Intra-articular Platelet-rich Plasma Research Articles

Comparison of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injection versus placebo for clinical outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a double-blind, randomized trial

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressively debilitating condition that leads to musculoskeletal pain, particularly in the knee joint. Most clinical guidelines recommend platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for knee OA. However, the use of PRP in knee OA is increasing. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of intra-articular administration of PRP on the symptoms, lower limb function, and daily living activities in patients with knee OA. Patients and Methods: A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted and 34 patients with grade 2 or 3 knee OA were enrolled. The knees of each participant were randomly allocated to receive either 3cc PRP injection (PRP knees) or needling only (control knees). Patients were evaluated by a general practitioner before, three, and six months after the intervention using the EuroQol-visual analog scales (EQ-VAS), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Results: The mean (±SD) age of patients with knee OA was 56.6 ± 10.2 years. Seventy-point-six percent of patients were female. 67.6% and 32.4% of patients were in stages 2 and 3 of the disease, respectively. IKDC, WOMAC, TAS, and EQ-VAS scores in knees under PRP injection and control of knees, three and six months after injection showed significant improvement. Three and six months after the intervention, IKDC, WOMAC, TAS, and EQ-VAS scores in the PRP and control knees were not significant (P > 0.05). Inter-group comparison indicated that the IKDC score significantly increased six months in comparison to three months (P = 0.048) in PRP knees, but not significant in the control knees (P = 0.133). TAS score in PRP and control knees significantly increased six months compared to three months after injection. WOMAC and EQ-VAS score in PRP and control knees was not significant at six months in comparison to three months after the intervention. Conclusion: Our findings could suggest safety and feasibility data for the intra-articular administration of PRP in patients with knee OA that may help to appraise a larger clinical trial. Findings show that PRP injection improves IKDC, WOMAC, TAS, and EQ-VAS scores, however, there was no significant difference with needling only (control knees). Trial Registration: The trial protocol was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial (identifier: IRCT2015010112823N2; https://en.irct.ir/trial/12827, Ethics committee reference number: 93/551664) and Research Registry (Research Registry Unique Identifying Number: researchregistry9843).

Лечение гонартроза с применением аутологической обогащенной тромбоцитами плазмы

Injections of platelet-rich plasma are considered to be a promising treatment. Medicines acting on the subchondral bone can improve tissue's structure and slow down destruction of the articular cartilage. This study aimed to analyze the results of intraarticular and intraosseous administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in gonarthrosis cases. One hundred and eighty-seven participants (gonarthrosis stages 1 through 3) were divided into three groups. Group 1 (treatment group) received intraarticular PRP injections, group 2 (comparison group) — intraosseous PRP injections. For assessment purposes, we used the SF-36 survey and visual analog scale. Three months after the treatment, initial pain level decreased in both groups 1 and 2. In group 1, the prevalence of synovitis went down after 3 months, in group 2 — after 6 months (21.9 and 31.3%, respectively; p < 0.05). Six months after the treatment, soft tissue swelling around the joint was registered less often in groups 1 and 2 (8.2 and 8.3%, respectively). As for the physical component of the quality of life, it improved in group 1 after 3 months (70.40%), in group 2 — after 6 months (69.80%); as for the mental component, the dynamics was acknowledged positive 3 months after the treatment in groups 1 and 2 (64.30 and 65.10%, respectively), and 6 months after the treatment (65.10 and 66.40%, respectively). Thus, administration of PRP in gonarthrosis cases attenuate pain and improves the quality of life. In terms of alleviation of the clinical symptoms and improvement of the physical component of patients' lives, intraosseous PRP injections performed significantly better.

