Iris-fixated Intraocular Lens Research Articles

Assessment of safety of retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens as a viable option in surgical aphakia

Background: Aphakia is the most dreaded and inadvertent complication of cataract surgery. Visual rehabilitation with wide variety of surgical options is a challenge for the ophthalmologist. Our study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the retropupillary implantation of the iris-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) in a 2-month follow-up period. Aims: This study aims to assess the visual outcome, identify complications, and assess the long-term stability of eyes undergoing retropupillary iris-claw lens implantation for aphakia. Settings and Design: This was a prospective interventional study (single-group, before–after study). Materials and Methods: Sixty eyes with surgical aphakia fulfilling the inclusion criteria were considered. Preoperatively, evaluation of visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, fundus examination, intraocular pressure, corneal endothelial cell count, macular thickness, and edema was done. Anterior vitrectomy was done, and retropupillary iris-claw lens was implanted. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, corneal endothelial cell density, macular edema, and IOL stability were evaluated. Statistical Analysis: The computer software statistical package for the social sciences, version 20.0 (SPSS) was used, and a 0.05 level of significance was considered. Results: The major cause of aphakia was posterior capsular rupture (55%). Postoperative BCVA on day 60 was 6/6–6/18 in 83.33% of cases. Three patients had disenclavation of the haptic which required retucking of IOL. No patient had corneal decompensation, cystoid macular edema, or IOP rise. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that retropupillary technique of iris-claw implantation is a safe and effective method for visual rehabilitation in aphakic patients. This surgical procedure has an advantage of posterior chamber implantation with a low intraoperative and postoperative complication profile.

Surgical management of non-syndromic ectopia lentis.

To compare whether aphakic contact lenses or secondary iris-claw intraocular lenses are superior in the refractive management post-pars plana vitreolensectomy in a pedigree with an FBN1 mutation causing non-syndromic ectopia lentis (NSEL) with retinal detachment (RD). Eight affected individuals had pars plana vitreolensectomy for bilateral ectopia lentis (EL). Twelve eyes of 6 patients had secondary iris-claw intraocular lenses inserted and 4 eyes of 2 patients were managed with contact lenses. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) was treated when necessary. Pre- and post-operative assessment included visual acuity, endothelial cell count and dilated fundal examination. Macula-on RRD was present in all individuals >18y, 64% (7/11 eyes) presenting post-vitreolensectomy with 57% having bilateral non-synchronous RRD. Surgical aphakia was managed with iris-fixated intraocular lenses (IOL group, n=6), or contact lenses (CL group, n=2). Visual acuity ≥0.3 logMAR (driving standard) was achieved in 75% of IOL group eyes and 25% of the CL group eyes. Mean loss of corneal endothelial cell count in the IOL group was 4% at 2y post-operative. In this cohort, refractive management with iris-claw IOLs provided superior outcomes to contact lenses and the authors recommend this as the optimal refractive correction in EL patients.

Outcomes and complications of iris-fixated intraocular lenses in cases with inadequate capsular support and complex ophthalmic history.

BackgroundTo report the indications, visual outcomes, and intra-operative and post-operative complications of iris-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with inadequate capsular support and complex ocular history.MethodsA chart review and data analysis of eyes that underwent iris fixation of posterior chamber (PC) IOL for correction of aphakia, dislocated and subluxed IOLs, ectopia lentis, and IOL exchange. Data included clinical risk factors, associated eye conditions, previous surgeries, and concomitant procedures. The pre-operative and post-operative vision, manifest refraction, endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure (IOP), as well as intra-operative and post-operative complications were also recorded.ResultsOne hundred and seventeen eyes from 114 patients were examined with a mean follow-up of 22.4 months. The most common identifiable predisposing risk factor was high myopia in 23 eyes. A significant improvement in uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity compared with baseline was observed. The most common post-operative complications included recurrent IOL subluxation in 16 (13.7%) eyes, IOP spike in 7 (5.9%) eyes, cystoid macular oedema in 5 (4.3%) eyes, and epiretinal membrane formation in 4 (3.4%) eyes. There was one (0.85%) case of sterile endophthalmitis.ConclusionsIris suture fixation of PC IOLs is a good treatment option for eyes with inadequate capsular support and complex ocular history.

