Metastatic Solid Tumors Research Articles

The real-world impact of next-generation sequencing in advanced stages of solid tumor malignancies.

e23066 Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a revolutionary technology that allows for DNA and RNA genomic analysis of malignant tumors via tissue or blood sample to aid in diagnosis and treatment while providing predictive and prognostic data about cancer patients. 75.6% of US oncologists use NGS in advanced cancer patients. As there are now site-agnostic approvals of certain targeted therapies, ASCO published a provisional clinical opinion stating that there is a rationale for genomic testing of all solid tumors. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of NGS testing in advanced solid tumor patients in a community based cancer center in Florida. Methods: Patients were diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 solid malignancy between January 1st, 2019 - December 31st, 2022. 496 patients were reviewed of which 269 patients were included in the study as they underwent NGS testing with either tissue (70.6%), blood (25.3%) or both (4.1%). Results: Median age of the study population was 71% with 87% of patients being insured with Medicare. 52.4% of patients were male. Overall, 67.7% of patients had biomarkers identified, 47.2% had FDA approved targeted therapies, and 77.3% had clinical trials identified. NGS testing impacted first line therapy in only 10% of patients where a matched therapy was initiated as first line treatment. Median time from initial diagnosis to NGS result was 53 days while the median time from diagnosis to initiation of first line of therapy was 47.5 days. In the entire study population, 14.1% never received therapy and 40.9% of patients passed. Of the 110 patients who passed, median overall survival in patients who had a biomarker identified through NGS testing was 6 months compared to 7 months in patients without a biomarker. Rates of biomarker identification and availability of FDA approved therapy were similar between deceased patients (67.3% and 45.5%) and those who were alive at time of analysis (63.1% and 48.4%). Conclusions: NGS testing has become part of routine oncologic care in patients with advanced solid malignancies, however in only 10% of cases did it impact first line therapy. Though currently NGS testing has a limited role in the initial management of advanced solid tumors, it is imperative that this technology continues to be used and developed as it leads to hypothesis generating and clinically relevant questions in discovery of oncogenic drivers, targets for novel therapeutics, and mechanisms of resistance to therapies. [Table: see text]

Opioid prescribing trends and pain scores among adult patients with cancer in a large health system.

11059 Background: Some opioid stewardship policies could negatively affect patients with cancer pain. However, patients with cancer are also at risk for opioid related harms, especially with persistent use. We assessed opioid prescribing trends in the context of cancer treatment and patient reported pain in a large health system in Connecticut. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of opioid-naïve adult patients with solid tumor malignancies diagnosed from 2016 through 2020 within the Yale New Haven Health System. We identified new (≥1 opioid prescription in 0-6 months following diagnosis) and additional (0-6 and 6-9 months) opioid prescriptions. The analysis evaluated all eligible patients as well as two clinical cohorts: patients treated surgically and patients with metastatic cancer. For patients with metastatic cancer and a documented pain score in the electronic health record flowsheet data, we further stratified by any (any score≥1) or no (all scores=0) pain in the 6 months since diagnosis and prior to first opioid, if given. For these patients, we noted therapeutic class of the first opioid. We used a logistic model adjusted for patient demographics to calculate predicted probability of opioid prescription and change over time. Results: A total of 10,868 patients met study criteria. Overall, we observed a decline in new opioid prescribing from 69.0% to 62.7% (p<.001) (Table). Additional opioid use also declined from 23.4% to 20.2% (p=.02). In the surgery cohort, new opioid prescribing fell from 95.7% to 88.2% (p<.001), while additional opioid use was stable over time (approximately 12%). For patients with metastatic cancer with any documented pain, new opioid prescribing was stable over time (approximately 56%). For those with documented pain scores=0, new opioid prescribing declined from 59.7% to 34.2% (p<.001). In these patients, the class listed on the first opioid prescription was analgesia in 86.6% and cough in 13.4%. Conclusions: Overall, and in patients treated with oncological surgeries, our study in a single large US health system suggests a modest, gradual decline in opioid prescribing for patients with cancer over time. On the other hand, among patients with metastatic cancer, opioid prescribing remained stable for those with documented pain and declined steeply for those without documented pain. [Table: see text]

A phase 1 study of REGN6569, a GITR mAb, in combination with cemiplimab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumor malignancies: Initial dose-escalation results.

