Intra-abdominal Pressure Measurement Research Articles

Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement Devices: A Technologic Analysis.

The purpose of this Technologic Analysis is to review devices designed to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP); these devices are used to detect intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Published literature focusing on devices designed to measure IAP was reviewed, comparing the options available and outlining recommendations for appropriate use. Safety information regarding IAP measurement devices was derived from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Intra-abdominal hypertension is prevalent among critically ill patients of all ages and is linked to adverse consequences, such as abdominal compartment syndrome. The condition is often unrecognized due to the lack of overt clinical symptoms, supporting the need for devices to accurately measure IAP. Commercially available devices measure IAP indirectly, typically via the bladder or stomach. Additional research is needed to demonstrate the benefits of routine screening, further define risk factors for IAH/ACS development, and evaluate the impact of measures to reduce IAP in an effort to improve patient outcomes.

The Sheep as a Comprehensive Animal Model to Investigate Interdependent Physiological Pressure Propagation and Multiparameter Influence on Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics.

The present study aims to develop a suitable animal model for evaluating the physiological interactions between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics, hemodynamics, and abdominal compartment pressures. We seek to contribute to the enhanced recognition of the pathophysiology of CSF-dependent neurological disorders like hydrocephalus and the improvement of available treatment options. To date, no comprehensive animal model of CSF dynamics exists, and establishing an accurate model will advance our understanding of complex CSF physiology. Persisting knowledge gaps surrounding the communication and pressure propagation between the cerebrospinal space and adjacent anatomical compartments exacerbate the development of novel therapies for neurological diseases. Hence, the need for further investigation of the interactions of vascular, craniospinal, and abdominal pressures remains beyond dispute. Moreover, the results of this animal study support the optimization of in vitro test benches for medical device development, e.g., ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Six female white alpine sheep were surgically equipped with pressure sensors to investigate the physiological values of intracranial, intrathecal, arterial, central venous, jugular venous, vesical pressure, and four differently located abdominal pressures. These values were measured simultaneously during the acute animal trial with sheep under general anesthesia. Both carotid and femoral arterial blood pressure indicate a reliable and comparable representation of the systematic blood pressure. However, the jugular venous pressure and the central venous pressure in sheep in dorsal recumbency do not correlate well under general anesthesia. Furthermore, there is a trend for possible comparability of lateral intraventricular and lumbar intrathecal pressure. Nevertheless, animal body position during measurements must be considered since different body constitutions can alter the horizontal line between the cerebral ventricles and the lumbar subarachnoid space. While intra-abdominal pressure measurement in the four different abdominal quadrants yielded greater inter-individual variability, intra-vesical pressure measurements in our setting delivered comparable values for all sheep. We established a novel and comprehensive ovine animal model to investigate interdependent physiologic pressure propagation and multiparameter influences on CSF dynamics. The results of this study will contribute to further in vitro bench testing, the derivation of novel quantitative models, and the development of a pathologic ovine hydrocephalus model.

Role of intra-abdominal pressure measurement in patients with acute abdomen requiring exploratory laparotomy.

<b>Introduction:</b> Acute abdomen is one of the most common surgical emergencies faced by a surgeon. Monitoring Intra-Abdominal Pressure (IAP) in patients with acute abdomen referred for exploratory laparotomy may help guide the need for early intervention. </br></br> <b>Aim:</b> This study was performed to determine whether preoperative IAP had any significant association with organ failure as assessed using SOFA score. Furthermore, effect of IAP on patient outcome in terms of hospital stay, mortality was also evaluated. </br></br> <b>Materials and methods:</b> 60 patients above 18 years of age presenting with acute abdomen requiring exploratory laparotomy were included in this prospective observational study from November 2013 until March 2015. IAP and SOFA scores were calculated at the time of admission. The outcome of patients was assessed in terms of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. The correlation between IAP and SOFA scores was also assessed to determine the risk of organ failure. The inferences were drawn with the use of SPSS v22.0 statistical software. ANOVA, Chi-square and Student's t-test were used in the analysis. </br></br> <b> Results:</b> There was a positive correlation between SOFA score and IAP; and this correlation was found to be statistically significant with Pearson's correlation coefficient being 0.6247 and significance levels being <0.0001. Both hospital stay and mortality positively correlated with the degree of IAP. </br></br> <b> Conclusions:</b> IAP should be routinely measured in patients with acute abdomen requiring exploratory laparotomy. Patients with preoperatively raised IAP should be referred for emergency surgery as soon as possible for better outcome.