Pharmacological interventions for early-stage frozen shoulder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

To evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological interventions for treating early-stage, pain predominant, adhesive capsulitis, also known as frozen shoulder. We performed a systematic review in accordance with PRSIMA guidelines. Searches were conducted on PUBMED, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on the 24th of February 2022. Outcomes were shoulder pain, shoulder function and range of movement. Synthesis involved both qualitative analysis for all studies and pairwise meta-analyses followed by a network meta-analysis for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A total of 3,252 articles were found, of which 31 met inclusion criteria, and 22 of these were RCTs. Intraarticular (IA) injection of corticosteroids (8 RCTS, 340 participants) and IA injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (3 RCTs, 177 participants) showed benefit at 12 weeks compared with physical therapy in terms of shoulder pain and function, while oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) (2 RCTs, 44 participants) and IA injection of hyaluronate (2 RCTs, 42 participants) did not show a benefit. Only IA PRP showed benefit over physical therapy for shoulder range of movement. These results shows that IA corticosteroids IA PRP injections are beneficial for early-stage frozen shoulder. These findings should be appraised with care considering the risk of bias, heterogeneity, and inconsistency of the included studies. We believe that research focused on early interventions for frozen shoulder could improve patient outcomes and lead to cost-savings derived from avoiding long-term disability. Further well-designed studies comparing with standardised physical therapy or placebo are required to improve evidence to guide management.

A Comparative Study of Intra-Articular Knee Injection of Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma Compared to Corticosteroids and Local Anesthetics in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common reason for orthopedic secondary care referral. And it is one of the main causes of disability in adults worldwide. It is estimated to affect between 10 to 25% of patients over the age of 60. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IA CS) and physical therapy were the two choices in an attempt to provide symptomatic management or deferred surgery. There is a growing trend is intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (IA PRP) injection to reduce pain and improve function in OA patients. PRP is divided into two types: leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP) and leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP). It was shown that LR-PRP increases pro-inflammatory factors and also decreases anti-catabolic mediators, and LP-PRP has the opposite aspect.
 Methods: In our research 40 patients were divided into two equal groups, IA corticosteroid and leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP) 40 cc of blood from the basilic vein of the upper limb is used with two step centrifugation. The final samples were 4 millilitres product injected intra-articular. group two (corticosteroid (CS)) received an intra-articular injection of triamcinolone acetate (Kenalog) 40 mg/ml along with 4 ml of lidocaine 0.02% (Abureyhan Co.) for a total of 5 ml. The needle used is a 22-gauge pencil-point Quincke needle (Dr. Japan Co, Ltd), which is performed with the Sonosite Edge II ultrasound guide and in an anterior-lateral manner in the knee joint. Pain was assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS range 0-10 points) before, one week, one month, two month and 3 months after the operation. The WOMAC questionnaire was also filled before injection and three months following injection and other variables were examined.
 Results: There were no significant differences between the groups across all the baseline parameters including age, sex, body mass index and comorbidities including high blood pressure, diabetes and smoking. Both injection groups were effective in reducing patients' pain from one week to three months after injection. The level of pain in the first week after injection was significantly lower in the corticosteroid group than in the PRP group. In the first month and the third month after the injection, the pain reduction according to mean scores of VAS was the same in both groups.
 Conclusion: In short, one injection of PRP can reduce the pain of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee as much as corticosteroids during a three-month treatment process. Considering the possible side effects of corticosteroids, this alternative treatment can be considered with further investigation.

INTRA-ARTICULAR PLATELET RICH PLASMA IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

Introduction: Osteoarthritis of knee is the most common worldwide degenerative joint disease and is a common condition associated with pain and morbidity which significantly impacts the patients mobility and quality of life. It is treated by use of exercises, weight reduction, walking supports, bracing, topical and oral NSAID, intra-articular (IA) injections of corticosteroids and blood-derived products, including platelet-rich-plasma. An autologous blood product containing a high percentage of various growth factors (GFs), cytokines and modulating factors as PRP has shown promising results in achieving this goal. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) injections in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (KOA) of grades from 1 to 3 Kellgren‑Lawrence (KL) grading. Materials and Methods: In this study a total of 30 patients, radiologically confirmed with knee osteoarthritis. All patients were managed with intra-articular platelet rich plasma injection. The pain and function of the target knee were evaluated by the VAS, KSS and IKDC scales at the baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after treatment. Results: In this study, there was reduction of 5 ± 0.4 and 4 in mean VAS from baseline was found after 24 and 48 weeks after treatment. A significant function improvements of 32.10±1.5 and 21.4±4.9 in mean KSS from baseline was seen after 24 and 48 weeks respectively after treatment. Similarly a significant function improvements of 47.1±3.9 and 32.1±4.6 in mean IKDC from baseline was seen after 24 and 48 weeks respectively after treatment. Conclusion: Intra articular platelet rich plasma produce superior outcomes for symptomatic management in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis grade I, II and III, including improved pain management, less joint stiffness and better participation in daily activity.

