Reviewed by: Dickens and Democracy in the Age of Paper: Representing the People by Carolyn Vellenga Berman John M. L. Drew (bio) Carolyn Vellenga Berman. Dickens and Democracy in the Age of Paper: Representing the People. Oxford UP, 2022. Pp. xiv + 353. £90.00. ISBN 978-0-19-284540-5 (hb). In his lengthy speech condemning the Absolutist regime of Miguel I of Portugal on 1 June 1829, Viscount Palmerston gave a memorable account (inserted into Hansard by special permission) of the operation of power in human society: “There is in nature no moving power but mind, all else is passive and inert; in human affairs this power is opinion; in political affairs it is public opinion; and he who can grasp this power, with it will subdue the fleshly arm of physical strength and compel it to work out his purpose.” Indeed, those who “know how to avail themselves of the passions, and the interests, and the opinions of mankind, are able to gain an ascendancy, and to exercise a sway over human affairs, far out of proportion greater than belong to the power and resources of the state” (Hansard) 1668). Palmerston took it for granted that it fell to statesmen to wield such power, but during his lifetime, the rise of what Macaulay a few years later famously dubbed the “Fourth Estate” of the realm saw journalists, newspaper editors, and even writers of popular fiction assuming a similar influence, to the consternation of Establishment figures like Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (1829–94), who felt democratic institutions could be dangerously undermined through being called to account by unelected populist rabble-rousers: [J]ust as a foolish gossip in a country-town, who says what she pleases because all the world knows what her tongue is like, may babble away the purest character, a popular novelist may produce more disaffection and discontent than a whole army of pamphleteers and public orators, because he wears the cap and bells, and laughs in your face when you contradict him. A novelist has no responsibility. (347) In the classic Whig-Liberal narrative of the growth of the periodical press in the nineteenth century, a mighty engine gradually frees itself from the grip of government, aristocratic patronage and reactionary “Taxes on Knowledge.” But for Marxist and many left-leaning media historians in the twentieth [End Page 248] century, the press merely passed from being the plaything of ministers to that of unprincipled capitalists, moguls and market forces: power without responsibility remains a keynote of the analysis.1 Across such fault-lines and mindful of their implications for the way we live now, Carolyn Berman’s important new book on Dickens picks its way, with thoughtful ingenuity. It hinges throughout on the idea of representation of “the people,” as the twinned imperative of parliamentary democracy on the one hand and fiction writers on the other, and in particular on the simultaneously comic and deadly serious interplay in Dickens’s writings between these Doppelgängers. Broadly, it draws on the fact that in the “age of paper” (that is to say, the Modern period, since the invention of printing) government business involves the recording in print of the activities of its citizens–an activity, particularly in the so-called “blue books” of the 1840s Royal Commissions, that involved chronicling the lives of the poor and reporting their oral testimony. This draws the work of both Dickens and Parliament into the same medium, as well as pointing up how both kinds of authority present their own narrative world of “alternative facts.” Berman tackles the problem of analyzing Dickens’s political aims (considered openly socialist by some and covertly despotic by others) with skill and vigor, claiming from the outset that “we have underestimated the ways in which his writings can help us to understand the challenges of representative government” (3). The book is divided into three parts, the first of which (“The Art of Representation”) covers Dickens’s saturation in shorthand as a reporter and contributor to his uncle’s verbatim record of the debates in the Houses of Commons, The Mirror of Parliament, and explores the place of The Pickwick Papers in the context of...
Read full abstract