The management of geriatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is becoming increasingly complex with an aging population. A comprehensive transition of care from the inpatient to the outpatient setting is a key aspect of effective management of these patients. Training those who implement that transition is critically important. The Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a well-validated tool for assessing trainee performance, is uniquely capable of gauging fellows’ interpersonal communication skills and can have a role in assessing disease-specific knowledge in a standardized manner. Here, we report the results of the first OSCE designed to evaluate gastroenterology (GI) fellows’ ability to manage these complex patients as they transition them from the inpatient to outpatient care setting. Twelve second-year adult GI fellows from 5 fellowship programs participated in a 4 case OSCE focused on caring for patients with IBD. Previously validated OSCE checklists were used to assess the GI fellows’ performance. The goal of the geriatric OSCE station was to evaluate the patient’s knowledge of his disease, to assess his values regarding therapeutic options, to educate him on medication interactions and side effects, and to address potential functional limitations to care upon discharge. Checklists were scored independently by a physician-observer and the Standardized Patient, who both provided feedback to the fellow immediately following each case. A 3, 4, and 5-point Likert Scale (LS) was used to assess performance. Each fellow was scored across multiple domains and score reports were provided. Fellows received fair scores in information gathering (median score of 2, range 2–3 on a LS from 1–3, with a score of 1 representing “not proficient” and 3 “well done”). Fellows also excelled in the area of professionalism (median score of 4, range 4–5 on a LS from 1 to 5 with a score of 1 representing “unprofessional” and 5 “complete professionalism”). Fellows did not adequately assess plans for monitoring and adjusting therapy or reviewing medication interactions (median of 2, range 2–3 on a LS from 1 to 3, with a score of 1 representing “not proficient” and 3 “well done”). Items pertaining to transition of care including discharge planning, home safety and the need for home services were inadequately addressed (median of 2, range 2–3 on a LS from 1 to 3, with a score of 1 representing “not proficient” and 3 “well done”). Global communications scores were suboptimal (median of 2, range 1–4 on a LS from 1 to 4 with score of 1 representing “not proficient” and 4 “well done”). Fellows also received low ratings for skills associated with caring for IBD medical knowledge (median of 2, range 1–4 on a LS from 1 to 4, with a score of 1 representing “not proficient” and 4 “well done”). To our knowledge, this is the first OSCE designed to evaluate transition of care in the management of geriatric patients with IBD. This OSCE identified limitations to an optimized patient interaction and has the potential to help prepare fellows to facilitate safer, more effective management of this group of IBD patients
Read full abstract