British Army basic training (BT) and initial trade training (ITT) enable personnel to develop role-related physical capability to perform in-service job-roles. The study aimed to compare physical performance of trainees (completing ITT) and trained soldiers, on a series of gym-based fitness tests and representative military tasks. A total of 316 British Army personnel [68 trainees (63 men: 22±3years, 71.6±8.4kg and 1.74±0.07m) and 248 trained soldiers (225 men: 27±6years, 78.7±12.7kg and 1.76±0.08m)] completed two sessions. Session 1; body mass, stature, age and gym-based tests (2km run, broad jump, seated medicine ball throw, hex bar deadlift, 100m shuttle sprints, pull-ups and mid-thigh pull). Session 2; representative military tasks (loaded carriage [stage 1, 4km, 35-40kg and 4.8kmh-1 fixed pace and stage 2, 2km, 20-25kg and individual best-effort speed], tactical movement, casualty drag, stretcher carry, vertical lift, repeated carry and incremental lift). Independent sample t-tests were employed to examine group differences. Compared to trainees, trained soldiers were older (p<0.001), heavier (p<0.001) and scored higher on broad jump (p=0.024), medicine ball throw (p=0.007) and mid-thigh pull (p=0.048), but were slower on 2km run (p=0.047), loaded carriage (p<0.019), tactical movement (p<0.001) and casualty drag (p<0.001). Overall, trainees achieve higher scores on aerobic/anaerobic tests, whereas trained soldiers outperform trainees in strength/power-based tests. Although a cross-sectional comparison does not provide strong evidence, the results may indicate that cardiovascular fitness is developed during BT, whereas muscle strength/power develops post BT/ITT. These findings would need confirming by a longitudinal study and could inform the development/management of role-related fitness during BT, ITT and through career.
Read full abstract