MRI-based cartilage changes and clinical effectiveness of autologous intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections in symptomatic patients with moderate osteoarthritis of the knee

BackgroundAn autologous blood product containing a high percentage of various growth factors, cytokines, and modulating factors such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is thought to play a role in chondral remodeling by promoting the production of cartilage matrix molecules and repairing and regenerating articular cartilage. In symptomatic patients with moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, we aimed to investigate MRI-based cartilage changes and the clinical efficacy of autologous intra-articular PRP injections.ResultsThirty-three patients with grades 2 and 3 OA of knees as per Kellgren and Lawrence OA classification underwent three consecutive PRP injections at monthly intervals. These patients were followed up monthly for the first 3 months, and then after every 3 months at 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. There was statistically significant improvement in joint pain and functionality with the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores showing a reduction from 7 ± 2 at baseline to 2.76 ± 1.34 at 12 months and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Score (WOMAC) scores declining from 77.91 ± 1 1.6 at baseline to 23.61 ± 19.1 at 12 months (p < 0.05). The reduction in VAS and WOMAC scores was maximum during the first 3 months after PRP therapy. MRI showed a statistically insignificant improvement in cartilage thickness [Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) 3.15 ± 1.41 to 3.3 ± 0.84) (p > 0.05)].ConclusionsPRP had a positive effect on pain alleviation and patient functioning, but there was no significant change in articular cartilage as measured by MRI.

Effects of Intra-Articular Platelet Rich Plasma on Clinical Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis

Background and Aim: With increasing frequency, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparations have been used to treatcartilage lesions to regenerate tissue homeostasis and retard the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aimof our research was to study the effectiveness of intra-articular PRP injections in early-stage OA patients and toevaluate the clinical outcome and QOL at 6 months.Material and Methods: Present study was conducted on 80 patients at tertiary care institute of Gujarat for thePeriod of 1 year. Intraarticular administration of PRP was done by injecting 5 mL of platelet concentrate in thesupra-patellar pouch through supero-lateral approach with a 22-gauge needle. The patients were followed upfor reduction in pain, reduction in stiffness and improvement in physical function in accordance with WOMACscoring system on day 0 and at the end of 6th week, 3rd and 6th months and QOL in accordance with WHOQOLquestionnaire before PRP therapy and at the end of 6th month.Results: In our study of 80 patients 26 had very poor, 23 had poor and 1 had neither poor nor good QOL beforePRP injection evaluated by WHOQOL. At 6 months post PRP therapy 5 had very good, 59 had good, 15 hadneither good nor poor and 1 had poor QOL which showed highly significant improvement in QOL.Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of autologous PRP is a safe, cheap, easy to prepare and use, and has atherapeutic role in early knee OA. Hence, PRP therapy can be used in management of early stage knee OA toprovide relief from symptoms and to improve QOL with negligible complication, low cost and ultimately withgood results.

The Combined Intraosseous Administration of Orthobiologics Outperformed Isolated Intra-articular Injections in Alleviating Pain and Cartilage Degeneration in a Rat Model of MIA-Induced Knee Osteoarthritis

