Hamstring Autograft Research Articles

Association of Spanish as a Primary Language With Retear Rates After Pediatric ACL Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common knee injuries in pediatric patients in the United States. The patient's primary spoken language may affect outcomes after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to identify differences in ACLR outcomes between patients whose primary, preferred spoken language was either English or Spanish. It was hypothesized that there would be a difference in retear rates between patients preferring English versus Spanish. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A retrospective cohort study was performed on pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent ACLR at a single institution. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preferred spoken language: English or Spanish. All patients underwent either hamstring tendon or bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft ACLR performed by the same surgeon with the same postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Linear regression, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine if outcomes, graft tear, revision surgery, and contralateral injury differed between groups. A total of 68 patients were identified: 33 patients whose preferred language was English and 35 patients whose preferred language was Spanish. The overall mean age of the patients was 16.4 ± 1.4 years (range, 13.2-20.5 years), and the mean follow-up time was 3.26 ± 1.98 years (range, 0.53-8.13 years). Patients who preferred Spanish were more likely than those who preferred English to experience graft tears requiring revision surgery after ACLR (P = .02; odds ratio [OR] = 5.81; adjusted OR = 1.94), at a tear rate of 14.3%. Patients who preferred to speak Spanish experienced higher graft tear rates when compared with patients who preferred speaking English, even after adjusting for sex, sport played, graft type, type of insurance, and time to surgery.

A High Grade of Postoperative Knee Laxity Is Associated With an Increased Hazard of Revision Surgery: A Cohort Study of 4697 Patients With Primary ACL Reconstruction

Background: There is still debate regarding the association between arthrometric knee laxity measurements and subjective knee outcome and revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose: To assess whether arthrometric knee laxity (measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with the 1-, 2-, and 5-year subjective knee outcomes or revision ACLR at a 5-year follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study, Level of evidence 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft at the authors’ institution between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, with no concomitant ligamentous injuries, were identified. Anterior knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer, 134 N) was assessed 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Patients who underwent revision ACLR at any institution in the country within 5 years of primary surgery were identified through the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Results: A total of 4697 patients (54.3% male) with available KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were included (normal: side-to-side [STS] ≤2 mm, 3015 [64.2%]; nearly normal: STS 3-5 mm, 1446 [30.8%]; abnormal: STS >5 mm, 236 [5.0%]). The only significant difference in subjective knee outcome between the groups was for the KOOS Symptoms subscale at the 1-year follow-up (STS ≤2 mm, 79.9 ± 16.2; STS 3-5 mm, 82.5 ± 14.8; STS >5 mm, 85.1 ± 14.2; P < .001). No other significant differences between the groups were found preoperatively or at 1, 2, or 5 years postoperatively for any of the KOOS subscales. The hazard for revision ACLR within 5 years of the primary surgery was significantly higher for the groups with an STS of 3 to 5 mm (6.6%; 95/1446) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.07-1.87; P = .01) and an STS >5 mm (11.4%; 27/236) (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.69-4.03; P < .001) compared with the group with an STS ≤2 mm (3.8%; 116/3015). Conclusion: A high grade of postoperative knee laxity (STS 3-5 mm and STS >5 mm) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with an increased hazard of revision ACLR within 5 years, but it was not associated with an inferior subjective knee outcome.

Pattern of strength recovery differences Exist in Adolescent athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction when using quadriceps versus Hamstring tendon autograft

ObjectivesTo compare the timeline for post-operative quadriceps and hamstrings strength recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using either a quadriceps tendon (QT) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. MethodsPatients (≤18 years) who underwent ACLR using autograft QT or HT were included. Isokinetic strength was extracted at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Effects of time and graft type on quadriceps or hamstring limb symmetry index (qLSI/hLSI) was assessed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Between group differences at each time point were assessed with unpaired t-tests. Chi-square and Kaplan-Meir analysis analyzed the proportions of subjects able to achieve ≥90% LSI. ResultsA total of 75 subjects (QT n = 38 HT n = 37,15.8 years) were included. There were significant differences in qLSI, with greater symmetry within the HT group at all time points. A higher proportion of subjects with HT grafts were able to achieve ≥90% qLSI within 12 months of surgery (81% vs 45%, p = 0.001). ConclusionCompared to those with HT autografts, adolescents with QT autografts demonstrate a prolonged timeline for quadriceps recovery. While mean strength values above 90% are achieved, a significantly lower percentage of QT patients are able to achieve 90% qLSI by 12 months post-op.

