Objectives This paper discusses the two conflicting logics of learning recognition that underlie the higher-level learning recognition system.
 Methods For this purpose, higher education was divided into university and non-university areas and the logic of learning recognition that developed historically in each area was examined. The two logics of learning recognition were analyzed while reviewing the evolution of learning recognition that has developed in the field of university higher education, focusing on degrees and credit systems, and in the field of non-university higher education, fo-cusing on vocational qualifications.
 Results Throughout its long history, universities have established a learning recognition system with the logic of process-based recognition as its core. While various prototypes of higher-level learning and education existed, degrees and credits played a major role in establishing universities at the core of higher education. On the other hand, in the non-university sector, a learning recognition system has been established based on the logic of out-come-based recognition, and is now being emphasized more at the national and supranational policy level. In this context, it is frequent today that process-based recognition and outcome-based recognition logic are combined to build a learning recognition system, and in the process, the two heterogeneous learning recognition logics are showing signs of conflict.
 Conclusions Because the two learning recognition logics of process-based recognition and outcome-based rec-ognition are conflicting logics, it is natural that they primarily show conflicting aspects. Nevertheless, the reason why attempts to combine the two logics in a convergent manner rather than in conflict are being actively made at the national and supranational level is because it is becoming more clear that human capabilities cannot be com-prehensively evaluated and recognized by any single logic. In light of global trends, we can take a critical look at how our society is fundamentally restructuring the learning recognition system by combining the two learning rec-ognition logics. Since the higher-level learning recognition system is a measure that clearly shows how society designs higher education system, it is necessary to deeply examine the conflicting logics of learning recognition and consider ways to combine them.
Read full abstract