Background: Intra-articular (IA) platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections have shown efficacy and safety in treating osteoarthritis (OA). However, the effectiveness and mechanisms of combined intraosseous (IO) administration of these orthobiologics have yet to be explored. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on pain, cartilage, synovium/infrapatellar fat pad (IFP), and subchondral bone in rat knee OA, comparing isolated IA with combined IA and IO (IA+IO) injections of PRP or BMAC. It was hypothesized that combined injections would be superior to sole IA injections. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 48 rats were divided into 6 groups: sham (only joint puncture during OA induction with IA+IO saline injection treatment) and 5 groups with OA induction, control (IA+IO saline injection), PRP (IA PRP+IO saline injection), BMAC IA (IA BMAC+IO saline injection), PRP IA+IO (IA+IO PRP injection), and BMAC IA+IO (IA+IO BMAC injection). OA was induced by IA injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA). Rats were administered different orthobiologics according to their grouping 3 weeks after the MIA injection. Pain changes were evaluated using the weightbearing ratio assay at weeks 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 after OA induction. Rats were euthanized at week 9 for gross, radiological, histological, immunohistochemical, and immunofluorescence assessments of cartilage, synovium, and subchondral bone. Results: Compared with the control group, all orthobiologics injection groups had reduced joint pain. Compared with IA injection, IA+IO injections provided superior pain relief by suppressing calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P in both the synovium/IFP and subchondral bone. IA+IO injections slowed the progression of subchondral bone lesions by inhibiting CD31hiEmcnhi vessel formation and excessive osteoclast and osteoblast turnover while preserving subchondral bone microarchitecture, slowing cartilage degeneration. However, IA+IO injections did not outperform isolated IA injections in reducing synovitis and synovium/IFP fibrosis. Compared with PRP, BMAC exhibited superior inhibition of pain-related mediators, but no significant differences were observed in synovitis suppression, infrapatellar fat pad fibrosis, and subchondral bone protection. Conclusion: IA+IO injections of orthobiologics were more effective in relieving pain, slowing cartilage degeneration, and inhibiting abnormal vascularization and remodeling compared with isolated IA injections. BMAC showed superior pain relief in the synovium/IFP and subchondral bone compared with PRP. Further research is needed to optimize PRP and BMAC components for enhanced efficacy in OA management. Clinical Relevance: Our findings contribute to advancing the understanding of pain relief mechanisms and support the endorsement of IO injection of orthobiologics for the treatment of OA and joint pain.

Efficacy of Intra-articular Concentrated Growth Factor, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Analysis

Objective: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent chronic joint condition causing substantial pain and disability. In recent years, intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), concentrated growth factor (CGF), and hyaluronic acid (HA) have emerged as promising KOA therapies. We aimed to compare the effects of intra-articular CGF, PRP, and HA in KOA patients. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with KOA and who were grade 2-3 according to the Kellgreen-Lawrence classification in radiological imaging were included in the study. Patients were randomized into three groups receiving a single injection of either HA, PRP, or CGF. Patients were evaluated for pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS) and for pain, stiffness, and physical function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) before and 1 and 6 months after the procedure. Results: Of 60 patients, 41 were female and 19 were male. According to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification, 27 patients had grade II and 33 patients had grade III KOA, with a similar distribution among the three groups. The VAS scores showed a statistically significant decrease in all groups at 1-month and 6-month follow-up compared to pre-procedural scores. However, there was no significant difference among the groups in terms of VAS scores. The WOMAC-pain, -stiffness, -physical function scores also showed a significant decrease in all groups at 1-month and 6-month follow-up compared to pre-procedural scores. The CGF group had the lowest WOMAC scores at both time points, with a statistically significant difference compared to the PRP group (p&lt;0.05). Patient satisfaction rates were high in all groups, while the satisfaction rate was highest in the CGF group. Conclusion: CGF demonstrated superior pain alleviation and functional improvement compared to PRP and HA. Although the results of this study demonstrate the potential of regenerative treatments for KOA, more research with larger samples and longer follow-up is needed for robust validation. Additionally, the standardization of treatment protocols is important.

КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ СЛУЧАЙ УСПЕШНОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ И ЛЕЧЕНИЯ ГНОЙНОГО ЭПИДУРИТА, ОСЛОЖНЕННОГО СЕПСИСОМ, ПОСЛЕ ИНТРААРТИКУЛЯРНОГО ВВЕДЕНИЯ АУТОПЛАЗМЫ

Background. Currently, intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are becoming increasingly popular as a technically simple and effective method of osteoarthritis treatment. However, this clinical case would demonstrate that this procedure could lead to severe complications. Purpose of the study. Our aim is to describe a clinical case in which PRP injections led to the development of a generalized infection resulting in purulent polyarthritis, epiduritis and sepsis in a patient with a previous odontogenic infection. Material and methods. Clinical manifestations, results of laboratory and instrumental studies, anamnesis and medical documentation were analyzed. Results. After intra-articular injection of PRP the patient developed purulent polyarthritis and spondylodiscitis resulting in purulent epiduritis and sepsis. The patient was diagnosed with extensive dental caries which had caused transient bacteremia, and then PRP injections helped to the transfer of infection from the blood to the joint cavities. Conclusions. Before undergoing intra-articular PRP injections the patient should be carefully assessed for the presence of infection.