Outcome and management in neonates with gastroschisis in the third millennium—a single-centre observational study

Gastroschisis is one of the most common congenital malformations in paediatric surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal management. The aims of this study were to investigate the management and outcome and to identify predictors of outcome in gastroschisis. A retrospective observational study of neonates with gastroschisis born between 1999 and 2020 was undertaken. Data was extracted from the medical records and Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of outcome measured by length of hospital stay (LOS) and duration of parenteral nutrition (PN). In total, 114 patients were included. Caesarean section was performed in 105 (92.1%) at a median gestational age (GA) of 36 weeks (range 29–38) whereof (46) 43.8% were urgent. Primary closure was achieved in 82% of the neonates. Overall survival was 98.2%. One of the deaths was caused by abdominal compartment syndrome and one patient with intestinal failure–associated liver disease died from sepsis. None of the deceased patients was born after 2005. Median time on mechanical ventilation was 22 h. Low GA, staged closure, intestinal atresia, and sepsis were independent predictors of longer LOS and duration on PN. In addition, male sex was an independent predictor of longer LOS.Conclusion: Management of gastroschisis according to our protocol was successful with a high survival rate, no deaths in neonates born after 2005, and favourable results in LOS, duration on PN, and time on mechanical ventilation compared to other reports. Multicentre registry with long-term follow-up is required to establish the best management of gastroschisis.What is Known:• Gastroschisis is one of the most common congenital malformations in paediatric surgery with increasing incidence.• There is no consensus among clinicians regarding the optimal management of gastroschisis.What is New:• Although primary closure was achieved in 82% of the patients, mortality rate was very low (1.8%) with no deaths in neonates born after 2005 following the introduction of measurement of intraabdominal pressure at closure.• Low gestational age, staged closure, intestinal atresia, sepsis, and male sex were independent predictors of longer length of hospital stay.

The Effects of Perioperative Factors on Early Postoperative Morbidity in Bariatric Surgery.

This study aims to examine the predictive role of obesity-type-related indexes and perioperative intraabdominal pressure measurements for early postoperative complications following bariatric surgery. Sixty-seven female patients with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery (laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass) were included in this study. Obesity-related indexes (BMI, waist/hip ratio, and waist/height ratio) were calculated using patient data. Intraoperative hemodynamic measurements and intraabdominal pressure measurements were done at the beginning and at the end of the operation. Intraabdominal pressure measurements were done using both bladder port and trocar port. Patients were followed for early postoperative complications. Among 67 patients included, 22 developed early postoperative complications (32.8%), mostly pulmonary (20.9%). Trans-trocar IAP measured at the beginning of the operation emerged as the single independent predictor of postoperative complications (OR, 40.3; p = 0.002). Based on ROC analysis, AUC for predicting complications was 0.955 (p < 0.01). Optimal cutoff point (≥ 14.5mmHg) was associated with 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity. In addition, there were weak but significant positive correlations between trans-trocar IAP-beginning and BMI (r = 0.443, p < 0.001), waist/hip ratio (r = 0.434, p < 0.001), and waist/height ratio (r = 0.539, p < 0.001). Findings of this study suggest that a high baseline intraabdominal pressure predicts a higher risk for early postoperative complications following bariatric surgery. This information would help improve patient care. Further large studies are warranted.

