AbstractBackgroundPhysical inactivity, obesity, type 2 diabetes [T2D], hypertension, smoking, and depression, are six major modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While several multi‐domain intervention studies have been completed, mostly in older adults, targeting one or more modifiable risk factor, results have been inconsistent. We designed novel, “real‐life”, feasibility study of a personalized 18‐months intervention for prevention of cognitive decline in middle‐aged individuals at very high AD risk due the presence of at least two modifiable risk factors plus parental family history of AD. Our aims are to explore: 1) The feasibility of our novel approach; 2) Whether our intervention improves AD risk factors and whether greater adherence is associated with larger improvement; and 3) Whether our intervention improves cognition.MethodStudy’s participants are 40‐65 years old cognitively normal offspring of individuals with AD. Participants must have at least two of the six major modifiable AD risk factors. Recruitment goal was 100 participants. Participants were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to the intervention:control arms of the study. The 18‐months intervention combines a smartphone application (app) with study team guidance through phone‐calls, which include advice for risk factors improvement, interactive follow‐up using an app, and feedback on risk factors management for its modification.ResultSince study was launch in 2019, 500 individuals have completed an online eligibility questionnaire. We have achieved the recruitment goal, and 100 participants have been enrolled, with 67 in the intervention group and 33 in the control group. Groups are well‐matched for baseline demographics and AD risk factors (intervention vs control: age‐ 57.3[SE = 0.64]vs.57.0[SE = 0.99]; sex ‐ [% males]30%vs.33%; years of education‐ 17.7[SE = 0.77] vs.17.0[SE = 0.64]; BMI‐ 30.5[SE = 0.63]vs.29.6[SE = 0.59]; % physical inactivity ‐84vs.82; % T2D‐ 15vs.12; % hypertension‐ 27vs.30; % depression‐ 16vs.15; and MMSE‐ 29[SE = 0.17]vs. 29.2[SE = 0.16]; all p>0.05), except for percentage of smokers which was significantly higher in the intervention arm (12vs.3). Additional analyses will be ready by AAIC 2023.ConclusionResults of this study will provide feasibility data on the adherence to the human‐app approach, characteristics of those who adhere, on whether the approach improves risk factors, and will provide initial data on intervention efficacy for cognition.
Read full abstract