What is the Efficacy of Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis in Clinical Practice? A "Real-Life" Prospective Cohort.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections may improve symptoms in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. However, there is a lack of data on its effectiveness in a "real-life" cohort. This multi-site institutional registry study aimed to assess patients' longitudinal progress after PRP injection for knee osteoarthritis. All patients receiving PRP injections for knee osteoarthritis at a large, integrated tertiary academic center (December 18, 2017 to March 1, 2021) were eligible. A prospective data collection instrument was used to collect patient demographics, procedural information, and patient-reported outcome measures. Overall, 97 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 53 were included in the analysis. One in four patients (26%) improved on all three Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales: 17% in two subscales and 20% in one subscale, respectively. Overall, 64% of patients improved in at least one patient-reported outcomes measure. At six months post injection, 49% of patients were satisfied. PRP injection provides positive changes in two out of three patients in different magnitudes and characteristics with careful attention to clinically meaningful differences.

Comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with platelet rich plasma and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in gonarthrosis grade I-II

Background: Worldwide, the incidence of degenerative diseases has increased, mainly gonarthrosis. The World Health Organization estimates that 40% of the population over 70 years of age has gonarthrosis, which may increase in the following decade,1 generating 10%-25% of consultations.2 Treatment with intra-articular Platelet Rich Plasma is an effective therapy.3 Methodology: A cross-sectional, prospective, quasi-experimental, non- randomized study was carried out comparing the evolution of the symptoms of grade I and II gonarthrosis in 140 patients, half treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the other half treated with Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), at the Specialty Clinic N.3, Cuauhtémoc Health Jurisdiction, 2020. Descriptive statistics were analyzed by calculating the mean and standard deviation, inferential statistics through Chi-square. Results: The most affected age group was from 60 to 69 years old with 43.5%, with a female sex prevailing with 33.5%. Most patients were overweight and obese with 39% and 53% respectively. Pain improved in 92% of patients treated with PRP and in 25.7% of patients treated with NSAIDs. The functional capacity of the knee recovered in 97% of the patients treated with PRP and in 35.7% of those treated with NSAIDs. Conclusions: treatment of grade I and II gonarthrosis with intra-articular PRP is more effective than treatment with NSAIDs.

Platelet-rich plasma injections for hip osteoarthritis : a systematic review

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent type of joint disorder. Symptomatic hip OA was observed in 9.2% of adults aged 45 and above, with 27% displaying radiographic evidence of the condition. While there is no definitive cure for OA, numerous research studies have explored the application of PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma) for addressing knee OA, there is a relatively limited number of investigations dedicated to hip OA. It is important to note that the hip joint possesses distinct characteristics compared to the other three joints. Therefore, in this systematic review, we wanted to focus on hip osteoarthritis and gave a brief update from the previous studies. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. All randomized control trials that compared injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid in hip osteoarthritis patients using English language from 2018 until 2023 will be included. Six studies involved in this study with total samples of 237 in PRP group and 220 in HA group. The injection site, injection volume, number of injections, interval, and follow up were varied between these studies. All of the patients are undergoing treatment with ultrasound-guided intraarticular injections of PRP. The outcomes tabulated were Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score which showed improvements from the baseline. All of the studies showed improvement of the score from the baseline. Although, there were improvements, it can be concluded that there was not enough evidence to promote the utilization of intra-articular PRP injections as a treatment for hip osteoarthritis. Since international guidelines only recommend intra-articular steroid injections for managing hip OA, it would be advantageous to conduct additional studies comparing PRP to steroids to assess the effectiveness of PRP injections in treating hip OA.