Validating the capture rate of revisions by the New Zealand ACL Registry: An analysis of all-cause reoperation following primary ACL reconstruction.

To validate the New Zealand Anterior Cruciate Ligament(ACL) Registry's capture rate of revisions by cross-referencing Registry data with reoperations data recorded by the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) and identify risk factors for all-cause reoperation. Primary ACL reconstructions performed between April 2014 and September 2019 were individually matched on a record-by-record basis between the two databases. The ACC database was used to identify patients who underwent a reoperation with manual review of operation notes to identify whether a revision or other procedure was performed. This was combined with the number of revisions separately recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry, which was used as the denominator value to calculate the Registry's capture rate of revisions. Patient and surgical data recorded in the Registry were analysed to identify independent predictors for all-cause reoperation. A total of 8046 primary ACL reconstructions were matched between the New Zealand ACL Registry and the ACC databases. The reoperation rate was 8.9% (n = 715) at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. Meniscal-related procedures were the most common reoperation (n = 299, 3.7%), followed by revision ACL reconstruction (n = 219, 2.7%), arthrofibrosis (n = 185, 2.3%), cartilage (n = 56, 0.7%)and implants (n = 32, 0.4%). The New Zealand ACL Registry captured 96% of revisions. Younger age (hazard ratio [HR] > 1.4, p < 0.001), earlier surgery (HR > 1.3, p = 0.05), concurrent meniscal repair (medial meniscus HR = 1.9, p < 0.001 and lateral meniscus HR = 1.3, p = 0.022)and hamstring tendon autografts (HR = 1.4, p = 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of reoperation. The New Zealand ACL Registry captured 96% of revisions. Risk factors for all-cause reoperation included younger age, earlier surgery, meniscal repairand hamstring tendon autografts. Level III.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effect of graft type and gender on early to mid-term clinical outcomes

IntroductionAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a debilitating condition and often requires surgery to restore joint stability. Common autografts used for reconstruction include patella tendon and hamstring tendons. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the early to mid-term clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The secondary aim was to compare clinical outcomes between patella tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. The tertiary aim was to compare clinical outcomes between males and females.MethodsPatients with an ACL rupture were evaluated before and after surgery using PROM scores which included Lysholm, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Short Form-12 Item (SF-12) and EQ-5D-5L.ResultsA total of 87 patients were included in the study. All PROM scores significantly improved following surgery (p < 0.001) at a mean follow-up time of 28 months (range 12 to 88 months). The patella tendon subgroup (n = 27) had superior post-operative results as compared to the hamstring tendon subgroup (n = 60) for KOOS sport and recreation (p = 0.005), KOOS quality of life (p = 0.025), KOOS overall (p = 0.026), Tegner (p = 0.046) and IKDC (p = 0.021) scores. There was no significant difference of PROM scores between males (n = 60) and females (n = 27) (p > 0.05).Conclusions ACL reconstruction significantly improves clinical outcomes for patients with symptomatic instability consequent to ACL rupture. Overall, patella tendon autograft resulted in better clinical outcomes as compared to hamstring tendon autograft following surgery. Gender did not influence clinical outcome following ACL reconstruction.

