Monitor Units Research Articles

Preclinical validation and treatment of volumetric modulated arc therapy based total bone marrow irradiation in Halcyon™ ring gantry linear accelerator

AimThis study aims​ to report preclinical validation, and the first clinical treatment of total bone marrow irradiation (TMI) and total bone marrow and lymph nodal irradiation (TMLI) using Volumetric modulated arc therapy in Halcyon-E ring gantry linear accelerator. Preclinical validation includes simulation, planning, patient-specific QA, and dry run.Material and methodFour patients, two female and two male, with body weights of 116 kg, 52 kg, 64 kg, and 62 kg; with two with chronic myeloid leukemia, one each with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were simulated and planned for TMI/TMLI. Patients were immobilized with a full-body vacuum bag. Head first supine (HFS) and Feet first supine (FFS) CT scans were acquired from head to knee and knee to toe. Planning target volume (PTV) was created with a uniform margin of 6 mm over the total bone marrow/bone marrow + lymph nodes. HFS and FFS PTVs were optimized independently using 6MV unflatten energy for 12 Gy in 6 fractions. Plans were merged to create the resultant dose distribution using a junction bias dose matching technique. The total number of isocenters was ≤ 10 per CT set, and two to four full arcs were used for each isocenter. A junction dose gradient technique was used for dose feathering between arcs between adjacent isocenters.ResultOnly one female patient diagnosed as AML received the TMLI treatment, while the other three patients dropped out due to clinical complications and comorbidities that developed in the time between simulation and treatment. The result presented has been averaged over all four patients. For PTV, 95% dose was normalised to 95% volume, PTV_V107% receiving 3.3 ± 3.1%. Total lung mean and V12Gy were 1048.6 ± 107.1 cGy and 19.5 ± 12.1%. Maximum lens doses were 489.5 ± 35.5 cGy (left: L) and 497 ± 69.2 cGy (right: R). The mean cardiac and bilateral kidney doses were 921.75 ± 89.2 cGy, 917.9 ± 63.2 cGy (L), and 805.9 ± 9.7 cGy (R). Average Monitor Unit was 7738.25 ± 1056.6. The median number of isocenters was 17(HFS+FFS), average MU/Dose (cGy) ratio per isocenter was 2.28 ± 0.3.ConclusionHalcyon-E ring gantry linear accelerator capable of planning and delivering TMI/TMLI.​​

Use of CBCT plus plan robustness for reducing QACT frequency in intensity-modulated proton therapy: Head-and-neck cases.

Anatomic variation has a significant dosimetric impact in intensity-modulated proton therapy. Weekly or biweekly computed tomography (CT) scans, called quality assurance CTs (QACTs), are used to monitor anatomic and resultant dose changes to determine whether adaptive plans are needed. Frequent CT scans result in unwanted QACT dose and increased clinical workloads. This study proposed utilizing patient setup cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) and treatment plan robustness to reduce the frequency of QACTs. We retrospectively analyzed data from 27 patients with head-and-neck cancer, including 594 CBCTs, 136 QACTs, and 19 adaptive plans. For each CBCT, water-equivalent thickness (WET) along the pencil-beam path was calculated. For each treatment plan, the WET of the first-day CBCT was used as the reference, and the mean WET changes (ΔWET) in each following CBCT was used as the surrogate of proton range change. Using CBCTs acquired prior to a QACT, we predicted the ΔWET on the QACT day by a linear regression model. The impact of range change on target dose was calculated as the predicted ΔWET weighted by the monitor units of each field. In addition, plan robustness was estimated from the robust dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and combined with ΔWET to reduce QACT frequency. Robustness was estimated from the distance between the DVH curves of the nominal and worst scenarios. When the estimated mean ΔWET was<6.5mm(or<7.5mmif the robustness was>95%),the QACT could be skipped without missing any adaptive planning; otherwise a QACT was required. Overall, 41% of QACTs could be eliminated when ΔWET was<6.5mmand 56% when ΔWET was<7.5mm,and robustness was>95%.At least one QACT could have been omitted in 25 of the 27 cases under skipping thresholds at ΔWETs<7.5mm and R>95%. This study suggests that the number of QACTs can be greatly reduced by calculating range change in patient setup CBCTs and can be further reduced by combining this information with analyses of plan robustness.

