Question Among children with group A β-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis and a high risk for rheumatic fever, how does once-daily oral amoxicillin compare with the recommended twice-daily (BID) oral penicillin V with respect to eradicating GABHS? Design Randomized, non-inferiority (≤10% difference in eradication rates) trial. Setting School-based clinic in New Zealand. Participants 353 children who had throat swabs positive for GABHS. Intervention Amoxicillin 1500 mg once daily (or 750 mg if bodyweight was ≤30 kg) orally or penicillin V 500 mg twice daily (or 250 mg if bodyweight was ≤20 kg) orally, each treatment for 10 days. Outcomes Eradication of GABHS, determined with follow-up throat cultures on days 3-6, 12-16, and 26-36. GABHS isolates were serotyped to distinguish bacteriologic treatment failures (and relapses) from new acquisitions. Main Results The upper 95% confidence limit for the differences in positive cultures between the antibiotics was 4.9% at days 3-6, 6.5% at days 12-16, and 8.5% at days 26-36. Treatment failures (including relapses) occurred at each visit in 5.8%, 12.7% and 10.7% of amoxicillin recipients and 6.2%, 11.9% and 11.3% of penicillin V recipients, respectively. No significant differences in resolution of symptoms were noted between treatment groups. One case of unsubstantiated acute rheumatic fever occurred after 7 days of amoxicillin. Conclusions In this adequately powered study, once-daily oral amoxicillin is not inferior to twice-daily penicillin V for the treatment and eradication of GABHS in children with pharyngitis. Commentary One of the problems facing care for populations at high risk of acute rheumatic fever is that of adherence to antibiotics—which we know have to be given for a relatively long period (roughly twice as long as most antibiotic courses) to be effective at reducing this important secondary nonsuppurative complication by two-thirds. Use of amoxicillin—although broader spectrum than oral penicillin—has the advantage of its longer half-life, rendering once-daily treatment possible, and lack of absorption problems with food, which probably therefore increases adherence. This study made the comparison in a randomized trial among a group of children, who were >80% Pacific Island/Maori and at high risk of acute rheumatic fever, designed to test equivalence. Unfortunately it was not blinded (which would have required a placebo second dose for the amoxicillin group), and the outcome measure was the proxy of the bacteriologic profile (checking for persistence of the original Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus strain) rather than acute rheumatic fever itself. But the risk of bias remains low (it is hard to see how the lack of blinding could have affected the bacteriology much). It adds to the literature suggesting that amoxicillin is equivalent to oral penicillin for this purpose—and much easier to use. Clinical Research Abstracts for PediatriciansThe Journal of PediatricsVol. 153Issue 5PreviewEDITOR'S NOTE: Journals reviewed for this issue: Archives of Disease in Childhood, Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of Pediatrics, The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Journal, and Pediatrics. Gurpreet K. Rana, BSc, MLIS, Taubman Medical Library, University of Michigan, contributed to the review and selection of this month's abstracts. Full-Text PDF