Quantitative MRI Analysis of Patellofemoral Joint Cartilage Health 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis

Background: The addition of an iliotibial band–based lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to reduce failure rates. However, there are concerns as to the potential overconstraint of tibiofemoral kinematics that may increase the risk of cartilage degradation. To date, no clinical study has investigated the effect of LET on patellofemoral joint articular cartilage health. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that at 2 years postoperatively, (1) the addition of LET at the time of ACLR would have no effect on cartilage health on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (2) higher cartilage relaxation values would be associated with worse patient-reported and functional outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A subset of patients from the STABILITY 1 randomized controlled trial were included. All patients underwent primary ACLR with a hamstring autograft. Patients were randomized to either LET augmentation or not. Cartilage status in the patellofemoral joint between the ACLR group and ACLR+LET group was compared using 2-year postoperative quantitative MRI and the ACL osteoarthritis scores of both the surgical and the contralateral nonsurgical knees. Objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were attained. Results: A total of 92 patients (43 patients in the ACLR group; mean age, 18.9 ± 3.2 years; 60.5% female; and 49 patients in the ACLR+LET group; mean age, 18.7 ± 3.2 years, 63.3% female) were included. No significant differences were seen in the mean values (ms) for adjusted T1ρ/T2 relaxation times in the medial patella (47.8/42.2 vs 47.3/43.2), central patella (45.5/42.5 vs 44.1/42.7), lateral patella (48.2/43.5 vs 47.3/43.0), medial trochlea (54.7/50.9 vs 56.4/50.9), central trochlea (53.3/51.1 vs 53.1/52.0), and lateral trochlea (54.9/52.1 vs 53.9/52.6) between the ACLR and ACLR+LET groups. No difference in overall ACL osteoarthritis scores was observed (P = .99). An increase in medial patellar T2 relaxation times was associated with a decreasing International Knee Documentation Committee score (P = .046), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Symptoms subscale score (P = .01), and total KOOS (P = .01). Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in patellofemoral cartilage health between knees 2 years after primary ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft with or without LET. Statistically significant correlations were found between quantitative MRI relaxation times, functional outcome scores, and PROMs; however, the correlations were weak and the clinical significance is unknown. Registration: NCT02018354 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Peroneus Longus Tendon Autografts have Better Graft Diameter, Less Morbidity, and Enhanced Muscle Recuperation than Hamstring Tendon in ACL Reconstruction.

Recently the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) gained popularity in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and has been utilized with satisfactory outcomes. However, there are concerns regarding donor site morbidity. This study aims to compare the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction using hamstring (HT) and PLT autografts and evaluate the donor site morbidity. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were allocated to two groups (HT and PLT). Graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Knee functional outcome was evaluated with IKDC and Tegner-Lysholm scores preoperatively, and postoperatively after 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Donor site morbidities were assessed with thigh circumference measurements, subjective evaluation of sensory disturbances, and ankle scoring with AOFAS and FADI scores. At 1-year follow-up, the PLT group showed comparable IKDC (p = 0.925) and Tegner-Lysholm (p = 0.600) scores with those of the HT group. The mean graft diameter in the PLT group (7.93 ± 0.52mm) was larger compared with the HT group (7.43 ± 0.50mm) (p < 0.001). The incidence of thigh atrophy (HT-16.7%, PLT-10%) and sensory disturbances (HT-73.3%, PLT-10%) was greater in the HT group. There was no significant ankle donor site morbidity in the PLT group (AOFAS-98.67 ± 3.45, FADI-99.23 ± 1.69). ACL reconstruction with PLT had comparable functional outcome with that of HT at 1 year. However, PLT demonstrated larger graft diameter, less donor site morbidity, and enhanced muscle recovery without significantly affecting the ankle function. PLT can be safely used as an acceptable alternative graft choice harvested from outside the knee for ACL reconstruction.

Impact of Surgical Timing on Functional Outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Objectives: Although acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often avoided because of postoperative joint stiffness, delayed ACLR can lead to a longer recovery time and can have a negative impact on physical function due to detraining. This study aimed to determine the effects of acute ACLR on postoperative outcomes, including muscle strength, performance, and return to sports. Methods: A total of 110 patients who underwent anatomical ACLR using hamstring autografts were included in this study and were divided into three groups: acute (ACLR performed within 2 weeks after ACL injury), 2-6 weeks (ACLR performed between 2 and 6 weeks after injury), and 6-12 weeks (ACLR performed between 6 and 12 weeks after injury). Several parameters were evaluated, including range of motion, knee joint stability, isokinetic knee strength, performance, and return to sports. Results: No significant differences were found in the range of motion or knee joint stability between the groups. The acute group exhibited significantly greater quadriceps strength at 3 months postoperatively than the other groups (p < 0.05). The single-leg hop test showed that 66.7%, 38.7%, and 33.3% of the patients in the acute, 2-6 weeks, and 6-12 weeks groups, respectively, recovered to an LSI of 90% or greater (p = 0.09, Cramer's V = 0.27). All patients in the acute group were able to return to sports (p = 0.14; Cramer's V = 0.28). Conclusions: Acute ACLR is advantageous for the early recovery of strength and performance without adverse events. Acute ACLR may shorten the time spent away from sports activities.

