In order to achieve post-war recovery of the country, integrate the economy into the European space and global value chains, Ukraine needs to implement a large-scale recovery program. With the current development of information technologies (big data, cloud technologies, high-speed internet coverage, modern satellite systems, etc.), the world has not seen recovery projects on the scale of Ukraine's future recovery. Therefore, Ukraine needs to create its own recovery model using the best principles of recovery from natural disasters and military conflicts, as well as modern digital tools. To achieve this goal, this study examined the international experience of post-World War II recovery. The main focus of the analysis was on approaches and tools that produced the maximum result. The study also showed the necessity for Ukraine to form a new paradigm of economic thinking and development. Its content lies in the transition to thinking in terms of reconstructive type of economic development. It is shown that reconstructive development is possible both on the basis of economic growth and under certain conditions with zero or even negative rates of economic growth. In analyzing the issues outlined in the title of the article, it is relevant to refer to the experience of developed countries around the world. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to analyze the main factors that helped countries recover and develop after wars and military conflicts, in order to take them into account when creating a new concept for the reconstruction of Ukraine's economy. Looking at the examples of state intervention in post-war economic growth processes that have been analyzed, there are somewhat common features in foreign experience that indicate the importance of targeted international assistance for the recovery of production capacity and stable economic growth. The Golden Age of capitalism was characterized by an unprecedented growth in international trade combined with impressive rates of global economic growth, and modern thinking and development practices are largely a result of it. Long-term economic planning was recognized as important, and industrialization was promoted as a means of promoting economic development in less developed countries.
Read full abstract