2650 Background: REGN6569 is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that is highly specific for glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor–related protein (GITR). GITR is expressed on several immune cell subtypes, notably regulatory T cells (Tregs), and activated natural killer (NK) cells. REGN6569 demonstrated greater in vitro antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against GITR-expressing Tregs, as compared to GITR-expressing CD8+ T cells. Mouse studies showed that REGN6569 + cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) combination treatment achieved longer-term tumor responses compared with either drug alone. Methods: This is a first-in-human study (NCT04465487) evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of REGN6569 administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W) + cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W, in pts with advanced solid tumors for which immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies have not been approved or are not available. The study includes a dose-escalation part with 5 dose levels (DL1-DL5) for REGN6569 (“4+3” design), with an initial dose of REGN6569 monotherapy given as a safety lead-in followed by REGN6569 + cemiplimab in subsequent doses. Results: As of the data cutoff date Oct 20, 2023, the dose-escalation part has been completed. 29 pts (median age 58.0 years, 62.1% male) were treated with REGN6569 + cemiplimab, up to the 1200 mg dose level (DL5), across many solid tumor types. The most common tumor type was colorectal cancer (34.5%). One pt (40 mg DL2) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (Grade 3 hepatic failure); maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Twelve pts (41.4%) had a Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 16 pts (55.2%) had a treatment-related TEAE (any grade). The most frequent TEAEs (any grade) were arthralgia (24.1%), infusion-related reactions, and abdominal pain (20.7% each). There were no treatment-related deaths; 19 (65.5%) pts had disease progression leading to death. Two pts achieved ongoing partial responses by investigator assessment with REGN6569 + cemiplimab treatment: 1 pt with mucoepidermoid tumor of the parotid gland treated with 120 mg (DL3) REGN6569 and 1 pt with B3 thymoma treated with 400 mg (DL4) REGN6569, with duration of responses, 5.6 and 10.4 months, respectively. Full receptor occupancy on circulating Tregs was observed in all dose cohorts following REGN6569 treatment. Increased frequency (~10–50%) of proliferating NK cells in peripheral blood was observed post REGN6569 treatment across all dose cohorts. Conclusions: In this dose-escalation study, REGN6569 was administered up to 1200 mg (DL5) in combination with cemiplimab with one dose-limiting toxicity. The study has progressed to dose-expansion cohorts in anti–PD-1-resistant head and neck cancer, with pts treated with REGN6569 (DL5) + cemiplimab. Clinical trial information: NCT04465487 .

Real-world quality analysis of palliative care utilization in patients with brain metastases at three academic institutes.

12080 Background: Brain metastases (BMETs) are a devastating complication of cancer, occurring in up to 30-50% of patients with advanced solid tumors. Median survival after diagnosis of BMETs can be limited, with 3-6 months survival for patients with poorer performance status (Updated Recursive Partition analysis [U-RPA] classification class 2b and 3). Early integration of palliative care (PC) can improve a patient’s quality of life. Per guidelines, patients with advanced cancer should be referred to an interdisciplinary team, including PC, early in the disease. We aimed to assess the utilization and impact of PC in patients with BMETs at three academic centers. Methods: We obtained data from the electronic medical record (EMR) of all patients diagnosed with BMETS at the University of Virginia, the Medical College of Wisconsin, and the University of Vermont between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019. Inclusion criteria were age 18+ years, diagnosis of BMETs secondary to a solid tumor malignancy (excluding leptomeningeal metastases), and >3 months of follow-up treatment. Patients were included if considered at high risk for mortality, which was defined as KPS <70 (U-RPA Class 3) or KPS 70-80 and age > 65 (U-RPA Class 2b). Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests compared survival, hospice referral, emergency visits, readmissions, and advance directives (AD) on the file between the PC and non-PC groups. Results: In total, of the 309 patients that were assessed, 220 patients were class 2b, and 89 were class 3 per U-RPA classification. The mean age was 66 in both groups, and 167 (54%) were seen by PC. The median survival for patients seen by PC was 7.8 months compared to 8.3 months (p 0.056). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups. 80% of patients in the group seen by PC enrolled with hospice care compared to 58% in the non-PC group (p 0.0002). 80% of patients had an AD on file in the group seen by PC compared to 56% in the non-PC group (p <0.0001). In terms of ED visits or re-hospitalization, there was a trend for more ED visits/readmissions in the group seen by PC compared to the non-PC group (p 0.057). Conclusions: In this real-world quality analysis, we found that there is under-utilization of formal PC consultation in patients with BMETs. There was no difference in survival between groups, indicating PC is not synonymous with end-of-life or hospice care. PC was associated with more patients completing ADs and more patients using hospice. Health systems and policy initiatives promoting palliative care utilization earlier in the disease course may support patient values and preferences at the end of life. [Table: see text]

A phase 2 clinical trial of first-in-class fascin inhibitor NP-G2-044 as monotherapy and in combination therapy with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.