Clinical Outcomes of Iris vs. Scleral Intraocular Lens Fixation

Background: We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two techniques for the correction of subluxated posterior intraocular lens (IOL): scleral fixation (SFIOL) and iris fixation of IOL (IFIOL). Methods: 112 eyes of 105 patients that underwent SFIOL or IFIOL at the Kaplan Medical Center between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively included, 73 eyes had SFIOL and 39 eyes had IFIOL. The main outcome measures were: operation time, postoperative visual acuity and intra and post-operative complications. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean operation time between SFIOL and IFIOL. The mean follow-up time was significantly longer for the IFIOL compared with the SFIOL (34 ± 31 vs. 14 ± 20 months, respectively [p>0.001]).Postoperative distance corrected visual acuity (DCVA) at the last follow-up was significantly better than the preoperative DCVA in both groups (SFIOL: 0.52 ± 0.49 vs. 1.20 ± 0.84, [p<0.001], and IFIOL: 0.75 ± 0.88 vs. 1.31 ± 0.81 [p<0.001], respectively [LogMar]). No difference in DCVA was found between the groups. Irregular pupil was found in 59% IFIOL vs. 20.5% of the SFIOL [p<0.001] and corneal edema was found in 10.3% of the IFIOL vs. 1.4% of the SFIOL [p=0.05]. No other differences in intra and post-operative complications were found between the two groups. Conclusion: Both IFIOL and SFIOL are effective and safe for the secure of IOL in the absence of adequate capsular support. Both techniques resulted in a significant improvement in DCVA. Pupil ovalization and corneal edema were more common in the IFIOL group. Longer follow-up was noticed at the IFIOL group.

Implantation of ArtificialIris, a CustomFlex® iris prosthesis, in a trauma patient with an Artisan lens

Purpose: To evaluate probable complications of ArtificialIris implantation with iris-fixated intraocular lens.&#x0D; Method: Development of photophobia, glare, and psychological strain during face-to-face communication in a 23-year-old man with a widespread traumatic iris defect terminate to make a decision for performing implantation an ArtificialIris (HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) under the remnant iris without removing the patient’s existing Artisan lens.&#x0D; Results: Without any intraoperative or postoperative complications, the patient’s visual acuity increased by one line, the endothelial cell loss was comparable with the cell loss associated with standard cataract surgery, and the anterior chamber depth and anterior chamber anatomy did not change. At the final follow-up examination, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) did not differ from baseline, and we achieved high level of patient satisfaction and subjective vision improvement. We discuss the particular importance of considering the patient’s expectations, the appropriate measurements, ways to perfect color evaluation, and the types of ArtificialIris products.&#x0D; Conclusion: The implantation of the ArtificialIris in patients with aphakic iris-supported lenses (i.e., preexisting Artisan lenses) is a feasible approach and a useful option for patients with thin irises and iris hypoplasia who are at risk of subluxation or the dislocation of the PCIOL as well as those with sclerally fixed PCIOLs.

A Mathematical Model of Corneal Metabolism in the Presence of an Iris-Fixated Phakic Intraocular Lens

Corneal endothelial cell loss is one of the possible complications associated with phakic iris-fixated intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation. We postulate that this might be connected to the alteration of corneal metabolism secondary to the lens implantation. A mathematical model of transport and consumption/production of metabolic species in the cornea is proposed, coupled with a model of aqueous flow and transport of metabolic species in the anterior chamber. Results are presented both for open and closed eyelids. We showed that, in the presence of a PIOL, glucose availability at the corneal endothelium decreases significantly during sleeping. Implantation of a PIOL significantly affects nutrient transport processes to the corneal endothelium especially during sleep. It must still be verified whether this finding has a clinical relevance.

Comparison between Refractive Outcome of Primary Piggyback Intraocular Lens versus Secondary Lens Iris Claw Lens in Posterior Microphthalmos.

