History Of Severe Allergic Reactions Research Articles

Research progress on desensitization of recurrent hypersen-sitivity reaction to iodinated contrast media.

Desensitization therapy for iodinated contrast media (ICM) aims to induce drug tolerance in patients with a history of severe allergic reactions to ICM in a short time. There is no widely accepted consensus on inducing desensitization to avoid severe allergic responses to ICM currently. The clinically successful cases have shown that the prophylactic use of antihistamines and glucocorticoids can increase the desensitization effect; and repeatedly desensitizing and gradually increasing the dose can be conducive to establishing better tolerance to ICM. Most desensitization effects, including stress resistance, can endure 24-48 h. The mechanisms of desensitization therapy remain unclear, the initial dose, administration interval, and dose gradient are largely base on clinical experiences and the reaction of patients. This article reviews the current research progress on the ICM-related allergies, desensitization methods and related mechanisms, as well as the benefits and hazards of desensitization, to provide a reference for diagnosis and desensitization treatment of hypersensitivity to ICM .

Barriers to COVID-19 vaccine surveillance: the issue of under-reporting adverse events.

This study investigated the reporting rates of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) to the spontaneous reporting system (SRS) and its predictors among individuals with AEFIs after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted from December 2, 2021 to December 20, 2021, recruiting participants >14 days after completion of a primary COVID-19 vaccination series. Reporting rates were calculated by dividing the number of participants who reported AEFIs to the SRS by the total number of participants who experienced AEFIs. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariate logistic regression to determine factors associated with spontaneous AEFIs reporting. Among 2,993 participants, 90.9% and 88.7% experienced AEFIs after the first and second vaccine doses, respectively (reporting rates, 11.6 and 12.7%). Furthermore, 3.3% and 4.2% suffered moderate to severe AEFIs, respectively (reporting rates, 50.5 and 50.0%). Spontaneous reporting was more prevalent in female (aOR, 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31 to 1.81); those with moderate to severe AEFIs (aOR, 5.47; 95% CI, 4.45 to 6.73), comorbidities (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.57), a history of severe allergic reactions (aOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.47 to 2.77); and those who had received mRNA-1273 (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.49) or ChAdOx1 (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.30) vaccines versus BNT162b2. Reporting was less likely in older individuals (aOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99 per 1-year age increment). Spontaneous reporting of AEFIs after COVID-19 vaccination was associated with younger age, female sex, moderate to severe AEFIs, comorbidities, history of allergic reactions, and vaccine type. AEFIs under-reporting should be considered when delivering information to the community and in public health decision-making.

Clinical Signs and Medical History as Predictors of Enalapril-Associated Dry Cough in Cardiovascular Patients

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are among the most prescribed and effective medicinal products for the treatment of several cardiovascular diseases. According to a number of studies, 30% of patients taking ACEIs develop adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and treatment discontinuation is often required as a result. The most common ADR associated with ACEIs is a dry (non-productive) cough. Nevertheless, the clinical signs and medical history predictive of this ADR in cardiovascular patients are still understudied.The aim of the study was to analyse the clinical signs and medical history predictive of cough in patients with cardiovascular conditions treated with enalapril.Materials and methods. The study was carried out in 2019–2022 and enrolled 224 patients with essential hypertension (grades 2 and 3) treated with enalapril at a dose of 10–20 mg/day. The patients were assigned to 2 groups: Group 1 included 113 patients with enalapril-associated cough, while Group 2 (control group) comprised 104 patients without this ADR. At screening, all the patients underwent a general examination and a check of their allergy and medication history. Using the data obtained, the authors analysed the association of the clinical signs and medical history with the ADR of interest (dry cough).Results. In contrast to the control group, the group with ACEI-associated dry cough included more patients with a history of drug-induced toxicoderma (OR=5.639, CI 2.234–14.236, χ2=15.845, and p<0.001) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR=3.409, CI 1.461–7.953, χ2=8.7472, and p<0.01), a family history of bronchial asthma (OR=4.141, CI 2.066–8.299, χ2=17.417, and p<0.001), and a close family history of severe allergic reactions (OR=3.714, CI 1.720– 8.018, χ2=12.137, and p<0.001).Conclusions. A family history of allergy increases the probability of dry cough in patients taking ACEIs. In order to improve the safety of ACEI therapy, patients with cardiovascular conditions should be asked more detailed questions about their personal or first-degree family history of allergy.