A phase 2 clinical trial of first-in-class fascin inhibitor NP-G2-044 as monotherapy and in combination therapy with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.

Irradiate the knowledge gap: Empowering residents for blood product selection at Albany Medical Center.

e23236 Background: Transfusion-associated graft versus host disease (ta-GvHD) poses risks for immunocompromised patients. Indications for irradiated blood products include hematological malignancies and bone marrow transplant cases. In instances of severe acute pancytopenia, the initial contact at the emergency room (ER) is typically a nurse, followed by the ER physician. Patients referred from the local private practice, New York Oncology and Hematology (NYOH) office to our local hospital, Albany Medical Center (AMC), often bring comprehensive paper charts, but those coming directly from home frequently lack necessary documents, relying on the medical teams' expertise to ensure appropriate blood product selection. We aim to improve understanding of transfusion products and their indications. Methods: An initial pre-survey questionnaire was sent to internal medicine residents. Of the 33 responses received, 87.9% were aware of the need for irradiated blood products in hematological malignancies, 66.6% knew it was not required for solid tumors, and only 57.6% knew about the need for CAR-T patients. Additionally, only 15.2% knew where to find information on selecting irradiated blood products at AMC. The analysis highlighted a significant knowledge gap in transfusing irradiated blood products for hematological and oncological malignancies. In response, a user-friendly educational resource was created and displayed in residents' conference rooms during inpatient rotations, with plans for intermittent educational sessions over the next months. A comprehensive educational initiative addressed this aspect of patient care within the inpatient service, distributing detailed materials and discussions with the internal medicine residents at AMC. The focus was on emphasizing the critical requirement for irradiated blood products in specific clinical scenarios, particularly when managing patients with hematological malignancies and other conditions where irradiated blood is medically indicated. Results: A follow-up survey, conducted four months after distributing educational material on medicine floors, included responses from 27 internal medicine residents. Notably, 100% and 88.9% were knowledgeable about the necessity of irradiated blood products in hematological malignancies and bone marrow transplant recipients, respectively. Additionally, 24 out of 27 residents were aware that irradiated products are unnecessary for solid tumor malignancies in adult patients. All residents knew where to find information on blood product selection at AMC, and 92.6% found the education material helpful. Conclusions: Improved knowledge among residents underscores our commitment to patient care. We aim to extend education on irradiated blood product necessity beyond our residency program. Our long-term vision is to broaden this critical knowledge across the healthcare community at AMC.

Results of the COMPARE-GPT study: Comparison of medication package inserts and GPT-4 cancer drug information.

e13646 Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has opened new avenues for information dissemination. GPT-4 (GPT) is a large language model developed by open AI. Concerns about its accuracy exist, especially in health communications. We conducted a study to evaluate the accuracy of GPT responses to questions about anti-neoplastic agents for solid tumor malignancies. Methods: We evaluated GPT responses to four questions (Table 1) for each solid tumor drug newly approved or approved for a new indication between 2020 and 2022. The responses from GPT were saved and then compared to the information provided in the medication package insert. For discordant results, a second search was run using a new GPT session. The study was performed by two physicians who ensured that the comparison was both rigorous and unbiased. Results: 53 unique antineoplastic agents were included. GPT responses regarding FDA approval & mechanism of action were correct for each drug (100%). When asked about common adverse reactions, GPT provided incorrect responses for 47% (25/53) of the medications and correct responses for 53% (28/43). The inaccurate responses were either missing certain side effects (88%), provided inaccurate incidence rates (8%), and/or included side effects not listed on the package insert (20%). When a second search was conducted with the same question, GPT provided different responses in 76% (19/25), same responses in 16% (4/25) and now correct responses in 8% (2/25). When asked about drug warnings and precautions, GPT provided incorrect responses for 68% (36/53) of the medications and correct responses for 32% (17/53). The inaccurate responses were missing certain warnings and precautions (89%) and/or included warnings and precautions not listed on the package insert (25%). When a second search was conducted with the same question, GPT provided different responses in 53% (19/36), same responses in 39% (14/36) and now correct responses in 8% (3/36). Conclusions: Analysis of solid tumor drugs approved for use in 2020-2022 evaluated GPT's ability to provide drug information. GPT accurately identified FDA approved indications & mechanisms of action but had significant limitations in accurately reporting a comprehensive list of adverse reactions, drug warnings and precautions. GPT occasionally included drug side effects that are not listed in the package insert. Significant variability in output was demonstrated in repeated searches. Given the inconsistencies in the data identified, GPT should not be used as a primary source of medical information and may potentially cause harm. [Table: see text]

Two phase 2A clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IMSA101 in combination with radiotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive solid tumor malignancies.

