Mechanical compression tests were performed on an economical Ti–6Al–4V alloy over a range of strain-rates and temperatures. Low rate experiments (0.001–0.1/s) were performed with a servo-hydraulic load frame and high rate experiments (1000-80,000/s) were performed with the Kolsky bar (Split Hopkinson pressure bar). Emphasis is placed on the large strain, high-rate, and high temperature behavior of the material in an effort to develop a predictive capability for adiabatic shear bands. Quasi-isothermal experiments were performed with the Kolsky bar to determine the large strain response at elevated rates, and bars with small diameters (1.59 mm and 794 µm, instrumented optically) were used to study the response at the higher strain-rates. Experiments were also conducted at temperatures ranging from 81 to 673 K. Two constitutive models are used to represent the data. The first is the Zerilli-Armstrong recovery strain model and the second is a modified Johnson–Cook model which uses the recovery strain term from the Zerilli–Armstrong model. In both cases, the recovery strain feature is critical for capturing the instability that precedes localization.