Heart Rate Variability in Subjects with Severe Allergic Background Undergoing COVID-19 Vaccination

Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is the world's most important strategy for stopping the pandemic. Vaccination challenges the body's immune response and can be complicated by hypersensitivity reactions. The autonomic nervous system can modulate the inflammatory immune response, therefore constituting a potential marker to characterize individuals at high risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Autonomic nervous system functionality was assessed through measurement of the heart rate variability (HRV) in subjects with a history of severe allergic reactions and 12 control subjects. HRV parameters included the mean electrocardiograph RR interval and the standard deviation of all normal R-R intervals (SDNN). All measurements were performed immediately before the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The median RR variability was lower in the study than in the control group: 687 ms (645-759) vs. 821 ms (759-902); p = 0.02. The SDNN was lower in the study group than in the control group: 32 ms (23-36) vs. 50 ms (43-55); p < 0.01. No correlation was found between age and the SDNN. Autonomic nervous system activity is unbalanced in people with a severe allergy background.

COVID-19 VACCINE ADMINISTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH FIRST-DOSE ADVERSE REACTIONS OR HISTORY OF SEVERE ALLERGIC REACTION

<h3>Introduction</h3> The COVID-19 pandemic has claimed over 6 million lives from 2020 onward. Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are one of our best tools in preventing severe illness and mortality. There have been multiple reactions reported to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine that initially precluded further revaccinations, making protection against the virus incomplete. Our study aimed to identify true SARS-CoV-2 vaccine reactions, underlying patient risk factors, and to confirm the safety of our vaccine challenge protocol for revaccination. <h3>Methods</h3> Patients with reported adverse first-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine reactions precluding second dose, or those with history of severe allergic reaction were given a graded vaccine challenge of an initial 10% dose, observed for 30 minutes, with advancement to the 90% dose if no concerning reaction. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 50 patients enrolled, 49/50 (98%) were able to obtain the full vaccine dose. 8 (16%) of patients had a first dose reaction concerning for delayed hypersensitivity, and 7/8 of those patients tolerated the full repeat vaccine dose. 42 (84%) patients had history of immediate reaction to the first dose of the vaccine and all tolerated the full dose via challenge protocol. 1/50 patients needed epinephrine, but was able to fully obtain the dose with outpatient treatment during the course, and subsequent revaccination. <h3>Conclusion</h3> In a monitored setting, this challenge protocol is safe and effective for patients with history of adverse reaction to the vaccine or an underlying history of severe allergic reaction that would traditionally preclude repeat vaccination. The mechanism and pathophysiology of these reactions need to be elucidated through further research.

Risk of Adverse Events of Live-Attenuated COVID-19 Vaccination Among Atopic Patients.

Atopic patients have more risk of adverse drug reactions. COVID-19 vaccination is very important in the current situation. We still do not have data about risks of adverse effects from vaccine in atopic patients. The goal of our study was to evaluate atopic risks and adverse effects of live-attenuated Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination. Data was collected using a prospective descriptive cohort study from participants 18 years old and above who came to the Outpatient Department, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center for live-attenuated COVID-19 vaccination between March and December 2021. The sample size was 3016 individuals. The information about adverse reactions at 6, 2, 72 hours and 7.30 and 60 days after each live-attenuated Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination was collected by telephone. Participants with history of severe allergic reaction to vaccine components were excluded. There were 732 atopic patients and 2284 non-atopic patients. Atopic patients included 556 with allergic rhinitis, 83 with asthma, 23 with urticaria and 73 with food allergies. The underlying diseases of hypertension, hyperlipidemia and hyperthyroidism were more common in non-allergic patients, with p-value <0.001, <0.001 and 0.042, respectively. Atopic patients developed significantly more fever, nausea and vomiting, skin rash (urticaria), and local reaction than non-atopic patients, with p-values of <0.001, 0.018, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively. Atopic patients had more risk of adverse reactions to live-attenuated Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination. No life-threatening adverse reaction was seen. Physicians should screen atopic risks in people who are getting vaccinated. Atopic patients should be knowledgeable about their risk and how to monitor clinical reactions by themselves.

Allergic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccination in High-Risk Allergic Patients: The Experience of Trieste University Hospital (North-Eastern Italy).

