HIV-1 Viral Load Assay Research Articles

POC viral load testing in an antenatal clinic setting for Ugandan pregnant women living with HIV: a qualitative implementation process analysis

IntroductionPoint of care viral load (POC VL) testing improves viral suppression and retention in HIV care, and is increasingly being integrated into routine health services for African pregnant women living with HIV. We examined processes of implementing POC VL testing in antenatal care and at delivery for Ugandan mothers living with HIV as part of a pilot randomized trial (Clinical Trial Number: NCT05092997).MethodsWe conducted individual qualitative interviews with 12 clinical and research staff who implemented POC VL testing and 22 mothers who received POC VL testing using the Xpert® HIV-1 Viral Load Assay (Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). An inductive, content analytic approach was used to examine the interview transcripts. The analysis addressed the question: How did a group of Ugandan health care providers approach the process of implementing POC VL testing in antenatal care and at delivery for mothers living with HIV?ResultsThe analysis yielded three themes. (1) Staff created an efficient system of communication and then relied on that system to coordinate testing procedures. (2) They also found ways of increasing the speed and efficiency of the testing process. (3) They adopted a “mother-centered” approach to implementation, prioritizing the needs, preferences, and well-being of women in planning and carrying out testing procedures.ConclusionAs POC VL testing becomes more widely used across high HIV burden settings, understanding how implementers approach the implementation process and what they do to make an intervention successful will be an important part of evaluating feasibility.Clinical Trial Number: NCT05092997.

Optimised prevention of postnatal HIV transmission in Zambia and Burkina Faso (PROMISE-EPI): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Transmission through breastfeeding accounts for more than half of the unacceptably high number of new paediatric HIV infections worldwide. We hypothesised that, in addition to maternal antiretroviral therapy (ART), extended postnatal prophylaxis with lamivudine, guided by point-of-care assays for maternal viral load, could reduce postnatal transmission. We did a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial at four health-care facilities in Zambia and four health-care facilities in Burkina Faso. Mothers with HIV and their breastfed infants without HIV attending the second visit of the Expanded Programme of Immunisation (EPI-2; infant age 6-8 weeks) were randomly assigned 1:1 to intervention or control groups. In the intervention group, maternal viral load was measured using Xpert HIV viral load assay at EPI-2 and at 6 months, with results provided immediately. Infants whose mothers had a viral load of 1000 copies per mL or higher were started on lamivudine syrup twice per day for 12 months or 1 month after breastfeeding discontinuation. The control group followed national guidelines for prevention of postnatal transmission of HIV. The primary outcome assessed by modified intention to treat was infant HIV infection at age 12 months, with HIV DNA point-of-care testing at 6 months and at 12 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03870438). Between Dec 12, 2019 and Sept 30, 2021, 34 054 mothers were screened for HIV. Among them, 1506 mothers with HIV and their infants without HIV, including 1342 mother and infant pairs from Zambia and 164 from Burkina Faso, were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to the intervention (n=753) or control group (n=753). At baseline, the median age of the mothers was 30·6 years (IQR 26·0-34·7), 1480 (98·4%) of 1504 were receiving ART, and 169 (11·5%) of 1466 had a viral load ≥1000 copies/mL. There was one case of HIV transmission in the intervention group and six in the control group, resulting in a transmission incidence of 0·19 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0·005-1·04) in the intervention group and 1·16 per 100 person-years (0·43-2·53) in the control group, which did not reach statistical significance (p=0·066). HIV-free survival and serious adverse events were similar in both groups. Our intervention, initiated at EPI-2 and based on extended single-drug postnatal prophylaxis guided by point-of-care maternal viral load could be an important strategy for paediatric HIV elimination. The EDCTP2 programme with the support of the UK Department of Health & Social Care.

High risk of virologic failure among HIV-infected children and adolescents routinely followed-up in Littoral region of Cameroon.

