Left Atrial Volume Measurements Research Articles

Sequential Quality Assurance of Left Atrial Volume Measurements in a Tertiary Centre

Sequential Quality Assurance of Left Atrial Volume Measurements in a Tertiary Centre

Efficiency and feasibility of semi-automated software for measuring left atrial volume in routine echocardiography in a pediatric population.

The traditional method for measuring left atrial volume (LAV) involves manual tracing. Recently, semi-automated techniques for measuring LAV, based on 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and 3D echocardiography (3DE), have become commercially available. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency and feasibility of these semi-automated software methods for LAV measurement in pediatric patients. We analyzed 207 pediatric patients with 2D and 3D echocardiographic images of the left atrium. The maximum LAV was measured using three techniques: (1) manual tracing, (2) STE-based semi-automated measurement, and (3) 3DE-based semi-automated measurement. We compared both LAV and the time required for LAV measurement among these three techniques. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the LAV measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation (ICC). There was no difference in the LAV between the manual tracing and the STE-based method, but the LAV measured by 3DE-based method was slightly smaller than manual tracing. The measurement time was 32.6 ± 3.5, 53.8 ± 10.8, and 33.8 ± 13.0s for manual tracing, STE-based, and 3DE-based techniques, respectively. There was no difference the time for LAV measurement between the manual tracing and the 3D-based technique. The agreement and ICC for intra-observer reproducibility was similar across all three techniques, but inter-observer reproducibility was superior with the 3DE-based technique. Although the maximum LAV obtained through the 3DE-based techniques was slightly smaller compared with the traditional manual tracing method, the 3DE-based technique is anticipated to be integrated into routine examinations owing to its short measurement time and superior reproducibility.

Conduit Flow Compensates for Impaired Left Atrial Passive and Booster Functions in Advanced Diastolic Dysfunction.

Quantification of left atrial (LA) conduit function and its contribution to left ventricular (LV) filling is challenging because it requires simultaneous measurements of both LA and LV volumes. The functional relationship between LA conduit function and the severity of diastolic dysfunction remains controversial. We studied the role of LA conduit function in maintaining LV filling in advanced diastolic dysfunction. We performed volumetric and flow analyses of LA function across the spectrum of LV diastolic dysfunction, derived from a set of consecutive patients undergoing multiphasic cardiac computed tomography scanning (n=489). From LA and LV time-volume curves, we calculated 3 volumetric components: (1) early passive emptying volume; (2) late active (booster) volume; and (3) conduit volume. Results were prospectively validated on a group of patients with severe aortic stenosis (n=110). The early passive filling progressively decreased with worsening diastolic function (P<0.001). The atrial booster contribution to stroke volume modestly increases with impaired relaxation (P=0.021) and declines with more advanced diastolic function (P<0.001), thus failing to compensate for the reduction in early filling. The conduit volume increased progressively (P<0.001), accounting for 75% of stroke volume (interquartile range, 63-81%) with a restrictive filling pattern, compensating for the reduction in both early and booster functions. Similar results were obtained in patients with severe aortic stenosis. The pulmonary artery systolic pressure increased in a near-linear fashion when the conduit contribution to stroke volume increased above 60%. Maximal conduit flow rate strongly correlated with mitral E-wave velocity (r=0.71; P<0.0001), indicating that the increase in mitral E wave in diastolic dysfunction represents the increased conduit flow. An increase in conduit volume contribution to stroke volume represents a compensatory mechanism to maintain LV filling in advanced diastolic dysfunction. The increase in conduit volume despite increasing LV diastolic pressures is accomplished by an increase in pulmonary venous pressure.

