Surrogate safety measures (SSM) are widely used in safety analysis. In addition to offering the advantages of being a proactive approach, it also addresses the limitations of historical crash data, including inaccuracies and unavailability. Most SSM studies focus particularly on tangents and intersections, but curve-specific analyses remain underexplored. This study aims to investigate whether SSM thresholds remain consistent across all types of curves or whether adjustments are necessary. After analyzing 5600 km of road network in Kerala, India, we observe that the curves in it can be classified into 19 well-defined clusters based on geometric and infrastructural attributes such as radius, length, sight distance, abutting land use, and number of access points. We extract trajectories using aerial videography in four selected curve clusters and use Anticipated Collision Time (ACT) for conflict analysis. We compare traffic conflicts estimated at various ACT values with actual crash counts across all four curve clusters to determine the SSM threshold. Observing differences in conflict-based and historic crash–based vulnerability rankings, we illustrate that different thresholds are warranted in different types of curves. We further present an optimization formulation to estimate these thresholds by comparing the relative vulnerability of curve clusters.
Read full abstract