Fetal dose estimation for Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy whole breast irradiation by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed tumor in pregnant women and radiation therapy should carefully be weighted up because of the dose to the fetus. The aim of this study was to investigate fetal dose in a patient treated with Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy (ViTAT), an innovative technique for whole breast irradiation. Optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) were calibrated on a Varian TrueBeam linac, with both a 6X and 6XFFF beam quality, and used for out-of-field measurements. Fetal dose related with ViTAT technique was compared to the standard 3D conformal radiation therapy technique (3DCRT). The fetal dose delivered with a ViTAT technique planned with 6XFFF beam was also investigated. Measurements were taken on a phantom composed of Rando Alderson Phantom slices and solid water slabs. OSLDs were placed in a region identified by the height of the fundus from conception to the twentieth week using a custom made PMMA grid. Due to the higher number of monitor units, the peripheral dose of ViTAT delivered with 6X beams is higher than that of 3DCRT. However, nanoDots measurements prove that ViTAT can be used in place of 3DCRT while maintaining similar fetal dose levels if 6XFFF beams are used.

Influence of beamlet width on dynamic IMRT plan quality in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify the effects of beamlet width on dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and determine the optimal parameters for the most effective radiotherapy plan.MethodsThis study evaluated 20 patients with NPC were selected for dynamic IMRT. Only the beamlet width in the optimization parameters was changed (set to 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm that were named BL02, BL04, BL06, BL08, and BL10, respectively) to optimize the results of the five groups of plans. Using the plan quality scoring system, the dose results of the planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risks (OARs) were analyzed objectively and comprehensively. The lower the quality score, the better the quality of the plan. The efficiency and accuracy of plan execution were evaluated using monitor units (MUs) and plan delivery time (PDT).ResultsThe BL04 mm group had the lowest quality score for the targets and OARs (0.087), while the BL10 mm group had the highest total score (1.249). The BL04 mm group had the highest MUs (837 MUs) and longest PDT (358 s). However, the MUs range of each group plan was below 100 MUs, and the PDT range was within 30 s. In the BL02, BL04, BL06, BL08, and BL10 plans, <5 MUs segments accounted for 33%, 16%, 24%, 33%, and 40% of total segments, respectively, with which the lowest was in the BL04 mm group.ConclusionSmaller beamlet widths have not only reduced OARs dose while maintaining high dose coverage to the PTVs, but also lead to more MUs that would produce greater PDT. Considering the quality and efficiency of dynamic IMRT, the beamlet width value of the Monaco treatment planning system set to 4 mm would be optimal for NPC.

A comprehensive method for calculating total body irradiation

Toprovide meansfor calculating the dose received by various tissues of the patient, calculate lung shield, and verify received dose using a phantom as a tool for quality assurance for a planned Total Body Irradiation (TBI) procedure in radiotherapy. Using Microsoft Visual Basic, MATLAB, and Python, a program for Total Body Irradiation Calculation in Radiotherapy (TBICR) is constructed. It uses patient translation and beam zone method for total body irradiation calculations to compute the proper dose received by the patient and determine the lung shield thickness. There are three main user-friendly interfaces in the application. The first one allows the user to upload the TBI topography and estimate the distances needed for TBI calculations. The second one enables the user to count the number of beam zones needed for each point and estimate the effective area (Aeff) for each level. The third interface estimates the velocity required to deliver the relative dose depending on patient separation, Monitor Units (MU), couch speed and travel distance. It allows the user to compute the required lung shield thickness, read any patient's CT DICOM file and acquire dose in any distinct location using machine learning model to predict the dose. The TBICR software has been successfully validated by reproducing all of the manual calculations in an exact and timely manner. TBICR generated more accurate results and confirmed the absorbed dose to patient through measurements on Anderson phantom. A computer program for the calculation of total body irradiation (TBI) is described in full. The dose received at each point on the patient, the calculation of lung shield and the determination of the velocity and time required for the couch movement are all made possible using the software. The ease of use, precision, data storage and printing are some important features of the present software.

