least due to the non-uniform pattern in mean returns across emission portfolios. Second, although a hedge portfolio that is long (short) in the most (least) brown firms earns significantly positive alphas based on standard asset pricing models, these abnormal returns can become statistically insignificant when factors from multiple models are combined. Third, although the highest-emission quintile generates superior reward-to-risk ratios and manipulation-proof performance measures than the lowest-emission quintile, the pattern across portfolios is once again not uniform.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.