Virological response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains a challenge for HIV-infected children and adolescents due to non-optimization of pediatric ART for resource-limited settings. In this study, we aimed to investigate factors associated with virologic failure (VF) in HIV-infected-children and adolescents on ART in Cameroon. A prospective patient-based cohort study was conducted among HIV-infected children (0-9 years) and adolescents (10-19 years) followed-up between November 2018 and October 2019 in 38 healthcare centers located in the Littoral region of Cameroon. The 1st viral load (VL) was assessed after 6 months of ART initiation and the 2nd VL between 3 and 6 six months later in patients with VL ≥1000 copies/ml in accordance with the national algorithm using Abbott Real-Time HIV-1 Viral Load Assay. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the determinants of higher risk of VF. Of 1,029 HIV-infected children and adolescents (393 children and 636 adolescents), 801 (77.8%) cumulatively presented with VL <1000 copies/mL within 12 months on ART. Adolescents were more likely to have VF than children (24.5% vs 18.3%, OR: 1.39; 95%CI: 1.00-1.93; p = 0.047). Patients followed-up in decentralized care units were significantly more likely to have VF compared to those attending the accredited treatment centers (26.1% vs 16.6%, OR: 1.88, 95%CI: 1.37-2.58; p<0.001). Our findings show a high rate of VL suppression (VLS, 77.8%) among HIV-infected children and adolescents, albeit lower than the established target of 90%. Being adolescent and patients followed in the decentralized care units are high risk factors for VF, thereby necessitating routine therapeutic education of patients and guardians in resource limited countries to improve VLS.

Evaluation of the performance of a novel HIV-1 viral load assay for HIV quantification in China.

Our objective was to assess the HIV-1 quantification performance of the Livzon HIV-1 viral load (VL) assay and the Roche Cobas HIV-1 assay to evaluate an HIV-1 VL testing reagent for application in China. We compared the Livzon and Roche Cobas HIV-1 VL assays using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plasma samples collected between May 2021 and November 2021 from patients with HIV-1 and healthy controls. We used Cohen's κ coefficient to measure agreement of qualitative values and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) values and the coefficient of determination (R2 ) to determine the linear relationship between the two assays. We performed a Bland-Altman analysis to assess VL quantification agreement. In total, 11 plasma samples from patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) and nine samples from healthy controls were undetectable on both assays. Overall agreement was seen in 419 of 500 specimens (91.40%), with a κ value of 0.59. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the two assays was 0.970. Using the Bland-Altman method, 95.14% (352/370) of paired VLs fell within the 95% confidence limits of agreement (-0.51 to 0.95 log10 copies/mL). Higher VLs had a better correlation and a smaller mean difference between the two assays. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the samples of subtype CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC, and CRF55_01B was 0.950, 0.935, and 0.952, respectively. The Livzon HIV-1 VL assay exhibits good precision and linearity and a high correlation with the Roche Cobas HIV-1 assay. The Livzon HIV-1 VL assay has salient advantages in terms of the lyophilized powder reagent, which gives the assay greater stability and sensitivity and can be readily used in low-resource areas.

Comparative sensitivity of automated (Abbott M2000) and manual plasma HIV-1 RNA PCR assays for the detection of persistent viremia after long-term antiretroviral therapy

BackgroundThe ability of automated, FDA-cleared plasma HIV-1 RNA assays to detect low-level viremia, compared to manual, highly sensitive research-only methods, is not well-defined. We therefore tested paired plasma samples from people with HIV-1 (PWH) on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) with both the Abbott M2000 RealTime HIV-1 Viral Load assay (Abbott) and a quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-initiated PCR assay that has a reported 95% detection limit of 1 HIV-1 RNA copy/ml (single copy assay, SCA). MethodsPlasma samples from 309 participants in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group study A5321 were tested by both Abbott and SCA. Participants were mostly men (82%). All were on stable ART for a median of 7 years with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL by Abbott. Pooled plasma from each donor was divided and tested. Abbott results were reported as target detected <40 copies/mL but not quantifiable (target detected <40) or target not detected (TND), and SCA results were classified as HIV-1 RNA detected or not detected. ResultsBy Abbott, 17% (51/309) of sample results were target detected <40, whereas 83% (258/309) were TND. Of the samples that were target detected <40 by Abbott, 73% (37/51) had HIV-1 RNA detected by SCA. By contrast, 43% of samples that were TND by Abbott (110/258) had HIV-1 RNA detected by SCA (p < 0.001). ConclusionPlasma samples from PWH with HIV-1 RNA detected but <40 copies/ml by the automated Abbott M2000 assay are likely (73% of 51 samples) to have HIV-1 RNA detected by an optimized manual assay with single copy sensitivity. An Abbott HIV-1 RNA result of target not detected did not exclude low-level viremia: 43% of 258 samples had HIV-1 RNA detected by the single copy assay. These findings indicate that the Abbott M2000 assay cannot exclude the persistence of viremia on ART and thus may have less utility, compared to a manual single copy assay, for assessing the impact of experimental interventions designed to eliminate low-level viremia as a step towards achieving ART-free HIV-1 remission.