The significance of intra-abdominal pressure on postural stabilization: a low back pain case report

Intra-abdominal pressure is a hydraulic pressure within the abdominal cavity. Previous studies confirmed its direct association with both spinal stability and spinal unloading. The literature review part of the paper summarizes intra-abdominal pressure physiology and pathophysiology and explains the underlying mechanisms of Intra-abdominal pressure regulation and its effects on the human body, especially spinal stability. Current methods of invasive and non-invasive intra-abdominal pressure measurement are described in detail. Second part of a paper presents a case report of a competitive athlete suffering from low back pain. The functional assessment and treatment focused on quality of patient’s trunk stabilization. Training following principles of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization resulted in better ability to activate abdominal wall muscles which is a critical mechanism of Intra-abdominal pressure regulation and in this case caused significant low back pain reduction. The effect of the therapy was evaluated by DNS Brace which measures activity of the abdominal wall, thus Intra-abdominal pressure indirectly, along with clinical Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization assessment tests.https://doi.org/10.24040/sjss.2021.7.2.3-18

Pathophysiology of intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome and relevance to veterinary critical care.

Increased intraabdominal pressure, termed intraabdominal hypertension (IAH), is reported as an independent cause of morbidity and mortality in the human ICU but, until recently, has been rarely described in veterinary species outside of experimental models. Failure to identify severe IAH leads to organ dysfunction, termed abdominal compartment syndrome, and rapidly becomes fatal without therapeutic intervention. Although the veterinary community has been slow to address the concept of IAH and associated comorbidities, recent companion and large animal case series and experimental studies suggest IAH may also be common in veterinary species and correlates well with risk factors and grading systems already described in the human literature. Increasing abdominal pressures exert deleterious local effects through visceral ischemia and reperfusion injury as well as systemic effects on the cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and central nervous systems. Even mild grades of IAH increase systemic vascular resistance, impede venous return, increase pulmonary wedge pressure, and decrease pulmonary function. More severe grades cause azotemia, oliguria, decreased coronary blood flow, hypoxia, increased intracranial pressure, and death. Many of the common diseases in veterinary patients are associated with IAH, including gastric dilatation-volvulus, colon volvulus, closed pyometra, hemoperitoneum, ascites, uroperitoneum, and hydrops. Monitoring of the veterinary patient is difficult, but several experimental studies validate both the presence of IAH and the ability to monitor abdominal pressures in large and small animal species. Moreover, prompt recognition of IAH and subsequent treatment is feasible in the veterinary ICU. Increasing abdominal pressures exert deleterious local effects through visceral ischemia and reperfusion injury as well as systemic effects on the cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and central nervous systems. Increases in central venous pressure, systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary wedge pressure, and a decreased cardiac output by way of both decreased preload and increased afterload have been documented as a result of intraabdominal hypertension (IAH). Direct diagnosis of IAH is achieved by blind or ultrasound-guided abdominal needle puncture attached to a water manometer or direct pressure monitoring transducer. Transvesicular measurement of intraabdominal pressure (IAP) is relatively noninvasive, and many patients that would benefit from rapid diagnosis of IAH and abdominal compartment syndrome already have indwelling bladder catheters. Recommendations for interventions are based on the assigned grade of IAH (mild, moderate, severe). If IAH is strongly suspected or diagnosed, abdominal wall compliance may be improved through judicious use of neuromuscular blockers and sedation. Decompression, either minimally invasive or surgical, is absolutely recommended for IAPs consistently above 20mm Hg, especially in the presence of signs attributed to secondary organ dysfunction.

Diagnostic challenges in postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis in critically ill patients: When to reoperate?

Abstract The present paper was done to review common diagnostic techniques used to help surgeons find the most suitable way to diagnose postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS). The topic was searched on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Collected articles were classified and checked for their quality. Findings of selected research were included in this study and analyzed to find the best diagnostic method for intra-abdominal sepsis. IAS presents severe morbidity and mortality, and its early diagnosis can improve the outcome. Currently, there is no consensus among surgeons on a single diagnostic modality that should be used while deciding reoperation in patients with postoperative IAS. Though it has a high sensitivity for abdominal infections, computed tomography has limited applications due to mobility and time constraints. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a safe process that produces usable images, and can be used at the bedside. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) has high sensitivity, and the patients testing positive through DPL can be subjected to exploratory laparotomy, depending on severity. Abdominal Reoperation Predictive Index (ARPI) is the only index reported as an aid for this purpose. Serial intra-abdominal pressure measurement has also emerged as a potential diagnostic tool. A proper selection of diagnostic modality is expected to improve the outcome in IAS, which presents high mortality risk and a limited time frame.