Cardiovascular MRI Reference Ranges for Heart, Aorta, and Pulmonary Artery in Healthy Chinese Children.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (cardiac MR) reference ranges in Chinese children are lacking. To establish age- and sex-specific reference ranges for cardiac MR parameters in a cohort of healthy Chinese children. Retrospective. One hundred ninety-six healthy children (mean age 9.5 ± 3.6 years, 111 boys). 1.5 T; balanced steady-state free precession. Biventricular volume and ejection fractions (EF), left atrial (LA) volume, right atrial (RA) area, left ventricular (LV) mass and thickness, aortic root (AR), and main pulmonary artery (MPA) dimensions were measured. Parameters were compared between age groups and sex. The relationships between parameters and age, body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA) were investigated. Independent-samples t tests; Pearson's correlation. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Generally, boys exhibited greater absolute measurements of LV volume (end-diastolic: 94.4 ± 29.5 vs. 81.3 ± 31.0 mL), LA volume (end-diastolic: 42.6 ± 13.4 vs. 38.0 ± 13.3 mL), RA area (end-diastolic: 11.6 ± 2.5 vs. 10.8 ± 2.6 cm2), LV thickness (base: 4.4 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9 mm), AR dimensions (annuls: 16.3 ± 2.7 vs. 15.0 ± 2.8 mm), and MPA dimensions (14.3 ± 2.3 vs. 13.1 ± 2.4 mm) than girls did. However, these differences were not observed when the measurements were normalized to BSA (LV volume: 75.3 ± 11.7 vs. 71.9 ± 12.3 mL/m2, P = 0.052; LA volume: 34.8 ± 8.9 vs. 34.5 ± 7.6 mL/m2, P = 0.783; RA area: 9.7 ± 2.3 vs. 10.2 ± 2.3 cm2/m2, P = 0.107; LV thickness: 3.6 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9 mm/m2, P = 0.990; AR: 13.6 ± 2.7 vs. 14.3 ± 3.4 mm/m2, P = 0.108; MPA: 11.9 ± 2.3 vs. 12.4 ± 2.4 mm/m2, P = 0.118). Boys had greater RV volume (end-diastolic: 98.7 ± 33.5 vs. 82.7 ± 33.1 mL) and LV mass (52.6 ± 20.2 vs. 41.4 ± 16.0 g) compared to girls, irrespective of whether the values were indexed or not for BSA. Additionally, there were significant associations between age, BMI, and BSA with biventricular volume, LA volume, RA area, LV mass and thickness, AR and MPA dimensions in both boys and girls. This study suggests reference ranges at 1.5 T for Chinese children. 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Adjusting Atrial Size Parameters for Body Surface Area: Does it Affect the Association With Pulmonary Embolism-related Adverse Events?

Small left atrial (LA) volume was recently reported to be one of the best predictors of acute pulmonary embolism (PE)-related adverse events (AE). There is currently no data available regarding the impact that body surface area (BSA)-indexing of atrial measurements has on the association with PE-related adverse events. Our aim is to assess the impact of indexing atrial measurements to BSA on the association between computed tomography (CT) atrial measurements and AE. Retrospective study (IRB: 2015P000425). A database of hospitalized patients with acute PE diagnosed on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) between May 2007 and December 2014 was reviewed. Right and left atrial volume, largest axial area, and axial diameters were measured. Patients undergo both echocardiographies (from which the BSA was extracted) and CTPAs within 48 hours of the procedure. The patient's body weight was measured during each admission. LA measurements were correlated to AE (defined as the need for advanced therapy or PE-related mortality at 30 days) before and after indexing for BSA. The area under the ROC curve was calculated to determine the predictive value of the atrial measurements in predicting AE. The study included 490 acute PE patients; 62 (12.7%) had AE. There was a significant association of reduced BSA-indexed and non-indexed LA volume (both <0.001), area (<0.001 and 0.001, respectively), and short-axis diameters (both <0.001), and their respective RA/LA ratios (all <0.001) with AE. The AUC values were similar for BSA-indexed and non-indexed LA volume, diameters, and area with LA volume measurements being the best predictor of adverse outcomes (BSA-indexed AUC=0.68 and non-indexed AUC=0.66), followed by non-indexed LA short-axis diameter (indexed AUC=0.65, non-indexed AUC=0.64), and LA area (indexed AUC=0.64, non-indexed AUC=0.63). Adjusting for BSA does not substantially affect the predictive ability of atrial measurements on 30-day PE-related adverse events, and therefore, this adjustment is not necessary in clinical practice. While LA volume is the better predictor of AE, LA short-axis diameter has a similar predictive value and is more practical to perform clinically.

