Attribute control charts are used effectively to monitor for process change. Their accuracy can be improved by judiciously selecting the sample size. The required sample sizes to achieve accuracy can be quite restrictive, especially when the nominal proportions of non-conforming units are quite small. The usual attribute control chart has a set sample size and the number of non-conforming units in the sample is plotted. If, instead of setting a specific sample size the number of non-conforming units is set, an alternative monitoring process is possible. Specifically, the cumulative count of conforming (CCC-r) control chart is a plot of the number of units that must be tested to find the rth non-conforming unit. These charts, based on the geometric and negative binomial distributions, are often suggested for monitoring very high quality processes. However, they can also be used very efficiently to monitor processes of lesser quality. This procedure has the potential to find process deterioration more quickly and efficiently. Xie et al. (Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 1999; 16(2):148–157) provided tables of control limits for CCC-r charts for but focused mainly on high-quality processes and the tables do not include any assessments of the risk of a false alarm or the reliability of detecting process change. In this paper, these tables are expanded for processes of lesser quality and include such assessments using the number of expected monitoring periods (average run lengths (ARLs)) to detect process change. Also included is an assessment of the risk of a false alarm, that is, a false indication of process deterioration. Such assessments were not included by Xie et al. but are essential for the quality engineer to make sound decisions. Furthermore, a hybrid of the control charts based on the binomial, geometric and negative binomial distributions is proposed to monitor for process change. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Read full abstract