Intra-abdominal pressure during and after cardiac surgery: a single-centre prospective cohort study.

While intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) has been associated with adverse outcomes in multiple settings, the epidemiology and clinical implications of IAH in the context of cardiac surgery are less known. In this study, we aimed to describe the prevalence of IAH in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and determine its association with patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes. We conducted a single-centre prospective cohort study in which intra-abdominal pressure was measured in the operating room after general anesthesia (T1), after the surgical procedure (T2), and two hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission (T3) in a subset of patients. Intra-abdominal hypertension was defined as intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) ≥ 12 mm Hg. Postoperative outcomes included death, acute kidney injury (AKI), and length of stay in the ICU and hospital. A total of 513 IAP measurements were obtained from 191 participants in the operating room and 131 participants in the ICU. Intra-abdominal hypertension was present in 105/191 (55%) at T1, 115/191 (60%) at T2, and 31/131 (24%) at T3. Intra-abdominal pressure was independently associated with body mass index, central venous pressure, and mean pulmonary artery pressure but was not associated with cumulative fluid balance. Intraoperative IAH was not associated with adverse outcomes including AKI. Intra-abdominal hypertension is very common during cardiac surgery but its clinical implications are uncertain.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement Method via Bladder in Predicting Renal Dysfunction after Kidney Transplantation

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement Method via Bladder in Predicting Renal Dysfunction after Kidney Transplantation

Comparison of Intra Abdominal Pressure Monitoring Techniques and the Effects of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

Background: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening condition that develops in the setting of increasing and uncontrolled intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), leading to cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic and/or renal dysfunction. Aims: To establish a porcine model for the evaluation of the effects of IAH on renal blood flow (RBF) and to determine if IVC pressure and/or Camino fiberoptic direct intraabdominal pressure measurements can accurately predict IAPs that have been derived using bladder pressure measurements. Methods: Abdominal laparotomy, placement of IAP and RBF measuring devices, and fascial closure were performed on six adult feeder pigs with a mean body weight of 25 +/- 5 kg. A Transonic Doppler flow probe, a suprapubic bladder catheter, a Camino fiberoptic probe, and a triple lumen central venous catheter were placed and then baseline measurements were taken of renal blood flow, bladder pressure, direct intra-peritoneal Camino pressure and IVC pressure, respectively. Normal saline was then infused into the abdomen to simulate increasing IAP. Following a 5–10-minute stabilization period, all measurements were again taken. Results: The correlation between IVC pressure and bladder pressure was 0.98, with a mean bias of -0.5 (SD 2.0; 95% CI: -0.9, -0.2). The correlation between direct IAP readings by Camino probe and bladder pressure was 0.91, with a mean bias of -3.9 (SD 4.3; 95% CI: -4.6, -3.2). There was a strong negative correlation (-0.95) between RBF and bladder pressure. At an IAP of 20 mmHg, RBF reduced by an average of 45.4% (95% CI: 40%, 50.8%). Upon abdominal decompression, RBF returned to 66.6% (95% CI: 54.3%, 78.9%) of its baseline value. Conclusions: A porcine model is effective in accurately measuring changes in real time RBF. RBF progressively declines as IAP increases, however upon decompression, it fails to achieve complete recovery. IVC pressure measurements correlate well with, and therefore may substitute, the gold standard bladder pressure measurements as representatives of IAP. Keywords: Abdominal Compartment syndrome, renal blood flow, intrabdominal hypertension, bladder pressure

Non-Invasive Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement by Means of Transient Radar Method: In Vitro Validation of a Novel Radar-Based Sensor.