Background. Allergic patients may develop reactions following COVID-19 vaccination more frequently than non-allergic individuals. The aim of our study was to assess the risk of reactions in high-risk allergic patients vaccinated for COVID-19 at the University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI) of Trieste (northeastern Italy). Methods. Patients were considered at high risk for allergic reactions in case of: prior anaphylactic reaction to any drug/vaccine; multiple drug allergy; intolerance to polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate 80 (PS80) containing drugs; and mast cell disorders. High-risk allergic patients were immunized in hospital by a dedicated allergy team supported by resuscitation staff. Patients were interviewed over the phone one month after vaccination to complete a structured questionnaire investigating signs and symptoms developed after immunization. Results. From March 2021 to February 2022, 269 patients with a history of severe allergic reactions were assessed, of whom 208 (77.3%) eventually received COVID-19 vaccination, 50 (18.6%) refused to be immunized, 10 (3.7%) were deferred for medical reasons and one was declared exempted due to testing positive for PS80. Mild reactions (urticaria, angioedema, rhinitis, erythema) to COVID-19 vaccines were reported by 30.3% of patients, 8.7% within 4 h and 21.6% > 4 h after immunization. No anaphylactic events were observed. Although they were 80 times (3.8%) more prevalent than in COVID-19 vaccinees from the general population (0.047%), vaccine allergic reactions in high-risk patients were mainly mild and late, more likely affecting women (OR = 3.05; 95% CI 1.22–7.65). Conclusions. High-risk allergic patients with urticaria and angioedema may experience mild flare-ups of mast cell activation-like symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination, supporting antihistamine premedication before vaccination and to be continued for one week afterwards.

Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2022-2023.

This technical report accompanies the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the routine use of influenza vaccine and antiviral medications in the prevention and treatment of influenza in children during the 2022 to 2023 season. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends annual influenza vaccination of all children without medical contraindications starting at 6 months of age. Influenza vaccination is an important strategy for protecting children and the broader community as well as reducing the overall burden of respiratory illnesses when other viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2, are cocirculating. This technical report summarizes recent influenza seasons, morbidity and mortality in children, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccination coverage, and provides detailed guidance on storage, administration, and implementation. The report also provides a brief background on inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccine recommendations, vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding, diagnostic testing, and antiviral medications for treatment and chemoprophylaxis. Updated information is provided about the 2021 to 2022 influenza season, influenza immunization rates, the effectiveness of influenza vaccination on hospitalization and mortality, available vaccines, guidance for patients with history of severe allergic reactions to prior influenza vaccinations, and strategies to promote vaccine uptake.

Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule, United States, 2022.

Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule, United States, 2022.

Increasing SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Counseling by Fellows in the Allergy Clinic

Soon after the rollout of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in December 2020, allergic reactions after vaccination were reported, prompting public alarm. In some localities, mRNA vaccines were initially contraindicated in individuals with history of severe allergic reactions. Consequently, many patients with existing allergic conditions raised concerns about their candidacy for vaccination and sought provider counseling.

COVID-19 Vaccination in Pediatric Patients with History of Allergic Reactions

Severe allergic reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are rare. In May 2021, the FDA expanded emergency use authorization of a mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 12-15 years old. Contraindications to vaccination include history of severe allergic reaction to prior mRNA COVID-19 vaccine or vaccine component. Precautions include immediate allergic reaction to any other vaccine or polysorbate. Based on limited data, we expect that most pediatric patients with a history of allergic reaction to vaccines, polyethylene glycol (PEG), or polysorbate will tolerate mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

The study of COVID-19 infection following vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis

BackgroundAt this time vaccination against SARS-CoV2 is a global priority. Cases with multiple sclerosis (MS) were among the first vaccinated populations in Iran. We evaluated the change in the frequency of COVID-19 after vaccination and the associated factors with severe COVID-19 infection before and after full vaccination. MethodsA questionnaire was validated to investigate the basic characteristics (age, gender, education, body mass index, smoking status, and comorbidities), MS disease and treatment status (MS type, MS duration, The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), disease modifying treatments) and the information about COVID-19 infection and severity. Results692 (91.9%) of participants have received both doses of vaccines, of which Sinopharm appeared to be the most common type. Significant difference of COVID-19 infection prevalence was seen before vaccination and after full vaccination (difference: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.12–0.20) (p value < 0.001). The difference was not significant for severe cases (those who were admitted in the ward or ICU) relative to the COVID-19 cases or the whole participants. Of all the basic and disease factors, only EDSS showed a significant association with severe COVID-19 before vaccination. Severe COVID-19 in fully vaccinated cases did not show any significant relation to any of basic or disease characteristics except with prior history of severe allergic reactions (OR: 17.1, p value: 0.001). DiscussionThe decreased frequency of infection with SARS-CoV2 was predictable but the insignificant difference in cases with the severe forms of the disease raise concern. The only significant predictor was found to be severe allergic reactions. As there are debates on antiCD20 s association with severe COVID-19 and vaccine efficacy, we could not find such significant relation. The other noticeable point about the found relation of EDSS and critical COVID-19 before vaccination is the absence of such relation after full vaccination.