Comparative effectiveness of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autografts versus hamstring tendon (HT) autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive systematic review and meta analysis

The hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is currently the most widely utilised autograft option for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, recent studies endorse the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft as a viable alternative. To evaluate this, we systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of PLT against HT autografts. Our search encompassed Cochrane, Embase, OVID, PubMed, and Scopus databases for RCTs comparing outcomes of PLT and HT autografts in ACL reconstruction. Primary outcomes included Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, while secondary outcomes involved American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, graft diameters and donor-site complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration) and heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. 683 patients from 6 RCTs were included, with 338 (49.5%) patients treated with PLT autografts. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 30 months. Despite lower preoperative Lysholm scores in the PLT group, no significant differences were observed at 6 and 12 months. Although preoperative and 6-month IKDC scores were lower in the PLT group, no significant differences were found at 12 and 24 months. AOFAS scores showed no significant preoperative difference, but slightly lower scores were noted in the PLT group at 12 or 24 months. There was no significant difference in graft diameter, while donor-site complications were fewer in the PLT group. In summary, the PLT autograft is a promising and non-inferior alternative to the HT autograft, demonstrating equivalent outcomes in patient-reported knee and ankle metrics, comparable graft diameters and fewer donor-site complications.

Periosteal wrapping of the hamstring tendon autograft improves graft healing and prevents tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament anatomic reconstruction

IntroductionThe periosteum is a readily available tissue at the hamstring harvest site that could be utilized to enhance graft healing and prevent tunnel widening without additional cost or morbidity. This study aimed to compare graft healing using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional clinical outcome scores in a matched cohort of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts with or without periosteal augmentation.Material and methodsForty-eight patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) were prospectively enrolled: 25 with standard ACLR (ST-ACLR) and 23 with periosteal augmented grafts (PA-ACLR). The same surgical techniques, fixation methods, and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. Signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ), graft healing at the bone-graft interface, graft signal according to the Howell scale, and femoral tunnel widening were evaluated using MRI after 1 year of follow-up. International knee documentation score (IKDC), Lysholm, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale for pain were used for functional evaluation at a minimum of 2 years postoperative.ResultsThe mean SNQ of the proximal part of the graft was 9.6 ± 9.2 and 2.9 ± 3.3 for the ST-ACLR and PA-ACLR groups, respectively (P = 0.005). The mean femoral tunnel widening was 30.3% ± 18.3 and 2.3% ± 9.9 for the ST-ACLR, PA-ACLR groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Complete graft tunnel healing was observed in 65% and 28% of cases in the PA-ACLR and ST-ACLR groups, respectively. Both groups showed marked improvements in functional scores, with no statistically significant differences.ConclusionPeriosteal wrapping of hamstring tendon autografts is associated with better graft healing and maturation and lower incidence of femoral tunnel widening based on MRI analysis 1 year after ACL reconstruction. However, patient-reported outcomes and measured laxity were similar between the two groups at 2 years follow up.Trial registrationTrail registration number: PACTR202308594339018, date of registration: 1/5/2023, retrospectively registered at the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (pactr.samrc.ac.za) database.