Purpose To compare the refractive outcome of 2 different methods of intraocular lens implantation in cases of posterior microphthalmos, primary piggyback IOLs versus secondary iris claw lenses. Methods This study was a retrospective interventional comparative study that included 60 eyes of 30 patients. The included patients had bilateral microphthalmos with high axial hyperopia and had undergone a lens-based surgical procedure for hyperopia correction. The included patients were equally divided into two groups. The first group had undergone refractive lens exchange (RLE) with primary piggyback IOL implantation. The second group undergone RLE with maximum available IOL power implanted followed by a secondary implantation of Artisan iris-fixated IOL (Ophtec B.V., Groningen, the Netherlands). Results The 2 groups were highly comparable to each other regarding the mean age, axial length (AL), manifest refraction (MR), and K readings. Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the CDVA. At 36 months, 20% and 73% of the eyes were within ±0.5 D of intended refraction at 36 months in 1ry piggyback and 2ry Artisan groups, respectively. Fifty-three percent and 93% of the eyes were within ±1.0 D of intended refraction at 36 months in 1ry piggyback and 2ry Artisan groups, respectively (p=0.001). Conclusion Secondary procedure with implantation of iris-fixated intraocular lens yielded very good results for treatment of axial hyperopia in cases of posterior microphthalmos. The primary piggyback IOL showed less satisfactory results with cases of under correction and the possible complication of interlenticular opacification. Both groups showed good safety parameters.

Safety and efficacy of posterior iris claw intraocular lens fixation in aphakic patients

Purpose: To assess the indications and visual outcome of eyes undergoing posterior iris fixated intraocular lens (IFIOL) implantation for aphakia, to identify reasons for poor visual outcome, and report occurrence of complications.&#x0D; Methods: In this retrospective case series study, all cases of posterior IFIOL fixation performed over a 30-month period were identified retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations comprised objective and subjective refraction, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit lamp biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry, and dilated fundus examination.&#x0D; Results: Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 60.55 ± 17.2 years. The most common indication for IFIOL implantation was surgical aphakia following complicated cataract surgery (n = 33; 58.9%) followed by trauma (n = 10; 17.9%), dropped nucleus/IOL during primary surgery (n = 6; 10.7%), and subluxated/dislocated lens-induced glaucomas (n = 5; 8.9%). BCVA better than or equal to their preoperative BCVA was achieved in 96.43% patients. The surgical aphakia and paediatric/adolescent groups had the best visual results while the dropped nucleus/IOL group and subluxated lens-induced glaucoma groups fared poorly. On the long-term follow-up visit, the most common complication noted was pigment dusting on the corneal endothelium (65.7%).&#x0D; Conclusion: The long-term results suggest that posterior IFIOL implantation is a safe and effective method for correction of aphakia and can be used for a wide range of indications in eyes without adequate capsule support. It may be considered an easier and faster alternative with minimal manipulation to anterior segment structures in paediatric and post-traumatic aphakic eyes.

Computational simulation of aqueous humour dynamics in the presence of a posterior-chamber versus iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens.

PurposeTo compare aqueous humour (AH) dynamics in the presence of a precrystalline (Implantable Collamer Lens®; ICL) or iris-fixed (Artiflex®) phakic intraocular lens (PIOL).MethodsBy computational fluid dynamics simulation, AH flow was modelled through a peripheral iridotomy (PI) or central lens hole (both 360 μm) in the presence of an Artiflex or ICL lens, respectively. The impacts of AH flow were then determined in terms of wall shear stress (WSS) produced on the endothelium or crystalline lens. Effects were also modelled for different scenarios of pupil diameter (PD 3.5 or 5.5 mm), ICL vault (100, 350, 800 μm) and number of Artiflex iridotomies (1 or 2) and location (12 or 6 o’clock).ResultsFor a PD of 3.5 mm, AH volumes flowing from the posterior to the anterior chamber were 37.6% of total flow through the lens hole (ICL) and 84.2% through PI (Artiflex). For an enlarged PD (5.5 mm), corresponding values were 10.3% and 81.9% respectively, so PI constitutes a very efficient way of evacuating AH. Central endothelial WSS in Pa was lower for the large vault ICL and the Artiflex (1−03 and 1.1−03 respectively) compared to the PIOL-free eye (1.6−03). Crystalline lens WSS was highest for the lowest vault ICL (1−04).ConclusionsAH flow varied according to the presence of a precrystalline or iris-fixed intraocular lens. Endothelial WSS was lower for an implanted ICL with large vault and Artiflex than in the PIOL-free eye, while highest crystalline WSS was recorded for the lowest vault ICL.