HIV viral load assays when used with whole blood perform well as a diagnostic assay for infants.

Over the past several years, only approximately 50% of HIV-exposed infants received an early infant diagnosis test within the first two months of life. While high attrition and mortality account for some of the shortcomings in identifying HIV-infected infants early and putting them on life-saving treatment, fragmented and challenging laboratory systems are an added barrier. We sought to determine the accuracy of using HIV viral load assays for infant diagnosis of HIV. We enrolled 866 Ugandan infants between March-April 2018 for this study after initial laboratory diagnosis. The median age was seven months, while 33% of infants were less than three months of age. Study testing was done using either the Roche or Abbott molecular technologies at the Central Public Health Laboratory. Dried blood spot samples were prepared according to manufacturer-recommended protocols for both the qualitative and quantitative assays. Viral load test samples for the Roche assay were processed using two different buffers: phosphate-buffered saline (PBS: free virus elution viral load protocol [FVE]) and Sample Pre-Extraction Reagent (SPEX: qualitative buffer). Dried blood spot samples were processed for both assays on the Abbott using the manufacturer's standard infant diagnosis protocol. All infants received a qualitative test for clinical management and additional paired quantitative tests. 858 infants were included in the analysis, of which 50% were female. Over 75% of mothers received antiretroviral therapy, while approximately 65% of infants received infant prophylaxis. The Roche SPEX and Abbott technologies had high sensitivity (>95%) and specificity (>98%). The Roche FVE had lower sensitivity (85%) and viral load values. To simplify and streamline laboratory practices, HIV viral load may be used to diagnose HIV infection in infants, particularly using the Roche SPEX and Abbott technologies.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Rapid Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load XC, Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load, & m-PIMA HIV-1/2 Viral Load in South African Clinics.

BackgroundWe aimed to evaluate the analytic performance of three rapid HIV viral load assays: the novel Xpert HIV-1 VL XC (Xpert XC), the Xpert HIV-1 VL (Xpert VL), and the m-PIMA HIV-1/2 VL (m-PIMA).SettingTwo South African clinics.MethodsWe conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Site-laboratory technicians and nurses used the Xpert XC, Xpert VL and m-PIMA to test plasma samples from people with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy. We compared results with the Roche Cobas HIV-1 reference assay. We determined accuracy to detect viraemia at the World Health Organization (WHO) failure threshold of 1000 copies/mL on all three assays, and 50 and 200 copies/mL on the Xpert assays. We assessed agreement using Bland-Altman plots.ResultsWe enrolled 140 participants (98 [70%] women, median age 37 years), who provided 189 paired samples at one or more timepoints. We tested 174 samples with the Xpert XC, 188 with the Xpert VL, and 128 with the m-PIMA. At 1000 copies/mL, sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence intervals) were 97% (82-100) and 98% (93-99) (Xpert XC), 100% (87-100) and 96% (91-98) (Xpert VL), and 92% (72-99) and 99% (93-100) (m-PIMA) respectively. At 50 copies/mL, sensitivity and specificity were 93% (81-98) and 96% (91-99) (Xpert XC), and 95% (84-99) and 95% (90-98) (Xpert VL) respectively. Mean bias was -0.10 (-0.54 to 0.34) log10 copies/mL (Xpert XC), 0.07 (-0.37 to 0.52) log10 copies/mL (Xpert VL) and -0.26 (-0.83 to 0.31) log10 copies/mL (m-PIMA).ConclusionsIn these South African clinics, the accuracy of all three assays was clinically acceptable to detect viraemia at the WHO failure threshold, while both Xpert assays were also accurate at detecting low level viraemia.