Two phase 2A clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IMSA101 in combination with radiotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive solid tumor malignancies.

Improving quality of oncology (onc) documentation and enhancing structured data collection using a standardized onc note template.

11128 Background: To improve documentation quality in Medical Onc outpatient clinics, a standardized template was created. In this template we embedded: 1. An Epic SmartForm to collect structured data (SD) about patient, disease, and response status at each encounter. Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) compatible SD elements were used to enhance interoperability. 2. Several clinically impactful quality metrics (QM) selected based on the Quality Onc Practice Initiative (QOPI) guidelines. In this analysis, we aim to assess how template use impacted documentation quality. Methods: 113,376 outpatient encounters occurred between 01/2018 – 12/2022 (41 providers: 35 physicians, 6 APPs). The template go live was 3/19/2019. 2,520 randomly selected encounters were manually reviewed. Distinct documentation of 8 items served as QMs (Table). Of note, using the template was voluntary and data entry in the embedded form is not mandated. Documentation of each QM was compared between notes authored with/without template. For each note, a completeness score was calculated based on total number of QMs present/note. Categorical comparisons were made using chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests. Numerical/continuous values were summarized using means and standard deviations. A template “user” was defined as a provider using the template in >10% of encounters after go live. This QI project was exempted by IRB. Results: 154/2520 encounters were excluded after manual review (visits not for solid tumor malignancy). The template was used in 38.7% (917/2366) of the reviewed notes. Cancer diagnosis was documented in >99.8% of notes regardless of template use. Template use was associated with increased documentation of 7 QMs (Table). Documentation overall completeness improved from 62% to 90% with a very large effect size (Table). Template use positively correlated with female gender and fewer years since last training (p<0.001). In the subgroup of notes written by “users” (21 physicians, 4 APPs), individual QM and overall completeness scores improved with template use (p<0.001). Conclusions: Template use profoundly improved QM documentation (statistically significant and clinically meaningful) by Onc clinic providers. This strategy enhances mCODE compatible structured data collection and semantic interoperability between systems, strengthening the available real-world data (RWD) in EHR. [Table: see text]

Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Indicators in Patients with Solid Malignant Tumor-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

To analyze the clinical features and laboratory indicators in patients with solid malignant tumor-associated venous thromboembolism (Ta-VTE), and to study the risk factors for Ta-VTE. The hospitalized patients with VTE in Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital from January to December 2020 were enrolled, and they were divided into Ta-VTE group and pure VTE group based on the presence or absence of solid malignant tumor. The differences in clinical data and laboratory indicators between the two groups were analyzed, and the indicators with significant differences were included in logistic regression model to analyze the risk factors of Ta-VTE. A total of 288 patients with VTE were included in this study, including 64 cases in Ta-VTE group and 224 cases in pure VTE group, respectively. There were significant differences in the following indexes between the two groups, including the hospitalization time (14.20±15.29 d vs 10.05±6.90 d, t=3.112, P =0.002), pain (35.94% vs 65.18%, χ2=17.554, P =0.000), recent surgery (75.00% vs 37.50%, χ2=28.196, P =0.000), D-dimer [2.8 (0.92, 7.55) μg/ml vs 5.69 (2.25, 13.91) μg/ml, Z=-2.710, P =0.007], PLR[198.59 (139.54, 312.16) vs 149.76 (114.08, 233.66), Z=-2.924, P =0.003] and TBIL[10.90 (7.63, 15.68) μmol/L vs 12.90 (9.33, 18.28) μmol/L, Z=-2.066, P =0.039]. There was no significant difference in the other indicators (P >0.05). The result of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that elevated PLR (OR =1.003, 95%CI : 1.000-1.006, P =0.027), recent surgery (OR =4.312, 95%CI : 2.093-8.885, P =0.000) and prolonged hospitalization (OR =1.037, 95%CI : 1.002-1.074, P =0.038）were independent risk factors for Ta-VTE. However, pain (OR =0.274, 95%CI : 0.133-0.564, P =0.000) was a protective factor. Elevated PLR level, recent surgery and prolonged hospital stay are independent risk factors for Ta-VTE patients, and rational use of these indicators is helpful for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of Ta-VTE patients.