Shielding evaluator actual treatment leaf: A program for automatic shielding assessment using patient data

PurposeIn this paper, we propose shielding evaluator actual treatment leaf (SEATTLE), a program that evaluates radiation shielding and calculates the maximum number of treatable patients, using the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Radiation Therapy (DICOM RT) plan files of the actual treated patients. MethodsMATLAB App Designer was used for GUI-based program development and DICOM RT plan file analysis. The intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) factor was calculated based on the monitor unit (MU) value obtained from the DICOM RT plan file; the use factor considering the MU for each gantry angle was obtained. For shielding calculation, the workload and dose were calculated using the formula based on the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP)-151 report; the maximum number of treatable patients was calculated. For evaluation and validation of the program, an shielding evaluation was performed using anonymized patient data from seven treatment rooms at four institutions for one week of treatment. ResultsThe average IMRT factor calculated from patient data for the pilot institution was 3.0 ± 0.9, confirming a difference of up to 58.8% compared to the currently used IMRT factor of 5; moreover, the use factor had a difference of up to 33.8% compared to the NCRP-151 value. The measurement data and shielding evaluation result of the transmitted dose at each point in the treatment rooms with SEATTLE showed an error of up to 0.01145 mSv/week. The program was designed with simple operation for user convenience; it was possible to evaluate shielding for the treatment room and the number of patients available for treatment. ConclusionsThe program developed in this study performs shielding evaluation considering the clinical environment, and it will be possible to build a real-time shielding management system using actual patient data.

Strip detector array (SDA) for beam monitoring in radiotherapy: reconstruction of MLC parameters from multiple projections of flux

Objective. In this paper we propose and investigate a new detector with multiple strip detector arrays (SDA) for monitoring MLC shaped x-ray beams for radiotherapy treatment. Approach. Each SDA measures 1D dose profiles equivalent to dose projections. The goal of such a detector is to determine individual MLC leaf positions as well as the Monitor Units (MU) per MLC segment during radiotherapy. In the present work we investigate an optimal SDA detector configuration and reconstruction algorithm. We determine the accuracy of SDA for different treatment sites (spine, pelvis, retroperitoneum, prostate, brain SRT, SRS, lung and head and neck). We perform a simulation study accounting for different type of MLC leaf positional errors: random MLC leaf, systematic for the whole leaf bank and systematic for an individual leaf. In a similar fashion, we also account for errors in Monitor Units per segment. Main results. We demonstrate that for a broad range of IMRT treatment plans a robust reconstruction of errors is achievable with only 3 projections (3 sets of SDA oriented at at 0°, 45° and 135°). The SDA is capable of capturing both systematic errors in leaf banks and individual leaves as well as random errors sufficient for practical clinical purposes. Significance. These features of the SDA detector makes it suitable for real-time Quality Control of MLC collimated linac output.

Development and Clinical Implementation of an Automated Virtual Integrative Planner for Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer

PurposeHead and neck (HN) radiation (RT) treatment planning is complex and resource intensive. Deviations and inconsistent plan quality significantly affect clinical outcomes. We sought to develop a novel automated virtual integrative (AVI) knowledge-based planning application to reduce planning time, increase consistency, and improve baseline quality. Methods and MaterialsAn in-house write-enabled script was developed from a library of 668 previously treated HN RT plans. Prospective hazard analysis was performed, and mitigation strategies were implemented before clinical release. The AVI-planner software was retrospectively validated in a cohort of 52 recent HN cases. A physician panel evaluated planning limitations during initial deployment, and feedback was enacted via software refinements. A final second set of plans was generated and evaluated. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in addition to generalized evaluation metric and weighted experience score were used to compare normal tissue sparing between final AVI planner versus respective clinically treated and historically accepted plans. A t test was used to compare the interactive time, complexity, and monitor units for AVI planner versus manual optimization. ResultsInitially, 86% of plans were acceptable to treat, with 10% minor and 4% major revisions or rejection recommended. Variability was noted in plan quality among HN subsites, with high initial quality for oropharynx and oral cavity plans. Plans needing revisions were comprised of sinonasal, nasopharynx, P-16 negative squamous cell carcinoma unknown primary, or cutaneous primary sites. Normal tissue sparing varied within subsites, but AVI planner significantly lowered mean larynx dose (median, 18.5 vs 19.7 Gy; P < .01) compared with clinical plans. AVI planner significantly reduced interactive optimization time (mean, 2 vs 85 minutes; P < .01). ConclusionsAVI planner reliably generated clinically acceptable RT plans for oral cavity, salivary, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx cancers. Physician-driven iterative learning processes resulted in favorable evolution in HN RT plan quality with significant time savings and improved consistency using AVI planner.