A multi-center study comparing the analytical sensitivity and clinical concordance of three HIV-1 viral load assays

BackgroundHIV-1 viral load assays are essential tools for clinical management of people living with HIV-1. Objectives and study designWe evaluated concordance between three assays: the cobas® HIV-1 test for use on the cobas® 6800 and cobas® 8800 systems (cobas HIV-1); the COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 Test, v2.0 for use with the High Pure System and the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 test, v2.0. Analytical sensitivity, precision and accuracy of all three methods were assessed using the WHO 2nd International Standard for HIV-1, with concentrations from 5 to 1000 copies/mL. Accuracy and concordance were evaluated using 212 clinical specimens. Overall percent agreement (OPA) was determined using three different thresholds used as medical decision points. ResultsThe limit of detection was below 20 copies/mL for each assay. The hit rate for each assay was 100 % for concentrations ≥ 50 copies/mL. Only the cobas HIV-1 test generated quantifiable data for all replicates at 50 copies/mL. Between 50 and 400 copies/mL, results for all assays were accurate within 0.09 log10 copies/mL, with standard deviation less than 0.14 log10 copies/mL. The mean difference between paired results in clinical specimens ranged from −0.050 to 0.107 log10 copies/mL across all assay comparisons. The OPA between pairs of assays ranged from 94.8 to 98.1% at the 50 copies/mL cutoff, and improved to a range of 97.6–99.0% at the 200 copies/mL cutoff. At the 1000 copies/mL cutoff, OPA between assays was 98.5–99.0%. ConclusionsThe cobas HIV-1 assay is highly sensitive, accurate and suitable for use in clinical practice.

Performance of Affinity-Improved DARPin Targeting HIV Capsid Domain in Interference of Viral Progeny Production.

Previously, a designed ankyrin repeat protein, AnkGAG1D4, was generated for intracellular targeting of the HIV-1 capsid domain. The efficiency was satisfactory in interfering with the HIV assembly process. Consequently, improved AnkGAG1D4 binding affinity was introduced by substituting tyrosine (Y) for serine (S) at position 45. However, the intracellular anti-HIV-1 activity of AnkGAG1D4-S45Y has not yet been validated. In this study, the performance of AnkGAG1D4 and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y in inhibiting wild-type HIV-1 and HIV-1 maturation inhibitor-resistant replication in SupT1 cells was evaluated. HIV-1 p24 and viral load assays were used to verify the biological activity of AnkGAG1D4 and AnkGAG1D4-S45Y as assembly inhibitors. In addition, retardation of syncytium formation in infected SupT1 cells was observed. Of note, the defense mechanism of both ankyrins did not induce the mutation of target amino acids in the capsid domain. The present data show that the potency of AnkGAG1D4-S45Y was superior to AnkGAG1D4 in interrupting either HIV-1 wild-type or the HIV maturation inhibitor-resistant strain.

Predicting, Diagnosing, and Treating Acute and Early HIV Infection in a Public Sector Facility in Eswatini.

The lack of acute and early HIV infection (AEHI) diagnosis and care contributes to high HIV incidence in resource-limited settings. We aimed to assess the yield of AEHI, predict and diagnose AEHI, and describe AEHI care outcomes in a public sector setting in Eswatini. This study was conducted in Nhlangano outpatient department from March 2019 to March 2020. Adults at risk of AEHI underwent diagnostic testing for AEHI with the quantitative Xpert HIV-1 viral load (VL) assay. AEHI was defined as the detection of HIV-1 VL on Xpert and either an HIV-seronegative or HIV-serodiscordant third-generation antibody-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT) result. First, the cross-sectional analysis obtained the yield of AEHI and established a predictor risk score for the prediction of AEHI using Lasso logistic regression. Second, diagnostic accuracy statistics described the ability of the fourth-generation antibody/p24 antigen-based Alere HIV-Combo RDT to diagnose AEHI (vs Xpert VL testing). Third, we described acute HIV infection care outcomes of AEHI-positive patients using survival analysis. Of 795 HIV-seronegative/HIV-serodiscordant outpatients recruited, 30 (3.8%, 95% confidence interval: 2.6% to 5.3%) had AEHI. The predictor risk score contained several factors (HIV-serodiscordant RDT, women, feeling at risk of HIV, swollen glands, and fatigue) and had sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 65.8%, respectively, to predict AEHI. The HIV-Combo RDT had sensitivity and specificity of 86.2% and 99.9%, respectively, to diagnose AEHI. Of 30 AEHI-positive patients, the 1-month cumulative treatment initiation was 74% (95% confidence interval: 57% to 88%), and the 3-month viral suppression (<1000 copies/mL) was 87% (67% to 98%). AEHI diagnosis and care seem possible in resource-limited settings.