Role of platelet rich plasma in management of early knee osteoarthritis pain: A retrospective observational study

IntroductionKnee joint osteoarthritis is a well-known cause of pain and disability in patients above 40 years of age. It is treated by use of non-steroidal inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, physiotherapy with limited success. The platelet rich plasma (PRP) contains a large amount of platelet derived growth factors, cytokines and anti-inflammatory molecules which showed promising results in recent studies to relieve pain of knee joint osteoarthritis. The present study aims to determine the efficacy of intraarticular PRP for pain relief and functional improvement in patients with early knee joint osteoarthritis. MethodsIt is a retrospective observation study involving patients who underwent single intraarticular administration of PRP for knee pain with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades I or II knee joint osteoarthritis. The Visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oxford knee score (OKS) were recorded pre-procedure and at 1- and 6-month post-procedure. ResultsA total of 31 patients (20 females, 11 males) underwent PRP therapy for knee pain (16 kL grade I, 15 kL grade II). The mean age and duration of symptoms were of 53.9 years (range: 79–42 years) and 5.53 ± 2.35 years respectively. There was a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in VAS scores from pre-procedure (68.06 ± 8.33) to post procedure at 1 month (37.74 ± 11.16) and 6 months (54.52 ± 11.78). There was also significant improvement (p < 0.05) in OKS score from pre-procedure (31.1 ± 3.47) to post-procedure at 1 month (39.06 ± 3.37) and 6 months (34.10 ± 3.75). No adverse effects were reported in patients during the study period. ConclusionThis small retrospective study suggests that a single administration of intraarticular PRP may be safe and effective for pain relief and functional improvement for up to 6 months in patients of early-stage osteoarthritis.

Ultrasound guided platelet rich plasma or corticosteroid for supraspinatus tendonosis or partial tear: an observational study of clinical outcome

Background: The clinical application of platelet rich plasma (PRP) in rotator cuff tears has increased recently. Many studies have found no difference between placebo controls and PRP and corticosteroids (CS) and some have found more rapid benefits with PRP injections. The present study was undertaken with the objectives to observe and assess efficacies of the two different treatment modalities in terms of symptomatic relief and recovery of ROM and to ascertain the duration of symptom free period and functional improvement on follow up. Methods: Observational clinical outcome study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital between September 2020 and March 2022 after institute ethical committee clearance. A total of 100 patients, with a positive clinical test for supraspinatus and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggestive of supraspinatus tendinitis were divided to 2 groups and based on whether they received either intra-articular CS or PRP injection under ultrasonography (USG) guidance All patients were followed up at for assessing the outcomes at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months from intervention Results: The clinical outcome of the group receiving the PRP was better than group receiving CS intervention. Conclusions: PRP should therefore be considered as a viable option to treat supraspinatus tendinopathy/partial tear as it is cheap, readily available modality using patients own blood which is more acceptable to patient and also safe to individual where complications related to corticosteroids anticipated. Ultrasound guided procedure were found to enhance the accuracy of injection.

The Preventive Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma Against Knee Osteoarthritis Progression in Rats.

In recent years, the intra-articular administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a novel therapeutic strategy for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), has gained attention. However, the efficacy of PRP in inhibiting degenerative joint changes remains unclear. The current study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the intra-articular administration of PRP in rats with induced KOA. PRP was prepared from the whole blood of nine-week-old male Wistar rats via centrifugation at 25°C, 200 × g, for seven minutes. KOA was induced in the right knees of the rats via destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) surgery. The animals were divided into the control, sham, DMM, and DMM + PRP groups (n = 5 each). The rats in the DMM + PRP group received 50 μL of intra-articular PRP in the right knee joint four weeks after surgery. The rotarod test was conducted to assess locomotive function. Eight weeks after DMM surgery, the degree of medial meniscus extrusion was measured via computed tomography (CT) images on the right knee. Then, a histological analysis of the harvested knees was conducted. KOA progression was assessed using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) score. The number of multinucleated tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive osteoclasts in the subchondral bone was counted via histological analysis. The degree of medial meniscus extrusion did not significantly differ between the DMM and DMM + PRP groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the walking time based on the rotarod test between the DMM and DMM + PRP groups. However, the DMM group had a significantly higher OARSI score than the DMM + PRP group. The number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts in the subchondral bone of the DMM group increased over time, peaking four weeks after surgery. The DMM + PRP group had a higher number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts in the subchondral bone than the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts between the DMM group and the control and sham groups. The intra-articular administration of PRP may inhibitKOA progression in a rat model, especially in the articular cartilage degradation and osteophyte formation. The results can provide further evidence about the efficacy of PRP against KOA progression and can contribute to the current practice of healthcare professionals based on accurate knowledge.

