A reduction in serum estradiol (E2) seen in GnRH-ant cycles has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. It is thought to be related to abnormal folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation. While some suggest luteinizing hormone supplementation improves clinical outcomes by maintaining E2, we evaluated the impact of additional follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and the timing of GnRH-ant on cycle stimulation in donor oocyte cycles. From 6/2000 to 4/2005, 93 initiated donor cycles resulting in 84 retrievals generated embryos for 123 recipient cycles (25 shared). All donors (27.0 ± 0.4 years (yr), ± standard error of the mean, range 19-36 yr) with normal day (d) 3 FSH (5.4 ± 0.3 mIU/mL) were placed on oral contraceptives for cycle synchronization. Following discontinuation, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was begun following d3 of recombinant FSH (225 to 300 IUqd). GnRH-ant (Antagon, Organon) was begun on cycle d6 of ovarian hyperstimulation (Group A) or when lead follicles were 13-14 mm in greatest diameter (Group B) with an additional 75 IU of FSH/d. When lead follicles reached >18-20 mm diameter, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (10,000 IU) was administered intramuscularly and transvaginal ultrasound guided aspiration was performed 36 hours later. All recipients (41.7 ± 0.6 yr, range 32-54 yr) were synchronized to the donors using GnRH-agonist down-regulation followed by estrogen and progesterone supplementation. Embryos were transferred transcervically 3 or 6 days post retrieval. Outcomes measured were days of stimulation (DOS), ampules (amp) used, E2 on d5 and day of hCG, oocytes retrieved, cancellation rates (CR), embryos transferred (ET), fertilization rates (FR), clinical and on-going pregnancy rates (PR) and implantation rates (IR). Categorical comparisons, analysis of variance and Bonferroni correction were used where appropriate. Two patterns of E2 were noted in A and B following GnRH-ant: a progressive rise in E2 (A1, n=22 and B1, n=26) or a decline in E2 (A2, n=21 and B2, n=24). B2 required significantly more FSH and DOS (45.7 ± 2.5 amp; 11.9 ±0.4 d) compared to A1 (35.3 ± 1.9 amp, 9.9 ± 0.3 d), A2 (41.2 ± 2.9 amp, 10.5 ± 0.3 d), and B1 (39.7 ± 2.2 amp, 11.2 ±0.4 d), p<0.006. No differences were seen in E2 on d5 of stimulation, but E2 on the day of hCG was lower in A2 (1256 ± 189 pg/mL) and B2 (1612 ± 239 pg/mL) compared to A1 (2154 ± 189 pg/mL) and B1 (2720 ± 289 pg/mL), p<0.006. No differences were seen with respect to CR and oocytes retrieved (A1: 0%, 21.5 ± 2.7; A2: 24%, 15.1 ±2.3; B1: 8%, 21.8 ± 2; B2 9%, 21.2 ± 2.5), p-NS. FR were similar with respect to the recipients for each group (A1 (n=30): 69% ± 4%; A2 (n=25): 80% ± 4%; B1 (n=34): 66% ± 5%; B2 (n=34) 68% ± 3%), p-NS. The number of ET was significantly less in B1 and B2 (2.7 ± .2 and 2.6 ± .2) compared to A1 and A2 (3.7 ± .2 and 4 ± .2), p<0.006. A2 had significantly lower clinical PR/ET (17%[4/24]) compared to A1 (61%[17/28]), B1 (48%[13/27]), and B2 (55%[16/29]); ongoing PR/ET (4%[1/24]) compared to A1 (57%[16/28]), B1 (44%[12/27]), and B2 (48%[14/29]) and IR (7%) compared to A1 (34%); B1 (39%), and B2 (43%), p<0.006. Increased FSH dosing and delayed GnRH-ant initiation did not enhance E2 production in donor oocyte cycles, though significant increases in clinical PR were seen regardless of the E2. This suggests that other gonadotropin factors may be pivotal for oocyte maturation and embryo development.