Phase 1 study of ERK inhibitor JSI-1187 for patients with advanced solid tumors with MAPK pathway mutations.

e15111 Background: Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is a key regulator of cellular proliferation and survival, it is highly correlated with the occurrence of many cancers, JSI-1187 is a potent and reversible small molecule inhibitor of ERK1/2. This study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ERK Inhibitor JSI-1187 for advanced MAPK-mutant tumors patients. Methods: This is a phase 1 study included dose escalation and expansion (NCT06239623). The dose escalation study was conducted using a 3+3 escalation design to assess JSI-1187 16, 24, 32, 48,72, 80 and 96 mg BID, and 80, 128 and 152mg QD, repeated q 28 days. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were predefined in the protocol. MAPK-mutant tumor patients whose disease progressed after existing standard treatment were treated. RAS and BRAF-mutated solid malignant tumors were explored in the dose-escalation phase. Results: As of December 23, 2023, 26 patients were enrolled, including 23 from the BID group and 3 from the 80mg QD group. No DLT was observed in QD group, 1 DLT (1 macular edema) and 2 DLTs (1 macular edema and 1 pneumonia) were observed at 96 and 80 mg BID, respectively. The most common JSI-1187 16-96mg BID related AEs were hypoalbuminemia (69.6%), rash (62.5%), and anemia (43.5%), while the most common JSI-1187 80mg QD related AEs were rash (100%), leukopenia (100%) and neutropenia (66.7%). The most common Grade 3 JSI-1187 16-96mg BID treatment-related AEs were anemia (17.4%) and thrombocytopenia (8.7%). Tumor response was evaluated in 18 of the total 26 patients. SD was noted as best response at doses of 16 – 96 mg BID and 80 mg QD including 29.8% tumor shrinkage in 1 NRAS-mutant melanoma patient treated at 32mg BID and 21.6% tumor shrinkage in 1 MEK1 K57N-mutant lung cancer patient treated at 72mg BID. Conclusions: JSI-1187 monotherapy is well-tolerated in advanced solid tumor patients and demonstrated preliminary antitumor effect. Current evidence supports future exploration of JSI-1187 as monotherapy, and in combination, in patients with MAPK-mutant tumors. Research Sponsor: JS Innopharm Clinical trial information: NCT06239623 .

Incidence of mortality in vulnerable and non-vulnerable older patients with cancer.

e13775 Background: Cancer most often affects older adults; 56% of all newly diagnosed cancer patients and 71% of deaths belong to this age group. Frail patients are at increased risk of unfavorable outcomes after Treatment. Methods: This cross-sectional study included adults older than ≥ 65 years who attended the Oncology department were included, with a diagnosis of a solid malignant neoplasm during March 2022-May 2023. Sociodemographic characteristics and characteristics of the disease were evaluated, and the G8 test was applied, a tool that identifies patients at risk of frailty (nutritional status, mobility, age, general health status, neuropsychological status, drugs used); a score ≤14 indicates that they are vulnerable. They were classified into two groups: group 1 (vulnerable) and group 2 (non-vulnerable). Telephone follow-up was performed at 12 and 24 weeks. We evaluated the incidence of mortality in both groups after oncological medical management. Results: Eighty-eight older adults were recruited, the majority were men (77.3%), and the mean age was 74.2 ± 6.71. Forty-seven patients (53.4%) were vulnerable (group 1), and 41 patients (46.6%) were non-vulnerable (group 2). Mortality at 12 weeks was evaluated: vulnerable (29.8%) vs. non-vulnerable (0%), and mortality at 24 weeks: vulnerable (46%) vs. non-vulnerable (4.9%). In both follow-ups, statistically significant results were obtained (<0.001). Conclusions: Vulnerable patients have a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes; their detection is essential to perform a comprehensive geriatric assessment and provide multidisciplinary treatment, improving the prognosis of their disease. [Table: see text]

Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study.

Lorlatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial activity versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced, ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase III CROWN study. Here, we report long-term outcomes from CROWN after 5 years of follow-up. Two hundred ninety-six patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (n = 149) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 147). This post hoc analysis presents updated investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses. With a median follow-up for PFS of 60.2 and 55.1 months, respectively, median PFS was not reached (NR [95% CI, 64.3 to NR]) with lorlatinib and 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 10.9) with crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.27]); 5-year PFS was 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) and 8% (95% CI, 3 to 14), respectively. Median time to intracranial progression was NR (95% CI, NR to NR) with lorlatinib and 16.4 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 21.9) with crizotinib (HR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.12]). Safety profile was consistent with that in prior analyses. Emerging new ALK resistance mutations were not detected in circulating tumor DNA collected at the end of lorlatinib treatment. After 5 years of follow-up, median PFS has yet to be reached in the lorlatinib group, corresponding to the longest PFS ever reported with any single-agent molecular targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC and across all metastatic solid tumors. These results coupled with prolonged intracranial efficacy and absence of new safety signals represent an unprecedented outcome for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and set a new benchmark for targeted therapies in cancer.