A high prevalence of potential HIV elite controllers identified over 30 years in Democratic Republic of Congo

BackgroundIn-depth analysis of the HIV pandemic at its epicenter in the Congo basin has been hampered by 40 years of political unrest and lack of functional public health infrastructure. In recent surveillance studies (2017-18), we found that the prevalence of HIV in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (11%) far exceeded previous estimates.Methods10,457 participants were screened in Kinshasa with rapid tests from 2017-2019. Individuals confirmed as reactive by the Abbott ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay (n=1968) were measured by the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 viral load assay. Follow up characterization of samples was performed with alternate manufacturer viral load assays, qPCR for additional blood borne viruses, unbiased next generation sequencing, and HIV Western blotting.FindingsOur data suggested the existence of a significant cohort (n=429) of HIV antibody positive/viral load negative individuals. We systematically eliminated collection site bias, sample integrity, and viral genetic diversity as alternative explanations for undetectable viral loads. Mass spectroscopy unexpectedly detected the presence of 3TC antiviral medication in approximately 60% of those tested (209/354), and negative Western blot results indicated false positive serology in 12% (49/404). From the remaining Western blot positives (n=53) and indeterminates (n=31) with reactive Combo and rapid test results, we estimate 2.7-4.3% of infections in DRC to be potential elite controllers. We also analyzed samples from the DRC collected in 1987 and 2001-03, when antiretroviral drugs were not available, and found similarly elevated trends.InterpretationViral suppression to undetectable viral loads without therapy occurs infrequently in HIV-1 infected patients around the world. Mining of global data suggests a unique ability to control HIV infection arose early in central Africa and occurs in <1% of founder populations. Identification of this group of elite controllers presents a unique opportunity to study potentially novel genetic mechanisms of viral suppression.FundingAbbott Laboratories funded surveillance in DRC and subsequent research efforts. Additional funding was received from a MIZZOU Award from the University of Missouri. Research was supported in part by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH.

The Development of a Standardized Quality Assessment Material to Support Xpert® HIV-1 Viral Load Testing for ART Monitoring in South Africa.

The tiered laboratory framework for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load monitoring accommodates a range of HIV viral load testing platforms, with quality assessment critical to ensure quality patient testing. HIV plasma viral load testing is challenged by the instability of viral RNA. An approach using an RNA stabilizing buffer is described for the Xpert® HIV-1 Viral Load (Cepheid) assay and was tested in remote laboratories in South Africa. Plasma panels with known HIV viral titres were prepared in PrimeStore molecular transport medium for per-module verification and per-instrument external quality assessment. The panels were transported at ambient temperatures to 13 testing laboratories during 2017 and 2018, tested according to standard procedures and uploaded to a web portal for analysis. A total of 275 quality assessment specimens (57 verification panels and two EQA cycles) were tested. All participating laboratories met study verification criteria (n = 171 specimens) with an overall concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) of 0.997 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.996 to 0.998) and a mean bias of −0.019 log copies per milliliter (cp/mL) (95% CI: −0.044 to 0.063). The overall EQA ρc (n = 104 specimens) was 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998 to 0.999), with a mean bias of 0.03 log cp/mL (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.05). These panels are suitable for use in quality monitoring of Xpert® HIV-1 VL and are applicable to laboratories in remote settings.

Utility of CD4 Cell Count and Viral Load Assay in Hospitalized Patients with Known HIV Infection: High Value Care Exercise.