A novel weight optimized dynamic conformal arcs with TrueBeam™ Linac for very small tumors (≤1 cc) with single isocenter of multiple brain metastases (2≤, ≥4) in stereotactic radiosurgery: A comparison with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

We evaluated whether improved increase delivery efficiency of weight optimized dynamic conformal arc (WO-DCA) therapy in comparison to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with single isocenter for SRS treatment of very small volume and multiple brain metastases (BMs). 20 patients having a less than 1 cc volume and 2≤, ≥4 of multiple BMs, redesigned for 20 Gy in 1 fraction using WO-DCA and VMAT techniques with double full coplanar and three partial noncoplanar arcs. Plan qualities were compared using tumor coverage, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V4Gy, V10Gy, and V12Gy volumes of brain, monitor units (MUs), and percent of quality assurance pass rate (QA%). Both techniques satisfied clinical requirements in coverage and CI. VMAT had a significantly higher MU and mean GI than WO-DCA (for MUs; 2330 vs. 1991; P < 0.001, and for GI; 4.72 vs. 3.39; P < 0.001). WO-DCA was found significantly lower V4Gy (171.11 vs. 232.80 cm3, P < 0.001), V10Gy (25.82 vs. 29.71 cm3, P < 0.05), and V12Gy (14.35 vs. 17.28 cm3, P < 0.05) volumes than VMAT. WO-DCA was associated with markedly increase QA pass rates for all plans (97.65% vs. 92.64%, P < 0.001). WO-DCA may be the first choice compared to the VMAT in reducing the dose in the brain and minimizing small-field dosimetric errors for very small SRS treatment of brain metastases in the range of ≤ 1 cc and 2≤, ≥4.

The Optimal Choice of Technique for Stereotactic Radiosurgery—A LINAC-Based Dosimetric Study between DCA, DCA-SSO, DCA-SSO-VDR, and VMAT

Abstract Introduction Advanced radiation therapy delivery techniques require greater understanding of various planning sequences and methods. The aim of this study is to determine a class solution that finds the best possible technique to deliver for stereotactic radiosurgery between dynamic conformal arc (DCA) techniques using various options such as DCA, DCA + SSO (segment shape optimization), and DCA + SSO + VDR (variable dose rate) using noncoplanar beam arrangement and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using coplanar beams. Materials and Methods In this dosimetric study, 11 brain cases were retrospectively planned for various techniques and analyzed for the Paddick conformity index (CI), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group homogeneity index (HI), Paddick gradient index (GI), treatment time in terms of monitor units (MU) and normal brain dose (V12Gy). The paired t-test was performed to know the statistical significance between the techniques. Results In terms of CI, GI, and control of the normal brain dose, the VMAT plan was superior to other techniques. But, HI was found to be better with DCA. Above all, VMAT delivered higher MU than any other technique. The p-values between DCA + SSO and DCA, DCA + SSO + VDR and DCA + SSO, and VMAT and DCA + SSO + VDR are as follows: CI: 0.0004, 0.015, and 0.03; GI: 0.03, 0.33, and 0.29; HI: 0.008, 0.04, and 0.06; V12 Gy of normal brain: 0.1, 0.01, 0.38. VMAT requires approximately 41 ± 17% more MU than DCA + SSO + VDR. Conclusion VMAT using coplanar beams is preferable among all the techniques, considering the dosimetric parameters studied. If VMAT is not available in the facility, DCA + SSO + VDR technique using non coplanar beams can be used to deliver SRS treatment.