Which left atrial volume measurement should we use in the neonatal intensive care?

BackgroundIncreased left atrial volume (LAV) is a marker of cardiovascular risk. Echocardiography standards to assess LAV in adults and children are the biplane area-length method (AL) and method of disks (MOD). LAV in neonatology is usually derived as M-mode ratio between the LA and the Aorta (LAAo). The aim of this study is to determine feasibility and reliability of these methods in neonatal clinical practice. MethodsClinically indicated echocardiograms in neonatal intensive care patients were retrospectively analyzed. Feasibility was determined with an image quality score describing insonation angle, foreshortening and wall clarity. Reliability was determined with Bland-Altman and correlation coefficient analysis of intra- and inter-observer measurements. Results104 infants ranging from 23 to 39 weeks gestation were included. The feasibility of LAAo, AL and MOD was comparable (median image score 4 out of 6 points). Linear regression between AL and MOD was excellent (R2 0.99). LAAo best-fit with MOD was reached with curve-linear regression (R2 0.28) whereby a LAAo of 1.60 correlated with 1.24 ml/kg, but with a wide 95 % CI. The correlation coefficient within and between observers for LAAo, biplane AL, biplane MOD and monoplane MOD was 0.93 (0.87–0.96), 0.98 (0.96–0.99), 0.98 (0.96–0.99), 0.99 (0.97–0.99) and 0.58 (0.11–0.81), 0.75 (0.44–0.89), 0.92 (0.88–0.98), 0.96 (0.88–0.98) respectively. ConclusionAll methods were equally feasible and reliable when repeated by the same observer, but LAAo reliability was poor when repeated by a different observer. Biplane MOD was the most reliable and thus recommended in neonatal practice. Monoplane MOD performed well and could be considered as alternative but might be less accurate.

Retracted: Artificial Intelligence-Based Echocardiographic Left Atrial Volume Measurement with Pulmonary Vein Comparison.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2021/1336762.].

Automated 2-D and 3-D Left Atrial Volume Measurements Using Deep Learning

Echocardiography, a critical tool for assessing left atrial (LA) volume, often relies on manual or semi-automated measurements. This study introduces a fully automated, real-time method for measuring LA volume in both 2-D and 3-D imaging, in the aim of offering accuracy comparable to that of expert assessments while saving time and reducing operator variability. We developed an automated pipeline comprising a network to identify the end-systole (ES) time point and robust 2-D and 3-D U-Nets for segmentation. We employed data sets of 789 2-D images and 286 3-D recordings and explored various training regimes, including recurrent networks and pseudo-labeling, to estimate volume curves. Our baseline results revealed an average volume difference of 2.9 mL for 2-D and 7.8 mL for 3-D, respectively, compared with manual methods. The application of pseudo-labeling to all frames in the cine loop generally led to more robust volume curves and notably improved ES measurement in cases with limited data. Our results highlight the potential of automated LA volume estimation in clinical practice. The proposed prototype application, capable of processing real-time data from a clinical ultrasound scanner, provides valuable temporal volume curve information in the echo lab.

A method for measuring the angle between left atrial and left ventricular long axes using 3D echocardiography.

Left ventricle (LV) optimized views are routinely used for left atrial (LA) volume and strain measurements on 2D echocardiography. This might be a source of the error because of the variation of the angle between the left atrial and left ventricle long axes (LA-LV angle), leading to foreshortening of the LA. We investigated two novel parameters: the angle between the left atrial and left ventricle long axes (LA-LV angle) and its deviation from the 4-chamber plane. To accurately measure the angles in 3D space, these measurements were performed using 3D echocardiography. We developed a method for the measurement based on marking anatomic points of reference in the 3D echocardiogram and measuring the angles between these points. We used three types of phantoms made of wood and agar-agar to investigate the repeatability and reproducibility of these measurements and performed measurements on human subjects. The ultrasound measurements were in excellent agreement with the true angles of the phantoms: LA-LV angle bias was .5 degrees (95% CI -1.8 to +2.7) in the wooden phantoms and 1.2 degrees (-.7 to +3.1) in the agar-agar phantoms, while the angle deviation from the 4-chamber plane was -.9 degrees (-4.3 to +4.1) in the wooden phantoms and .0 degrees (-3.3 to +3.3) in the agar-agar phantoms. The measurements demonstrated good repeatability and reproducibility (Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from .91 to .99). The measurements from human hearts showed good repeatability (Pearson correlation was .81 for repeated LA-LV angle measurements and .97 for repeated measurements of the deviation from the 4-chamber plane). The measurement of the LA-LV angle is a feasible tool to investigate one eventual error of 2D echocardiography.