Intra-abdominal hypertension, defined as an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) equal to or above 12 mmHg is one of the major risk-factors for increased morbidity (organ failure) and mortality in critically ill patients. Therefore, IAP monitoring is highly recommended in intensive care unit (ICU) patients to predict development of abdominal compartment syndrome and to provide a better care for patients hospitalized in the ICU. The IAP measurement through the bladder is the actual reference standard advocated by the abdominal compartment society; however, this measurement technique is cumbersome, non-continuous, and carries a potential risk for urinary tract infections and urethral injury. Using microwave reflectometry has been proposed as one of the most promising IAP measurement alternatives. In this study, a novel radar-based method known as transient radar method (TRM) has been used to monitor the IAP in an in vitro model with an advanced abdominal wall phantom. In the second part of the study, further regression analyses have been done to calibrate the TRM system and measure the absolute value of IAP. A correlation of –0.97 with a p-value of 0.0001 was found between the IAP and the reflection response of the abdominal wall phantom. Additionally, a quadratic relation with a bias of −0.06 mmHg was found between IAP obtained from the TRM technique and the IAP values recorded by a pressure gauge. This study showed a promising future for further developing the TRM technique to use it in clinical monitoring.

Intra-abdominal pressure measurement

An elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) above 12 mmHg is a pathological finding in critically ill patients. IAP are classified into different degrees of intra-abdominal hypertension and, in the presence of associated organ failure, as abdominal compartment syndrome. Both disease entities represent an underestimated factor in intensive care patients and are associated with increased mortality and prolonged intensive care and hospital stay. The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill patients in intensive care units is not widely established and there is often considerable uncertainty regarding measurement conditions and methods. If risk factors are present, intra-abdominal pressure should be monitored every 4 hours. Bladder pressure measurement is the gold standard for determining intra-abdominal pressure. The measurement is a non-invasive, cost-effective, easy to perform bedside and safe method for the patient.

Systematic Review of Diagnostic Sensors for Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring

Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is defined as the steady-state pressure within the abdominal cavity. Elevated IAP has been implicated in many medical complications. This article reviews the current state-of-the-art in innovative sensors for the measurement of IAP. A systematic review was conducted on studies on the development and application of IAP sensors. Publications from 2010 to 2021 were identified by performing structured searches in databases, review articles, and major textbooks. Sixteen studies were eligible for the final systematic review. Of the 16 articles that describe the measurement of IAP, there were 5 in vitro studies (31.3%), 7 in vivo studies (43.7%), and 4 human trials (25.0%). In addition, with the advancement of wireless communication technology, an increasing number of wireless sensing systems have been developed. Among the studies in this review, five presented wireless sensing systems (31.3%) to monitor IAP. In this systematic review, we present recent developments in different types of intra-abdominal pressure sensors and discuss their inherent advantages due to their small size, remote monitoring, and multiplexing.

Effect of intraabdominal hypertension on splanchnic blood flow in children with appendicular peritonitis.

Background and Aims:Intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) is poorly diagnosed condition that cause splanchnic hypoperfusion and abdominal organs ischemia and can lead to multiple organ failure. There are no scientific data regarding effect of intraabdominal pressure (IAP) on splanchnic circulation in children.Material and Methods:Ninety-four children after surgery for appendicular peritonitis were enrolled in the study. After IAP measurement children were included in one of two groups according IAP levels: “without IAH” (n = 51) and “with IAH” (n = 43). Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and portal vein (PV) blood flows (BFSMA, BFPV, mL/min) were measured, and SMA and PV blood flow indexes (BFISMA, BFIPV, ml/min*m2) and abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) were calculated in both groups.Results:Median BFISMA and BFIPV in group “with IAH” were lower by 54.38% (P < 0.01) and 63.11% (P < 0.01) respectively compared to group “without IAH”. There were strong significant negative correlation between IAP and BFISMA (rs = –0.66; P < 0.0001), weak significant negative correlation between IAP and BFIPV (rs = –0.36; P = 0.0001) in group “with IAH” and weak significant negative correlation between IAP and BFISMA (rs = –0.30; P = 0.0047) in group “without IAH”. There were no statistically significant correlations between IAP and BFIPV in group “without IAH”, between BFISMA and APP in both groups and between BFIPV and APP in both groups.Conclusion:Elevated IAP significantly reduces splanchnic blood flow in children with appendicular peritonitis. BFISMA and BFIPV negatively correlate with IAP in these patients. There is no correlation between BFISMA/BFIPV and APP in children with IAH due to appendicular peritonitis.