M044 POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL ALLERGY TESTING AN ADOLESCENT WITH ANAPHYLAXIS TO PEG-ASPARAGINASE BEFORE ADMINISTERING PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in the deaths of millions of people worldwide. The current mechanism of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine allergy and the causative antigen is not known. The FDA Emergency Use Authorization for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine recommends against administration in those with a history of severe allergic reaction to components of the vaccine. We present a patient with previous anaphylactic reaction to PEG-asparaginase who successfully received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine in Children

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine in Children

Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2021–22 Influenza Season

Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2021–22 Influenza Season

Patch testing: Uses, systems, risks/benefits, and its role in managing the patient with contact dermatitis

Patch testing is the gold standard diagnostic tool for cell-mediated type IV hypersensitivity reactions like allergic contact dermatitis. Sensitized individuals have primed antigen-specific T lymphocytes that cause a reaction when antigens are applied to the skin owing to prior sensitization. Patch testing can be used in the adult and pediatric populations, but it is contraindicated in patients with a known history of severe allergic reactions to suspected allergens, generalized active dermatitis, or extensive eczema. Patch test systems can be a comprehensive panel (70-80 allergens), but they can also be targeted and limited to a more common allergen series (35 allergens). The decision for allergen selection should be based on an accurate patient history, physical examination, and availability of allergens. Measurement and interpretation of the test results requires training and experience, as well as consideration of relevance and clinical history. Patch testing is generally considered safe with just a few known complications: excited skin syndrome, active sensitization, and rarely anaphylaxis or other cutaneous complications. Appropriately pretesting patient education can help to mitigate some of these complications. Based on patch testing results, patients should be educated regarding proper allergen avoidance measures to resolve symptoms of allergic contact dermatitis.

Use of Ebola Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2020.

SummaryThis report summarizes the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of the rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP Ebola vaccine (Ervebo) in the United States. The vaccine contains rice-derived recombinant human serum albumin and live attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) in which the gene encoding the glycoprotein of VSV was replaced with the gene encoding the glycoprotein of Ebola virus species Zaire ebolavirus. Persons with a history of severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to rice protein should not receive Ervebo. This is the first and only vaccine currently licensed by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of Ebola virus disease (EVD). These guidelines will be updated based on availability of new data or as new vaccines are licensed to protect against EVD.ACIP recommends preexposure vaccination with Ervebo for adults aged ≥18 years in the U.S. population who are at highest risk for potential occupational exposure to Ebola virus species Zaire ebolavirus because they are responding to an outbreak of EVD, work as health care personnel at federally designated Ebola treatment centers in the United States, or work as laboratorians or other staff at biosafety level 4 facilities in the United States. Recommendations for use of Ervebo in additional populations at risk for exposure and other settings will be considered and discussed by ACIP in the future.

COVID-19 Vaccine-associated Anaphylaxis and Allergic Reactions: Consensus Statements of the KAAACI Urticaria/Angioedema/Anaphylaxis Working Group.

In the era of novel coronavirus epidemics, vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been recognized as the most effective public health interventions to control the pandemic. An adverse event following immunization (AEFI) is defined as any untoward occurrence following immunization, and the majority of AEFIs are caused by protective immune responses stimulated by vaccines. Most of the reported AEFIs are not serious, and many are not immunologically mediated or even reproducible on re-exposure. However, uncommon severe allergic adverse reactions, such as anaphylaxis or other allergic reactions, can occur after vaccinations. Confirmed allergic reactions to vaccines may be caused by residual non-human protein, preservatives, or stabilizers in the vaccine formulation (also known as excipients). There are 2 main potential allergenic/immunogenic excipients in COVID-19 vaccines, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polysorbate 80. PEG, also known as macrogol, is an ingredient in various laxatives and injectable formulations, such as depot steroids. Polysorbate 80 is present in various medical products, creams, ointments, lotions, and medication tablets. Contraindications to the administration of COVID-19 vaccines include a previous history of severe allergic reactions to the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine or proven hypersensitivity to a vaccine component, such as PEG or polysorbate 80. Anaphylaxis or other allergic reactions following immunization can cause fear and loss of confidence in the safety of vaccines among the public. A better understanding of these events is thought to help alleviate concerns about the current COVID-19 vaccines and provide reassurance to the general population by analyzing the exact incidence of anaphylaxis and potential risk factors. COVID-19 vaccine-associated anaphylaxis could be prevented and managed by risk stratification based on our local and global experience.