Three-dimensional Echocardiography for the Early Detection of Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Abstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease. Left atrial (LA) dysfunction is strongly linked to cardiovascular diseases, and the early detection of LA function in patients with RA is vital. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE) offers a noninvasive method to assess the structure and function of the LA. Aim of the study To assess LA volumes and phasic function in patients with RA using 3D transthoracic echocardiography. Materials and Methods This prospective case-control study included 162 subjects classified into two groups: Group 1 included 82 patients with RA, subdivided into an active RA group (n = 40) and an inactive RA group (n = 42), and Group 2 included 80 healthy matched controls. All study participants were examined using 2D and 3D transthoracic echo-cardiography. Results Diastolic dysfunction was significantly greater in patients with moderate and severe disease activity than in patients with mild disease activity. RT-3DE analysis of RA groups showed significantly higher maximum, minimum, and pre-atrial LA volumes compared to controls (p &lt;0.01), and these volumes were significantly higher in the active RA group than in the inactive RA group (p &lt;0.01). We also found significantly lower LA passive ejection fraction (EF) and active EF in both RA groups than the control group (p &lt;0.01), and significantly lower total EF in the active RA group than the inactive RA group (p &lt;0.01). Conclusion Patients with RA had increased 3D LA volumes and impaired mechanical function, especially in active RA. RT-3DE provides an accurate measurement of LA volumes and function, being a feasible and reproducible method in clinical applications.

Automated evaluation of the left-sided heart volumes using machine learning during stress echocardiography: a multicenter stress echo 2030 study

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): HORIZON. Introduction Stress echocardiography (SE) is a recognized method for risk assessment and detection of coronary artery disease. Although left atrial (LA) and left ventricle (LV) volumes provide valuable information during SE, the time-consuming manual tracings of these structures and operator-dependent accuracy remain significant limitations in analyzing and interpreting SE that might be overcome by automated evaluation. Purpose To assess the potential of an automated machine learning (ML) system for the volumetric evaluation of left-sided heart volumes during SE. Methods The study enrolled 218 participants from five recruiting centers who underwent SE (in most cases, dipyridamole SE). Imaging data were acquired in DICOM format and anonymized for further processing. The studies were evaluated by an expert cardiologist trained in SE evaluation who selected apical four-chamber (4Ch) and two-chamber (2Ch) view images during stress and rest phases an marked end-systolic (ES) and end-diastolic (ED) frames and traced endocardial borders for LA (in ES) and LV (in ED and ES). The same frames were then processed by a transformer neural network trained on a separate set of images. LA volume (LAV), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated in 4Ch and 2Ch views during rest and at stress phases. Each evaluator (cardiologist and ML model) was blinded from each other's measurements. All of the tracings and automated measurements were performed on the same platform. Results Comparison between evaluators by Student's paired t-test showed the best agreement between LAV (4Ch) and LVESV (2Ch) during the rest phase and LVEDV (4Ch and 2Ch) during the stress phase (p&amp;gt;0.05). Other volumetric measurements tended to be slightly higher (except LVEDVs at rest) and LVEF lower assessed by ML than by cardiologists. Pearson's correlation analysis demonstrated strong correlations between the ML model and cardiologist for LAVs (4Ch LAV r=0.94, p&amp;lt;0.001 and r=0.93, p&amp;lt;0.001, 2Ch LAV r=0.91, p&amp;lt;0.001 and r=0.88, p&amp;lt;0.001 at rest and stress, respectively), and LV volumes (4Ch LVEDV r=0.86, p&amp;lt;0.001 and r=0.84, p&amp;lt;0.001, 2Ch LVEDV r=0.82, p&amp;lt;0.001 and r=0.93, p&amp;lt;0.001, 4Ch LVESV r=0.82, p&amp;lt;0.001 and r=0.83, p&amp;lt;0.001, 2Ch LVESV r=0.86, p&amp;lt;0.001 and r=0.82, p&amp;lt;0.001 at rest and stress, respectively), and moderate correlations for LVEF measurements during rest and stress phases. The strongest correlations between raters and the smallest root mean squared errors (RMSEs) were for LAV measurements. Conclusions This multicenter study showed the effectiveness of using ML to produce left-sided heart measurements during SE. There was a tendency for higher volumes assessed by ML, demonstrating the need for additional standardization of SE evaluation for more precise accuracy. However, correlations between the ML model and cardiologists' measurements for left-sided heart volumes were strong during the rest and the stress phases.