Comparison of Three Intraocular Lens Implantation Procedures for Aphakic Eyes With Insufficient Capsular Support: A Network Meta-analysis

To compare the clinical outcomes and main complications of transscleral-fixated (TSF), intrascleral-fixated (ISF), and iris-fixated (IF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). Systematic review and network meta-analysis. The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles up to April 2017 with no language restrictions, and related studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included. A Bayesian framework was applied to compare the visual outcomes and complications of these 3 approaches. A total of 14 studies with 845 eyes were included in the present report. There was no significant difference between any pair of surgical approaches in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and in final BCVA achieving 20/40 or better (Snellen). ISF presented a lower risk of cystoid macular edema (CME) compared with TSF (risk ratio [RR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], [0.18, 1.0]). IF showed superiorities in less intraocular hemorrhage (IOH) than ISF (RR, 0.078; 95% CI [0.0095, 0.38]), as well as TSF (RR, 0.26; 95% CI, [0.09, 0.72]). IF had a lower risk of glaucoma escalation; the difference was slightly higher than the conventional level of significance (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, [0.16, 1.04]). Moreover, the surgical time in IF was shorter than TSF (standard mean difference [SMD], -2.98; 95% CI, [-4.32, -1.64]) and ISF (SMD, -2.60; 95% CI, [-3.71, -1.49]). However, IF was associated with a significantly higher risk of endothelial cell density (ECD) impairment (SMD, -0.54; 95% CI, [-1.02, -0.05]) and significantly greater postoperative corneal endothelial cell loss rate (ECLR, %) (SMD, 0.35; 95% CI, [0.08, 0.63]) compared with TSF. Postoperative visual outcomes were comparable among TSF, ISF, and IF for eyes with insufficient capsular support. However, the risk of some complications differed among approaches. IF showed its superiorities in lower risk of IOH and glaucoma escalation as well as shorter surgical time, while IF was at a disadvantage in greater endothelial cell impairment. Since some patients might have a clear contraindication to one of the surgical approaches, the decision of surgical approach eventually depends on surgeon experience and the presenting pathology.

Refractive Outcomes After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Anterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lenses.

To report the efficacy, predictability, and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in eyes with anterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs). This retrospective case series included eyes with previous implantation of an angle-supported and an iris-fixated phakic IOL for the correction of myopia that underwent a combined procedure of phakic IOL ex-plantation and FLACS with in-the-bag implantation of a posterior chamber IOL. Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability of refractive outcome, and occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed. Ten eyes of 7 patients with significant cataract were included: 5 eyes with an angle-supported foldable hydrophobic phakic IOL, 4 eyes with an angle-supported polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phakic IOL, and 1 eye with an iris-fixated PMMA phakic IOL. Mean follow-up after FLACS was 8.4 ± 5.8 months. Mean interval between phakic IOL implantation and FLACS was 11.9 ± 4.0 years. After the combined procedure of phakic IOL explantation and FLACS, mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.11 ± 0.49 diopters (D) and MRSE was within ± 0.75 D of target refraction in all eyes. Four eyes received a toric posterior chamber IOL after phacoemulsification. Mean preoperative CDVA of 0.40 ± 0.23 logMAR improved significantly to 0.22 ± 0.11 logMAR postoperatively (P = .027). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. The results in this series showed that FLACS in eyes with previous implantation of both rigid and foldable anterior chamber phakic IOLs offers good refractive outcomes with a high level of predictability and safety. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(5):338-342.].

Clinical Outcomes and Intraocular Pressure Control After Scleral-glued Intraocular Lens Insertion in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliation.