Disease Control and Toxicity Outcomes after Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Cancers in Young-Adult and Pediatric Patients.

Pediatric patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors have poor survival outcomes despite standard-of-care systemic therapy. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) may improve tumor control. We report the outcomes with the use of SABR in our pediatric solid tumor population. This was a single-institutional study in patients < 30 years treated with SABR. The primary endpoint was local control (LC), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates in R v4.2.3. In total, 48 patients receiving 135 SABR courses were included. The median age was 15.6 years (interquartile range, IQR 14-23 y) and the median follow-up was 18.1 months (IQR: 7.7-29.1). The median SABR dose was 30 Gy (IQR 25-35 Gy). The most common primary histologies were Ewing sarcoma (25%), rhabdomyosarcoma (17%), osteosarcoma (13%), and central nervous system (CNS) gliomas (13%). Furthermore, 57% of patients had oligometastatic disease (≤5 lesions) at the time of SABR. The one-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 94%, 22%, and 70%, respectively. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were observed, while the rates of any grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicities were 11.8%, 3.7%, and 4.4%, respectively. Patients with oligometastatic disease, lung, or brain metastases and those who underwent surgery for a metastatic site had a significantly longer PFS. LC at 1-year was significantly higher for patients with a sarcoma histology (95.7% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.01) and for those who received a biological equivalent dose (BED10) > 48 Gy (100% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.001). SABR is well tolerated in pediatric patients with 1-year local failure and OS rates of <10% and 70%, respectively. Future studies evaluating SABR in combination with systemic therapy are needed to address progression outside of the irradiated field.

BL-B01D1, a first-in-class EGFR–HER3 bispecific antibody–drug conjugate, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours: a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1 study

Antibody-drug conjugates have promising clinical activity in the treatment of solid tumours. BL-B01D1 is a first-in-class EGFR-HER3 bispecific antibody-drug conjugate. We aimed to assess the safety and preliminary antitumour activity of BL-B01D1 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours. This first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 trial was conducted in seven hospitals in China, enrolling patients aged 18-75 years (dose escalation; phase 1a) or older than 18 years (dose expansion; phase 1b), with a life expectancy of at least 3 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours that had progressed on current standard treatment. In the phase 1a i3+3 design, patients received intravenous BL-B01D1 at three different schedules: 0·27 mg/kg, 1·5 mg/kg, and 3·0 mg/kg weekly; 2·5 mg/kg, 3·0 mg/kg, and 3·5 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks; or 5·0 mg/kg and 6·0 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks. The primary objectives of phase 1a were to identify the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and dose-limiting toxicity. In phase 1b, patients were treated in two schedules: 2·5 and 3·0 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, or 4·5, 5·0, and 6·0 mg/kg on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary objectives of phase 1b were to assess the safety and recommended phase 2 dose of BL-B01D1, and objective response rate was a key secondary endpoint. Safety was analysed in all patients with safety records who received at least one dose of BL-B01D1. Antitumour activity was assessed in the activity analysis set which included all patients who received at least one dose of BL-B01D1 every 3 weeks. This trial is registered with China Drug Trials, CTR20212923, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05194982, and recruitment is ongoing. Between Dec 8, 2021, and March 13, 2023, 195 patients (133 [65%] men and 62 [32%] women; 25 in phase 1a and 170 in phase 1b) were consecutively enrolled, including 113 with non-small-cell lung cancer, 42 with nasopharyngeal carcinomas, 13 with small-cell lung cancer, 25 with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, one with thymic squamous cell carcinoma, and one with submandibular lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. In phase 1a, four dose-limiting toxicities were observed (two at 3·0 mg/kg weekly and two at 3·5 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; all were febrile neutropenia), thus the maximum tolerated dose was reached at 3·0 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks and 6·0 mg/kg on day 1 every 3 weeks. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 139 (71%) of 195 patients; the most common of which were neutropenia (91 [47%]), anaemia (76 [39%]), leukopenia (76 [39%]), and thrombocytopenia (63 [32%]). 52 (27%) patients had a dose reduction and five (3%) patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. One patient was reported as having interstitial lung disease. Treatment-related deaths occurred in three (2%) patients (one due to pneumonia, one due to septic shock, and one due to myelosuppression). In 174 patients evaluated for activity, median follow-up was 6·9 months (IQR 4·5-8·9) and 60 (34%; 95% CI 27-42) patients had an objective response. Our results suggest that BL-B01D1 has preliminary antitumour activity in extensively and heavily treated advanced solid tumours with an acceptable safety profile. Based on the safety and antitumour activity data from both phase 1a and 1b, 2·5 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose in Chinese patients. Sichuan Baili Pharmaceutical. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Isocoumarins incorporating chalcone moieties act as isoform selective tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.