Clinical outcomes of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using six-strand hamstring autograft

Objectives: Quadrupled and five-strand hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but there is significant variability in graft diameter. The six-strand HT autograft has been introduced to increase graft diameter in patients with undersized HT grafts and may achieve better clinical outcomes. None of the studies has reported clinical outcomes following this technique in Indian patients. We investigated clinical outcomes in patients who underwent primary ACLR using a six-strand HT autograft technique with a minimum six-month follow-up. Materials and Methods: Fifty-five patients who underwent primary ACLR using six-strand HT autografts with interference screw fixation were included in the study. These patients were followed up at three and six months for the evaluation of clinical outcomes. Subjective evaluations included the TegnerLysholm score, anterior cruciate ligament-quality-of-life (ACL-QOL) score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. Laxity assessments of the knees were performed using the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test. Functional evaluation of the patients was performed with an overall IKDC objective score. Results: The mean IKDC subjective score was significantly improved at three-month (63.42 ± 5.38) and six-month (82.82 ± 7.49) follow-up after surgery (P &lt; 0.05) when compared with pre-operative scores (50.55 ± 1.84). A similar finding was also noted with the Tegner-Lysholm score and ACL-QOL score in our study. All patients have achieved normal to near-normal functional outcomes at six months in our study without any major complications. The most commonly found complication was paresthesia (21.80%) in the present study. Conclusion: In the primary ACLR, six-strand hamstring autograft achieves similar clinical outcomes and complications as reported with four-strand or five-strand HT autografts. However, the percentages of patients who achieved normal to near-normal outcomes were higher in the present study (100%) as compared to earlier reported data using four-strand or five-strand HT autografts (~85%). The six-strand graft technique is a useful means of increasing graft diameter when faced with an undersized hamstring graft.

RISK FACTORS FOR MENISCAL REPAIR FAILURE FOLLOWING CONCURRENT PRIMARY ACL RECONSTRUCTION: RESULTS FROM THE NEW ZEALAND ACL REGISTRY

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with concomitant meniscal injury occurs frequently. Meniscal repair is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared to resection but is also associated with a higher reoperation rate. Knowledge of the risk factors for repair failure may be important in optimizing patient outcomes.PurposeThis study aimed to identify the patient and surgical risk factors for meniscal repair failure, defined as a subsequent meniscectomy, following concurrent primary ACL reconstruction.MethodsData recorded by the New Zealand ACL Registry and the Accident Compensation Corporation, the New Zealand Government's sole funder of ACL reconstructions and any subsequent surgery, was reviewed. Meniscal repairs performed with concurrent primary ACL reconstruction was included. Root repairs were excluded. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed to identify the patient and surgical risk factors for meniscal repair failure.ResultsBetween 2014 and 2020, a total of 3,024 meniscal repairs were performed during concurrent primary ACL reconstruction (medial repair = 1,814 and lateral repair = 1,210). The overall failure rate was 6.6% (n = 201) at a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, with a failure occurring in 7.8% of medial meniscal repairs (142 out of 1,814) and 4.9% of lateral meniscal repairs (59 out of 1,210). The risk of medial failure was higher in patients with a hamstring tendon autograft (adjusted HR = 2.20, p = 0.001), patients aged 21–30 years (adjusted HR = 1.60, p = 0.037) and in those with cartilage injury in the medial compartment (adjusted HR = 1.75, p = 0.002). The risk of lateral failure was higher in patients aged ≤ 20 years (adjusted HR = 2.79, p = 0.021) and when the procedure was performed by a surgeon with an annual ACL reconstruction case volume of less than 30 (adjusted HR = 1.84, p = 0.026).ConclusionWhen performing meniscal repair during a primary ACL reconstruction, the use of a hamstring tendon autograft, younger age and the presence of concomitant cartilage injury in the medial compartment increases the risk of medial meniscal repair failure, whereas younger age and low surgeon volume increases the risk of lateral meniscal repair failure.

Association Between Knee Flexor Strength and Preservation of the Tibial Attachment of the Sartorial Fascia During Hamstring Tendon Harvest.

During anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there are various autograft options. Donor-site morbidity is an important consideration while deciding the type of the autograft. Gracilis and semitendinosus autografts are commonly used in ACL reconstruction, resulting in weakness of the hamstring muscle. We hypothesized that if we preserved the tibial insertion site of the sartorial fascia (SF) during hamstring tendon harvest, there would be better recovery of knee flexor strength. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. In this retrospective study, 34 patients (aged 20-59 years) underwent ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft with 2 different incision techniques on the SF. The tibial attachment site of the SF was preserved in 17 patients. The insertion site of the muscle was incised transversely in 17 patients. The follow-up duration was ≥2 years. Patients were recalled to the institute for examination and muscle strength assessment. The results were compared between the groups in terms of flexor and extensor knee isokinetic muscle strength at 60 and 180 deg/s. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, or body mass index. When compared with patients whose SF attachment site was incised, patients with a preserved SF tibial insertion were found to have a higher flexion peak torque at the angular speed of 180 deg/s (P < 002). No statistically significant difference was noted at 60 deg/s. During collection of gracilis and semitendinosus autografts, preserving the SF tibial attachment site was associated with better knee flexion peak torque.

Evaluation of Anterior Tibial Translation Under Physiological Axial Load After ACL Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.

Postoperative laxity correlates with negative clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The influence of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) on anteroposterior translation is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the reduction in radiographic static anterior tibial translation (SATT) and dynamic anterior tibial translation (DATT) after LET as an adjunctive procedure to ACLR. It was hypothesized that adding a LET procedure would have no effect on postoperative SATT and DATT. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Patients who underwent primary ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts between 2020 and 2022 were reviewed, and those who underwent ACLR and LET as an anterolateral associate procedure were paired 1 to 1 with those who underwent isolated ACLR (control) based on age, sex, preoperative SATT, and posterior tibial slope (PTS). The indications for LET were age <18 years and anterolateral rotary instability (grade ≥2 pivot shift). A previously validated technique was used to measure SATT, DATT, and PTS on lateral weightbearing and lateral stress knee radiographs. Preoperative and 9-month postoperative radiographs were compared between the 2 groups. A total of 72 patients were included in the analysis (n = 36 patients in each group). The inter- and intraobserver reliability of the SATT, DATT, and PTS measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.88-0.99). The mean pre- and postoperative SATT in the ACLR+LET group was 2.44 ± 2.90 mm and 2.44 ± 2.38 mm, respectively, compared with 2.60 ± 2.99 mm and 2.12 ± 2.74 mm, respectively, in the control group. The mean pre- and postoperative reduction in side-to-side DATT in the ACLR+LET group was 5.44 ± 4.65 mm and 1.13 ± 2.95 mm, respectively, compared with 5.03 ± 3.66 mm and 2 ± 3.12 mm, respectively, in the control group. There was no pre- to postoperative difference in SATT (P = .51). However, the side-to-side DATT was reduced by 3.66 ± 3.37 mm postoperatively (P < .001), without significant differences between groups (P = .24). Including a LET procedure for patients undergoing ACLR did not reduce SATT; that is, it did not decrease the amount of tibial translation due to physiological axial load.

Return to Work After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

The timing of return to work (RTW) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is a less studied milestone compared with return to sports. To systematically review the rate and postoperative timing of RTW after ACLR. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. This study was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid databases for clinical studies reporting RTW after ACLR, and 806 studies were identified in August 2022. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index of Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) grading system. The following data were extracted from studies: study characteristics, cohort demographics, ACLR technique, concomitant meniscal and/or cartilage procedures, preoperative patient-reported outcomes, rates of RTW, and days required for RTW after ACLR. A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria, totaling 1791 patients (86.4% male). Wide variability was observed in the methodological quality of the assessed studies (MINORS score range, 8-17). Hamstring tendon (HT) autograft was used in 76.8% (n = 1377; mean age, 30.5 years old), allograft in 17.1% (n = 308; mean age, 33.1 years old), the ligament advanced reinforcement system in 2.5% (n = 46; mean age, 33.2 years old), bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in 2% (n = 36; mean age, 28.5 years old), and quadriceps tendon autograft in 1.3% (n = 24; mean age, 24.1 years old). Among the included patients, 99.1% (n = 1781) reported successful RTW after surgery. The mean time to RTW was 84.2 days (range, 31.4-107.1 days) for HT and 69.5 days (range, 49-56.6 days) for allograft. While data regarding work intensity before and after ACL injury were absent, our study results suggested that patients most often RTW within 90 days of surgery. Patients with allograft ACLR may RTW earlier than patients undergoing ACLR with HT autograft.