Intra‑Articular Platelet‑Rich Plasma Injections VS Hyaluronic Acid for Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Introduction One of the most common conditions leading to impairment, particularly in the elderly, is osteoarthritis (OA). Most often caused by knee and/or hip OA, OA is the most prevalent articular disease in the developed world and a major contributor to chronic. OA is recognized as a major contributor to disability and impairment, and it has a significant socioeconomic cost due to medical and surgical procedures, as well as lost productivity. OA is a complex chronic illness that begins with joint cartilage disintegration and progresses to synovitis, subchondral sclerosis, and the development of peripheral osteophytes. A treatment option for osteoarthritis cartilage injuries is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, which is linked to a decrease in tissue inflammation. However, there is still a lack of clinical research on PRP administration's price, length of treatment, and possible application as a treatment for articular cartilage injuries. Objectives This study aimed to examine the clinical outcomes of patients with knee osteoarthritis, comparing the clinical results of The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) between PRP and HA intra-articular injection. Methods The medical term “PRP”, “HA”, and “Knee Osteoarthritis” were used in Pubmed and Google Scholar to discover studies of the efficacy of Intra‑articular PRP injection VS HA in decreasing WOMAC scores up to October 2023. Two independent reviewers excluded the non-RCTs and other clinical studies irrelevant to the study question. Seven remaining studies were reviewed and screened for inclusion based on relevance to the subject and outcomes. Results Based on seven studies in this review, two studies showed that intra-articular platelet-rich plasma has a superior outcome on decreasing the WOMAC score than intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection with significant. Five of seven studies demonstrated that PRP has better outcomes on WOMAC score, even if not significantly. Conclusions PRP intra-articular injection is a clinically meaningful improvement for patients with knee OA, with no significant difference between treatment groups

A Preliminary Report on the Combined Effect of Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections and Photobiomodulation in Canine Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is highly prevalent in the canine population. Due to the multiple dimensions of the disease, a multimodal approach is usually favored by clinicians. To evaluate the combined treatment with intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and photobiomodulation in dogs with bilateral hip OA, thirty dogs were assigned to a PRP group (PRPG, n = 10), a photobiomodulation group (PBMTG, n = 10), or a combined therapies group (PRP+PBMTG, n = 10). The PRPG received two intra-articular administrations of platelet-rich plasma 14 days apart. The PBMTG received photobiomodulation with a therapeutic laser, with three sessions every other day in week one; two sessions in week two; a single session in week three; and one session/month on follow-up evaluation days. The PRP+PBMTG received the two combined therapies. The response to treatment was evaluated with weight-bearing distribution and the Canine Brief Pain Inventory, the Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs, and the Canine Orthopedic Index. Evaluations were conducted before treatment and +8, +15, +30, +60, and +90 days after initial treatment. Normality was assessed with a Shapiro-Wilk test, and the groups' results in each evaluation moment were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test. Animals of both sexes (male n = 19, female n = 11) were included in the sample, with a mean age of 7.8 ± 2.5 years and a body weight of 26.5 ± 4.7 kg. Joints were classified as mild (n = 6, three in PRPG, two in PBMTG, and one in PRP+PBMTG), moderate (n = 18, six in PRPG, five in PBMTG, and seven in PRP+PBMTG), and severe (n = 6, one in PRPG, three in PBMTG, and two in PRP+PBMTG). No differences were found between groups at the initial evaluation. All treatments produced clinically significant improvements compared to the assessment on treatment day. The combination of PRP and photobiomodulation produced greater, longer-lasting improvements. PRP and photobiomodulation can improve objective outcomes and client-reported outcome measures in dogs with OA. Their combined use leads to greater, longer-lasting, clinically significant improvements.