Healthcare spending as a percentage of Gross domestic product (GDP) is at all-time high and continues to rise in the United States. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimate that 33% of resources spent on healthcare goes to waste. As part of a 'high value care' exercise, we studied if estimating CD4 cell counts and HIV viral load in hospitalized patients with a known diagnosis of HIV led to any meaningful change in HAART regimen and discharge diagnosis. Retrospective chart review for all patients admitted with a known diagnosis of HIV from January 1, through December 31, 2017. A total of 83 patient encounters were reviewed during the period. The mean age was 54.1 ± 16.4 years, 64.1 % of patients were males. 75 patients (90.3%) were already on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 3 days (IQR 2.0 - 5.0). The mean turnaround time for CD4 counts and HIV viral load assay was 2.9 days (95% CI 2.1 - 3.7) and 3.9 days (95% CI, 3.2 - 4.6), respectively. A CD4 count estimation led to no change in HAART regimen. HIV viral load assay testing had no impact on a change in treatment or a change in diagnosis. In our study, testing CD4 counts and HIV viral load for inpatients did not confer any benefit in altering the diagnosis or HAART regimen. We believe that our study identifies a systems level opportunity to add to the concept of 'Choosing Wisely.'

Validation of Dried Tube Sample Format Quality Controls for the Monitoring of Viral Load and Blood Screening Assays

HIV viral load (VL) and donor screening assays experience variation and require quaity assurance (QA). NRL sought to confirm a dried tube sample format (HIVDTS) sample type for use in quality control (QC) programs for HIV molecular testing.50 μL of HIV supernatant at 1 × 105 copies per millilitre (copies/mL)) was dried for 48 hours at room temperature. Post-production and shipped integrity studies were undertaken. Dried HIVDTS was reconstituted in PBS buffer and tested in HIV VL (six participants) or blood screening assays (four participants). Results were entered into NRL’s QC monitoring software (EDCNet™) for analysis.The mean of 224 VL results when HIVDTS QCs were tested in Biocentric HIV GENERIC Charge Virale assay was 4.54 log10 copies/mL, with the percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) ranging from 1.75 to 13.20%. The mean Ct value for HIVDTS QCs tested on Roche Cobas MPX assay results was 28.71 (range 28.33 to 29.14), with CV% ranging from 1.56 to 3.98%.The study confirms HIVDTS QCs can effectively monitor the performance of HIV molecular testing and offers a cheaper alternative to commercial QC samples that require cold-chain shipping on dry ice and UN3373 conditions.

Performance of a high-throughput next-generation sequencing method for analysis of HIV drug resistance and viral load.

To evaluate the performance of a high-throughput research assay for HIV drug resistance testing based on whole genome next-generation sequencing (NGS) that also quantifies HIV viral load. Plasma samples (n = 145) were obtained from HIV-positive MSM (HPTN 078). Samples were analysed using clinical assays (the ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System and the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Viral Load assay) and a research assay based on whole-genome NGS (veSEQ-HIV). HIV protease and reverse transcriptase sequences (n = 142) and integrase sequences (n = 138) were obtained using ViroSeq. Sequences from all three regions were obtained for 100 (70.4%) of the 142 samples using veSEQ-HIV; results were obtained more frequently for samples with higher viral loads (93.5% for 93 samples with >5000 copies/mL; 50.0% for 26 samples with 1000-5000 copies/mL; 0% for 23 samples with <1000 copies/mL). For samples with results from both methods, drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were detected in 33 samples using ViroSeq and 42 samples using veSEQ-HIV (detection threshold: 5.0%). Overall, 146 major DRMs were detected; 107 were detected by both methods, 37 were detected by veSEQ-HIV only (frequency range: 5.0%-30.6%) and two were detected by ViroSeq only. HIV viral loads estimated by veSEQ-HIV strongly correlated with results from the Abbott RealTime Viral Load assay (R2 = 0.85; n = 142). The NGS-based veSEQ-HIV method provided results for most samples with higher viral loads, was accurate for detecting major DRMs, and detected mutations at lower levels compared with a method based on population sequencing. The veSEQ-HIV method also provided HIV viral load data.

Multicenter evaluation of Xpert HIV-1 viral load assay for HIV quantification in China.