A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL INVESTIGATING FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING A SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE TENDON HARVEST

INTRODUCTION &amp; AIMS Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common. While surgical reconstruction (ACLR) is commonly advocated and a hamstring autograft is the popular choice, hamstring tendon harvest has been linked to reduced hamstring strength and ongoing donor site pain. While traditional surgical techniques required a harvest of both semitendinosus/gracilis tendons, modern harvesting and fixation methods permit a shorter, broader harvest of semitendinosus only. This study investigated donor site pain, strength and functional recovery in patients undergoing ACLR via a single (ST) versus dual (DT) tendon hamstring harvest. METHODS This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated 138 patients to ACLR with one of the two hamstring tendon graft options (ST=71, DT=67) followed by a structured rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed pre-surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including a validated donor-site morbidity score. Graft laxity, peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength and a 6-hop performance battery were assessed. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated. RESULTS All PROMs significantly improved (p&amp;lt;0.0001) and were largely similar between groups (p&amp;gt;0.05), apart from significantly less graft morbidity reported in the ST group (p=0.001). No group differences were observed for knee laxity or LSIs for hop measures (p&amp;gt;0.05), nor the LSIs for peak knee flexor (p=0.113) or extensor (p=0.286) torque. CONCLUSION While the ST ACLR group reported significantly less harvest site morbidity, no other subjective or functional differences were observed in patients undergoing ACLR with either a single or dual hamstring tendon autograft harvest.

A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL INVESTIGATING PATIENT RECOVERY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION UNDERTAKEN WITH A QUADRICEPS VERSUS HAMSTRINGS TENDON AUTOGRAFT

INTRODUCTION &amp; AIMS Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common. However, a lack of high-quality evidence exists comparing different graft options in patients undergoing surgical reconstruction (ACLR). This randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated the course of recovery in patients undergoing ACLR with either a quadriceps (QT) or hamstrings (HT) tendon autograft. METHODS This study randomized 112 patients to one of the two graft reconstruction cohorts (HT=55, QT=57), subsequently undergoing ACLR and a structured rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed pre-surgery and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the International Knee Documentation Committee form (IKDC) and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score. Graft laxity, peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength and a 6-hop performance battery were assessed. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated. RESULTS All PROMs significantly improved (p&amp;lt;0.0001). Apart from the ACL-RSI score which was significantly better (p&amp;lt;0.05) in the HT group at 3, 6 and 12 months, no other group differences (p&amp;gt;0.05) were observed. No group differences (p=0.407) were observed for knee laxity. While the HT group demonstrated significantly greater (p&amp;lt;0.05) quadriceps strength LSIs at 6 and 12 months, the QT group demonstrated significantly greater (p&amp;lt;0.05) hamstrings strength LSIs at 6, 12 and 24 months. The HT group demonstrated significantly greater (p&amp;lt;0.05) LSIs for the single horizontal (6 months), lateral (6 and 12 months) and medial (6 months) hop tests. CONCLUSION The HT group reported a higher level of psychological readiness to return to sport, while demonstrating greater quadriceps strength (and hop test) LSIs. Greater hamstring strength LSIs were observed for the QT cohort. Longer-term review will continue to evaluate RTS and later-stage re-injury between the two graft constructs.

Comparison of Contralateral ACL Rupture Versus ACL Graft Rupture in Australian Netballers After ACL Reconstruction