The Single Intra-Articular Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs as Treatment Options for Canine Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Patellar Luxation.

Cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) and patellar luxation (PL) are common pathologies affecting canines. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used as a non-surgical treatment plan in these cases. Clinical usage of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an emerging area of interest in veterinary medicine. There is a lack of studies comparing those two different treatment methods in veterinary medicine. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the use of oral NSAIDs and single intra-articular injection of PRP on treatment outcomes in cases of canine CCLR and PL. Dogs diagnosed with CCRL (n = 12) and PL (n = 10) were subgrouped by the severity of pathologies and administered treatment: half of the CCRL and PL groups were orally administered NSAIDs and supplements for 14 days, and the other half received a single intra-articular PRP injection into affected stifle joint. We measured serum TNF-α levels and clinical outcomes (lameness scores, painfulness to manipulations, goniometry of stifle joint in flexion and extension, and muscle strength) before treatment, at day 14 and day 28 of treatment. The results of TNF-α concentration indicates a significant difference between groups of differently treated partial CCLR groups on d14 (p = 0.006). Results of group CCLR-P1 on d14 were decreased, while results of group CCLR-P2 on d14 were increased. When comparing TNF-α concentration between all CCLR cases treated with NSAIDs and treated with PRP, there was a significant difference between those groups on d14 (p = 0.001). The results of TNF-α concentration indicates a significant difference between groups of differently treated PL-III on d28 (p = 0.036). Results of group PL-III1 indicate growth of TNF-α concentration, while at the same d28, results of group PL-III2 indicate decreased levels of cytokine, comparing results between the subgroups at the same time point and within subgroups from baseline. Results indicate a significant difference in muscle strength between group CCLR-P1 and group CCLR-P2 on d28 (p = 0.007), indicating an increment in muscle strength in group CCLR-P1 up to d14 and its reduction up to d28, and muscle strength of group CCLR-P2 increasing up to d28. When comparing the muscle strength between all CCLR cases treated with NSAIDs and treated with PRP, there was a significant difference between those groups on d28 (p = 0.007). In conclusion, a single intra-articular injection of PRP has a superior effect on management of inflammatory processes, has better clinical outcomes, and longer duration of action than oral NSAIDs, in the treatment of canine CCRL or PL.

COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL DISEASE MODIFYING ANTI-RHEUMATIC DRUGS WITH AND WITHOUT INTRA-ARTICULAR PLATELET RICH PLASMA INJECTION IN THE ALTERATION OF DISEASE PROGRESSION OF EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background and Objectives:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a symmetric inflammatory polyarticular arthritis, where autoimmune response causes chronic inflammation and destruction of joints leading to deformities and affecting the activities of daily living. ACR recommends early diagnosis and aggressive treatment of RA with combination disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although it attenuates disease progression, long-term remissions have not been adequately achieved. Injection of platelet rich plasma(PRP) decrease joint inflammation by modulating synovial cell proliferation, differentiation and inhibition of catabolic pathways. Aim:to compare conventional DMARDs with and without intra-articular platelet rich plasma injection in wrist joint in the alteration of disease progression of early rheumatoid arthritis. Methods:A randomized controlled trial, done among newly diagnosed patients of Rheumatoid Arthritis affecting wrist joint, in Department of PMR, RIMS. Data collected in pretested structured proforma and analysis for Pain, Disease activity, USG grading and hand function done using Chi-square test, students t-test, repeated measure ANOVA test. Results:There is significant improvement in VAS, DAS28, Cochin scale and USG Grade in study group at the end of 8 weeks, however at 20 weeks it is found to be comparable and p-value is not significant. Conclusion:Addition of Intra articular PRP in wrist along with DMARDs has early and better improvement in pain and delay disease progression. Intra-articular PRP injection under USG guidance helps in reduction of synovial inflammation and pain, improvement in function and a safe treatment modality. Early treatment and reduction of disease activity by intervention in targeted joint may delay joint deformity and disability.