Left atrial CT volume and CHA2DS2-VASc score predict early pulmonary vein stump thrombus after left upper lobectomy

The purpose of this study is to clarify the feasibility of left atrial (LA) volume measurement and CHA2DS2-VASc score for predicting the development of pulmonary vein (PV) stump thrombus after left upper lobectomy (LUL). The study population comprised 50 patients who underwent LUL for pulmonary lesions. All patients were evaluated for the development of PV stump thrombus at 7 days after LUL. LA volume was measured using preoperative CT and the CHA2DS2-VASc score was evaluated. LA volume and CHA2DS2-VASc score were compared between patients with and without the development of PV stump thrombus using the Mann–Whitney U test. Receiver–operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of prediction of PV stump thrombus development. PV stump thrombus was detected in 17 (33.4%) of the 50 patients. LA volume was significantly greater in patients who developed PV stump thrombus than in those without thrombus (79.7 ± 19.4 vs. 66.6 ± 17.0 mL, p = 0.040). CHA2DS2-VASc score was significantly higher in patients with PV stump thrombosis than in those without thrombus (3.4 ± 1.5 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5, p = 0.039). Area under the ROC curve values for predicting PV stump thrombus were 0.679, 0.676, and 0.714 for LA volume, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and their combination, respectively. In conclusion, LA volume measured using preoperative CT and CHA2DS2-VASc score may help predict the development of PV stump thrombus after LUL.

Left atrial function and not volume predicts mid-to-late atrial fibrillation after mitral valve repair.

Patients undergoing surgical mitral valve repair (MVr) for degenerative mitral regurgitation are at risk of even late postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial (LA) function has been shown superior to LA volume in evaluating the risk of AF in diverse cardiac conditions. We therefore investigated the prognostic value of LA function and volume in predicting mid-to-late postoperative AF after MVr (>30 days postoperatively). We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent MVr for degenerative mitral regurgitation between 2012 and 2019 at our institution. Exclusion criteria were preoperative AF, concomitant procedures, re-operations, missing or insufficiently processable preoperative echocardiograms and missing follow-up. LA function and volume measurements were conducted using speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic analysis. Postoperative LA function was measured in a subgroup with sufficient postoperative echocardiograms. We included 251 patients, of whom 39 (15.5%) experienced AF in the mid-to-late postoperative period. Reduced LA strain parameters and more than mild preoperative tricuspid regurgitation were independently associated with mid-to-late postoperative AF. LA volume index had no association with mid-to-late postoperative AF in univariable analysis and did not improve the performance of multivariable models. Patients with mid-to-late AF exhibited diminished improvement in LA function after surgery. In MVr patients, LA function (but not volume) showed independent predictive value for mid-to-late postoperative AF. Including LA function into surgical decision-making and approach may identify patients who will benefit from earlier intervention with the aim to prevent irreversible LA damage with consequent risk of postoperative AF.

Cardiac Computed Tomography-Derived Left Atrial Strain and Volume in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Comparative Analysis With Transthoracic Echocardiography.