Aim: A series of isocoumarin-chalcone hybrids were prepared and assays for the inhibition of four isoforms of human carbonic anhydrase (hCA; EC 4.2.1.1), hCA I, II, IX and XII. Materials & methods: Isocoumarin-chalcone hybrids were synthesized by condensing acetyl-isocoumarin with aromatic aldehydes. They did not significantly inhibit off-target cytosolic isoforms hCA I and II (KI>100μM) but acted as low micromolar or submicromolar inhibitors for the tumor-associated isoforms hCA IX and XII. Results & conclusion: Our work provides insights into a new and scarcely investigated chemotype which provides interesting tumor-associated CA inhibitors, considering that some such derivatives like sulfonamide SLC-0111 are in advanced clinical trials for the management of metastatic advanced solid tumors.

Genomic landscape of comprehensive genomic profiling in patients with malignant solid tumors in Japan.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can aid the discovery of clinically useful, candidate antitumor agents; however, the variant annotations sometimes differ among the various types of CGP tests as well as the public database. The aim of this study is to clarify the genomic landscape of evaluating detected variants in patients with a malignant solid tumor. The present, cross-sectional study used data from 57,084 patients with a malignant solid tumor who underwent CGP at the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) between June 1, 2019 and August 18, 2023. The pathogenicity of the variants was annotated using public databases. As a result of re-annotation of the detected variants, 20.1% were pathogenic and 1.4% were benign. The mean number of pathogenic variants was 4.30 (95% confidence interval: 4.27-4.32) per patient. Of the entire cohort, 5.7% had no pathogenic variant. The co-occurrence of the genes depended on the tumor type. Germline findings were detected in 6.2%, 8.8%, and 15.8% of the patients using a tumor/normal panel, tumor-only panel, and liquid panel, respectively, with the most common gene being BRCA2 followed by TP53 and BRCA1. The detected variants should be re-annotated because several benign variants or variants of unknown significance were included in the CGP, and the genomic landscape derived from these results will help researchers and physicians interpret the results of CGP tests. The method of extracting presumptive, germline, pathogenic variants from patients using a tumor-only panel or circulating tumor DNA panel requires improvement.

Mortality prediction and influencing factors for intensive care unit patients with acute tubular necrosis: random survival forest and cox regression analysis

Background: Patients with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) not only have severe renal failure, but also have many comorbidities, which can be life-threatening and require timely treatment. Identifying the influencing factors of ATN and taking appropriate interventions can effectively shorten the duration of the disease to reduce mortality and improve patient prognosis.Methods: Mortality prediction models were constructed by using the random survival forest (RSF) algorithm and the Cox regression. Next, the performance of both models was assessed by the out-of-bag (OOB) error rate, the integrated brier score, the prediction error curve, and area under the curve (AUC) at 30, 60 and 90 days. Finally, the optimal prediction model was selected and the decision curve analysis and nomogram were established.Results: RSF model was constructed under the optimal combination of parameters (mtry = 10, nodesize = 88). Vasopressors, international normalized ratio (INR)_min, chloride_max, base excess_min, bicarbonate_max, anion gap_min, and metastatic solid tumor were identified as risk factors that had strong influence on mortality in ATN patients. Uni-variate and multivariate regression analyses were used to establish the Cox regression model. Nor-epinephrine, vasopressors, INR_min, severe liver disease, and metastatic solid tumor were identified as important risk factors. The discrimination and calibration ability of both predictive models were demonstrated by the OOB error rate and the integrated brier score. However, the prediction error curve of Cox regression model was consistently lower than that of RSF model, indicating that Cox regression model was more stable and reliable. Then, Cox regression model was also more accurate in predicting mortality of ATN patients based on the AUC at different time points (30, 60 and 90 days). The analysis of decision curve analysis shows that the net benefit range of Cox regression model at different time points is large, indicating that the model has good clinical effectiveness. Finally, a nomogram predicting the risk of death was created based on Cox model.Conclusion: The Cox regression model is superior to the RSF algorithm model in predicting mortality of patients with ATN. Moreover, the model has certain clinical utility, which can provide clinicians with some reference basis in the treatment of ATN and contribute to improve patient prognosis.