To analyze clinical outcomes and intraocular pressure control following scleral-glued intraocular lens (IOL) fixation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation (PXF). A retrospective chart review and outcome analysis was performed on a series of eyes undergoing glue-assisted, scleral-fixated (scleral-glued) IOL insertion in the setting of PXF and poor or absent capsular support. In total, 28 eyes were included in the study. The indications for scleral-glued IOL fixation included late endocapsular IOL dislocation (21/28, 75%), exchange for iris-fixated IOL due to complication (4/28, 14%), subluxed crystalline lens (2/28, 7%), and aphakia after complicated cataract surgery (1/28, 4%). In total, 15/28 (54%) eyes had diagnosed preexisting glaucoma at the time of scleral-glued surgery. The most common postoperative complication was ocular hypertension requiring escalation of medical management, which occurred in 8/28 (29%) eyes. At final follow-up, corrected distance visual acuity was equivalent to or improved from preoperative measurements in 25/28 (89%) eyes. The scleral-glued surgery is a good option for fixating an IOL in eyes with PXF and poor zonular integrity or absent capsular support. Special attention should be placed on intraocular pressure control following surgery, which can be less predictable in PXF eyes with or without preexisting glaucoma.

Chronic and Intermittent Angle Closure Caused by In-The-Bag Capsular Tension Ring and Intraocular Lens Dislocation in Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome

A subluxation or dislocation of the intraocular lens (IOL) is a well-known complication after cataract surgery in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX). Capsular tension rings (CTR) are frequently used to prevent postoperative complications caused by zonular weakness. Here we present a series of 7 cases, 2 with intermittent and 5 with acute angle closure caused by a combination of PEX-associated zonular weakness and a resulting unstable capsular bag-CTR-IOL complex. We describe the typical clinical course with elevated intraocular pressure, myopic shift, and shallowing of the anterior chamber in 7 patients with a new type of secondary angle closure. The diagnostic challenges and treatment options are discussed in detail. In all cases, the mechanism of angle closure identified by ultrasound biomicroscopy was an anterior dislocation of the peripheral iris by the capsular bag-CTR-IOL complex. The IOL was removed together with the capsular bag and the CTR and replaced by an iris-fixated IOL in all cases. We present a new type of secondary angle closure caused by an anterior dislocated capsular bag-CTR-IOL complex. The cause of both, this atypical presentation and the ineffectiveness of the laser peripheral iridotomy is the large diameter CTR. Therefore CTR implantation might also be the source of late postoperative complications. If a secondary angle closure associated with PEX and unstable capsular bag-CTR-IOL complex is encountered, IOL explantation and replacement by an iris-fixated IOL is a simple and effective treatment option.

The clinical outcomes of surgical management of anterior chamber migration of a dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®).

Our purpose was to describe the clinical course, and individualized management approaches, of patients with migration of a dexamethasone implant into the anterior chamber. This was a retrospective review of four patients with seven episodes of anterior chamber migration of a dexamethasone implant. After 924 intravitreal dexamethasone injections, anterior migration of the implant occurred in four eyes of four patients (0.43%). All four eyes were pseudophakic: one eye had a posterior chamber intraocular lens in the capsular bag but in a post-laser posterior capsulotomy state, two eyes had a sulcus intraocular lens (IOL), and one eye had an iris-fixated retropupillary IOL. All eyes had a prior vitrectomy and no lens capsule. The time interval from injection to detection of the implant migration ranged from 2 to 6weeks. Of the four eyes with corneal edema, only one eye required a corneal transplantation, although it was unclear whether the implant migration was the direct cause of the corneal decompensation because the patient had a history of bullous keratopathy resulting from an extended history of uveitis. All patients underwent surgical intervention: two patients with a repositioning procedure, and the other two patients with removal due to repeated episodes, although surgical removal was not always necessary to reverse the corneal complications. In our study, not all patients required surgical removal of the implants. Repositioning the implant back into the vitreous cavity may be considered as an option in cases involving the first episode with no significant corneal endothelial decompensation. Considering potential anterior segment complications and the loss of drug effectiveness together, an individualized approach is recommended to obtain the best treatment outcomes and to minimize the risk of corneal complications.

