Imust admit to some early trepidation when I was asked if I would be prepared to table this paper, 'The adoption of the Metric System in the Ordnance Survey'. In the first place, the results of metrication, whilst massive in the numbers of docu? ments affected are fairly ordinary in substance in comparison with, say, the adoption of the metric system in aircraft instrumentation and less likely therefore to give rise to impassioned argument and discussion! Secondly, the Ordnance Survey has proposed to begin its adoption of the metric system at that end of its work which you generally might find to be less interesting, although the reverse may be true for those of you who are engineers, surveyors or architects. Lastly, it is not a subject which lends itself to presentation by magic lantern, which would conveniently hide deficiencies in my presentation. To assess the merits of a contour interval, or the clutter created by the inclusion of new material on a map, or the effect of more colour, must be gauged for its visual effect at scale, and projection does nothing to help the appreciation. I should add, finally, that my paper does not state accepted Government policy, which is still under discussion. The Ordnance Survey's task.?Looking back at papers presented by the Ordnance Survey and others concerning the Ordnance Survey, in the past, I am struck by the fact that speakers generally assume that, because the Ordnance Survey has been going for a considerable time, everybody knows precisely what it has done in the past, is doing at present and plans to do in the future. They then launch into a specialized subject. Perhaps they are right, but in talking about the effect of metri? cation in the Ordnance Survey, I cannot take this sort of risk because it really is essential for metrication to be assessed and measured against what would have been happening in the future without it. A good deal of my research has shown that there is not really very much appreciation of what we are doing. I am sure I do not need to go back to the Ordnance Survey's first published map in 1801, and it may simply be confirming your knowledge when I say by the 1930's the state of mapping had so deteriorated that Lord Davidson's Committee was appointed in 1935 to consider what measures were needed to restore the national survey. The recommendations of the Committee provided for the retriangulation of the whole country so that all its maps and plans could be revised and reconstituted upon a uniform system of control (now the national grid) which until then had been lacking, and also for the continuous revision of the large scale plans to ensure that the deterioration of the preceding years should never recur. A new and larger scale, 1/1250, was introduced for major built up areas, and the Ordnance Survey has been engaged on completing this, and on the recompilation and revision of the old twenty-five inch scale maps of cultivated areas and minor towns, as well as the resurvey of mountain and moorland areas at the six-inch scale, since the end of the Second World War. The 1/1250 scale survey is nearing completion. About 48,000 plans are involved. The 1/2500 and the six-inches to one mile, as well as the 1/25,000 is unfortunately however a different story. Of the total of some 182,000
Read full abstract