Accelerating and improving radiochromic film calibration by utilizing the dose ratio in photon and proton beams.

PurposeRadiochromic films are versatile 2D dosimeters with high‐resolution and near tissue equivalence. To assure high precision and accuracy, a time‐consuming calibration process is required. To improve the time efficiency, a novel calibration method utilizing the ratio of the same dose profile measured at different monitor units (MUs) is introduced and tested in a proton and photon beam.MethodsThe calibration procedure employs the dose ratio of film measurements of the same relative profile for different absolute dose values. Hence, the ratio of the dose is constant at any point of the profile, but the ratio of the net optical densities is not constant. The key idea of the method is to optimize the calibration function until the ratio of the calculated doses is constant. The proposed method was tested in the dose range between 0.25–12 and 1–6 Gy in a proton and photon beam, respectively. A radial symmetric profile and a rectangular profile were created, both having a central plateau region of about 3 cm diameter and a dose falloff of about 1.5 cm at larger distances. The dose falloff region was used as input for the optimization method and the central plateau region served as dose reference points. Only the plateau region of the highest dose entered the optimization as an additional objective. The measured data were randomly split into differently sized training and test sets. The optimization was repeated 1000 times with random start value initialization using the same start values for the standard and the gradient method. Finally, a proton plan with four dose levels was created, which were separated spatially, to test the possibility of a full calibration within a single measurement.ResultsParameter estimation was possible with as low as one dose ratio used for optimization in both the photon and the proton case, yet exhibiting a high sensitivity on the dose level. The root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of the dose was less than 1% when the dose ratio was in the order of 20, whereas the median RMSD of all optimizations was 1.7%. Using four dose levels for optimization resulted in a median RMSD of 1% when randomly selecting the dose levels. Having at least one dose ratio of about 20 included in the optimization considerably improved the RMSD of the calibration function. Using six or eight dose levels reduced the sensitivity on the dose level selection and the median RMSD was 0.8%. A full calibration was possible in a single measurement having four dose levels in one plan but spatially separated.ConclusionsThe number of measurements required to obtain an EBT3 film calibration function could be reduced using the proposed dose ratio method while maintaining the same accuracy as with the standard method.

Radiobiological Comparison of Acuros External Beam and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm on Esophageal Carcinoma Radiotherapy Treatment Plans.

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to investigate the dose differences and radiobiological assessment between Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros External Beam (AXB) with its 2 calculation models, namely, dose-to-water (AXB-Dw) and dose-to-medium (AXB-Dm), on esophageal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment plans.Materials and methodsThe AXB-Dw and AXB-Dm plans were generated by recalculating the initial 66 AAA plans using the AXB algorithm with the same monitor units and beam parameters as those in the original plan. The dosimetric and radiobiological assessment parameters were calculated for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The gamma agreement for the PTV and the correlation between it and the volume of the air cavity and bone among the different algorithms were compared simultaneously. The dose discrepancy between the theoretical calculation and treatment planning system (TPS) when switching from AXB-Dm to AXB-Dw was analyzed according to the composition of the structures.ResultsThe PTV dose of AXB-Dm plans was significantly smaller than that of the AAA and AXB-Dw plans (P < .05), except for D2. The difference values for AAA vs AXB-Dm (∆Dx,(AAA-AXB,Dm)) and AXB-Dw vs AXB-Dm (∆Dx,(AXB,Dw-AXB,Dm)) were 1.94% [1.27%, 2.64%] and 1.95% [1.56%, 2.27%], respectively. For the spinal cord and heart, there were obvious differences between the AAA vs AXB-Dm (spinal cord: 1.15%, heart: 2.89%) and AXB-Dw vs AXB-Dm (spinal cord: 1.88%, heart: 3.25%) plans. For the lung, the differences between AAA vs AXB-Dm and AAA vs AXB-Dw were significantly larger than those of AXB-Dm vs AXB-Dw. Compared to the case of AAA and AXB-Dw, the decrease in biologically effective dose (BED10, ) of AXB-Dm due to dose non-uniformity exceeded 6.5%, even for a small . The average values of equivalent uniform dose in the AAA, AXB-Dw, and AXB-Dm plans were 52.03±.39 Gy, 52.24 ± .81 Gy, and 51.13 ± .47 Gy, respectively. The tumor control probability (TCP) results for PTV in the AAA, AXB-Dw, and AXB-Dm plans were 62.29 ± 1.57%, 62.82 ± 1.69%, and 58.68±1.88%, respectively. With the 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm acceptance criteria, the mean values of , , and were 87.24, 63.3, and 64.81% vs 97.86, 91.77, and 89.25%, respectively. The dose discrepancy between the theoretical calculation and TPS when switching from AXB-Dm to AXB-Dw was approximately 1.63%.ConclusionsThe AAA and AXB-Dw algorithms overestimated the radiobiological parameters when the tumor particularly consisted of nonuniform tissues. A relatively small dose difference could cause a significant reduction in the corresponding TCP. Dose distribution algorithms should be carefully chosen by physicists and oncologists to improve tumor control, as well as to optimize OARs protection.