Secondary intraocular lens implantation: Complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes

To compare complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (IOLs) implantation. Department of Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. Retrospective case series. All secondary IOLs placed by the anterior segment service were reviewed. Preoperative data, operative reports, and data from each subsequent postoperative visit were evaluated. Patients were divided into 5 groups based on the final IOL position: (1) sulcus with optic capture, (2) sulcus without optic capture, (3) anterior chamber (AC), (4) iris-fixated, and (5) transscleral-sutured. Complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared for each group. The sulcus with and without optic capture groups had the lowest complication rates and best visual acuity outcomes. There was no difference in final corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) between the transscleral-sutured IOL, iris-fixated IOL, and AC IOL groups, although the AC IOL group had the lowest rates of early postoperative complications and a significant improvement in vision. The transscleral-sutured IOL group had the highest complication rates, and 25% of patients in the iris-fixated IOL group lost 2 or more lines of CDVA. When a secondary IOL cannot be placed withinthe capsular bag, sulcus with optic capture is the bestalternative, followed by sulcus without optic capture. There was no difference in visual acuity outcomes between transscleral-sutured IOLs, iris-fixated IOLs, and AC IOLs. Anterior chamber IOLs resulted in fewer early complications.

Artisan iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation in combination with pupilloplasty—correction of aphakia with pathologically large pupil and insufficient capsular support

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to report the efficacy and safety of applying pupilloplasty in combination with Artisan iris-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the treatment for aphakia with pathologically large pupil and insufficient capsular support. DesignThe study was a retrospective case series. ParticipantsTwenty-six aphakic eyes with pathologically large pupil and insufficient capsular support (from 26 patients) were included in the study. MethodsThe study patients underwent pupilloplasty in combination with Artisan iris-fixated IOL implantation. Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 1 week and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. ResultsThe mean uncorrected visual acuity was significantly improved from logMAR 1.15 ± 0.29 to logMAR 0.37 ± 0.17, and the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was significantly decreased from 12.07 ± 2.20 D to –0.69 ± 0.70 D at 6 month after surgery (p < 0.05). The pupil diameter decreased significantly, from 5.7 ± 1.1 mm preoperatively to 4.5 ± 0.8 mm at 6 months after pupilloplasty (p < 0.05). Patients experienced less photophobia postoperatively. The safety parameters, including endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure, corneal astigmatism, best-corrected visual acuity, and central corneal thickness, showed no significant differences in values before and after surgery. ConclusionsThe Artisan iris-fixated IOL implantation in combination with pupilloplasty can be used as an alternative way to correct aphakia with pathologically large pupil and insufficient capsular support.

Material Analysis of Spontaneously Subluxated Iris-Fixated Phakic Intraocular Lenses.

To conduct a material analysis of spontaneously subluxated iris-fixated phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs) using light and scanning electron microscopy. Six explanted Artisan/Verisyse and Artiflex/Veriflex IOLs (Ophtec, Groningen, Netherlands/AMO, Santa Ana, CA) were analyzed in a laboratory using light and scanning electron microscopy. Four of the IOLs had been explanted after spontaneous subluxation leading to a decrease in visual acuity, whereas the remaining two IOLs did not demonstrate signs of disenclavation but had been explanted in the course of planned cataract surgery and thus served as the control in this study. Light microscopy enabled the detection of clear deformations of the fixation arms on one or both haptics of the lens that had subluxated, and scanning electron microscopy revealed micro-cracks in the material. The deformations, which appeared to have been caused by some form of manipulation of the fixation arms, meant that adequate closure of the fixation arms was no longer possible and a reliable fixation in the iris stroma was unattainable. At least three of the lenses had been implanted with the use of an IOL haptic expander for enclavation, which may have contributed to the malformation of the haptics. The two control lenses exhibited no signs of material deformation or subsequent disenclavation. Deformations of the haptics of iris-fixated phakic IOLs can cause irreversible damage leading to disenclavation and inadequate re-enclavation. In such cases, explantation appears to be the only therapeutic option. It is important to adhere to an appropriate implantation technique to reduce the risk of spontaneous subluxation. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(9):618-624.].