Background: Netball is a popular sport worldwide, particularly for women. However, its nature puts players at high risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Purpose: To determine (1) the prevalence of ACL graft rupture and contralateral ACL (CACL) rupture in Australian female netballers after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) the rate of return to sports (RTS) and psychological readiness. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A patient database identified 332 consecutive female netball players who underwent ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts performed by 2 surgeons between 2007 and 2015. Patients were retrospectively surveyed at a minimum of 7 years postoperatively—including details of a second ACL injury to either knee, RTS, and psychological readiness per the ACL–Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) score. Multivariate regression assessed the association between selected variables and repeat ACL injury. Results: A total of 267 patients (80%) were included with a mean follow-up of 8.4 years (range, 7-15 years). ACL graft rupture and CACL rupture occurred in 11 (4%) and 27 (10%) patients, respectively, at 7 years postoperatively. The ACL graft had a survival rate of 99%, 97%, 97%, and 96% at 1, 2, 5, and 7 years after surgery, respectively. The native CACL had a survival rate of 100%, 99%, 94%, and 90% at 1, 2, 5, and 7 years, respectively. Adolescents had a 4.5 times greater hazard for ACL graft rupture (95% CI, 1.4-14.6; P = .014) and a 2.5 times greater hazard for CACL rupture (95% CI, 1.2-5.5; P = .021) compared with adults. CACL injury was also associated with a return to level 1—including jumping, hard pivoting, and cutting—sports (hazard ratio, 10.3 [95% CI, 1.4-77.1]; P = .023). Most (62%) participants returned to netball, with those with higher ACL-RSI scores more likely to RTS. Conclusion: The prevalence of repeat ACL injury was higher in the contralateral knee (10%) than the ACL-reconstructed knee (4%) at 7 years postoperatively. ACLR was a suitable option for female netballers who sustained an ACL rupture with low long-term rates of graft rupture. Repeat ACL injuries to either knee were more common in adolescents and those who returned to cutting and pivoting sports.

Evaluation of anterolateral ligament healing in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its relationship with clinical examination tests.

This study radiologically investigated the potential of preoperative recovery of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in patients who did not undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery in the early stages despite surgical indication. The secondary aim was to investigate the relationship between ALL injuries in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the results of Lachman and pivot shift tests performed preoperatively and postoperatively under anaesthesia amongpatients who underwent ACLR in acute and chronic stages. The study examined 100 patients aged 19-51 years who underwent anatomic single bundle ACLR using hamstring autografts for the ACL. Based on the time between the injury and ACLR, they were divided into acute (≤6 months) and chronic (>6 months) groups. The chronic group had three subgroups of ACLR times: 7-12, 13-24and >24 months. Complete recovery was defined as a change from grade B or C upon injury to grade A before surgery according to the Muramatsu MRI classification. The relationship between preoperative and postoperative Lachman grades and pivot shifting test results and the degree of ALL injury was evaluated. In the chronic group, 19/61 patients (31.1%) had preoperative grade A, and 4/61 patients (6.5%) had grade A at the time of injury. In the acute group, 22/29 patients with grades B and C (76%) had grade 3 preoperative pivot shifting. In the acute group, grades 1 and 2 were more common in patients with grades B and C (10/29, 35%) than grade A (0/10, 0.0%). The improvement rate was 24.6% amongpatients who did not receive ACLR in the acute phase and underwent ACLR in the chronic phase. In the acute group, the degree of ALL damage was related to the pivot shift results. However, the results in the chronic phase were not associated with the degree of injury. Level IV.

Quantification of anterior translation of tibia over femur using Lachmeter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft

Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is an important restraint on anterior tibial translation of the knee. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft is the most widely accepted surgical procedure for ACL insufficiency. This study is assessing the effect of ACL reconstruction by hamstring tendon autograft on the anteroposterior stability of the knee joint by measuring the side-to-side difference of anterior tibial translation using the Lachmeter. We are also assessing the functional outcome of the same surgery using international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score. Methods: The study included 30 patients who were admitted for ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft. The side-to-side difference of anterior tibial translation was assessed by using Lachmeter preoperatively and postoperatively at the end of the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months. The IKDC score was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the end of 6th month. Results: The mean Lachmeter value of respondents in the current study was 4.31±0.56 mm during the preoperative period. Lachmeter values were 2.79±0.42 mm, 2.09±0.42 mm, and 1.29±0.39 mm, respectively, at the end of the first, third, and sixth months postoperatively. Mean preoperative and postoperative 6th month IKDC scores were 55.83±7.7 and 89.20±5.3 respectively. Conclusions: There is significant serial improvement in the side-to-side difference of anterior tibial translation in the 6 months of post operative period following ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft. The improved IKDC score from preoperative to postoperative level is also indicating a positive functional outcome.