PurposeThis study aimed at exploring the feasibility and reproducibility of CCT for the measurement of Left Atrial (LA) strain and volume compared with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).Materials and MethodsThe present study included 43 postoperative patients with CHD (7.39 ± 3.64 years, 56% male) who underwent clinically indicated CCT, and all patients underwent additional TTE on the same day. LA strain and volume parameters were measured by dedicated software. The correlation and agreement of LA strain and volume parameters were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess CCT intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility.ResultsAll strain parameters of CCT were lower compared to TTE (reservoir strain: 28.37 ± 6.92 vs. 32.15 ± 8.15, respectively; conduit strain: 21.33 ± 6.46 vs. 24.23 ± 7.75, respectively; booster strain: 7.04 ± 2.74 vs. 7.92 ± 3.56). While the volume parameters of CCT were higher compared to TTE (LAV: 29.60 ± 19.01 vs. 25.66 ± 17.60, respectively; LAVi: 30.36 ± 22.31 vs. 28.63 ± 19.25, respectively). Both LA strain and volume measurements showed good correlation and agreement between the two modalities (r = 0.63–0.87, p < 0.001). CT-derived LA strain and volume measurements showed good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility using prototype software (ICC = 0.78–0.96).ConclusionsCCT was feasible for measuring LA strain and volume with good correlation and high reproducibility as compared with TTE. As a complementary modality, CCT can regard as an accepted method in the evaluation of LA function in pediatric patients with CHD

DIFFERENT APPROACHES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LEFT ATRIAL VOLUME IN A LARGE SAMPLE OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING AN ECHOCARDIOGRAM FOR CARDIOVASCULAR RISK STRATIFICATION

Objective: Left atrial (LA) enlargement (LAE) is associated to an increased risk of cardiovascular complications, and in particular of atrial fibrillation. When LA size is measured by echocardiography, LA volume measurement is preferred over linear measurements. In fact, the strength of the relationship between cardiovascular diseases is stronger for LA volume than for LA linear dimensions. Recently it has been proposed a new method (LAV_e) to estimate LA volume in order to provide a surrogate of biplane LA volume when direct measurement is not available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation between LA volume assessed by the biplane method(LAV_bip) and LA volume estimated by the linear measurements(LAV_e) and to assess the prevalence of LA enlargement in a large sample of patients undergoing an echocardiogram for cardiovascular risk stratification at an ESH excellence centre in Italy. Design and method: 4941 subjects undergoing a diagnostic work-up for arterial hypertension (known or suspect) were analysed. LAV_bip was assessed as by the area-length method using the apical 4-chamber and 2-chamber views and LAV_e was calculated according to the formula: 2.323*(LA parasternal linear diameter2.071). LAV was indexed to height2. Results: Mean age was 56 ± 16 years, BMI 26 ± 5, 43% of subjects had normal weight, 39% overweight, 18% obese, 54% males, 84 % were hypertensives.Mean LAV_bip was 46.2 ± 18.4 and LAV_e was 35.4 ± 11.6 ml. Mean LAV_bip/h2 was 16.2 ± 6.3 and LAV_e/h2 was 12.4 ± 4.1 ml/h2. The correlation coefficients between the two variables were respectively 0.62 and 0.60 (p &lt; 0.0001). Bland &amp; Altman analysis showed a progressive increase in discrepancy between the two measures with increasing LAV_bip. The prevalence of LA enlargement was 32% with the biplane method and 10 % with the elliptical estimation. Conclusions: In a large sample of subjects undergoing a diagnostic work-up for arterial hypertension we observed a possible underestimation of LAV and a lower prevalence of left atrial enlargement when the elliptical approach is used. These results, if confirmed in other populations, suggest that direct measurement of left atrial volume should be preferred, if available.

Left atrial remodelling among Turner syndrome patients: novel insights from non-invasive 3D echocardiography.