The clinical efficacy of secondary implantation of iris-fixated intraocular lens for traumatic aphakia

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of secondary implantation of iris-fixated intraocular lens for traumatic aphakia. Methods Postoperative outcomes of secondary implantation of iris-supported Artisan IOL in 18 unilateral aphakic patients with penetrating eye injuries or contusion were analysed retrospectively. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalents (SE), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were compared before and after the surgery. Results Mean postoperative follow-up time was (11.42±4.51) months. The UCVA was improved in all patients. The mean endothelial cell loss rate was 3.7% in the first 3 postoperative months. 18 eyes achieved the desired anatomic results. No intraoperative complication occurred. Transient high intraocular pressure occurred in 3 cases, 2 cases with iris depigmentation. And no retinal or choroidal detachment, macular edema, hyphema or vitreous haemorrhage was observed. Conclusion Secondary implantation of iris-fixated IOL is an effective and safe procedure for traumatic aphakia, which has good visual rehabilitation and low occurrence of complication. Key words: Aphakia, traumatic; IOL, iris-fixated; Implantation, secondary

Iris-claw versus posterior chamber fixation intraocular lens implantation in pediatric traumatic cataract

AimThis study aims to compare visual outcomes and complications of iris-fixated (claw) intraocular lens (IFIOL) implantation with those of posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation in children with traumatic cataract. Settings and designRetrospective observational clinical audit. Materials and methodsA total of 50 pediatric traumatic cataract cases that underwent lens removal and IOL implantation (IFIOL or PCIOL) with or without corneal or corneoscleral tear repair between January 2009 and December 2013 were analyzed. After meeting the eligibility criteria, their pre- and postoperative visual outcomes and complication rates were recorded. Data were analyzed descriptively. ResultsOut of 50 children, IFIOL and PCIOL implantations were performed in one eye of each of 25 children. Their mean age was 11 ± 4 years (range 4–18 years). Primary (cataract removal with lens implantation) and secondary (corneal tear repair followed by cataract removal with lens implantation) procedures were performed in 19 (76%) and six (24%) children in the IFIOL group and in 21 (84%) and four (16%) children in the PCIOL group, respectively. There was an improvement in best corrected visual acuity postimplantation in both the IFIOL and the PCIOL group, and no significant difference in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution of best corrected visual acuity was observed between the two groups over 36 months. Only three eyes in the IFIOL group developed complications: one eye developed secondary glaucoma, one disenclavation of IOL haptic, and one cystoid macular edema. ConclusionBoth IFIOL and PCIOL implantations have good visual outcomes and minimal postoperative complications; therefore, IFIOL can be used as an alternative to PCIOL in children with traumatic cataract with inadequate capsular support.

Posterior Iris Fixated Intraocular Lens for Pediatric Traumatic Cataract.

Purpose:To evaluate the postoperative visual outcomes and complications of posterior iris fixated intraocular lens (IFIOL) implantation for pediatric traumatic cataract.Methods:A retrospective clinical audit was performed of all the pediatric traumatic cataract patients who underwent lens removal and iris fixated lens implantation due to inadequate capsular support with or without corneal tear repair between January 2009 and December 2013. Data were collected and analyzed on the preoperative and postoperative visual outcomes and complications.Results:Twenty-five children (25 eyes; 21 males and 4 females) were enrolled with the mean age of 11 ± 4.0 years. There were 72% of eyes that underwent primary cataract removal with IFIOL implantation. Twenty-eight percent of eyes underwent corneal tear repair prior to intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was hand motion in 32% eyes, counting fingers in 24%, and perception of light in 44%. Postoperative BCVA of 0-0.2 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution was reported in the 64% of eyes. One eye developed secondary glaucoma, one eye underwent re-enclavation, and none developed retinal complications.Conclusion:Posterior IFIOL implantation resulted in an improved visual outcome, low incidence of postoperative complications, and is a good alternative to other IOL, in the cases of pediatric traumatic cataract without adequate capsular support.