New approaches to increase HIV-1 testing and HIV-1 viral load (VL) monitoring are needed for people living with HIV (PLHIV) in China. The Xpert HIV-1 VL assay was prequalified by the World Health Organization in 2017 but has not been evaluated in China. A multicenter evaluation was conducted to assess the accuracy of the Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 VL assay compared to the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay in China.Overall agreement was seen in 558 of 562 specimens (99.29%) with a κ value of 0.962. Pearson's coefficient between the two assays was 0.943. Analyzed by the Bland-Altman method, the mean bias was -0.54 log10 copies/mL, and 94.05% results fell within the 95% confidence limit of agreement (-1.248 to 0.168 log10 copies/mL). The coefficient of variation of the Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 VL assay ranged from 0.61% to 1.55%, as determined by testing eight positive plasma specimens with three different lots on different days. Due to its simplicity, random-access, rapid turnaround time, and accuracy, the Xpert HIV-1 VL assay can be used in local hospitals and clinics that bear the burden of identifying and treating HIV patients in China.

Performance Comparison of Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load Assay and Roche Taqman and Abbott M2000 RT in Bamako, Mali.

Routine monitoring of HIV-1 Viral Load (VL) is important in patients on Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) management. Access to HIV VL remains a challenge in resource-limited settings, especially in rural areas. Universal access to VL requires more simplified and less restrictive alternatives to current conventional VL methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the new rapid (2-hour turnaround time) Xpert HIV-1VL technique compared to Roche TaqMan and Abbott RT m2000 for HIV-1 RNA quantification in HIV- infected patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study in patients seen for routine VL monitoring between August and November 2018 in a HIV care site in Bamako. The performance of the Xpert HIV-1 VL assay was evaluated against the Roche TaqMan assay and Abbott m2000 RT assay. Performance, utility and reliability/reproducibility were verified using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR), Kappa coefficient, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis. The Xpert assay compared well with the two current referral assays (Roche TaqMan and Abbott m2000 RT assays). Compared to Roche TaqMan assay the sensitivity was 93.10%, specificity (97.01%) and accuracy (95.20%), the correlation coefficient of Pearson (r) was 0.98 (p <0.01). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.18 log10 cp/mL; (Standard Deviation) SD=0.33. Compared to the Abbott m2000 RT, the sensitivity, the specificity and the accuracy were respectively 93.44%; 92% and 92.65%. The Xpert HIV-1 VL assay showed a good correlation with a correlation coefficient of Pearson, r=0.99 (p <0.001). The overall mean difference in the HIV-1 VL values obtained by Xpert HIV-1 VL and Abbott m2000 RT assays was 0.08 log10 cp/mL; SD=0.30. Xpert HIV-1 VL showed a good performance compared to Roche TaqMan and Abbott m2000 RT. With the rapid test results (less than 2 h) and ease of testing individual specimens, the Xpert HIV-1 VL assay could be an effective alternative for HIV VL monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Performance evaluation of the Aptima HIV-1 RNA Quant assay on the Panther system using the standard and dilution protocols.

Currently, FDA-approved HIV-1 viral load (VL) assays use venipuncture-derived plasma. The Hologic Panther system uses 0.7 mL total volume for the Aptima HIV-1 Quant Assay standard (APT-Quant-std) and dilution (APT-Quant-dil) protocols. However, smaller plasma volumes from fingerstick whole blood (FSB) collected in EDTA-microtainer tubes (MCT) could provide an easier sample collection method for HIV-1 VL testing. To evaluate the performance of the APT-Quant-std compared to the Roche CAP/CTM and Abbott m2000RT VL assays and an alternative APTQuant 1:7 dilution protocol, the latter using 100 μL of MCT-derived plasma from FSB. Linearity was determined using commercial HIV-1 RNA plasma controls. Dilutions ranging 1.56-2.95 log10 copies/mL were prepared to determine the APT-Quant-dil Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) using Probit analysis. Specificity of APT-Quant-std was calculated using 326 HIVnegative samples. To evaluate agreement, 329 plasma specimens were tested with APT-Quant-std, CAP/CTM, and m2000RT. Forty-seven matched venipuncture and MCT-derived plasma specimens were tested with APT-Quant-std and APT-Quant-dil. Among the RNA controls, specificity was 99.69 % for APT-Quant-std. The R2 values were 0.988 (APT-Quant-std/CAP/CTM), 0.980 (APT-Quant-std/ m2000RT), and 0.997 (APT-Quant-std/APT-Quant-dil). The APT-Quant-dil LOQ was estimated at 2.7 log10 copies/mL (500 copies/mL) (95 %CI 2.62-2.87). At 2.3 log10 copies/mL (200 copies/mL), the overall agreement was 91.0 % for APT-Quant-std/CAP/CTM, 85.7 % for APT-Quant-std/m2000RT, and 82.9 % for APT-Quant-std/APT-Quant-dil. Quantified APT-Quant-std results were on average 0.2 log10 copies/mL higher than CAP/CTM and m2000RT and 0.14 log10 copies/mL higher than APT-Quant-dil. APT-Quant showed similar performance compared to the CAP/CTM and m2000RT assays and remains sensitive and accurate using the dilution protocol.