Dental extraction in congenital factor Vll deficiency with inhibitor – a case report

Abstract Background Hereditary factor VII (FVII) deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder with autosomal recessive inheritance, and FVII deficiency with an inhibitor is extremely rare. There is sparse information in the literature on the management of tooth extraction in patients with FVII deficiency and an inhibitor. Case description We report the case of a five-year-old child with FVII deficiency and an inhibitor who underwent dental extraction. The child had had multiple bleeding episodes including intracranial haemorrhage and had a history of severe allergic reaction to the infusion of recombinant FVII. The tooth was extracted using lignocaine gel and the antifibrinolytic agent oral tranexamic acid. Conclusion The extraction of a deciduous tooth in a patient with FVII deficiency and an inhibitor was undertaken without bleeding complications. There are currently no guidelines regarding management of this type of case. Further studies and evidence are required so that management can be standardised.

Safety and immunogenicity of a mosquito saliva peptide-based vaccine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1 trial

In animal models, immunity to mosquito salivary proteins protects animals against mosquito-borne disease. These findings provide a rationale to vaccinate against mosquito saliva instead of the pathogen itself. To our knowledge, no vector salivary protein-based vaccine has been tested for safety and immunogenicity in humans. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of Anopheles gambiae saliva vaccine (AGS-v), a peptide-based vaccine derived from four A gambiae salivary proteins, in humans. In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1 trial, participants were enrolled at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD, USA. Participants were eligible if they were healthy adults, aged 18-50 years with no history of severe allergic reactions to mosquito bites. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using block randomisation and a computer-generated randomisation sequence, to treatment with either 200 nmol of AGS-v vaccine alone, 200 nmol of AGS-v with adjuvant (Montanide ISA 51), or sterile water as placebo. Participants and clinicians were masked to treatment assignment. Participants were given a subcutaneous injection of their allocated treatment at day 0 and day 21, followed by exposure to feeding by an uninfected Aedes aegypti mosquito at day 42 to assess subsequent risk to mosquito bites in a controlled setting. The primary endpoints were safety and immunogenicity at day 42 after the first immunisation. Participants who were given at least one dose of assigned treatment were assessed for the primary endpoints and analysis was by intention to treat. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03055000, and is closed for accrual. Between Feb 15 and Sept 10, 2017, we enrolled and randomly assigned 49 healthy adult participants to the adjuvanted vaccine (n=17), vaccine alone (n=16), or placebo group (n=16). Five participants did not complete the two-injection regimen with mosquito feeding at day 42, but were included in the safety analyses. No systemic safety concerns were identified; however, one participant in the adjuvanted vaccine group developed a grade 3 erythematous rash at the injection site. Pain, swelling, erythema, and itching were the most commonly reported local symptoms and were significantly increased in the adjuvanted vaccine group compared with both other treatment groups (nine [53%] of 17 participants in the adjuvanted vaccine group, two [13%] of 16 in the vaccine only group, and one [6%] of 16 in the placebo group; p=0·004). By day 42, participants who were given the adjuvanted vaccine had a significant increase in vaccine-specific total IgG antibodies compared with at baseline than did participants who were give vaccine only (absolute difference of log10-fold change of 0·64 [95% CI 0·39 to 0·89]; p=0·0002) and who were given placebo (0·62 [0·34 to 0·91]; p=0·0001). We saw a significant increase in IFN-γ production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells at day 42 in the adjuvanted vaccine group compared with in the placebo group (absolute difference of log10 ratio of vaccine peptide-stimulated vs negative control 0·17 [95% CI 0·061 to 0·27]; p=0·009) but we saw no difference between the IFN-γ production in the vaccine only group compared with the placebo group (0·022 [-0·072 to 0·116]; p=0·63). AGS-v was well tolerated, and, when adjuvanted, immunogenic. These findings suggest that vector-targeted vaccine administration in humans is safe and could be a viable option for the increasing burden of vector-borne disease. Office of the Director and the Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and National Institutes of Health.