AMONG recent publications of the Geologische Reichsanstalt of Vienna, Herr G. Geyer (Verhandlungen, 1904, p. 363) discusses the nature of the pre-Jurassic floor of Austria, from a study of blocks of crystalline rock embedded in Liassic sandstone, and of the island-like. “Klippe,” formed of granite, which lies N.W. of Weyer, and which has been utilised for the memorial of von Buch. This mass of granite, by-the-by (Toula, ibid., 1905, p. 89), was correctly appreciated as a projecting mass of older land, and not as an erratic block, by von Hochstetter as far back as 1869. Herr Geyer refers to many instances of “exotic blocks” north of the Alps, and points out the influence of the old gneissic and granitic foundation on the subsequent folding in the region of the Enns. Herr R. J. Schubert (ibid., 1904, p. 461) adds greatly to our knowledge of the Upper Eocene and Oligocene beds of Dalmatia, while Dr. Franz Kossmat (ibid., 1905, p. 71) shows how the Sava began to flow eastward on the uplifted floor of a Miocene gulf, and formed the plain near Laibach by filling in a depression that developed during the latest movements of the Alps. In the department of palæontology, Dr. Katzer (ibid., 1905, p. 45) furnishes an interesting account of the microscopic structure of the Devonian Tentaculite-limestones of Bohemia, which may be regarded as a valuable supplement to Novák's work on Tentaculites (Beiträge zur Pal. Oesterreich-Ungarns, ii. Bd., 1882). Herr Theodor Fuchs (Jahrbuch der k.k. Reichsanstalt, 1904, p. 359) reviews in considerable detail a number of recent papers on fucoids, and concludes that these problematic organisms were not washed into the strata after the manner of floating seaweeds, but arose where they are now found. He insists that museum-specimens in such cases are likely to be misleading, and that a study of fucoids in the field shows that some, at any rate, run perpendicularly to the strata by which-they are surrounded. Herr G. Stache (Verhandlungen, 1905, p. 100) again investigates the globular Cretaceous organism named by him Bradya, and gives it new interest by showing its resemblance, in structure and mode of occurrence, to Brady's recent genus Keramosphæra, described in 1882 from the deep sea south of Australia. Bradya has long been connected with Steinmann's hydrozoan form Porosphæra; but Stache is now able to revive it, and once more to refer it to the foraminifera. Students of our well known British form Parkeria will find much to interest them in this paper. Herren Hofmann and Zdarsky (Jahrbuch, 1904, p. 577) discuss and illustrate the dentition of Deinotherium, and the abundant remains of a species of antelope, from the Miocene beds of Leoben.