MAIN PRINCIPLES OF ETIOPATHOGENETIC TREATMENT OF NEWBORNS WITH GASTROSCHISIS

Introduction. The paper focuses on the challenging issue of treatment of newborns with gastroschisis (GS) and a high level of intraabdominal hypertension in case of severe viscero-abdominal disproportion. The aim of the paper is to present the current state of the problem at the regional level based on our own clinical experience in observation and treatment of newborns with GS. Material and methods. The study is based on the analysis of examination and treatment of 29 newbornswith GS. The distribution of boys and girls was nearly the same: 16 (55.17%) boys and 13 (44.83%) girls. The number of premature babies was 23 (79.31%). The complex of diagnostic procedures included clinical laboratory examination, radiologic investigation (using contrast agents when required), ultrasound investigation and Doppler sonography, intraabdominal pressure measurement, histologic study of surgical specimens.Results. Prenatal information on the congenital anterior abdominal wall defect was obtained with the help of prenatal ultrasound. In most cases, fetal GS is diagnosed before 20 weeks of pregnancy. Prenatal ultrasound was performed in 13 (44.83%) pregnant women out of the researched group. Two false test results were obtained.Radiologic investigation of a child with GS is necessary to detect intestinal obstruction, necrosis or bowel perforation. Among patients under our study, two cases of ileal atresia were registered. The analysis of intraabdominal pressure indices in patients with GS showed a high level of intraabdominal hypertension in approximately 70% of cases. It proves that patients with GS have a high level of surgical and anesthetic risk. The main therapy measures include the following steps: appropriate preoperative preparation, anesthetic management, and the choice of appropriate perioperative techniques taking into account the level of intraabdominal hypertension and viscero-abdominal disproportion.Depending on the child's condition, type of GS and level of intraabdominal hypertension, there were twosurgical options:1. Primary radical surgery.2. Staged surgical treatment.Analyzing the results of the study, it may be noted that 8 newborns in total died after the surgery, which is 27.59%(it used to be 56-60% till 2005). The main causes of death were respiratory failure, neonatal sepsis and unfavorable premorbid conditions (very low gestational age, severe comorbidity, multiple congenital malformations).Conclusions. 1. Successful treatment of newborns with GS depends on the early diagnosis of the pathology, which must be prenatal, and elimination of contradictions in treatment tactics. 2. Before suturing the abdominal wall defect in newborns with GS, it is necessary to measure intraabdominal pressure, since intraabdominal hypertension leads to a significant deterioration in the mechanical properties of the lungs, hemodynamic abnormalities,oliguria, intestinal ischemia, decrease in organ perfusion, which must be taken into account when carrying out preoperative preparation and aesthetic management. 3. The level of intraabdominal hypertension in patients with GS,which is high in 68.96% of cases, must be an indication for choosing the method of surgical correction of the defect i.e.the refusal of radical plasty of the abdominal wall and the resort to staged intervention or other surgical techniquesthat involve an increase in the abdominal cavity volume. 4. The reduction in mortality in newborns with GS to 27.59%is possible due to the introduction of etiopathogenetic approaches to early diagnosis, preoperative management, anesthetic management and surgical correction of this pathology into the practice of neonatal surgery.

Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurements in Neurocritical Patients.

Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is increasingly being recognized as an indispensable and significant physiological parameter in intensive care units (ICU). IAP has been measured in a variety of ways with the development of many techniques in recent years. The level of intra-abdominal pressure under normal conditions is generally equal to or less than 12 mmHg. Accordingly, abdominal hypertension (IAH) is defined as two consecutive IAP measurements higher than 12 mmHg within 4-6 h. When IAH deteriorates further with IAP higher than 20 mmHg along with organ dysfunction and/or failure, this clinical manifestation can be diagnosed as abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). IAH and ACS are associated with gastrointestinal ischemia, acute renal failure, and lung injury, leading to severe morbidity and mortality. Elevated IAP and IAH may affect the cerebral venous return and outflow of the cerebrospinal fluid by increasing the intrathoracic pressure (ITP), ultimately leading to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Therefore, it is essential to monitor IAP in critically ill patients. The reproducibility and accuracy of intra-bladder pressure (IBP) measurements in previous studies need to be further improved, although the indirect measurement of IAP is now a widely used technique. To address these limitations, we recently used a set of IAP monitoring systems with advantages of convenience, continuous monitoring, digital visualization, and long-term IAP recording and data storage in critically ill patients. This IAP monitoring system can detect intra-abdominal hypertension and potentially analyze clinical status in real time. The recorded IAP data and other physiological indicators, such as intracranial pressure, can be further used for correlation analysis to guide treatment and predict a patient's possible prognosis.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Intra-abdominal Pressure in Patients Hospitalized in ICUs

Introduction: Considering the prevalence of obesity, overweight and risk factors related to the patients with Intra-abdominal pressure, the body mass index is among the factor which should be highly focused on these patients. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of body mass index on Intra-abdominal pressure in patients hospitalized in ICUs. Procedure: The present research is a prospective, nonexperimental study conducted on 76 patients hospitalized in ICUs. Measurements of Intra-abdominal pressure were carried out based on the modified Korn method every day with 8-hour intervals. The instrument used for this purpose is a questionnaire consisting of three parts including demographic information, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring form and record of its related parameters. Findings: The mean body mass index (BMI) scores revealed that 27.60% of the patients suffer from overweight and 7.2% of them have obesity problems with Intra-abdominal pressure of 8.44 ± 4.02 mmHg. For 15.8% and 2.6% of samples, Intra-abdominal hypertension of types I and II were observed, respectively. No sample was detected within the abdominal compartment. The average Intra-abdominal pressure for different BMIs indicated a statistically significant difference (p = 0.007), whereby an increase in BMI, IAP also indicates an increase. Conclusion: The present research indicated no obesity evidence so that no relation was observed between IAP and obesity.

Measurement of Intra Abdominal Pressure in Acute Pancreatitis and Correlation with Parameters and Outcomes

Measurement of Intra Abdominal Pressure in Acute Pancreatitis and Correlation with Parameters and Outcomes

The Correlation between Head of Bed Angle and Intra-Abdominal Pressure of Intubated Patients; a Pre-Post Clinical Trial

Introduction:The recommended position for measuring Intra-Abdominal Pressure (IAP) is the supine position. However, patients put in this position are prone to Ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study was done to evaluate the relationship between bed head angle and IAP measurements of intubated patients in the intensive care unit.Methods:In this clinical trial, seventy-six critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation were enrolled. IAP measurement was performed every 8 hours for 24 hours using the KORN method in three different degrees of the head of bed (HOB) elevation (0, 15, and 30). Bland-Altman analysis was performed to identify the bias and limits of agreement among the three HOBs. According to World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS), we can consider two IAP techniques equivalent if a bias of <1 mmHg and limits of agreement of - 4 to +4 were found between them. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software (v. 19), and the significance level was considered as 0.05.Results:The prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension was 18.42%. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) of IAP were 8.44 ± 4.02 mmHg for HOB angle 0°, 9.58 ± 4.52 for HOB angle 15 and 11.10 ± 4.73 for HOB angle 30o (p = 0.0001). The IAP measurement bias between HOB angle 0°and HOB angle 15° was 1.13 mmHg. This bias was 2.66 mmHg between HOB angle 0° and HOB angle 30°. Conclusion:Elevation of HOB angle from 0 to 30 degree significantly increases IAP. It seems that the measurement of IAP at HOB angle 15° was more reliable than 30°.