Dosimetric effects of embolization material artefacts in arteriovenous malformations stereotactic radiosurgery on treatment planning calculation.

Background and PurposeStereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a specialized radiotherapy treatment technique for Arteriovenous Malformations (AVM) in which Computed Tomography (CT) images are used for dose calculations. The purpose of this study was to investigate CT image distortions caused by embolic agents and quantify the influence of these distortions on dose calculations.MethodsEight AVM patients administered embolic agents prior to SRS were included. Original plans were compared to new recalculated plans using two sets of images. The first set was created by masking the embolic material and artefacts, the second was the diagnostic CT images. In addition, treatment plans were created for an anthropomorphic phantom with water inserts, then with known volumes of embolic materials to study the dosimetric effect of each material.ResultsRelative to patients’ original plans, maximum Monitor Unit (MU) difference was −4.4% with whole brain masking, −1.3% with artefact masking, −4.1% with embolic masking, and −4.5% with artefact-free diagnostic images. Calculated dose differences were within ± 3.5% for all plans. In phantom, Gamma pass rate was 96% for both embolic agents with conformal fields and 99.9% with dynamic arcs. Dose and MU differences in phantom plans were negligible.ConclusionRelative dose differences between the original plans and the corrected ones were not clinically remarkable. We recommend evaluating the effect of embolic materials on individual patients’ plans. The whole brain corrected planning CT images or diagnostic CT images could be utilized to calculate the magnitude of dose reduction caused by embolic materials and correct it if necessary.

First Results and Analysis From ESA Next Generation Radiation Monitor Unit Onboard EDRS-C

The first two units of the ESA Next Generation Radiation Monitor (NGRM) sensor are flying onboard the European Data Relay System, Satellite-C (EDRS-C), and the Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich (S-6), providing critical information related to the space radiation environment. This work presents a first evaluation and analysis of the measurements of the unit hosted on EDRS-C during the geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) of the satellite. The evaluation studies include comprehensive comparisons with measurements from other radiation monitors and science-class experiments. NGRM datasets will become publicly available in real time from the space weather (SWE) data center through dedicated applications contributing to the monitoring of SWE and the characterization of the space radiation environment.