To assess (I) the left atrial (LA) size, function and (II) the impact of excess weight on the LA and left ventricular (LV) performance in Turner syndrome (TS) patients. Twenty-five TS patients without congenital heart disease (CHD) and 19 healthy, age-matched controls underwent three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) for LA volume measurements and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) for LA strain measurements. LV performance was measured through LV Tei-index, indexed isovolumetric contraction (ICT/√RR interval), indexed relaxation (IVRT/√RR interval) and indexed filling time (FT/√RR interval). Compared to healthy controls, normal-weight TS patients (n=16) displayed significantly increased heart rate (92.88±16.66 vs. 76.53±15.65 bpm; P=0.005), reduced indexed LV filling time (11.67±2.55 vs. 15.16±5.07; P=0.018), reduced 3D maximum LA volume at LV end systole/BSA (16.74±5.00 vs. 19.89±4.32 mL/m2; P=0.05), reduced 3D LA total emptying volume/BSA [10.04 (5.05/18.46) vs. 13.11 (7.69/18.46) mL/m2; P=0.001] and reduced 3D LA active emptying volume/BSA [2.61 (0.1/3.82) vs. 3.44 (1.64/6.37) mL/m2; P=0.006]. Compared to normal-weight TS patients, overweight/obese TS patients (n=9) showed impaired LV Tei-index [0.38 (0.26/0.55) vs. 0.27 (0.07/0.41); P=0.009], prolonged indexed IVRT (2.04±0.72 vs. 1.30±0.64; P=0.015), prolonged indexed ICT [1.96 (1.57/2.73) vs. 1.29 (0.35/2.69); P=0.009] and increased 3D LA active emptying volume/BSA (3.38±1.21 vs. 2.29±1.07 mL/m2; P=0.032). Normal-weight TS patients with increased heart rate and reduced LV filling time display subtle LV diastolic dysfunction in the form of reduced LA reservoir and pump function. Manifested systolic and diastolic LV dysfunction among overweight TS patients is partially compensated through an increase in LA active pump function.

Left atrial function index (LAFI) and outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BackgroundClinical data regarding the association between the left atrial function index (LAFI) and outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited.ObjectivesWe aimed to investigate the association between the left atrial function index (LAFI) and outcome in patients undergoing TAVR.MethodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, we assessed baseline LAFI in 733 patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis in two German high-volume centers between 2008 and 2019. Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, patients were stratified according to their baseline LAFI into two groups (LAFI ≤ 13.5 vs. LAFI > 13.5) and assessed for post-procedural outcome. The primary endpoint of our study was the 1-year all-cause mortality.ResultsPatients with a LAFI ≤ 13.5 had significantly more often atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), lower LVEF (p < 0.001) and higher levels of NT-proBNP (p < 0.001). After TAVR, a significant improvement in the LAFI as compared to baseline was observed at 12 months after the procedure (28.4 vs. 32.9; p = 0.001). Compared to patients with a LAFI > 13.5, those with a LAFI ≤ 13.5 showed significantly higher rate of 1-year mortality (7.9% vs. 4.0%; p = 0.03). A lower LAFI has been identified as independent predictor of mortality in multivariate analysis (HR (95% CI) 2.0 (1.1–3.9); p = 0.03).ConclusionA reduced LAFI is associated with adverse outcome and an independent predictor of mortality in TAVR patients. TAVR improves LAFI within 12 months after the procedure.Graphical abstractLeft Atrial Function Index (LAFI) in Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with LAFI ≤ 13.5 compared with patients with LAFI > 13.5. Comparing rates of 1-year all-cause mortality between the different LAFI groups, we found a significant association between left atrial function and mortality. LAFI Left atrial function index. B Comparison of the mean LAFI before and after TAVR. After long-term follow-up the LAFI improved significantly. LAFI Left atrial function index; FU follow-up. C Assessment of the left atrial function index using the pre-procedural transthoracic echocardiography. A Measurement of the minimal left atrial volume (LAEDV). B Assessment of the maximal left atrial volume (LAESV).

Echocardiographic measurements of left atrial volume in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Echocardiographic measurements of left atrial volume (LAV) were evaluated in 57 consecutive patients with ischaemic heart disease. LAV was 38 ml/m2 (SD 11), larger in patients with ejection fraction (EF) below 45% than in patients with normal EF (≥55%) but in regression analyses only E/e' correlated independently with LAV. Measurements of LAV had acceptable reproducibility where repeated examinations indicated that half of the variability was explained by the measurement procedure. Our results suggest that an increase or decrease in LAV of 13 ml/m2 between two examinations indicates a true change in volume, possible due to a changed left ventricular filling pressure.

