Efficiency and feasibility of semi-automated software for measuring left atrial volume in routine echocardiography in a pediatric population.

Abstract

The traditional method for measuring left atrial volume (LAV) involves manual tracing. Recently, semi-automated techniques for measuring LAV, based on 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and 3D echocardiography (3DE), have become commercially available. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency and feasibility of these semi-automated software methods for LAV measurement in pediatric patients. We analyzed 207 pediatric patients with 2D and 3D echocardiographic images of the left atrium. The maximum LAV was measured using three techniques: (1) manual tracing, (2) STE-based semi-automated measurement, and (3) 3DE-based semi-automated measurement. We compared both LAV and the time required for LAV measurement among these three techniques. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the LAV measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation (ICC). There was no difference in the LAV between the manual tracing and the STE-based method, but the LAV measured by 3DE-based method was slightly smaller than manual tracing. The measurement time was 32.6 ± 3.5, 53.8 ± 10.8, and 33.8 ± 13.0s for manual tracing, STE-based, and 3DE-based techniques, respectively. There was no difference the time for LAV measurement between the manual tracing and the 3D-based technique. The agreement and ICC for intra-observer reproducibility was similar across all three techniques, but inter-observer reproducibility was superior with the 3DE-based technique. Although the maximum LAV obtained through the 3DE-based techniques was slightly smaller compared with the traditional manual tracing method, the 3DE-based technique is anticipated to be integrated into routine examinations owing to its short measurement time and superior reproducibility.