The real-world impact of next-generation sequencing in advanced stages of solid tumor malignancies.

Abstract

e23066 Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a revolutionary technology that allows for DNA and RNA genomic analysis of malignant tumors via tissue or blood sample to aid in diagnosis and treatment while providing predictive and prognostic data about cancer patients. 75.6% of US oncologists use NGS in advanced cancer patients. As there are now site-agnostic approvals of certain targeted therapies, ASCO published a provisional clinical opinion stating that there is a rationale for genomic testing of all solid tumors. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of NGS testing in advanced solid tumor patients in a community based cancer center in Florida. Methods: Patients were diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 solid malignancy between January 1st, 2019 - December 31st, 2022. 496 patients were reviewed of which 269 patients were included in the study as they underwent NGS testing with either tissue (70.6%), blood (25.3%) or both (4.1%). Results: Median age of the study population was 71% with 87% of patients being insured with Medicare. 52.4% of patients were male. Overall, 67.7% of patients had biomarkers identified, 47.2% had FDA approved targeted therapies, and 77.3% had clinical trials identified. NGS testing impacted first line therapy in only 10% of patients where a matched therapy was initiated as first line treatment. Median time from initial diagnosis to NGS result was 53 days while the median time from diagnosis to initiation of first line of therapy was 47.5 days. In the entire study population, 14.1% never received therapy and 40.9% of patients passed. Of the 110 patients who passed, median overall survival in patients who had a biomarker identified through NGS testing was 6 months compared to 7 months in patients without a biomarker. Rates of biomarker identification and availability of FDA approved therapy were similar between deceased patients (67.3% and 45.5%) and those who were alive at time of analysis (63.1% and 48.4%). Conclusions: NGS testing has become part of routine oncologic care in patients with advanced solid malignancies, however in only 10% of cases did it impact first line therapy. Though currently NGS testing has a limited role in the initial management of advanced solid tumors, it is imperative that this technology continues to be used and developed as it leads to hypothesis generating and clinically relevant questions in discovery of oncogenic drivers, targets for novel therapeutics, and mechanisms of resistance to therapies. [Table: see text]