The performance of a new point-of-care HIV virus load technology to identify patients failing antiretroviral treatment

BackgroundA new point-of-care (POC) HIV virus load technology has been recently developed and designed to be utilized in decentralized settings. Alere Technologies GmbH*, Germany, developed the mPIMA HIV-1/2 VL plasma test which uses real time PCR technology with 50 μl and a turnaround time of one hour. ObjectiveAnalyze the performance of mPIMA to detect and quantify HIV-1 and HIV-2 and compare with Abbott M2000 assay fooling patients HIV-1 failing ARV therapy. Study designIn this study we evaluate the mPIMA HIV-1/2 VL plasma test using 413 specimens from 270 patients failing ARV therapy, and compared its performance with Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Viral Load assay on the m2000 system. In addition, were determined VL in plasma specimens obtained from HIV-2 infected patients. ResultsThe results strongly indicate that mPIMA HIV-1/2 VL plasma test can determine HIV-1 with concordance of 88.9 % (95 % CI 85.4–91.7) the reference test when 1000 HIV-1 VL threshold was used as WHO cutoff to identify therapy failure. The overall correlation between HIV-1 VL was 0928 (Pearson correlation coefficient of Linear regression) and the Bland-Altman showed a mean difference of -0.20 Log cp/mL between the two technology. mPIMA HIV-1/2 VL plasma test was also able to measure HIV-2 viral load in 16 specimens from Guinea-Bissau HIV-1/HIV-2 positive samples. ConclusionsThese data support the use of mPIMA HIV-1/2 VL plasma test to follow up patients and select patients failing ART, guiding immediate clinical decisions such as adherence counseling or ART regimen switch during the patient consultation.

Performance and usability of Cepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay in Kenya.

BackgroundIn Kenya, access to early infant diagnosis and viral load monitoring services for HIV patients on ART is significantly hampered by sample transportation challenges and long turnaround times. Near patient care testing technologies have the potential to obviate such constraints. The Cepheid GeneXpert was launched in 2010 as a TB assay and in 2014 as a potential point of care HIV viral load assay. Whereas it is widely is used for TB in Kenya, its utility for HIV testing has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo investigate the performance and usability characteristics of the GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay.MethodsThis was a cross sectional study among 911 HIV Exposed infants and 310 HIV positive adults. Existing machines used for routine TB diagnosis were used in this study. The diagnostic accuracy of the qualitative assay was assessed using Roche CAP/CTM while the quantitative assay was assessed using with Abbott m2000 as the reference assays respectively. Statistical analysis was done using Stata/MP Version 14 for Mac. Concordance values and misclassification were calculated at the clinical cutoff of 1000 cp/ml.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative assay were 99.23% (95% CI 97.24–99.90%), 98.91% (95% CI 97.76–99.55%) and 99.00% respectively. For the quantitative assay, they were 92.50% (95% CI 79.61–98.43%), 100.00% and 97.00% respectively. All 30 (100%) users reported that the GeneXpert machine was easy to use, workflow was simple and TB diagnosis was not negatively affected. In our hands, the median turn-around time for an individual qualitative and quantitative test was 90 minutes. A total of 58 (4.34%) errors and 28 (2.10%) invalid outcomes were experienced; 44 (3.29%) tests did not run to completion due to power outages.ConclusionGeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay is an accurate test for the diagnosis of HIV in infants and for viral load monitoring. At the point of care, the GeneXpert machine’s simple work flow, ease of use and short test turnaround time present the potential to improve access to HIV testing and viral load monitoring. To integrate HIV diagnosis into the existing GeneXpert platforms for TB Diagnosis, there is need to scale up the infrastructure and to change the way work is done.