COMPARISON OF COPLANAR AND NON- COPLANARVMAT FOR BRAIN CANCER BY USING THE DOSIMETRICAL AND RADIOBIOLOGICAL INDICES

Background: Recent techniques of radiotherapy such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) that delivered in Coplanar technique or non-coplanar technique allows to deliver high doses to the brain tumors, at the same time reducing the risk of normal tissues as compared with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Aim: The aim of the current work is to compare dosimetrical and radiobiological indices of treatment plans for brain tumor using CO-VMAT and NC-VMAT techniques to choose the optimum technique for the treated cases. Patients and methods: Twenty-one cases with brain tumors were performed for the treatment planning study. The cases are planned by using the coplanar and non coplanar VMAT techniques and optimized to evaluate and compare dosimetrical and radiobiological parameters related to PTV dose coverage and sparing of organs at risk. The total dose of CO-VMAT and NC-VMAT plans is 60 Gray in 30 fractions during a single phase with a daily dose of 2 Gray. Results: In dosimetrical calculations, CO-VMAT and NC-VMAT techniques gave similar (homogeneity index HI, modified homogeneity index MHI, conformity index CI and quality factor QF) values for the PTV, while CO-VMAT was the higher in (target coverage index TCI, prescription isodose to target volume ratio PITV and conformity number CN) values and the lower in (gradient index GI, gradient measure GM) values, and NC-VMAT was the lower in Monitor units MUs values. In radiobiological calculations, equivalent uniform dose EUD values, tumor control probability TCP and complication free tumor control probability P+ were large in CO-VMAT and normal tissue complication probability NTCP was less in NC-VMAT. Conclusion: While the previous studies showed that CO-VMAT technique was used when the tumor is far from the organs at risk, the present work found CO-VMAT can be used when the tumor is near to or far from organs at risk (OARs) because it can achieve the target dose coverage and sparing of OARs together. We strongly recommend that NC-VMAT technique should be used when the OARs are located inside the tumor to be able to achieve more sparing of them.

Internet of Things-Based Automated Shopping Cart Incorporated With Virtual Instrumentation Using LabVIEW for Control Applications

Shopping mall or a super market is a first choice for buying all necessary products and that is why it attracts more number of customers than the retail shop. But the problem is it creates too many hurdles for customer and owner to maintain the order and keep sync with the time at billing counter. The normal billing and shopping system lacks the time saving approach also it doesn't have proper security arrangements to avoid theft and duplication. To overcome this issue, we developed a smart way for shopping using LabVIEW incorporated with internet of things (IOT). Each and every product contains RFID tag. The smart trolley will consist of a RFID reader, transmitter and ZigBee unit. Along with this, the cart is equipped with the child monitor unit. The whole system is controlled by utilizing the controller developed using LabVIEW. The ZigBee module attached in the cart is responsible for sending the bill to the main billing system and IOT feature is also enabled so that shopping-bill of each customer is mailed to their respective mail-id through esp8266 Wi-Fi module.

Resistive electrode array (REA) for radiotherapy beam monitoring and quality assurance

We have developed a new type of detector array for monitoring of radiation beams in radiotherapy. The detector has parallel-plane architecture with multiple large-area uniform thin-film electrodes. At least one of the electrodes is resistive and has multiple signal readouts spread out along its perimeter. The integral dose deposited in the detector gives rise to multiple signals that depend on the distribution of radiation with respect to resistive electrode array (REA) geometry. The purpose of the present study was to experimentally determine basic detector response to MLC collimated x-ray fields. Two detector arrays have been characterized: circular and rectangular. The current and electrostatic potential distribution within the resistive electrode are governed by the Laplace and continuity equations with boundary conditions at the border with the readouts. Measurements for pencil beams showed that signal strength depends primarily on the distances between the location of the pencil beam and the readouts. Measurements for larger irregular MLC showed that signals as a function of time are quasi-linear with respect to MLC position and are proportional to the MLC area. Derivation of clinically relevant radiation beam parameters from REA signals, such as MLC position, MLC gap size and monitor unit per MLC segment relies on the detector response model with empirical model parameters. An approximate analytical detector response model was proposed and used to fit experiment data.

Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer.

This study is to investigate the optimal treatment option for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) by comparing dosimetric and radiobiological parameters of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using single and dual isocenters.Twenty patients with SBBC without lymph node involvement were selected retrospectively. Four treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following two delivery techniques with two isocenter conditions—IMRT using a single isocenter (IMRT_Iso1), VMAT using a single isocenter (VMAT_Iso1), IMRT using dual isocenters (IMRT_Iso2), and VMAT using dual isocenters (VMAT_Iso2). A dose of 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions was prescribed for the planning target volume (PTV). All plans were calculated using the Acuros XB algorithm and a photon optimizer for a 6‐MV beam of a Vital Beam linear accelerator. PTV‐related dosimetric parameters were analyzed. Further, the homogeneity index, conformity index, and conformation number were computed to evaluate plan quality. Dosimetric parameters were also measured for the organs at risk (OARs). In addition, the equivalent uniform dose corresponding to an equivalent dose related to a reference of 2 Gy per fraction, the tumor control probability, and the normal tissue complication probability were calculated based on the dose–volume histogram to investigate the radiobiological impact on PTV and OARs.IMRT_Iso1 exhibited similar target coverage and a certain degree of dosimetric improvement in OAR sparing compared to the other techniques. It also exhibited some radiobiological improvement, albeit insignificant. Although IMRT_Iso1 significantly increased monitor unit compared to VMAT_Iso1, which is the best option in terms of delivery efficiency, there was only a 22% increase in delivery time. Therefore, in conclusion, IMRT_Iso1, the complete treatment of which can be completed using a single setup, is the most effective method for treating SBBC.