Diagnostic accuracy and performance of artificial intelligence in measuring left atrial volumes and function on multiphasic CT in patients with atrial fibrillation.

To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for fully automated measurement of left atrial (LA) volumes and function using cardiac CT in patients with atrial fibrillation. We included 79 patients (mean age 63 ± 12 years; 35 with atrial fibrillation (AF) and 44 controls) between 2017 and 2020 in this retrospective study. Images were analyzed by a trained AI algorithm and an expert radiologist. Left atrial volumes were obtained at cardiac end-systole, end-diastole, and pre-atrial contraction, which were then used to obtain LA function indices. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis of the LA volumes and function parameters was performed and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the ability to detect AF patients. The AI was significantly faster than manual measurement of LA volumes (4 s vs 10.8 min, respectively). Agreement between the manual and automated methods was good to excellent overall, and there was stronger agreement in AF patients (all ICCs ≥ 0.877; p < 0.001) than controls (all ICCs ≥ 0.799; p < 0.001). The AI comparably estimated LA volumes in AF patients (all within 1.3 mL of the manual measurement), but overestimated volumes by clinically negligible amounts in controls (all by ≤ 4.2 mL). The AI's ability to distinguish AF patients from controls using the LA volume index was similar to the expert's (AUC 0.81 vs 0.82, respectively; p = 0.62). The novel AI algorithm efficiently performed fully automated multiphasic CT-based quantification of left atrial volume and function with similar accuracy as compared to manual quantification. Novel CT-based AI algorithm efficiently quantifies left atrial volumes and function with similar accuracy as manual quantification in controls and atrial fibrillation patients. • There was good-to-excellent agreement between manual and automated methods for left atrial volume quantification. • The AI comparably estimated LA volumes in AF patients, but overestimated volumes by clinically negligible amounts in controls. • The AI's ability to distinguish AF patients from controls was similar to the manual methods.

Automated left atrial volume measurement by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction - A by-product of left atrial (LA) strain analysis is the automated measurement of LA maximal volume (LAVmax), which may decrease the time of echocardiography reporting, and increase the reproducibility of the LAVmax measurement. However, the automated measurement of LAVmax by two-dimensional speckle-tracking analysis (2DSTE) has never been validated. Purpose – Accordingly, we sought to: i. assess the feasibility of automated LAVmax measurement by 2DSTE; ii. compare the automated LAVmax by 2DSTE with conventional two-dimensional (2DE) biplane and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) measurements; and iii. evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the three echocardiography techniques. Methods – LAVmax (34­-197 mL) were prospectively obtained from 198/210 (feasibility 94%) consecutive patients with various cardiac diseases (median age 67 years, 126 men) by 2DSTE, 2DE and 3DE. Results – 2DE and 2DSTE measurements resulted in similar LAVmax values (bias = 1.5 mL, limits of agreement, LOA ± 7.5 mL), and slightly underestimated 3DE LAVmax (biases=-5 mL, LOA ± 17 mL, and -6 mL, LOA ± 16 mL, respectively). LAVmax by 2DSTE and 2DE were strongly correlated to those obtained by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (r=.946, and r=.935, respectively; p&amp;lt;.001). However, LAVmax obtained by 2DSTE (bias=-9.5 mL, LOA ± 16 mL), and 2DE (bias=-8 mL, LOA ± 17 mL) were significantly smaller than those measured by CMR. Conversely, 3DE LAVmax were similar to CMR (bias=-2 ml, LOA ± 10 mL). Excellent intra- and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients were found for 3DE (0.995 and 0.995), 2DE (0.990 and 0.988), and 2DSTE (0.990 and 0.989). Conclusion – Automated LAVmax measurement by 2DSTE is highly feasible, highly reproducible, and provided similar values to conventional 2DE calculations in consecutive patients with a wide range of LAVmax. Abstract Figure. Echocardiography and CMR correlations Abstract Figure. Echocardiography techniques correlations