Pt/C is widely used as polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) electrocatalyst. However, under high potential at the cathode, Pt detachment and aggregation due to carbon corrosion can occur. Therefore, conventional Pt/C electrocatalysts have a difficulty in durability, for e.g. heavy-duty applications. Our research group has been preparing electrocatalysts with both high activity and high durability (1-3). However, their electrocatalytic activity has to be further improved. For this reason, we are further improving catalytic activity by alloying platinum with cobalt on such SnO2-based catalyst support. Cobalt is one of the relatively stable metals under the PEFC electrocatalyst condition, and PtxCoy alloy catalysts are known to be capable of exhibiting higher activity over Pt catalysts (4). In addition, the doping of SnO2 with 2 mol% Nb is expected to increase electronic conductivity of SnO2 (5,6). Experimental Sn0.98Nb0.02O2 thin layer was deposited on the GCB (denoted as Sn0.98Nb0.02O2/GCB) by the ammonia coprecipitation method. Pt(acac)2 and Co(acac)2 were applied to simultaneously impregnate Pt and Co to obtain Pt-Co alloy catalysts (acac method). The Pt : Co ratio was adjusted to prepare Pt3Co alloy to obtain Pt3Co/Sn0.98Nb0.02O2/GCB electrocatalyst. The preparation procedure is schematically described in Figure.1. Results and discussion In order to evaluate Pt and Co loadings, ICP analysis was performed. We then made half-cell tests to evaluate electrochemical activities of these electrocatalysts. Electrochemical surface area (ECSA) was measured by cyclic voltammetry (CV), and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity was derived from kinetically controlled current density (ik ) in the rotating disk electrode (RDE) measurement. We prepared MEA (Membrane Electrode Assembly) using this electrocatalyst (Pt3Co/Sn0.98Nb0.02O2/GCB) on the cathode side. We then made full-cell tests to evaluate cell performance such as current-voltage characteristicsFrom the ICP results, we confirmed that we could impregnate both Pt and Co close to the designated ratio in the acac method. Microstructures and EDS maps are shown in Figure. 2, confirming that Pt and Co were uniformly supported on the SnO2 surface layer on GCB. Electrochemical results and detailed microstructural analysis will be reported and discussed. Acknowledgement Financial support from New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) is gratefully acknowledged (Contract No. 20001214-0). References S. Matsumoto, M. Nagamine, Z. Noda, J. Matsuda, S. M. Lyth, A. Hayashi, and K. Sasaki, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165 (14), F1164 (2018).Y. Nakazato, D. Kawachino, Z. Noda, J. Matsuda, S. M. Lyth, A. Hayashi, and K. Sasaki, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165 (14), F1154 (2018). T. Yoshizumi, M. Nagamine, Z. Noda, J. Matsuda, A. Hayashi, and K. Sasaki, ECS Trans., 92 (8), 479 (2019). T. Tada, Y. Yamamoto, K. Matsutani, K. Hayakawa, and T. Namai, ECS Trans., 16 (2), 215 (2008). F. Takasaki, S. Matsuie, Y. Takabatake, Z. Noda, A. Hayashi, Y. Shiratori, K. Ito, and K. Sasaki, J. Electrochem. Soc., 158, B1270 (2011). K. Sasaki, F. Takasaki, Z. Noda, S. Hayashi, Y. Shiratori, and K. Ito, ECS Trans., 33 (1), 473 (2010). Figure 1
Read full abstract