Which left atrial volume measurement should we use in the neonatal intensive care?

Abstract

BackgroundIncreased left atrial volume (LAV) is a marker of cardiovascular risk. Echocardiography standards to assess LAV in adults and children are the biplane area-length method (AL) and method of disks (MOD). LAV in neonatology is usually derived as M-mode ratio between the LA and the Aorta (LAAo). The aim of this study is to determine feasibility and reliability of these methods in neonatal clinical practice. MethodsClinically indicated echocardiograms in neonatal intensive care patients were retrospectively analyzed. Feasibility was determined with an image quality score describing insonation angle, foreshortening and wall clarity. Reliability was determined with Bland-Altman and correlation coefficient analysis of intra- and inter-observer measurements. Results104 infants ranging from 23 to 39 weeks gestation were included. The feasibility of LAAo, AL and MOD was comparable (median image score 4 out of 6 points). Linear regression between AL and MOD was excellent (R2 0.99). LAAo best-fit with MOD was reached with curve-linear regression (R2 0.28) whereby a LAAo of 1.60 correlated with 1.24 ml/kg, but with a wide 95 % CI. The correlation coefficient within and between observers for LAAo, biplane AL, biplane MOD and monoplane MOD was 0.93 (0.87–0.96), 0.98 (0.96–0.99), 0.98 (0.96–0.99), 0.99 (0.97–0.99) and 0.58 (0.11–0.81), 0.75 (0.44–0.89), 0.92 (0.88–0.98), 0.96 (0.88–0.98) respectively. ConclusionAll methods were equally feasible and reliable when repeated by the same observer, but LAAo reliability was poor when repeated by a different observer. Biplane MOD was the most reliable and thus recommended in neonatal practice. Monoplane MOD performed well and could be considered as alternative but might be less accurate.