Treatment Planning for Cardiac Radioablation: Multicenter Multiplatform Benchmarking for the RAdiosurgery for VENtricular TAchycardia (RAVENTA) Trial

Cardiac radioablation is a novel treatment option for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia unsuitable for catheter ablation. The quality of treatment planning depends on dose specifications, platform capabilities, and experience of the treating staff. To harmonize the treatment planning, benchmarking of this process is necessary for multicenter clinical studies such as the RAdiosurgery for VENtricular TAchycardia trial. Planning computed tomography data and consensus structures from 3 patients were sent to 5 academic centers for independent plan development using a variety of platforms and techniques with the RAdiosurgery for VENtricular TAchycardia study protocol serving as guideline. Three-dimensional dose distributions and treatment plan details were collected and analyzed. In addition, an objective relative plan quality ranking system for ventricular tachycardia treatments was established. For each case, 3 coplanar volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) plans for C-arm linear accelerators (LINAC) and 3 noncoplanar treatment plans for robotic arm LINAC were generated. All plans were suitable for clinical applications with minor deviations from study guidelines in most centers. Eleven of 18 treatment plans showed maximal one minor deviation each for target and cardiac substructures. However, dose-volume histograms showed substantial differences: in one case, the planning target volume ≥30 Gy ranged from 0.0% to 79.9% and the ramus interventricularis anterior V14Gy ranged from 4.0% to 45.4%. Overall, the VMAT plans had steeper dose gradients in the high-dose region, while the plans for the robotic arm LINAC had smaller low-dose regions. Thereby, VMAT plans required only about half as many monitor units, resulting in shorter delivery times, possibly an important factor in treatment outcome. Cardiac radioablation is feasible with robotic arm and C-arm LINAC systems with comparable plan quality. Although cross-center training and best practice guidelines have been provided, further recommendations, especially for cardiac substructures, and ranking of dose guidelines will be helpful to optimize cardiac radioablation outcomes.

Plan quality assessment in clinical practice: Results of the 2020 ESTRO survey on plan complexity and robustness

PurposePlan complexity and robustness are two essential aspects of treatment plan quality but there is a great variability in their management in clinical practice. This study reports the results of the 2020 ESTRO survey on plan complexity and robustness to identify needs and guide future discussions and consensus. MethodsA survey was distributed online to ESTRO members. Plan complexity was defined as the modulation of machine parameters and increased uncertainty in dose calculation and delivery. Robustness was defined as a dose distribution’s sensitivity towards errors stemming from treatment uncertainties, patient setup, or anatomical changes. ResultsA total of 126 radiotherapy centres from 33 countries participated, 95 of them (75%) from Europe and Central Asia. The majority controlled and evaluated plan complexity using monitor units (56 centres) and aperture shapes (38 centres). To control robustness, 98 (97% of question responses) photon and 5 (50%) proton centres used PTV margins for plan optimization while 75 (94%) and 5 (50%), respectively, used margins for plan evaluation. Seventeen (21%) photon and 8 (80%) proton centres used robust optimisation, while 10 (13%) and 8 (80%), respectively, used robust evaluation. Primary uncertainties considered were patient setup (photons and protons) and range calculation uncertainties (protons). Participants expressed the need for improved commercial tools to control and evaluate plan complexity and robustness. ConclusionClinical implementation of methods to control and evaluate plan complexity and robustness is very heterogeneous. Better tools are needed to manage complexity and robustness in treatment planning systems. International guidelines may promote harmonization.