Introductory biochemistry for majors is an upper‐level course that serves students from over three colleges and fifteen different majors with diverse academic backgrounds preparing them for success. As one example, students’ self‐reported chemistry preparation was identified as a factor that, in conjunction with prior GPA and score on the Introductory Molecular and Cell Biology Assessment, predicted 44% of variance in student performance. In this study, we used predictive variables to identify “at risk” students, those at high risk of earning a D or F or withdrawing from biochemistry and offer them a targeted opportunity to develop the higher‐order skills necessary to improve performance. Specifically, we employed a contract grading system; if students fulfilled all aspects of the contract they were guaranteed a C for the course. The contract required students to complete 15 obligations throughout the remainder of the semester, including attending regular help sessions, taking comprehensive notes, creating concept maps, and peer‐reviewing other C contract students’ work. After the first exam, 146 students were identified as “at‐risk”. Seventy‐five students signed the contract; twenty students completed all requirements. We compared student performance on major assessments for at‐risk students who (a) did not opt‐in to the contract, (b) opted in but did not complete the contract, and (c) completed the contract. 95% of students completing the contract earned enough points to achieve at least a C in the course, 45% earned a B or better (as compared to just 24% for students who started the contract but did not complete). Controlling for prior GPA, IMCA score, and self‐report chemistry preparation, we confirmed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between students who completed the contract and those who started but did not finish or opted out completely. Course assessments analyzed and a Weighted Bloom's Index for major assessments were calculated. Course assessments were at comparable or higher cognitive skill level than previous control semesters. These data suggest that a contract grading system provides the needed structure to support at‐risk students in developing the skills necessary to improve performance in introductory biochemistry. These data are consistent with previous work examining the role of high‐structure learning environments in supporting low performing students.
Read full abstract