#2557 Clinical and histological findings in cancer patients—a single center study

Abstract Background and Aims During the last years, there has been an outstanding improvement in cancer treatment. As patients’ survival has been elongated, the prevalence of kidney injury is increasing. However, clinicopathological data are limited in these patients. We aimed to assess the spectrum of kidney biopsy findings in cancer patients and their relation to treatment. Method Single center retrospective study of all patients with solid and hematologic malignancies, who underwent kidney biopsy due to renal impairment, from September 2015 to July 2023. Clinical, laboratory, histopathological and therapeutic data were evaluated Results Fifty-four patients were biopsied, 35 men and 21 women, of median age 66 (42-84) years and follow up 15 (3-84) months. Median serum creatinine was 3 (0.5-22) mg/dl and proteinuria 3 (0.1-23) gr per day at the time of biopsy. Among the solid malignancies (38/54), lung cancer was the commonest (11), followed by gastrointestinal (5), breast (4), sarcoma (5) and melanoma (3); the rest 10 included other solid malignant tumors. Hematologic malignancies (16/54) were mainly multiple myeloma (6) and lymphomas (5), followed by lymphoblastic leukemia (3) and AL amyloidosis (2). The most frequent indication of biopsy was acute kidney injury (AKI) (29/54), followed by both AKI and proteinuria (15/54) and proteinuria with preserved kidney function (9/54); out of 24 patients with proteinuria, 12 exhibited nephrotic range proteinuria (median 10, 3.5-23 gr/day). At the time of biopsy, more than half of patients (30/54) were on cancer treatment; 5 on immunotherapy, 11 on immunotherapy combined to chemotherapy, 10 on chemotherapy solely and four of them received other kind of treatment. Glomerulonephritis (GN) was shown on 24/54 patients. Among GN, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was the most common lesion (7), followed by light chain deposit disease (LCDD, 3) and membranous nephropathy (MN, 2); among the last, a rare case of MN with a full-house immunoflorescence pattern was reported. Notably, four patients showed amyloidosis (three AL-amyloidosis linked to multiple myeloma and one AA-amyloidosis possibly related to immunotherapy). A rare case of bevacizumab-induced hyaline occlusive glomerular microangiopathy is also reported. The rest 7/24 cases included glomerulosclerosis (1), minimal change disease (MCD, 1), IgA nephropathy (1), diabetic nephropathy (2) and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (2). Tubulointerstitial lesions were found on 30 patients. Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and combination of two (AIN+ATN) were found on 7, 4 and 12 patients respectively (23 in total). Of note, four out of five patients receiving ifosfamide for sarcomas, presented karyomegalic tubulointerstitial nephritis. Four patients, (three with B-cell lymphoma and one with urothelial carcinoma) exhibited renal infiltration by tumor cells. In addition, two patients were shown with oxalate nephropathy and one with nephrocalcinosis. Kidney disease was secondary to treatment in 23 patients, predominantly attributed to immunotherapy (13). Based on histological findings, cancer treatment was withheld in all patients (23/23).Sixteen of all patients received specific treatment for kidney injury, including corticosteroids, cyclosporine or colchicine. In most of them (14), kidney injury was evaluated as secondary to treatment; Two patients, who presented FSGS and MCD, exhibited renal damage attributed to cancer itself. All treated patients (16/16) recovered renal injury. A small proportion of patients (6/54) underwent dialysis—two due to oxalate nephropathy, two with ifosfamide toxicity, one with LCDD and the last due to sepsis. Half of patients (27/54), including 5/6 who were on dialysis, died during observation period. Conclusion Diagnosing and managing kidney injury in cancer patients may be a challenging task. In our single center study, kidney biopsy revealed diverse and rare histological findings, which necessitated tailored therapeutic interventions.

Long Non-Coding RNAs in Neuroblastoma: Pathogenesis, Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets.

Neuroblastoma is the most common malignant extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Recent studies involving the application of advanced high-throughput "omics" techniques have revealed numerous genomic alterations, including aberrant coding-gene transcript levels and dysfunctional pathways, that drive the onset, growth, progression, and treatment resistance of neuroblastoma. Research conducted in the past decade has shown that long non-coding RNAs, once thought to be transcriptomic noise, play key roles in cancer development. With the recent and continuing increase in the amount of evidence for the underlying roles of long non-coding RNAs in neuroblastoma, the potential clinical implications of these RNAs cannot be ignored. In this review, we discuss their biological mechanisms of action in the context of the central driving mechanisms of neuroblastoma, focusing on potential contributions to the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of this disease. We also aim to provide a clear, integrated picture of future research opportunities.