Electrodeposition is a critical electrochemical reaction with broad applications in technology. This demands a comprehensive understanding of the electrochemical nucleation and growth process (EN&G), and the different factors driving the formation of a new phase on a given substrate. Our understanding of the role of the substrate and the real nature of active sites still remains elusive due to the challenge of probing specific sites and bringing a statistical interpretation of the nucleation process. Moreover, conventional macroscopic approaches often record electrochemical magnitudes over large areas (cm2) which are then correlated with surface characterizations obtained from a vastly different scale (~μm2), correlations, which are not necessarily representative of the macroscopic surface. In order to establish meaningful and unambiguous correlations, it becomes necessary to employ techniques capable of surveying the surface with a high spatial-temporal resolution, such as scanning probe techniques, capable of recovering information in a scale closer to the growth of the new phase, i.e., local scale1. To address these challenges, we employed Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy (SECCM), to study the EN&G of Cu on a glassy carbon substrate at a scale closer to the initial stages of the electrodeposition2. SECCM can be combined with other imaging methods such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to recover information from the deposited nanostructures at the same scale as the electrochemical response3. This so-called multimicroscopy approach allows us establishing direct correlations between the EN&G and the morphological, structural, and compositional features of the substrate and deposit. As a result, new insights that are not available with conventional macro-electrochemical analysis can be gained, such as the time-, potential-, and site-dependent nature of the EN&G process with a statistical perspective. This approach provides a new avenue for developing novel analysis strategies to understand the real nature of active sites for nucleation.References M. Bernal, D. Torres, S. S. Parapari, M. Čeh, K. Ž. Rožman, S. Šturm, and J. Ustarroz, Electrochim. Acta, 445, 142023 (2023).D. Torres, M. Bernal, A. Demaude, S. Hussain, L. Bar, P. Losada-Pérez, F. Reniers, and J. Ustarroz, J. Electrochem. Soc., 169, 102513 (2022).D. Torres, M. Bernal Lopez, and J. Ustarroz, Electrochemical nucleation and growth: A multimicroscopy Approach at the same scale, In preparation. (2023). Figure 1