A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL INVESTIGATING FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING A SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE TENDON HARVEST

Abstract

INTRODUCTION & AIMS Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common. While surgical reconstruction (ACLR) is commonly advocated and a hamstring autograft is the popular choice, hamstring tendon harvest has been linked to reduced hamstring strength and ongoing donor site pain. While traditional surgical techniques required a harvest of both semitendinosus/gracilis tendons, modern harvesting and fixation methods permit a shorter, broader harvest of semitendinosus only. This study investigated donor site pain, strength and functional recovery in patients undergoing ACLR via a single (ST) versus dual (DT) tendon hamstring harvest. METHODS This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) allocated 138 patients to ACLR with one of the two hamstring tendon graft options (ST=71, DT=67) followed by a structured rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed pre-surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including a validated donor-site morbidity score. Graft laxity, peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength and a 6-hop performance battery were assessed. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated. RESULTS All PROMs significantly improved (p<0.0001) and were largely similar between groups (p>0.05), apart from significantly less graft morbidity reported in the ST group (p=0.001). No group differences were observed for knee laxity or LSIs for hop measures (p>0.05), nor the LSIs for peak knee flexor (p=0.113) or extensor (p=0.286) torque. CONCLUSION While the ST ACLR group reported significantly less harvest site morbidity, no other subjective or functional differences were observed in patients undergoing ACLR with either a single or dual hamstring tendon autograft harvest.